`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
` Paper No. 12
`
`
`
` Entered: November 28, 2016
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, BRIAN P.MURPHY, and
`ZHENYU YANG, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`YANG, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Christopher L. McArdle
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 This order addresses issues that are common to each referenced case. We,
`therefore, issue a single order that has been entered in each case. For
`convenience, paper numbers refer to those filed in IPR2016-01563.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)
`
`
`Petitioner filed a Motion for Christopher L. McArdle to appear pro
`hac vice in each of these proceedings. Paper 8. The Motion is supported by
`the Declaration of Christopher L. McArdle. Ex. 1017. Patent Owner did not
`file any opposition.
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Christopher L. McArdle pro hac vice in this proceeding.
`
`It is, therefore,
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Christopher L. McArdle to
`appear pro hac vice in this proceeding is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Christopher L. McArdle is
`authorized to represent Petitioner as back-up counsel only, and that
`Petitioner is to continue to have a registered practitioner represent it as lead
`counsel;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Christopher L. McArdle shall
`comply with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of
`Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of 37 C.F.R.; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Christopher L. McArdle shall be
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a)
`and the Office’s Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2016-01563 (Patent 8,673,927 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01564 (Patent 8,846,695 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01565 (Patent 8,853,156 B2)
`Case IPR2016-01566 (Patent 9,173,859 B2)
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Thomas Parker
`Chris McArdle
`Ellen Cheong
`Charles Naggar
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`
`thomas.parker@alston.com
`chris.mcardle@alston.com
`ellen.cheong@alston.com
`charles.naggar@alston.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Leora Ben-Ami
`Eugene Goryunov
`Mira Mulvaney
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`
`leora.benami@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`mira.mulvaney@kirkland.com
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
