throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel. 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 24
`Entered: August 1, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM INTERNATIONAL GMBH,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01565
`Patent 8,853,156 B2
`______________
`
`
`Before TONI R. SCHEINER, BRIAN P. MURPHY, and ZHENYU YANG,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SCHEINER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.73
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01565
`Patent 8,853,156 B2
`
`
`BACKGROUND
`I.
`On February 9, 2017, the Board instituted a review of the patentability of
`claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 23 of U.S. Patent No. 8,853,156 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’156
`patent”). Paper 17. On April 14, 2017, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH
`(“Patent Owner”) filed a Request for Adverse Judgment under 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.73(b). Paper 21. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Response
`(Paper 22) opposing Patent Owner’s Request as premature, pending a decision on
`Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing (Paper 19). A decision denying Petitioner’s
`Request for Rehearing has since been entered (Paper 23). Accordingly, Patent
`Owner’s Request for Adverse Judgment is ripe for decision.
`Patent Owner’s request is granted.
`II. DISCUSSION
`A party may request judgment against itself at any time during a proceeding.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b). Under the Rules, actions construed as a request for entry of
`adverse judgment include “[c]ancellation or disclaimer of a claim such that the
`party has no remaining claim in the trial.” 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(2). Here, Patent
`Owner has requested that “the Board cancel the instituted claims (claims 1, 2, 4, 5,
`and 23) and enter adverse judgment against it.” Paper 21, 1.
`III. CONCLUSION
`Having reviewed Patent Owner’s Request, we determine that entry of
`judgment against Patent owner with respect to claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 23 of the ’156
`patent is appropriate. Because no challenged claim remains in the trial, we
`terminate the proceeding. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01565
`Patent 8,853,156 B2
`
`IV. ORDER
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that adverse judgment is entered under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)
`against Patent Owner with respect to claims 1, 2, 4, 5, and 23 of U.S. Patent No.
`8,853,156 B2; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding is hereby TERMINATED.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01565
`Patent 8,853,156 B2
`
`
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Thomas Parker
`Ellen Cheong
`Charles Naggar
`Chris McArdle
`ALSTON & BIRD LLP
`thomas.parker@alston.com
`ellen.cheong@alston.com
`charles.naggar@alston.com
`chris.mcardle@alston.com
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Leora Ben-Ami
`Eugene Goryunov
`Mira Mulvaney
`Jeanna Wacker
`KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
`leora.benami@kirkland.com
`egoryunov@kirkland.com
`mira.mulvaney@kirkland.com
`jeanna.wacker@kirkland.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket