throbber
Paper: 43
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: July 10, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`POLARIS INNOVATIONS LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before SALLY C. MEDLEY, JEAN R. HOMERE,
`and KEN B. BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`Patent Owner, on July 9, 2018, sent an email to the Board requesting
`
`an “order of the Board” interpreting 37 C.F.R. § 90.3(b)(1), the rule
`pertaining to the time for filing an appeal. Specifically, Patent Owner seeks
`clarification as to how a prospective request for rehearing will impact the
`time for filing an appeal in this case.
`
`On May 29, 2018, Petitioner requested rehearing of the Final Written
`Decision (Paper 35) to address the effects of the Supreme Court’s decision
`on SAS Inst., Inc. v. Iancu, 584 U.S. ___ (U.S. Apr. 24, 2018). On June 11,
`2018, we entered an order granting the request for rehearing and modifying
`the Final Written Decision. Paper 42. Patent Owner previously filed a
`request for rehearing (Paper 36) of the original Final Written Decision, and
`that request was denied on April 12, 2018 (Paper 37). Patent Owner
`indicated in its email that it plans to file a request for rehearing of the June
`11, 2018, order.
`
`Rule 90.3—titled “Time for appeal or civil action”—provides, in
`pertinent part:
`(a) Filing deadline. (1) For an appeal under 35 U.S.C. 141. The
`notice of appeal filed pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 142 must be filed
`with the Director of the United States Patent and Trademark
`Office no later than sixty-three (63) days after the date of the
`final Board decision. Any notice of cross-appeal is controlled
`by Rule 4(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,
`and any other requirement imposed by the Rules of the United
`States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
`. . .
` (b) Time computation. (1) Rehearing. A timely request for
`rehearing will reset the time for appeal or civil action to no later
`than sixty-three (63) days after action on the request. Any
`subsequent request for rehearing from the same party in the
`same proceeding will not reset the time for seeking judicial
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`
`review, unless the additional request is permitted by order of
`the Board. . . .
`37 C.F.R. §90.3. The “timely request for rehearing” and “[a]ny subsequent
`request for rehearing” of Rule 90.3(b)(1) refers to a request for rehearing of
`“the final Board decision” of Rule 90.3(a)(1). The Order of June 11, 2018,
`modified the Final Written Decision and, therefore, that June 11 Order
`became the final Board decision within the meaning of Rule 90.3. See 37
`C.F.R. §42.2 (“Final means final for the purpose of judicial review to the
`extent available. A decision is final only if it disposes of all necessary issues
`with regard to the party seeking judicial review, and does not indicate that
`further action is required.”). Rule 90.3 should be applied in that light. As
`Patent Owner noted in its email, Rule 42.71(d) governs any request for
`rehearing of that Order.
`
`The parties also are encouraged to review Section 1216 of the Manual
`of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), which sets forth procedures
`pertaining to and the Office’s position regarding Rule 90.3 and judicial
`review.
`
`ORDER
`For the foregoing reasons, it is
`
`ORDERED that the parties shall comply with 37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d)
`
`regarding any requests for rehearing of the Order of June 11, 2018;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are not authorized to file a
`request for rehearing of any other decision or order; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with 37 C.F.R.
`§ 90.2 and § 90.3 regarding any appeal in this inter partes review.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01622
`Patent 6,850,414 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`David Hoffman
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`hoffman@fr.com
`
`Martha Hopkins
`LAW OFFICES OF S. J. CHRISTINE YANG
`mhopkins@sjclawpc.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket