throbber
J. Agric. Food Chem. 1999, 47, 4549-4556
`
`4549
`
`Use of Mass Spectrometry To Rapidly Characterize the
`Heterogeneity of Bovine oL—Lactalbumin
`
`Department of Product Technology, NIZO Food Research, P.O. Box 20, 6710 BA Ede, The Netherlands
`
`Charles J . Slangen and Servaas Visser*
`
`From a bovine whey protein fraction the nonglycosylated and glycosylated 0L—lactalbumin fractions
`were isolated by gel—permeation chromatography followed by reversed—phase high—performance liquid
`chromatography. Both fractions were studied by electrospray—ionization mass spectrometry (ESI—
`MS). For the nonglycosylated fraction, a mass of 14 178 Da was found, which was in accordance
`with the known amino acid sequence of the protein. The glycosylated fraction appeared to be a
`mixture of components with mass values ranging from ca. 15 840 to 16 690 Da. Given the published
`carbohydrate composition of the whole glyco—0L—lactalbumin fraction, these masses could be matched
`to those of 14 differently glycosylated forms of 0L—lactalbumin. Further support for these forms was
`obtained from the results of a separate mass spectrometric analysis of the mixture of oligosaccharides
`released from the protein by treatment with peptide—1\/4-(Z\flacetyl—f3—glucosaminyl)asparagine amidase
`F. ESI—MS was found to be a powerful tool to gain insight into the composition of the complex mixture
`of glycoforms of 0L—lactalbumin without the need of further purification of these forms or of the
`oligosaccharides released thereof.
`
`0L—Lacta]bL1m1'n,' (de—)g]yc0sy]at1'0n,' s1'ze—exc]L1s1'0n chromatography; reversed—phase HPL C;
`Keywords:
`H7855 Spl-Z‘CIfI”0IH6‘II”_y
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`0L—Lactalbumin, a major whey protein in milk of
`various species, plays an important role in the biosyn—
`thesis of lactose (Brodbeck and Ebner, 1966; Ebner et
`al., 1966; Brew and Grobler, 1992). On the basis of the
`most recent sequence data (Wang et al., 1989), the
`molecular mass of bovine 0L—lactalbumin is 14 178 Da.
`
`However, in fresh, nonprocessed milk, a small part of
`the native protein occurs in the glycosylated form (glyco—
`0L—lactalbumin)
`(Barman, 1970). By monosaccharide
`analysis of glyco—0L—lactalbumin, varying amounts of
`N—acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), N—acetylgalactosamine
`(GalNAc), mannose (l\/Ian), galactose (Gal), fucose (Fuc),
`and N—acetylneuraminic acid (NeuAc) were found, the
`quantities of Gal, Fuc, and NeuAc being relatively low
`(Barman, 1970; Hindle and Wheelock, 1971). In bovine
`0L—lactalbumin, Asn—45 was reported to be the single
`point of attachment of carbohydrate groups (Hopper and
`McKenzie, 1973; Hill and Brew, 1975), although accord-
`ing to the usual consensus sequence for N—linked
`carbohydrate chains (Asn—X—Thr/Ser) one more potential
`glycosylation site is present at Asn—74. It is noteworthy
`that the carbohydrate moiety does not seem to be
`involved in the role of 0L—lactalbumin in lactose biosyn—
`thesis, since the glycosylated and nonglycosylated forms
`are equally active as lactose synthase specifier protein
`(Barman, 1970).
`
`Hopper and McKenzie (1973) found that glyco— and
`nonglyco—0L—lactalbumin forms could be separated by
`Sephadex G—75 chromatography. Further purification
`by DEAE ion—exchange chromatography resulted in two
`electrophoretically distinguishable glyco—0L—lactalbumin
`
`* To whom correspondence should be addressed (fax +31
`318 650400; e—mail svisser@nizo.nl).
`
`fractions (S1 and S2) and a main and minor component
`(M and F) which both were nonglycosylated.
`No further data on the structure of the carbohydrate
`moiety of glyco—0L—lactalbumin were reported until the
`publication of a symposium abstract by Tilley et al.
`(1991). In this note not only were the carbohydrate
`composition and single glycosylation site of glyco—0L—
`lactalbumin confirmed, but also the oligosaccharide
`structure of a main glycoform of 0L—lactalbumin was
`shown.
`
`For the determination of one or more glycosylation
`sites and the detailed structure of attached carbohy-
`drate chains it is usual
`to proteolytically digest a
`glycoprotein and fractionate the digest to fragments
`each containing only one glycosylated position. The
`glycopeptides obtained or the oligosaccharides released
`thereof are purified and then analyzed by, for instance,
`NMR spectrometry (Vliegenthart et al., 1983, 1991; van
`Halbeek, 1989; Vliegenthart and Montreuil, 1995).
`Recent developments in mass spectrometric techniques
`have opened new ways into the study of glycoproteins
`(Vliegenthart and Montreuil, 1995; Rademaker and
`Thomas—Oates, 1996; Harvey, 1996; Settineri and Bur-
`lingame, 1996; Green et al., 1996).
`In the present paper we describe the isolation and
`purification of the nonglycosylated and glycosylated
`bovine 0L—lactalbumin fractions as well as their charac-
`
`terization by electrospray—ionization mass spectrometry
`(ESI—MS). On the basis of our results and the published
`carbohydrate composition of total glyco—0L—lactalbumin,
`the compositions of 14 glycoforms of 0L—lactalbumin are
`postulated. The presence of these glycoforms is sup-
`ported by ESI—MS results obtained with the whole
`mixture of oligosaccharides enzymatically released from
`the protein chain by peptide—1\/4-(N—acetyl—fi—glucosami—
`nyl)asparagine amidase (PNGase F).
`
`© 1999 American Chemical Society
`10.1021/jf990212j CCC: $18.00
`Published on Web 10/28/1999
`
`Amgen Exhibit 2010
`Apotex Inc. et al. V. Amgen Inc. et al., IPR2016-01542
`Page 1
`
`

`
`4550
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 11, 1999
`
`Slangen and Visser
`
`CB
`PAS
`/4? /4}
`
`(+3
`
`A230
`
`X
`
`jT
`
`fl if
`
`DITWPEI Y ]]1TWP]E Y
`
` 0
`
`100‘
`
`200
`
`300
`
`Figure 1. Separation of a whey protein fraction (1 g) on a 140 X 2.6 cm Sephadex G—75 Superfine column (for experimental
`conditions, see text). The rounding of peak summits is indicative of “overconcentration" in the photocell. Material from peaks III
`(fi—lactoglobulin), IV (glyco—oL—lactalbumin) and V (nonglyco—oL—lactalbumin) was analyzed by native PAGE followed by staining
`with periodic acid—Schiff reagent (PAS) or Coomassie Blue G—250 (CB), as illustrated by the inset. TWP = total whey protein.
`
`Elution volume (mL]
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`
`Materials. A bovine whey protein fraction, oL—lactalbumin—
`enriched byproduct (“fraction P2") of the classical /j’—lactoglo—
`bulin purification according to Aschaffenburg and Drewry
`(1957), was used as starting material for the isolation of the
`main (nonglycosylated) oL—lactalbumin fraction and of the minor
`fraction containing glyco—oL—lactalbumin. For comparative pur-
`poses, an oL—lactalbumin fraction prepared on a technical scale
`from concentrated cheese whey by ion—exchange chromatog-
`raphy on DEAE—Sepharose (Schmidt and van Markwijk, 1993)
`was employed.
`PNGase F was purchased from Boehringer—Mannheim,
`Germany. Trifluoroacetic anhydride was a product of Sigma
`(St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals were of analytical grade.
`Chromatographic Isolation and Gel—Electrophoretic
`Characterization. The isolation of oL—lactalbumin was per-
`formed essentially as described by Davies (1974) with some
`modifications. The oL—lactalbumin—enriched whey protein frac-
`tion (1 g dissolved in 3 mL of elution buffer, 0.01 M
`imidazole-HCl/0.2 M NaCl/0.02% NaN3, pH 6.65) was carefully
`loaded onto the top of a 140 X 2.6 cm Sephadex G—75 Superfine
`column (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) and eluted with elution
`buffer at room temperature and at a flow rate of 30 mL h’1.
`Absorbance was continuously measured at 280 nm using a
`Uvicord absorptiometer, type 8303A (LKB, Bromma, Sweden).
`Peak fractions were collected, dialyzed against distilled water
`at 4 °C, and freeze—dried.
`Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) at pH 8.6 was
`carried out in a vertical slab gel apparatus (E—C Corporation,
`St. Petersburg, FL) as described by Davies (1974). Staining
`for proteins was with Coomassie Blue G—250 and for glyco-
`proteins with periodic acid—Schiff reagent (PAS) (Kapitany and
`Zebrowski, 1973).
`Further purification of oL—lactalbumin fractions was per-
`formed by semipreparative reversed—phase (RP)—HPLC using
`a water—acetonitrile gradient elution, essentially as described
`elsewhere (Visser et al., 1991).
`Enzymatic Deglycosylation of oL—Lactalbumin and
`Acetylation of Released Oligosaccharides. Deglycosyla-
`tion of glyco—oL—lactalbumin was carried out with PNGase F as
`described by Rademaker and Thomas—Oates (1996). The gly-
`coprotein (0.33 mg dissolved in 200 ,uL of 50 mM ammonium
`bicarbonate buffer, pH 8.4, containing 1 drop of toluene) was
`incubated with 5 ,uL (1 unit) of PNGase F solution at 37 °C
`for 16 h. The resulting mixture of deglycosylated oL—lactalbumin
`and released oligosaccharides was freeze—dried, redissolved in
`500 ,uL of 5% acetic acid, and separated on a Sep—Pak Plus
`
`C18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, MA) which had been prewetted
`with methanol and equilibrated with 5% acetic acid. The
`oligosaccharides were eluted with 5% acetic acid in the first
`eluate. The vacuum—dried (SpeedVac vacuum centrifuge, Sa-
`vant Instruments, Farmingdale, NY) eluate was peracetyl—
`ated using a mixture of trifluoroacetic anhydride and acetic
`acid (together forming a mixed anhydride). After another
`evaporation step, the dried product was dissolved in dichlo-
`romethane and washed several times with distilled water
`(Rademaker and Thomas—Oates, 1996). The vacuum—dried
`mixture of oligosaccharides was then ready for mass spectro-
`metric analysis. The deglycosylated glyco—oL—lactalbumin was
`obtained from a second eluate fraction (20—40% 1—propanol
`in 5% acetic acid) during the Sep—Pak Plus C18 separation.
`Mass Spectrometry. For the analysis of the oL—lactalbumin
`fractions, ESI mass spectra were obtained with a Quattro II
`triple quadrupole instrument (Micromass, Cheshire, U.K.).
`Samples were dissolved in 50% acetonitrile, 0.3% formic acid,
`and analyzed by infusion with a syringe infusion pump, type
`22 (Harvard Apparatus, South Natick, MA), of the sample
`solution in 50% acetonitrile at 4 ,uL min‘1 through the
`electrospray interface. Nitrogen was used as a nebulizing and
`drying gas. The capillary was held at 3.9 kV; the cone voltage
`was 40 V. The acetylated carbohydrate fraction was dissolved
`in 50% methanol and 0.3% formic acid and analyzed by
`infusion as described above with the capillary held at 3.5 kV
`and the cone voltage at 30 V. Mass calibration was performed
`by multiple—ion monitoring of a NaI/CsI mixture. About 10-
`15 spectra were averaged to obtain an adequate signal—to—noise
`ratio. The raw mass spectral data were processed and trans-
`formed with the Masslynx software version 2.2 (Micromass,
`Cheshire, U.K.) on a Windows NT workstation.
`
`RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
`
`Chromatographic Isolation and Gel-Electro-
`phoretic Characterization of ot-Lactalbumin Frac-
`tions. The fractionation of the whey protein fraction on
`a Sephadex G—75 Superfine column is illustrated by
`Figure 1 (numbering of peaks according to Armstrong
`et al., 1970), with the PAGE gel patterns of isolated
`fractions III (ffilactoglobulin), IV (mainly glyc0—oL—lact—
`albumin), and V (n0nglyco—oL—lactalbumin) shown in the
`inset of that figure. Fraction I (pink) and II (yellowish),
`both not shown on the gel, included minor whey proteins
`such as lactoferrin, 3/—globulins, and serum albumin
`(Davies, 1974). Particularly when focusing on a satisfac-
`
`Page 2
`
`

`
`MS Study of ot-Lactalbumin Heterogeneity
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 11, 1999
`
`4551
`
`
`
`Absorbance(220nm)
`
`0
`
`5
`
`10
`
`15
`
`20
`
`25
`
`30
`
`35
`
`40
`
`45
`
`Figure 2. Reversed—phase HPLC patterns of (a) peak component IV of Figure 1, (b) peak component V of Figure 1, and (c) a
`sample of oL—lactalbumin prepared by DEAE—Sepharose chromatography on a technical scale. Peak material was collected and
`used for mass spectrometric analysis.
`
`Elution time (min)
`
`tory separation between glyco—oL—lactalbumin and the
`other fractions, we obtained better results with Sepha—
`dex G—75 than by using G—100 material. The latter had
`been used in the method of Davies (1974), who sepa-
`rated ca. 50 mg amounts of whey protein on a much
`shorter Sephadex G—100 column, collecting fractions IV
`and V together. Starting from 1 g of whey protein
`fraction, we obtained ca. 70 and 380 mg of dry material
`after dialysis and freeze—drying of fractions IV and V,
`respectively. The two electrophoretic glycoforms (PAS-
`positive) found in fraction IV (Figure 1) are the same
`as those reported in the literature (Barman, 1970;
`Hopper and McKenzie, 1973; Davies, 1974; Armstrong
`et al., 1970; Baumy and Fauquant, 1989) and represent
`the S1 and S2 fractions found by Hopper and McKenzie
`(1973)
`to include NeuAc—containing and NeuAc—free
`components, respectively.
`RP—HPLC patterns of fractions IV and V (Figure 1)
`are seen in Figure 2 (traces a and b) together with, for
`comparison, the pattern of an oL—lactalbumin preparation
`produced from cheese whey by DEAE—Sepharose chro-
`matography (trace c)
`(Schmidt and van Markwijk,
`1993). Glyco—oL—lactalbumin (trace a) still contained a
`major and a minor peak, in an area ratio of about 70:
`30. Assuming that the minor peak represents a chemi-
`cally induced oL—lactalbumin derivative (see next sec-
`tion), we may conclude that, on the basis of the above
`yields of fractions IV and V, ca. 10% (m/m) of oL—lactal—
`bumin in our starting material existed in the glycosyl—
`ated form. This is a significantly higher percentage than
`the 3% obtained by Hopper and McKenzie (1973) when
`separating total whey protein via a similar gel—filtration
`technique. Our percentage only slightly exceeds the 7%
`content reported by Baumy and Fauquant (1989), who
`used Sephadex G—50 chromatography and started from
`an industrial oL—lactalbumin preparation. The minor
`component eluting just before the main one in trace 0
`of Figure 2 is different from the minor component in
`
`trace a. It had an elution time corresponding to that of
`the last part of the main peak in trace a and, as seen in
`the next section, contained only part of the glycoforms
`of oL—lactalbumin. Several peak fractions of the RP-
`HPLC separations were collected and dried by vacuum
`centrifugation (SpeedVac) before use in mass spectro-
`metric analyses.
`Mass Spectrometry of (1-Lactalbumin Compo-
`nents and Released Oligosaccharides. Mass spectra
`and deconvoluted spectra of the main RP—HPLC com-
`ponents representing glyco— and nonglyco—oL—lactalbumin
`(see Figure 2) are depicted in Figures 3-5. It was found
`that nonglyco—oL—lactalbumin had a mass of 14 178.8 Da
`(Figure 3), which was in agreement with the theoretical
`value of 14 178 Da (Wang et al., 1989). The minor peak
`following the main one in the RP—HPLC pattern of
`Figure 2, trace 21, cannot be ascribed to a natural glyco—
`oL—lactalbumin form, as the corresponding mass (14 503
`Da) was too low to account for any oligosaccharide chain
`attached to oL—lactalbumin (result not shown). We have
`experimental evidence now that this component results
`from a chemical
`lactosylation process taking place
`during heat processing of milk (Slangen and Visser,
`unpublished). Recently, such components were also
`reported to occur in isolated ffilactoglobulin (Burr et al.,
`1996; Léonil et al., 1997). They can be considered as
`early Maillard products. A similar product, isolated from
`human blood serum, was found to be a reaction product
`of serum albumin and blood glucose (Bunk, 1997).
`The mass spectrum of glyco—oL—lactalbumin (Figure 4)
`was fairly complicated and contained, after deconvolu-
`tion, at least 15 discrete peaks (Figure 5). Given the
`presence of GlcNAc, GalNAc, Man, Gal, Fuc, and NeuAc
`in glyco—oL—lactalbumin (Barman, 1970; Hindle and
`Wheelock, 1971) and the known core structure of
`N—linked carbohydrates, we were able to match the
`masses of the various components shown in Figure 5 to
`those of 14 glycoforms of oL—lactalbumin (Table 1).
`
`Page 3
`
`

`
`4552
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, N0. 11, 1999
`
`Slangen and Visser
`
`m0_
`
`A9
`1576.4
`
`14178 8
`-
`
`100
`
`
`%
`
`1
`
`‘
`1
`‘ 1 “‘
`1600
`1700
`1800
`1900
`
`2000
`
`~‘
`2100
`
`"
`
`m/z
`2200
`
`A8
`
`1773.4
`
`0
`
`14500
`
`14750
`
`mass
`15000
`
`3
`3,
`
`%~
`1:
`an4..
`E
`
`_
`
`A10
`1418.8
`
`A“
`129°"
`
`A12
`1182.6
`
`.
`1
`
`1
`1
`
`1422.6
`
`1200
`
`i
`1300
`
`1400
`
`1500
`
`A13
`1091.6
`1
`1
`1100
`
`0.
`
`1”
`1000
`
`Figure 3. Electrospray mass spectrum of purified nonglyco—oL—lactalbumin (main peak in Figure 2, trace b). Charge numbers of
`the molecular—ion clusters are also indicated, with a maximum mass intensity at nine charges (A9). The inset shows the deconvoluted
`spectrum.
`
`100-
`
`Ex‘
`>-
`-1;,
`:
`9
`E
`
`-
`
`51,
`1431_()
`‘C1,
`1484.7
`.
`/
`
`A11
`14533
`
`
`B12
`A12
`‘335f1357.5
`1
`1‘
`1
`I
`
`‘
`
`1‘
`
`1445.1
`\1
`'
`
`1
`
`0
`1300
`
`111
`1350
`
`1400
`
`"
`
`‘
`1450
`
`,
`‘K 14913
`‘
`1519.1
`1‘
`1
`i
`
`1500
`
`1702.2
`A9
`\
`1
`
`'
`11300
`C91314.4
`
`B10
`1629.1
`
`1531300
`A‘°
`1604.0 /»
`'
`
`1
`
`1
`
`15139.4
`
`1
`‘
`3
`1
`1
`11
`15351 1.
`
`3
`
`I
`
`1
`1
`
`1600
`
`'
`1550
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1765.8
`\
`
`1822.7
`/
`
`1/5272
`
`
`
`1650
`
`1700
`
`1750
`
`33
`2036.0
`
`cg
`2041.1
`
`A8
`2004.6
`\
`‘
`1
`
`
`
`19865
`
`2043.1
`/
`
`°5°-9 20866
`/
`‘
`
`1
`1
`1
`3
`‘ ml
`1
`1
`:
`1
`1
`1
`1
`1
`111‘
`2000
`2050
`
`1950
`
`11
`1
`'
`1
`1
`1
`111"
`2100
`
`2150
`
`2200
`
`m/z
`
`Figure 4. Electrospray mass spectrum of purified glyco—o1—lactalbumin (main peak in Figure 2, trace a). AX, BX, and CX denote
`components of the three main envelopes of the spectrum.
`
`Our results indicate that 8 of the 14 proposed glyco-
`forms concern sialylated oligossacharide chains. This
`distinction between sialylated and nonsialylated oli-
`
`gosaccharides would account for the presence of the two
`PAS—positive bands in the PAGE—pattern of glyco—0L—
`lactalbumin (Figure 1) (Hopper and McKenzie, 1973).
`
`Page 4
`
`

`
`MS Study of 01-Lactalbumin Heterogeneity
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, N0. 11, 1999 4553
`
`16030
`
`16280
`
`16320
`
`100
`
`g\°,
`,§~
`2
`0.1
`*5
`—
`
`‘
`
`1
`
`1
`
`1‘
`
`'¢§“/\r¢M—~/xwrvw/Fprp/RV/
`
`0
`15600
`
`1w«
`
`1n
`15700
`
`.
`
`1
`15800
`
`2
`15883
`
`4
`15988
`4
`
`16133
`
`16175
`
`3
`16240
`
`6
`
`1
`15841
`
`3
`
`16092
`
`.
`
`15947
`V W
`
`\4
`
`
`
`\\A
`
`1
`16800
`
`1
`
`'
`
`11
`15900
`
`W
`
`W
`16000
`
`1
`
`*1 1
`16100
`
`1
`
`TT***1 H F
`16200
`16300
`
`1
`
`1n* 1 H 1
`16400
`16500
`
`1
`
`1
`16600
`
`1
`
`roman 11
`16700
`
`1
`
`Mass (Da)
`
`Figure 5. Deconvoluted mass spectrum of purified glyco—oL—lactalbumin (see Figure 4). The mass components numbered 1-14
`are referred to in Table 1.
`
`Table 1. Mass Data and Possible Monosaccharide
`Composition for Glycosylated Forms of Bovine
`oL—Lactalbumin""
`
`structure published so far (Tilley et al., 1991) and
`reported to represent the major glycoform
`
`Fuc
`
`GalNAc- G1cNAc-Man \
`Ga1NAc-GlcNAc-Man
`
`Man-G1cNAc-GlcNAc-Asn“
`
`corresponds with that of component 5 in Figure 5 and
`Table 1; this component was also found in the present
`study to give a relatively high response (Figure 5). It is
`likely to assume that the other glycoforms shown in
`Table 1 represent, by analogy with recently published
`milk glycoprotein structures (Coddeville et al., 1992;
`Sato et al., 1993; Girardet et al., 1995), closely similar
`structures, being either fucosylated or nonfucosylated,
`sialylated or nonsialylated, and having in a number of
`cases Gal instead of GalNAc. This would also be in line
`
`with the relatively small amounts of Gal, Fuc, and
`NeuAc that were earlier reported to occur in glyco—oL—
`lactalbumin (Barman, 1970; Hindle and Wheelock,
`1971). The occurrence of GalNAc, earlier considered as
`rather unusual in N—linked oligosaccharides (Tilley et
`al., 1991; Montreuil, 1980), has recently been reported
`for several glycoproteins of this category (Tilley et al.,
`1991; Sato et al., 1993; Girardet and Linden, 1996). It
`was suggested to be controlled by an N—acetylgalac—
`tosaminyltransferase acting in competition with a ga-
`lactosyltransferase on common, terminal—GlcNAc—con—
`taining substrate sites (Girardet and Linden, 1996;
`Neeleman et al., 1994).
`Molecular masses of glyco—oL—lactalbumin reported in
`the literature were calculated from amino acid and
`
`Page 5
`
`monosaccharide
`composition
`based on
`measured mass
`HexN Fuc Hex NeuAc
`
`\lC3\l\lO><.I1>-l>O)<.J‘10><.I1>J>O><.J‘1
`
`papa:3papapapa:3:3papapac3c3
`
`waLnaa6;L06:LnLoaaLoJaLnLowa
`
`papapa:3papapapapa:3:3:3c3c3
`
`calcd
`mass
`
`calcd residue
`mass of glycan
`15842.62 1664.54 (2691.45)
`15883.68 1705.60 (2690.47)
`15947.70 1769.63 (2922.66)
`15988.76 1810.69 (2921.67)
`16029.82 1851.74 (2920.69)
`16133.88 1955.80 (3108.82)
`16174.94 1996.85 (3107.84)
`16238.96 2060.89 (3340.03)
`16280.02 2101.95 (3339.04
`16321.08 2143.00 (3338.06
`16395.14 2217.08 (3496.21
`16540.28 2362.19 (3683.36
`16645.36 2467.28 (3914.56
`16686.42 2508.34 (3913.58
`
`))))))
`
`measured
`mass
`
`5o
`
`15841.1
`15882.8
`15946.7
`15987.5
`16029.5
`16133.0
`16175.3
`16240.2
`16280.3
`16320.2
`16394.3
`16539.5
`16646.6
`16685.3
`
`£DO0\lG><.H>J>L«>[\.)>d
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`
`5 Calculated masses of the glycoprotein components are based
`on the proposed monosaccharide composition in combination with
`a calculated average mass of 14178.06 for nonglycosylated 0L—lac—
`talbumin (Wang et al., 1989). Calculated average masses of the
`released and fully acetylated glycan moieties, including 102.09 for
`terminal—group acetylation, are indicated in parentheses (experi-
`mental values to be derived from Figure 6). HexN = GalNAc/
`GlcNAc: average residue mass 203.20 (acetylated, 287.27). Fuc:
`average residue mass 146.14 (acetylated, 230.22). Hex = Gal/Man:
`average residue mass 162.14 (acetylated, 288.23). NeuAc: average
`residue mass 291.26 (acetylated, 417.37).
`
`It should be borne in mind that the mass spectrometric
`results do not necessarily reflect the various glyco—oL—
`lactalbumin forms in a quantitative manner. On the
`other hand, the mass of the only glyco—oL—lactalbumin
`
`

`
`4554
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 11, 1999
`
`Slangen and Visser
`
`A 3°
`
`{
`3°»
`5‘
`3212
`
`3137
`
`/R
`I:
`xo
`xx
`u—1
`3066 2.
`:2
`O
`
`
`Al\
`8N
`3024
`
`/\
`'2
`8
`°"
`2982
`
`I‘\
`‘,1
`Q...
`("1V
`
`2878
`
`A
`V1
`V“
`2
`2836
`
`G
`VI
`9
`,3
`2920
`
`5?
`VI
`:3,
`M
`2794
`
`A
`N,‘
`,_
`V
`2648
`
`xx
`
`S
`O
`2690
`
`r\
`
`3
`N
`2606
`
`:3
`.:
`7,’
`2554
`
`2507
`
`100
`
`2%
`2.‘‘:7:
`C
`5.’.
`C
`—
`
`§0‘,
`ES;
`3236
`
`'2?
`O\:
`00
`v
`N
`3254
`
`8
`"L
`ox
`Do“
`‘g3335
`
`E E‘
`K V
`3411
`3453
`3393
`‘
`
`V A
`V
`1:,

`‘$571 : S
`3529 /
`3641;
`1 3683
`3487
`
`/3
`E
`2" E
`V
`T: 2"
`3871 O
`3912
`
`2500
`
`2600
`
`2700
`
`2800
`
`2900
`
`3000
`
`3100
`
`3200
`
`3300
`
`3400
`
`3500
`
`3600
`
`3700
`
`3800
`
`3900
`
`Figure 6. Deconvoluted mass spectrum of enzymatically released and peracetylated oligosaccharides originating from glyco—oL—
`lactalbumin. Number of acetyl groups missing as a result of incomplete derivatization are indicated by X in
`where (y)
`corresponds to the numbering of components as used in Table 1 and Figure 5. Several oligosaccharides could not be distinguished
`because of a similar mass of their acetylated forms.
`
`Mass (Da)
`
`carbohydrate analyses or from retention behavior dur-
`ing gel—permeation chromatography. Values obtained
`were between 16 300 and 16 800 Da (Barman, 1970;
`Hopper and McKenzie, 1973; Baumy and Fauquant,
`1989), which is within the mass range of the various
`individual components found in the present study (Table
`1).
`The glycoforms postulated in Table 1 were supported
`by mass spectrometric analysis of the oligosaccharide
`fraction obtained after deglycosylation of glyco—oL—lact—
`albumin with PNGase F and subsequent peracetylation.
`No distinction could be made between several acetylated
`oligosaccharides of similar mass. Acetylation was car-
`ried out in order to allow the subsequent extraction of
`derivatized oligosaccharides into the organic phase,
`which offers a more effective separation from contami-
`nants (e.g., salts) and therefore enhances the sensitivity
`of detection during mass spectrometric analysis (Rade—
`maker and Thomas—Oates, 1996). The molecular mass
`of the deglycosylated glyco—oL—lactalbumin was found to
`be 14 178.5 Da (calculated: 14 179 Da for oL—lactalbumin
`with Asn—45 converted to Asp as a result of the degly-
`cosylation procedure). The deconvoluted mass spectrum
`of the released and acetylated oligosaccharides is shown
`in Figure 6. Taking into account the occurrence of 2-4
`positive charges per molecule, a spectrum was obtained
`in which nearly all peaks could be assigned by assuming
`for each oligosaccharide moiety 0-3 acetyl residues less
`as a result of incomplete acetylation. Masses correlated
`very well with the compositions based solely on masses
`of total glycoprotein molecules, as postulated in Table
`1. On the basis of peak intensities, the main oligosac-
`
`charides as derived from Figure 6 corresponded to the
`main glycoprotein components deduced from Figure 5.
`The fact that complete deglycosylation could be achieved
`with nondenatured glyco—oL—lactalbumin indicates that
`the protein—glycan linkage is easily accessible to the
`enzyme. As recently reported (Pike et al., 1996), Asn—
`45 is indeed located in a solvent—exposed loop of the
`(rather compact) oL—lactalbumin molecule.
`
`For comparison, we have also analyzed the minor
`peak preceding the major one in trace 0 of Figure 2. It
`represented the glycoform of an oL—lactalbumin sample
`prepared in a quite different way (see Materials and
`Methods) without the specific intention of isolating all
`the glycosylated forms. Indeed, this glyco—oL—lactalbumin
`preparation appeared to contain only part of the
`glycoforms shown in Table 1 (mainly components 1, 6,
`7, 9, and 10; result not shown). Therefore, it is likely
`that the number and ratio of glyco—oL—lactalbumin forms
`found depend on the material used and, more particu-
`larly, on the mode of its isolation and purification.
`
`it may be concluded that our mass
`In summary,
`spectrometric analysis of the nonglycosylated fraction
`of bovine oL—lactalbumin has led to a mass value which
`
`is in perfect agreement with the amino acid sequence
`known for this protein (Wang et al., 1989). The glyco-
`oL—lactalbumin fraction, although showing only two
`electrophoretic components on PAGE, exhibits a high
`degree of heterogeneity when analyzed by ESI—MS. For
`the most part this carbohydrate heterogeneity probably
`concerns closely similar structures, either fucosylated
`
`Page 6
`
`

`
`MS Study of ot-Lactalbumin Heterogeneity
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 11, 1999 4555
`
`or nonfucosylated and sialylated or nonsialylated,
`whereas in quite a number of cases Gal is replaced by
`GalNAc.
`
`While data such as overall carbohydrate composition
`and single, N—linked glycosylation site were already
`known from the literature, our study demonstrates that
`mass spectrometry is a powerful tool to gain further
`insight
`into the structural composition of glyco—oL—
`lactalbumin. In our case this could be achieved without
`
`any further purification of the glycoprotein fraction or
`of the oligosaccharides released thereof. In case any
`ambiguity remained concerning the composition of some
`glycan residue at Asn—45 after ESI—MS of the total
`glycoprotein fraction, the independent second approach
`of ESI—MS analysis of the released and peracetylated
`oligosaccharide fraction provided enough evidence to
`make the appropriate choice. For instance, the mass
`found for glycoprotein component 13 of Table 1 (16 646.6
`Da) could also be explained by the glycan composition
`of component 10 plus one lactose residue resulting from
`lactosylation at some lysine residue (calculated mass
`16 645.1 Da). However, the latter assumption becomes
`unlikely by considering the results of the second ap-
`proach of ESI—MS analysis of the oligosaccharide frac-
`tion, i.e., the masses of 3912 and 3871 Da assigned to
`the acetylated glycan of component 13 (Figure 6).
`Moreover, no mass peaks were found which could
`represent any other mixed oligosaccharide/lactose-
`containing component.
`The biological function of the glyco—oL—lactalbumin
`fraction still remains unclear. It has been suggested
`(Barman, 1970) that in the Golgi region of the mammary
`gland cells oL—lactalbumin is wholly secreted as a glyco-
`protein and subsequently degraded by milk glycoside
`hydrolases. If this would be the case, then the biological
`significance of the glycan moiety in oL—lactalbumin might
`be limited to its role in the labeling of the protein for
`export from the cell. However, other biological functions
`cannot be excluded and may be a subject for further
`study.
`
`ABBREVIATIONS USED
`
`ESI—MS, electrospray—ionization mass spectrometry;
`PAS, periodic acid—Schiff reagent; PNGase F, peptide-
`l\/4—(l\flacetyl—fi—glucosaminyl)asparagine amidase F; RP-
`HPLC, reversed—phase high—performance chromatogra-
`phy-
`
`ACKNOWLEDGMENT
`
`We thank Peter van Rooijen for the isolation of glyco-
`oL—lactalbumin and Janneke Kromkamp for providing us
`with an oL—lactalbumin sample prepared on a technical
`scale. We are very grateful to Dr. Jane Thomas—Oates
`(University of Manchester, U.K.) for fruitful discussions
`and helpful suggestions.
`
`Supporting Information Available: Possible glycan
`structures at Asn—45 of bovine glyco—oL—lactalbumin components
`1- 14 based on the results presented in Figure 5 and Table 1
`of this paper.
`
`LITERATURE CITED
`
`Armstrong, J. McD.; Hopper, K. E.; McKenzie, H. A.; Murphy,
`W. H. On the column chromatography of bovine whey
`proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1970, 214, 419-426.
`
`Improved method for the
`Aschaffenburg, R.; Drewry, J .
`preparation of crystalline ,/j’—lactoglobulin and oL—lactalbumin
`from cow’s milk. Biochem. J. 1957, 65, 273-277.
`Barman, T. E. Purification and properties of bovine milk glyco-
`oL—lactalbumin. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1970, 214, 242-244.
`Baumy, J. J.; Fauquant, J. Mise en évidence d’oL—lactalbumine
`glycosylée dans une préparation industrielle d’oL—lactalbu—
`mine bovine. Lait 1989, 69, 315-322.
`Brew, K.; Grobler, J. A. oL—Lactalbumin. In Advanced Dairy
`Chemistry; Fox, P. F., Ed.; Elsevier Applied Science: Lon-
`don, 1992; Vol. 1, pp 191-229.
`Brodbeck, U.; Ebner, K. E. Resolution of a soluble lactose
`synthetase into two protein components and solubilization
`of microsomal lactose synthetase. J. Biol. Chem. 1966, 24],
`762-764.
`
`Bunk, D. M. Characterization of the glycation of albumin in
`freeze—dried and frozen human serum. Anal. Chem. 1997,
`69, 2457-2463.
`Burr, R.; Moore, C. H.; Hill, J. P. Evidence of multiple
`glycosylation of bovine ,/j’—lactoglobulin by electrospray ion-
`ization mass spectrometry. Milchvvissenschaft 1996, 5],
`488-492.
`
`Coddeville, B.; Strecker, G.; Wieruszeski, J. M.; Vliegenthart,
`J. F. G.; van Halbeek, H.; Peter—Katalinic, J.; Egge, H.; Spik,
`G. Heterogeneity of bovine lactotransferrin glycans. Char-
`acterization of oL—D—Gal p—(1->3)—,/j’—D—Gal— and oL—NeuAc-
`(2->6)—,/j’—D—Gal pNAc-(1->4)—,8—D—GlcNAc—substituted N-
`linked glycans. Carbohydr. Res. 1992, 236, 145-164.
`Davies, D. T. The quantitative partition of the albumin fraction
`of milk serum proteins by gel chromatography. J. Dairy Res.
`1974, 4], 217-228.
`Ebner, K. E.; Denton, W. L.; Brodbeck, U. The substitution of
`oL—lactalbumin for the B protein of lactose synthetase.
`Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1966, 24, 232-236.
`Girardet, J.—M.; Linden, G. PP3 component of bovine milk: a
`phosphorylated whey glycoprotein. J. Dairy Res. 1996, 63,
`333-350.
`Girardet,
`J.—M.; Coddeville, B.; Plancke, Y.; Strecker, G.;
`Campagna, S.; Spik, G.; Linden, G. Structure of glycopep—
`tides isolated from bovine milk component PP3. Eur. J.
`Biochem. 1995, 234, 939-946.
`Green, B. N.; Hutton, T.; Vinogradov, S. N. Analysis of complex
`protein and glycoprotein mixtures by electrospray ionization
`mass spectrometry with maximum entropy processing. In
`Methods in Molecular Biology (Protein and Peptide Analysis
`byMass Spectrometry); Chapman J . R., Ed.; Humana Press
`Inc.: Totowa, NJ, 1996; Vol. 61, pp 279-294.
`Harvey, D. J . Identification of cleaved oligosaccharides by
`matrix—assisted laser desorption/ionisation. In Methods in
`Molecular Biology {Protein and Peptide Analysis by Mass
`Spectrometry); Chapman J. R., Ed.; Humana Press Inc.:
`Totowa, NJ, 1996; Vol. 61, pp 243-253.
`Hill, R. L.; Brew, K. Lactose synthetase. Adv. Enzymol. Relat.
`Areas Mol. Biol. 1975, 43, 411-490.
`Hindle, E. J .; Wheelock, J . V. Carbohydrates of bovine OL-
`lactalbumin preparations. Chimia 1971, 25, 188-190.
`Hopper, K. E.; McKenzie, H. A. Minor components of bovine
`oL—lactalbumin A and B. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1973, 295,
`352-363.
`
`Kapitany, R. A.; Zebrowski, E. J. A high—resolution PAS stain
`for polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal. Biochem. 1973,
`56, 361-369.
`Léonil, J.; Mollé, D.; Fauquant, J.; Maubois, J. L.; Pearce, R.
`J .; Bouhallab, S. Characterization by ionization mass spec-
`trometry of lactosyl ,/j’—lactoglobulin conjugates formed dur-
`ing heat treatment of milk and whey and identification of
`one lactose—binding site. J. Dairy Sci. 1997, 80, 2270-2281.
`Montreuil, J . Primary structure of glycoprotein glycans. Basis
`for the molecular biology of glycoproteins. In Advances in
`Carbohydrate Chemistry and Biochemistry, Tipson, R. S.,
`Horton, D., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1980; Vol. 37,
`pp 157-223.
`Neeleman, A. P.; van der Knaap, W. P. W.; van den Eijnden,
`D. H. Identification and characterization of a UDP-GalNAc:
`
`GlcNAc/j’—R/j’1->4—N—acetylgalactosaminyltransferase from
`
`Page 7
`
`

`
`4556
`
`J. Agric. Food Chem., Vol. 47, No. 11, 1999
`
`cercariae of the schistosome Trichobilharzia ocellata. Ca-
`
`talysis of a key ste

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket