throbber
SCIENTIFIC
`
`[E N ZY M Ii M OLICCU LE.
`
`152'] 7’) ' 6'15} 175'
`
`I966)
`
`Apotex Inc. et a]. V. Amgen Inc. et a ., R2016—01542
`Page 1
`
`Am n Exhibit 2011
`
`

`

`The Three-dimensional Structure
`
`of an Enzyme Molecule
`
`‘The tzrrarzgermerit of arrmis in an £’!l:__t-"tn? rnolecule has been. wot’/md our
`
`for the _fir'.s't time. The c*r::_-wnt» is l_y‘.s0.-‘:._jv*:ne, whiz-I2 firm/£.s' open r_.'t’H.s'
`
`of l)(2(‘f€I‘t(t. The .s't1:d__v has also shoum. how l_j,'so.:_-1--'rrze perfornzs its task
`
`no (lay in 1922 :\lcx;mtlcr Flem-
`
`Oing was sailleriirg from n cold.
`
`This is not unusual
`
`in London.
`
`by lluvial
`
`(2. Phillips
`
`rletermiued and whose properties are
`Itmlnrstoml
`in atomic detail. Among
`these properties is the way in \\.’l.'l.l(’.'l'l lhe
`enzyme combines with the substance on
`which it
`ac-l:«'—:1 complex sugar in the
`wall ol the lmcterial cell.
`
`Like all cnz_vme5. lysozynic is it pro-
`tein.
`Its Chcniical mnlteup has hccn
`established
`Pierre jollés and his
`rcollezigues at
`the Unix-‘ersity of Paris
`and by Robert E. Cmifielsl of the Co-
`lnmhin Uniw.-rsil_v College of Pliysiciaiis
`nntl Stlrgeoras. The_\-' have lound tlmt
`em.-h molecule ol
`lysozyuiic ohtninccl
`from egg white consists of a single
`[J0l_vp€pliIle
`cllnin of 129 amlinu tt(.'l(l
`snhculit.-a of 20 djllurrmil
`lcinds. A pep-
`tide homl
`is lonnetl wlien two amino
`
`acids are joined following the removal of
`.1 molecule of waiter. It is cnstornury to
`Citll
`the portion of the amino ncid in-
`
`corporsitcd into It polypeptide chain .1
`residue, and each residue has its own
`c-lnm-wteristir: side t.-lmin. The l29-re.-:i-
`
`due l_\'.'iozyIne molecule is cross-linlced
`in
`four places by tlisullida bridges
`ltJl"l11tE'.(l by the cornhinntion of sulfur-
`:-ontuiuing side chains in tlifferent parts
`of the rnolecnlc [arm illrrslrafiort on up-
`pnsilte prrgc].
`The properties of the molecule cauniot
`he uuderstu-otl
`from its chelnicnl L-on~
`
`sfitntion alone; they depend most criti-
`cally on what parts of the niolecule are
`brought close together
`in the loltletl
`tl11'ee-dimensional stnir.-t'ure. Some form
`
`of microscope is rleederl to t'3ittl.Illl‘lt! the
`structure ol
`the molecule. Fortunate-
`
`ly one is effet-tively provitlecl by the
`techniques of X-my crystal-.-rtmcturo
`nlnllysis pioneered by Sir Lawrence
`Bragg and his father Sir William Bragg.
`
`ALA ALAN NE
`ARG nRGiNIr~.IE
`ASN ASPAR-’\_(;~INF
`ASP a1SP.€‘..!R1'C
`AC.J.‘.=
`CYS CYSTEINE
`GLU ‘3LL_lTJ\M|C I‘-CI|‘J
`GLN [—JL1,llI'-\l'U'l|l\.'E
`
`GLY r.aLrIfI|‘uE
`HI5 H-STI:’J:NF
`ILEU :5I.Z:LE'_IJr;'sN+_
`LEU |l-Il|l'|u"Jl.-‘
`LYS l.r§5.il\It
`MET I".»tErHsf_It».'-INK
`PHE i4'HEN'r1..mAN=r‘.IE
`
`PFID I“RO1.IN':
`SER SFRINE
`THR 'IHl-.’l:+'_lNil\.'|-_
`TRY lH‘fl-"|{JPHAN
`TYR ivHt)S:Nl-_
`VAL W-[INF
`
`TWO-DINIENSIDNAL MODEL 0! the lywzyme molecule lit uhown on the opposite page.
`Lyauzyme in a protein containing 129 amino in-ld mhunitr-. rumnlnnly culled residues. Iaee
`key to abbreoiutiams nbm.-e I. These rcriducs form n polypeptide chain that in rrose‘-linked in
`four |Ilm:'l:4! by dirulficlu I —t-‘-—5-
`I hands. The amino arid acqnentre of lywzp-me was. deter-
`mined iudepulidently Ivy Pierre lulléu and his co-workers at the University of Paris and by
`Robert E. Cnnlield nl the (Zulumhia University College of Physiciuniu and Surgeons. The
`tl-n-on-rlimnnninmul structure of the ly:-ozyme molecule has now been established with the
`help of X-rny crjmtullugraphy by the null-nor and his colleague: at the Royal Institution in
`London. A painting of the molt.-rule's three-dimensional structure appears on pages 80 and
`8]. The innrtinn of lyaozyma is to unlit n pnrticulur long-chuin mull.-rtlle, n rorupla.-Jr. sugar,
`found in the outer membrane at many living cells. Molecules that are acted on by enzymes
`are known as substrates. The sulnatrale of lysozyme lit!» into : cleft. or pocket. Iorlued II)’ the
`three-dintenuionul structure of the lysosyme molecule. In the two-dimensional model on
`tho opposite [Iago the amino acid rnidueu Illll line the pucluet. are ulwwn ill Llurk green.
`
`but Fleming was :1 most unusual man
`and he look zulvauitngu of the cold in at
`nhnrnctcristiL- way. He allowed in few
`drops of his nasal mucus in fall on a
`culture of bacteria he was working with
`and then put the plate to one side to
`see what would happen.
`lmnginc his
`excitement when he di.-zcoverecl some
`time later that
`the haeterin near tlm
`
`mums land dissolved nway. For in while-
`hc thought his nnihition ol Hurling n
`IltIi\’t:t‘:tal.l aintihiotic had he-(en rcnli:r.cd.
`
`(_'.‘iltllJ-
`lllIlCl(l_\-‘
`lll ll burst of activity lIl.’.
`lixhed that
`the :'tI|lll)‘¢lClt':tt‘lill nction of
`
`the inn:-u.-: was tlnc to the l'1I“F.'St?II(,“l" in
`it of an enzylnc; he ullletl this sI.Il)sta1Iwc
`lysozymc because of its c:1pucit_v to lyse,
`or dissolve,
`the l)n(:t-Brinl cells. Lyso-
`zyrm: was soon (ll.’1't:(l\’<:l’t:tl
`in nmny tis-
`slms and secrelimis of the lnnnan lt-tJll_\-‘.
`in plants and most [alentifully of nll
`in
`the white of egg. Unfortunately Flem-
`ing found that it is not cllcctivc against
`the most harmful bacteria. He had to
`
`wait seven years before u strznigoly
`similar experiment
`revealed the exis-
`tence of :1 genuinely effective .-1ntihi-
`otic: penicillin.
`Nevertheless, Fleming's lysozynm has
`proved It more vnluulnlc discovery than
`he t.-on liavc I_'1\‘p£'.t'.'l.£'t.l wlicn its prop-
`crticsi were first cslnhlislietl. With it.
`
`for example, bacterial nnntornists have
`been uhle to study many tletatils of ham-
`terial structure [see "Fleming's Lyso-
`zyme," by Robert F. Acluar and
`E.
`1-Inrtsell; SC'.IE.\"I'lI-'1C AMERICAN,
`june,
`1960].
`It has now tumed out
`that
`Lvsozyrne is
`the first enzyme wlmse
`three-tlimcnsional
`stnacture has been
`
`3'3
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`

