`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 48
`Entered: December 18, 2017
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2016-01643
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`_______________
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, GEORGIANNA BRADEN, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01643
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`
`On November 22, 2017, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70, both Petitioner and
`Patent Owner requested oral hearing. Papers 33, 34. The requests for oral hearing
`are granted.
`Oral argument will be held on Thursday, January 4, 2018 on the ninth floor
`of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, commencing
`at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Each party will have a total of forty-five (45) minutes
`of argument time. Petitioner will proceed first and may present arguments with
`respect to unpatentability of the challenged claims and with respect to its Motion to
`Exclude. Patent Owner will then respond and may also present arguments with
`respect to its Motion to Exclude and its Motion to Strike. Each party may reserve
`rebuttal time to address arguments made by the opposing party at the oral hearing
`with respect to issues on which the party reserving time has the burden of
`persuasion.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing.
`The hearing will be open to the public for in-person attendance. Space in the
`hearing room is limited, and any attendees beyond five per party (including any
`attorneys who may be appearing) will be accommodated on a first-come, first-
`served basis. One or more judges of the panel may appear remotely.
`At least seven (7) business days prior to the hearing, each party shall serve
`on the other party (and not file) any demonstrative it intends to use during the
`hearing. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). The parties should attempt to resolve any
`objections to demonstratives prior to involving the Board. If any objections
`remain, a party may raise them during the hearing as part of its allotted argument
`time. At least one (1) business day prior to the hearing, the parties shall provide
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01643
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`the demonstratives to the Board by emailing them in portable document format
`(.pdf) to Trials@uspto.gov. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan,
`No. IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65) for guidance regarding
`appropriate content of demonstratives.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at the hearing,
`although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in whole or in part.
`If any lead counsel will not be in attendance at the hearing, the Board should be
`notified via a joint telephone conference call no later than two days prior to the
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`Any special requests for audio visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov.
`
`
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2016-01643
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`Lionel M. Lavenue
`James Stein
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
`lionel.lavenue@finnegan.com
`james.stein@finnegan.com
`
`Jonathan Stroud
`Roshan Suresh Mansinghani
`UNIFIED PATENTS INC.
`jonathan@unifiedpatents.com
`roshan@unifiedpatents.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`John R. King
`Ted M. Cannon
`Brenton R. Babcock
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2jrk@knobbe.com
`2tmc@knobbe.com
`2brb@knobbe.com
`
`Tim Seeley
`James Hietala
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
`tims@intven.com
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`
`
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`