`

`CAHBOJRYL END
`
`r
`
`H
`
`\N—
`/
`
`H
`AMINO END
`
`‘G
`
`Page 3
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 4Page 4
`
`

`

`MAIN cnmn: * rurrnoeen
`
`cannon
`
`— oxvem
`
`
`
`'I'HRF.l{-IIIMENSION.-U. MOHEI. of the ly-
`:=II2)‘l'rI2 molecule. paints.-d 131.‘ Irving Ceis, in
`luau.-d turn an actual mm]:-I nan:-ntllllrtl III the
`Iluynl In-liltltiult h_\' Ibo Ilttthur nml Ilin nul-
`lengues. The painting enables» one In Irarc
`and tlintingninh between the 1-I11-mica] lmntis
`that hold together the main polypeptide
`chain and the |.mmle'- in the 129 side rhuim-.
`one for eaelt amino acid residue. The mole-
`cattle in iuldml .-'0 us In [arm 1.! vldaft that halt]:-
`the Hlhntrate mnlertlle uhilc it
`is Infill;
`broken in two. The painting. on the next
`page sllunms how the !-I-lllbII'IIE' fits into the
`rlnfl. The real balls represent murgelt atoms
`that urn important In splitting the substrate.
`
`SIDE cmum — SULFUR
`camaon
`
`T HYDROGEN
`BOND
`
`Page 5
`
`

`

`

`

`The dilliculiics ol examilling mole-
`cules in atomic detail arise, oi course.
`from the fact that molecule-5 are very
`small. Within a molecule each atom
`
`is usually separated from its neigl1boI'
`by about L5 angstrom units (1.5 x lit”
`centimeter). The lysmrymc molecule,
`which contains some 1.950 atoms,
`is
`almut
`-10 angstroms in its largest di-
`mension. The lirst problem is to {ind I1
`microscope in which the atoms can be
`rcsiolved from one another. or seen sep-
`amtcly.
`The resolving power of n niicroscope
`tlcpcmls lum.lanm:nlally on the wave-
`length ol
`the adiation it employs.
`In
`general no two objects can be seen: sep-
`arately if they are closer together than
`about half this wavelength. The short-
`est wavelength tran.-irnitletl by optical
`microscopes {those working in the ul-
`tmviolct end of the s“pecl'I'u::I1) is aliouli
`2,000 times longer
`t.l1an the distance
`between atoms. In order to "see" atoms
`one must use radiation with a much
`
`shorter wavelength: X rays, which have
`a wavelength closely comparable to
`interatomic distances. The employment
`cl X rays, however, creates other dif-
`ficulties: no satisfactory‘ way has yet
`been found to make lenses or mirrors
`
`that will focus then: into an image. The
`problem,
`then,
`is
`the apparently im-
`possible one of designing an X.-ray
`microscope without lenses or mirrors.
`Consideration ol the di.ll'r:u.-tion the-
`
`ory of microscope optics, as developed
`by Ernst Abbe in the latter part of the
`19th century, shows that the problem
`can be solved. Abbe taught us that the
`formation of an image in the micro-
`scope um be regarded as a two-stage
`process. First, the tlbject urldcr t.'.K.'i.l]ll-
`nation scatters the light or other radia-
`tion falling on it in all directions, form-
`ing a diliraction pattern. This pattern
`arises because the light waves scattered
`from different parts of the object com-
`bine so as to produce a wave of large
`or small amplitude in any direction
`
`according to whelller lltti waves are in
`or out of pha.-se-—in or out of step-
`with one another. {This effect
`is seen
`most easily in light waves scattered
`by a regularly repealing structure, such
`as .1
`tliflrrlction grilling made of lines
`st.-ribetl at regular intervals on a glass
`plate.)
`In the second stage of image
`formation, according to Abbe,
`the ob-
`jective lens of the microscope collects
`the dillracled waves and re-combines
`
`to form an image of the object.
`then:
`"Most important,
`the nature of the im-
`nge depends critically on how much ol
`the dillmction pattern is used in its
`formation.
`
`X-Ray Structure Analysis
`
`In essence X-ray structure analysis
`makes use of a microscope in which
`the two stages of image formation have
`been separated. Since the X. rays can-
`not be focused to form an image di-
`rectly,
`the diffraction pattern is
`re-
`corded and the image is obtained from
`it by calculation. Historically the meth-
`od xv-as not developed on the basis of
`this reasoning. but this way of regard-
`ing it {which was lir.-it suggested by
`Lawrence Bragg] brings out its essen-
`tial
`features and also introduces the
`
`In re-
`main tllflit-Illty of applying it.
`cording the intensities of the dillmcted
`waves, instead of focusing them to forrn
`an image, some crucial
`information is
`lost, namely the phase relations among
`the various dilfracted waves.
`\\'ithout
`
`this information the image cannot be
`formed. and some means of recovering
`it has to be found. This is the well-
`
`iznuwn phase problem of X-ray crys-
`tallography. It is on the solution of the
`problem that the utility of the method
`depends.
`The term "X-ray clystallogrepliy" re-
`minds us that
`in practice the method
`was developed (and is still applied} in
`the study of single crystals. Crystals
`suitable for study may contain some
`
`MODEL OF SU BSTHATE shows how it fits into the rich in the Ijrroitymc molecule. All the
`carbon atoms in the substrate are shown in purple. The portion of the substrate in intimate
`contact with the underlying enzyme is u polysucrbaricle chain corn-iating of six riugliku struc-
`turcu. each a residue o[ no amino-sugar molecule. The znubatrnle in the model is mule up of
`six identical residues of the amino sugar rolled ill-arelylglucouaminc I NAG I. In the actual
`substrate every other residue is an amino nugar known as N-ncetylronramic acid (NAM I.
`The illasuation is lined on X-my studies oi the way the enzyme is bound to l tria-at-charirle
`made. of three NAG units, which fills the top of the clelt: the arrangement oi NAG units in
`the llotlom ol the clell was worked out with the aid of three-dimensional models. The sub-
`stnte is held In the enzyme by in complex network of hydrogen bonds. in this style of model-
`meking each straight section of chain represents I bond between atoms. The alarm [hem-
`selvec lie II the intersections and elbows of the structure. Except for the [our red bull: rep-
`resenting oxygen atoms that are active in splitting the polysorcluaridc substrate, no attempt
`in m.rulc_lo represent the electron shells of atoms because they would merge into a solid mess.
`I4
`
`10'“ identical molecules in a regular
`array; in eliecl the molecules in such a
`crystal dil:lract the K radiation as though
`they were a single giant molecule. The
`crystal acts as a three-dimensiional dif-
`l'r:z(:tinn grating, so that the waves scat-
`tered by them are confined to :1 number
`of discrete dircctioris. In order to obtain
`
`a three-dimensional image of the struc-
`ture the intensity of the X rays scatterecl
`in these dil-lcrent directions must be
`
`measured, the phase problem must be
`solved somehow and the measurcnients
`
`nnnit be combined by a corn pater.
`The recent. successes of this mctllud
`
`in the study of protein structures have
`depended a great deal on the develop-
`ment of electronic computers capable
`of performing the calculations. They
`are due most of all, however,
`to the
`Lliscovery in 1953, by .\I. 1". Perntz of
`the Medical Research Council Labora-
`
`tory ol Moleclllar Biology in Cambridge,
`that
`the rnethod of "isomorphous re-
`plat.-einent" can lie used to solve the
`phase problem in the study of protein
`L‘t'_$'Sltll.-5. The method depends on the
`prepar;-ition and study of a series of pro-
`tein crystals into which additional heavy
`atoms. such as atoms of umnimn, have
`been introduced without otherwise af-
`
`fecting the crystal structure. The first
`successes of
`this method were in the
`
`study of sperni-whale myoglobin by
`John C. Kendrcw of the .\-lerlical Re-
`search Council Laboratory and in Pa-
`rutz’ own study of horse hemoglobin.
`For their work the two men received the
`
`Nobel prize for chemistry in 1969. [see
`"Tlie Three-dimensional Structure of :1
`
`john C. Kcuclrew.
`Protein .\loIcr:Iule,"
`SCIENTIFIC :‘\M1-2.H.IC..'|N, December, 1981,
`and "The Hemoglobin Molecule," by
`M. F. Perutz, Sou-':.\"I1|»'n.' ARI!-.'Itl(-JAN,
`November, 1934].
`llecause the X rays are scattered by
`the electrons within the molecules, the
`
`image ca.lcuJated from the diffraction
`pattern reveals the distribution of elec-
`trorls within the crystal. The electron
`density is usually calculated at o regu-
`lar array of points, and the image is
`made visible by drawing contour lines
`through points of equal electron den-
`sity.
`IF these contour maps are drawn
`on clear plastic sheets. one can obtain
`a three~dimensiona.l
`image by assem-
`bling the maps one above the other in a
`stack. The amount of detail that can be
`
`seen in such an image depends on the
`resolving pow:-.r of the clletrtive micro-
`scope, that is, on its "aperture," or the
`extent of the dilfmetion pattern that has
`been included in the formation of the
`
`image. If the waves dilirar.-ted through
`sufliciently high angles are included
`
`83
`
`
`
`Page 7
`
`

`

`(mrrt-.s[m:IdiIag to a Iau'ge aperh1.re}, the
`utmn.-«'
`lIl‘ll)(.’4'Il'
`:15
`individual
`[walks
`in
`the image map. At
`lower resolution
`gmups of unrcsnkecl uturns appear with
`I.'l1:IrlI(:l(fl'i5l‘iI.'.' shapes by which they can
`he l'l3('(lg!'Ii‘!.{'(1.
`The tIII‘I:!t2—(1iL1I£msim'mI
`
`Sl'I‘ll(:hIfl.'!
`
`LIE
`
`Iystrzyxnc cry:-'tal.[ized {mm the white of
`Iu-u'.~: egg has been determitled in utmw
`ic cl:-tail with the X~my metlmtl by mar
`group at the Royal Institution in Lon-
`
`j LYSOZYME. mm CHAIN
`
`dun. This is the lalmmtnry in which
`Humphry Davy and .V1ir.-luau] Felnulay
`made their Iundumentall discoveries dur-
`
`ing the 19th century. and in whiw.-h the
`X-my method uf stnwture analysis; was
`developed between the two world want
`by the brilliant gruup of wurkers led
`by William Bragg. including
`D. Ber-
`nnl, Kathleell Lnnsdale. W. T. Asthtlry.
`J. M. Rnlbertxoln am-:1 n1am_v ntlwrs. Our
`work on lysozymc \vaL-: begun in 1980
`
`when Roberto J. Puljalc. u visiting" war}:-
`er [mm Argentina. demonstrated that
`suitnhlr: t'1'ysl'uJs t,-unl.a1i1:iI1g heavy atoms
`r.-rmlcl be prepared. Since then C. C. F.
`Blake. A. C. T. Nurth. V. R. Snrma.
`Ruth Fe-ma, D. F. Koenig, Loni:-‘av N.
`juhnsun and C. A. Muir have p'w.)'e{l
`iniparlzmt rules in the work.
`In 19552 {L
`Iuw-resulutim image at
`the stmr.-tuw was nhtuine(l that revealed
`the gt-ncraal .-almpe of the Inulemulo and
`
`c:.-.-.= LYSOZYME. SIDE cum:
`
`3 suasm-us. MAIN CHAIN
`
`
`
`j suasrnxre. sun: cumu
`
`E HYDROGEN sour:
`
`T DISULFIDE BOND
`
`MM" OF LTSOZT.-\IE AND SLIBSTRATE depicts In rotor the
`Neutral I“1’IllirI of each molecule. Side rluuins have been nlnilled mt-
`mepl
`lnr llsnrw that prmltlrn Iln-. four tlisulfidr hcmrls clipping the
`Iysoxyme molerule. together and thus: that supply the terminal con-
`
`nwtiunec for lurtlmgen [loads holding the nulnltrnlc to the lynozyme.
`The tap lllree ring» of the snlnatrula IA. 3. C I are held to the un-
`derlying eluynm by six prim-ipnl hydrogen lnnnfln. which are Iden-
`tified by number In key with the desrription in the text. The lym-
`
`31-
`
`
`
`.*-‘-1.'fE;'I'I
`
`
`
`—-?-r‘-'~ :
`
`'—r.'"-\._.-——r‘.-
`
`_"a=-at-q.‘
`
`

`

`the
`til
`the arrniigerm.-lit
`that
`shuwetl
`pulyfrepficle Chain is even more enm-
`plex than it is in mynglnhin. This lnw-
`resolntinn image was ('itll.‘lIl:ltt‘tl
`lrnm
`the uniplitmles til abnut -‘mil tlillrnctioll
`Ilmximu nieasured from native protein
`crystals and from crystals containing
`eneli of
`tliree tliilerent
`In-uvy ntuni.-5.
`In I965, after the (lIt‘\'t-!l(!pI't‘lt‘t‘tI ul lt'lU1'l.'
`I:lli(.’lr-ul
`Imalhntl.-i nl
`ll!t3ilSlll‘L‘tl’lt'fll amtl
`
`I;'nJ1IptIl:1litm,
`
`till
`
`itnalgi: was e:rlcul:1t('rl
`
`‘sync molten-ule lulfills its lum-lion wl-nan it
`l-leaves the mlmlu-ale hetwen.-II the D and the
`E ring. Note the distortion oi the D ring.
`vI'l‘Iit‘h [rushes four at its alums irlln ll l‘|lIIl‘IB..
`
`
`
`.'— .7. -5-1-
`
`mm the lmsis of nearly 10,000 diffrac-
`tion |'I'lilXlll'|i1, which resnlvetl
`features
`
`st-painited by two angstrnms. Apart from
`slmwing it
`few well-sepairateil ehleritle
`inns. whit-.h are pre.-;.ent
`l)E(.‘t11lSe
`the
`|_\-'snz'I,'t11e is cI'yst':|Ilize(l from a 5.-ulntiun
`('()I1l‘£llJIlIIg smlium chloride.
`the two-
`zmg.-atrmn image still does nut slmw in-
`lll\r'ltlttlll
`tll‘l}|YI.‘i as sepuriItr.'
`rnaxilmi
`in
`the eletstmn-density map. The level of
`resolution is high enough. lmwever. for
`llIit.tl_\' til" the gl't:IlI])5 at atoms in he ::le:u'-
`ly 1‘t?Ct}gl|t'/.'ctl)l{3.
`
`The l.ysu2_ynn- .\’lnlecnl:-
`
`:tpp4=.urs
`The main pnlylieptidt-' £.‘lt:tiII
`us :1 euntinnuus riblmn of L-leetrun deu-
`
`sily running through the image with
`regnlm-l_v spsievcl prlmiontories an it that
`art‘ clmructeristir.- of the eurliunyl grcmps
`[(C0)
`that
`l'lIiI.l‘l£ catch peplille lmnI.'l.
`In same regions the chain is folded in
`\\=:i}'s that am:
`lumiliair from theoretical
`stndie.-a ui polypeptide mnfigurntlnns
`and from the stnlctllre nriulyses nf lTl.}»‘II-
`gluliiu and fibrmis proteins such as the.
`kemtin nf hair. The nmirlu acid residues
`
`in l_V.\'t)Z_\-'i‘lI|.“' have new been designated
`lay nnmh-er;
`the residues numheretl 5
`tlllmigll
`I5. 2-]
`tliruugli
`3-1 and 38
`lhrnugh 98 form three lengths til‘ "nlplm
`helix." the r.-nnl'nrn1utitm that was pro-
`Imst-tl by Llnns Pxuiling auul Iinberl ll.
`(inrey in 15151 uml
`that was fnmnl by
`Keutlrew and his mlleagiles in be the
`must cmmnmi :n‘nmgen1ent of the clmin
`in myuglnhin. The luelixes in lystirynie,
`lmwL-\-'er_ :1ppt':I.i'
`in he .-:mI1e\.\'lI:il
`rlis-
`torted [mm the "classical"
`ftirm,
`in
`wliicll
`lnln.‘ :It0ms letlrlirm, oxygen. lil-
`trtigicti amtl
`liyrlrrignril
`tit tftl(.‘l1 peptide
`grniip lie in n pluiie that is parallel
`tn
`the axis of llie ullftltal helix. ln the l}'su-
`zyiiie Iiinlet.-nle the peptide groups in
`the helical sections tend in be rntatetl
`
`their C0
`in such at way that
`sligl|tl_\'
`gr'ulI[1.\' paint
`rnltwzml
`frum the helix
`uses ;I.lILl
`their imino gruups (NHI in-
`ward.
`
`The aunnunt of mtatiun \':tI'l<3S. heing
`slight in the helix Farmed by residues 5
`thmugh [5 mid eunsltlenthle in the one
`lUl'T't‘l£'.(l by residues 24 thrnngh 84. The
`eifeel
`til the rutntirm is that each NI-I
`
`grnup |.lI‘.Jt'.S not paint Llirr.-L-tl_\' al the CO
`grmi [1 him’ residues Imck along the chain
`but points
`instead between the (20
`groups of the residues three and four
`hack. When the NH group paints di-
`r£'ctl_\' at
`the C0 group four residues
`lirwli. as it
`(lines in the cltI.ssiL':'1l alpha
`helix. it lnrms with the CO grnnp it hy-
`llrngen bond {the weal: cliemit-all bond
`in wliich at
`liytlrugen ntnm nets as it
`
`hridge). In the lysrizyane helises the hy-
`drogen bond is iurilied snmewliere he-
`t\-.*een two CO groups. giving rise to :1
`structure llIlE|'l‘rIE(ll&ltE hetween that iii
`
`an alpha helix and that til’ it more sym-
`metrical helix with :: L|rree-lald s_vinme—
`try axis that was discussetl by Lawrence
`llmgg, Kemlrew imtl Plarttlz in 1950.
`There is a further short length ol helix
`lresitlnes BU tlimtlgh B5)
`in which the
`hytlrrigerl-llmiding urmrigemeiit is quite
`Clllfie in than in the three-Fuld helix. tlllll
`also an isulntetl
`tum {resitlnes 119
`thruugh 122] of
`three-telcl helix. Fur-
`thennnre, the peptide at the far end of
`helix 5 thmngh I5 is in the t.-unfnrmau
`tinn til the three-frilcl helix. and the hy-
`drtigeu bi‘.-ml lrom its NH guilt]: is nnitle
`ii) the C0 three residues ban.-l< rather
`than l'mn'.
`
`Partly lice’-uuse at these irregnliwitit-s
`in the structure of Iysuzyiiie.
`the pre-
`portion of its polypcptitle cluiin in the
`ailplia-helix (‘tItIl'DI'Tl]tlfifJn is difficult
`to
`mlciilate in in meaningful way inr ::m'n-
`parisnn with the f.-stiniates nlntainetl by
`other
`Inetl1mls.'|n1l
`it
`is clearly less
`than lmll
`the prupnrlitm 0l)ser\'e(l
`in
`rnynglnlnili,
`in which helical
`regitms
`mnlze up ttlltltll 75 percent til the clmin.
`Tlic lysrizyziie iimlecirle dues int.-Imle,
`lmwever, an example of iunither regu-
`lar cnnlnnnntinn pi‘(.‘.LllI:l.e'(l
`lay Pauling
`and Corey. This
`is
`the "amtipnrnllel
`pleatetl slleet." wliielu is lieliuvetl to be
`the.
`limit: striietnre of the fihmus pro-
`tein silk nnrl in which, as the l‘.Ii|lflE' sug-
`gests, two lengths ni pulypeptitle chain
`run p:u-nllel
`tu eat.-I1 other in opposite
`tll'f'L‘L'litJ1‘IS. This .~:truetu1'e again is stabi-
`lized hy hydrogen lmntls between the
`NH tIlI(.l CO gI't)np.-' nl the nlitin chain.
`Resirhles -‘ll through 45 and 50 through
`5~l in the l_v.'tu'(.yII1e umlecule lurm .‘iltt'l'l
`1| slnlctnre. with the e(mm‘.L-tillg resi-
`dues 46 tlirmlgli -19 Folded into :1 hair-
`pin bend l1et\veen the twn lengths nl
`c-aiiipirmtively exrencled chain. The re-
`Ilnlimler of
`the pnlypeptitle chain is
`ftiltled in irregular \v:1_vs
`llnlt
`lnrve nu
`simple shnrt dest-riptimi.
`liven tlmngh the level uf resnlntiun
`:r(-hievetl in mar present image was not
`ennngli
`to rt-.-salve
`iridivitluul
`alllltllri.
`nlnn}-'
`til
`the stile t.‘l‘Iaii1s
`('h:IrtIL'l.‘e.rl.‘rlic'
`ul the .-nniuu i1L'l(l residues were reaulily
`identifiable from their general slmpe.
`The
`tour disnlfide bfitlgcs.
`for
`ex-
`mnple, are llI‘.|1“l\I:'ll hy slmrt rud.-5 of high
`eletrlrun dr,-nsil_v t..-urreslriunding tn the
`lwn rt-.lutivel_v LIL-use sulfur n.tcm1s with-
`in llltfltl. The six lryptopllun residues
`ulsn were easily 1'er.-ngriizetl by the ex-
`Iemletl electron density pl‘lKl1lt.'t't.l hy
`lllt.‘ lnrgc tlnulile-ring st1‘I.It:t11!'t.-s in their
`
`85
`
`

`

`liquid. Such “polar” side chains are
`l1ydrophilic—att:racted to water;
`they
`are found in aspartic acid and glutanile
`acid residues and in lysine, argtnine
`and histidine residues, which have basic
`side groups. On the other hand, most
`of the Inatlcetlly uonpolar and hydro-
`phobic side clmius (for example those
`found in leucinc and isolcucine resi~
`
`dues) are shielded from the surrotuniing
`liquid by more polar parts of the mole-
`cule. In fact. as was predicted by Sir
`Erie Rideel {who was at one time direc-
`tor ol the Royal Institution) and Irving
`Langmuir. lysozyme. like myoglobin, is
`quite well described as an oil drop with
`a polar coat. Herc it
`is important
`to
`note that the envirotunent of each mole-
`
`cule. in the crystalline state is not signifi-
`cantly cliiferent from its natural environ-
`ment
`in the living cell. The crystals
`tliemzielves include :1
`large proportion
`{some 35 percent by weight) of mostly
`watery liquid of crystallization. The
`effect of the surrounding liquid on the
`protein colifonnation thus is llliely to be
`rrulch the same in the crystals as it is in
`solution.
`
`the observed
`that
`then,
`It appears,
`conformation is preferred because in it
`the hydrophobic side chains are kept
`out of contact with the surrounding
`liquid whereas the polar side chains
`are generally exposed to it. In this way
`the system consisting of
`the protein
`and the solvent attains a minimum free
`
`energy, partly because of the large num-
`ber of
`favorable interactions of
`like
`
`groups witl'u'n the protein molecule and
`between it and the surrounding liquid,
`ant! partly because of
`lhe relatively
`high disorder of the water molecules
`that are in contact only with other
`polar groups of atoms.
`generalizntiotls,
`Guided
`by
`the.-ie
`many workers are now interested in the
`possibility of predicting the conforma-
`
`FIRST 56 Rfigl DUES in lyaozytne molecule contain a higher proportion ol symmetrically
`organized regions than does all the rest of the molecule. Residues 5 through 15 and 24
`through 34 (right) form two regions in which hydrogen bonds (gray) hold the residues in
`a helical configuration close to that of the "classical" alpha helix. Residues -Il through 45
`and 50 through 5-! {left} fold back against each other to term a “pleated sheet.“ also held
`together by hydrogen bonds. In addition the hydrogen bond lnetween residues 1 and 40
`ties the limit 40 residues into a compact structure that may have been lolcled in this way
`hclore the molecule was fully syntlreeiaccl {see illustration at the bottom of these two pages}.
`
`side chains. Many of the other residues
`also were easily identifiable, but it was
`new-a-tireless most
`important
`for
`the
`rapid and reliable interpretation of the
`image that the results of the chemical
`analysis were already available. ‘Nitlt
`their help more than 95 percent of the
`atoms
`in the molecule were readily
`identified and located within about .25
`angslront.
`Further efforts at improving the ac-
`cnntcy with which the atoms have been
`located is in progress, but an almost
`complete description of
`the lysozynte
`umlc<:ule now exists [sec illustration on
`pages 80 and 81]. By studying it and
`
`the results of some further experiments
`we can begin to suggest answers to two
`importsmt questions: How does :1 mole-
`cule such as this one attain its observed
`ctmfonnafion? How does it function as
`
`an enzyme, or biological catalyst?
`Inspection of the lysozyrne molecule
`immediately suggests two generaliza-
`tions about its conforrnalion that agree
`well with those arrived at earlier in the
`
`study of myoglobiu. It is oiavious that
`certain residues with acidic and basic
`side chains that
`ionize, or dissociate,
`on Contact with water are all on the
`surface of
`the molecule more or less
`
`readily accessible to the surrounding
`
`GROWING. POLYPEPTIDE CHAIN
`
`RIBOSDME
`
`MESSFNGER RNA
`
`CO DON N UM BER 1
`
`FOLDING OF PROTEIN MOLECULE may talte place as the grow-
`ing polypeptide rlmin is being synthesized by the intracellular par-
`ticles called rilnoaornes. The genetic mt-as-age specilyiog the amino
`
`ocid sequence of each protein is coded in “messenger” ribonucleic
`acid (RNAI. It is believed Ieaeral ribosomes travel simultaneously
`along this long-chain molecule. reading the message as they 50.
`
`36
`
`‘it
`
`Page 10
`
`

`

`I
`
`I41:
`
`L.
`
`1.__
`
`tion of a protein molecule from its
`chemical formula alone [see "Molecular
`Model-htfiltling by Computer." by Cy-
`rus Levialhal; SClEl\’TIFl(:
`z\MI:‘.H1c;A:~:.
`
`juuel. The task of exploring all possible
`coalonnatlons in the search for the one
`
`of lowest free energy seems likely. how-
`ever, to remain beyond the power of any
`imaginalalc computer. On a conservative
`estimate it would he necessary to con-
`sitler some Illl‘-3' t.liIlt=.rcI|t L‘(‘JT)fDl‘l1'|‘.'ll‘l()l1S
`
`lor the 'lysoz_vn1e molecule in any gen-
`eral search lor the one with lninimuan
`
`Free energy. Since this numlaer is far
`greater l'.la-m the number of particles in
`tho observalilc lII1ivcrse, it is clear that
`slrnplifying asslrtnptitarns will liave to he
`made il (.‘:ll(.'I.tl£l.l.l0ll5 of this kind are to
`succeed.
`
`The Folding of Lysozyrne
`
`For some time Peter Dunnill and I
`
`lmvc been trying to dc-.-velop :1 model of
`prntein-folding that promises to malce
`practicable cult:nlations of the IIIlIllIlIl11TI
`energy ('unfom1atio11 and that is. at the
`some time. qaalitatis-el_v consistent with
`the olaserved structure of myoglohin
`and lysozymc. This model makes use
`of our present
`lmowlctlge of the \.-my
`in which proteins are sjrntllesized in
`the living cell. For example.
`it
`is well
`known, from experiments by Howard -.\-I.
`Dintzis it.J'l(l. by Christian ll. Anfinsen
`and Robert Cautlield. that protein mole-
`cules are synthesized from the terminal
`amino end of their polypeptide chain.
`The nature of
`the synthetic mecha-
`nism, which involves the intracellular
`partit-les called ribosomes working in
`collaboration with two forms of ribonu-
`
`cleic acid ("messenger" RNA and "trans-
`fer" RNA),
`is increasingly well under-
`stood in principle. although the detailed
`environment of
`the growing protein
`chain remains Iulluuown. Nevertheless,
`
`it seems as reasonable as-au111ption that,
`as the synthesis proceeds,
`the amino
`end of the chain becomes separated by
`an increasing (lislance from the point. ol
`attachment to the ribosome, and that the
`
`folding of the protein chain to its no-
`tive conformation begins at
`this end
`ct-on |)el'orc the 5_Vlll.ll&.SlS is complete.
`Avumliug to our present
`ideas. parts
`of the polypepticlne cllain. parrit-ularl_v
`those near the terminal amino end. may
`fold into stable L't'Jnl(:r1n:ttio11s that can
`
`still be recognized in the linishecl mole-
`cule and that act as "illtt-nlal tcinplatcs,”
`or centers. around which the rest of
`the chain is folded [sec illrt-rtrofion oi
`lwflom of Hmsr!
`two pages].
`It may
`therefore be useful to look for the stable
`
`conformations of parts of the polypep—
`tide chain and to avoid studying all the
`possible conformations of
`the whole
`tnolctrule.
`
`Inspection of the Iysozymo molecule
`provirlcs qualitative support for these
`ideas [see top illrtstrolitlli on rrppositc
`ptrgcl. The first
`-10 residues from the
`terniinal amino end fo11'r1
`:1 mmpxlct
`structure [residues 1 and 40 are linked
`by a hyclrogen bond) with a hydropho-
`bic interior and a relatively hydrophilic
`surluce that seems likely to laws been
`folded in this way. or in :1 simply re»
`lated way. before the molecule was
`fully syntliesized. It may also be im-
`portant
`to observe that
`this part of
`the molecule includes more alpha lielix
`than the remainder does.
`These first 40 residues
`
`include a
`
`mixture ol hydrophobic and hydro-
`philic side clmins, but the next 14 resi-
`dues in the sequence are all h}'d1'op|1ilic:
`it is interesting, and p=ossihl_\r' significant.
`that these are the residues in the anti-
`
`pnrallel pleated sheet, which lies out
`of contact with the globular subn1olc-
`cule formed by the earlier residues. In
`the light of our model of protein fold-
`
`that
`speculation is
`ing the obvious
`there is no incentive to fold these by-
`drophilic residues in contact with the
`lirst part of
`the chain until
`the hy-
`drophobic residues 55 (isoleucinel and
`53 {lent-inc) have to be shielded from
`
`Contact with the surrounding liquid.
`It seems
`reasonable to suppose that
`at
`this stage residues 41
`through 54
`fold back on tllelnsclves,
`lornling the
`pleated-shoot strut-ture and lnn'_ving the
`hydrophobic side chains in the initial
`hydrophobic pocket.
`Similar considerations appear to gov-
`cm the folding of the rest of the mole-
`cule.
`In brief. residues 57 through 86
`are Folded in contact with the 11|eal'ed-
`sheet structure so that at
`this stage
`of the pro:-ess—if indeed it follows this
`L-ourse—tl1c folded chain forms a struc-
`
`ture with two wings lying at an angle
`to each other.
`llcsirlaes 88 through 96
`lonn a length of alpha helix. one side
`of \\-"l1l(.'l1 is pretlorninantly hydrophobic.
`because of an appropriate alternation
`of polar and nonpolar residtics in that
`part of the sequence. This helis lies in
`the gap between the two wings formed
`hy the earlier resitlues, with its hydro-
`phobic side l)l.1l‘if‘.'Ll Within the molecule.
`The gap between the two wings is not
`completely filled
`the helix, however;
`it is transformed into a deep cleft mn-
`ning up one side of the molecule. As we
`slmll see. this cleft forms the active site
`of the em:yu1e. The remuilling residtles
`are folded around the globular unit
`formed by the terminal amino and of
`the polypeptide Ichain.
`This model of protcin—l'oldi11g call he
`tested in a number of ways. for example
`by stlxdying the conlonoatiou of
`the
`lirst 40 resitlilcs in isolation both di-
`
`
`
`Presnrnably the messenger RNA for lysozyme contains 129 “ro-
`dent.” one for each amino acid. Amino acids are delivered to the
`site of synrlheeis by molecules of “transfer” RNA (dark color]. The
`
`illmilrnlion shows how the lysoayme chain would lengthen as a ri-
`hosorne travel: along the messenger RNA molecule. Here. hypothal-
`irally. the polypeptide is shown folding directly into its final shape.
`
`
`
`

`

`rcctly (after removal of the rest of the
`molecule] and by computation. Ulti-
`mately, of course, the model will be re-
`garded as satisfactory only if it helps us
`to predict how other protein molecules
`are folded from a knowletlge of their
`chcniicul structure alone.
`
`The Aclivitgr of Lysozymv
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket