throbber
CX-268
`
`Safety Isn’t Always Top Priority
`
`By Caroline E. Mayer July 14, 2001
`
`Talk to anyone who has seen a demonstration of SawStop -- where a hot dog, acting as a finger, is only nicked when it
`
`touches a table-saw blade -- and the first comment is almost always one of astonishment.
`
`"It is probably one of the most major developments in the area of product safety applicable for table saws," said
`
`Peter Domeny, director of product safety for SB Power Tool Co, which makes Skil and Bosch tools.
`
`"Safetywise, it is probably one of the most innovative features I’ve seen in the last ~o years," said Scott Box,
`
`manager of product development for Delta Machinery, the leading manufacturer of stationary saw machinery.
`
`Then come the "buts" -- the hesitations that help explain why -- despite the glowing reviews -- no manufacturer has
`
`yet agreed to add the year-old SawStop technology to any of its products.
`
`The hesitation helps illustrate the challenges often involved in adding new safety features to existing products.
`
`In this case, SawStop comes with the promise that it could reduce the number of visits by Americans to emergency
`
`rooms after using table saws. Of the 63,ooo such visits last year, nearly 3,5oo involved finger and hand
`
`amputations.
`
`Yet even if SawStop works as advertised, manufacturers say, they must also consider other factors -- its cost, the risk
`
`of product liability lawsuits and even consumer behavior -- before agreeing to add it to their products.
`
`Consumer advocates and some federal safety officials say those arguments are familiar --voiced when other safety
`
`innovations -- such as car air bags, safer cigarette lighters and better vehicle bumpers -- were developed.
`
`Stephen F. Gass, an Oregon patent lawyer, physicist and lifelong woodworker, developed SawStop after wondering
`
`whether he could stop a sawblade fast enough to avoid a serious injury if he accidentally ran his hand into it.
`
`Designed in a month and built from parts Gass had on hand, the device is based on the fact that humans conduct
`
`electricity much better than wood does. A monitor measures an electrical signal and detects when some part of a
`
`body (or, in the demonstration, the hot dog) comes in contact with the saw. The blade is immediately stopped by a
`
`special brake within a few milliseconds -- faster than it takes the body to register pain from a cut, Gass said.
`
`SawStoplTC-O099107
`
`CX-268.0001
`
`SD3 Exhibit 2004 – Page 1
`
`

`
`To build support for his invention, Gass has been demonstrating it at woodworking conventions around the world.
`
`He also showed it at a Consumer Product Safety Commission conference late last month in Oak Brook, Ill. The
`
`conference’s purpose was to highlight new technology to persuade manufacturers to be more aggressive in adopting
`
`new safety features.
`
`SB Power Tool, Delta and several other manufacturers say they are reviewing SawStop to see if it does what Gass
`
`claims. If it does, the companies say, they will then consider the other factors.
`
`First, Box said, "we need to determine if the consumer is willing to pay for the added cost of safety." When it comes
`
`to sales, safety "is not a barnburner," he said.
`
`Delta offers a number of safety extras, but "they don’t sell as large as they should," Box said. He said, for example,
`
`that schools are usually the only customers willing to pay $3oo for the extra protection provided by an overarm
`
`guard for table saws.
`
`In a recent Internet chat room discussion, some woodworkers said they would not buy a product with the
`
`attachment. "My saw cuts just fine without it," one said. "I don’t care for technology to do my thinking for me ....
`
`The best sawstop that I’ve ever seen is located between the ears," wrote another.
`
`If consumers won’t buy the product, stores won’t stock it. John Simley, spokesman for Home Depot, said the retailer
`
`is always encouraging manufacturers to develop safer products. But if the product "doesn’t sell, we won’t carry it."
`
`Simley said that in many cases, he’s seen customers reluctant to buy a product with a safety feature -- or say they will
`
`disable it -- because they believe it interferes with the product’s effectiveness.
`
`Retailers, manufacturers and woodworkers acknowledge that’s the case with the protective guards that come with
`
`stationary saws. Even (lass admits that he hasn’t used a guard in years.
`
`Gass estimates that the SawStop system will add about 15 percent to a saw’s price, but manufacturers aren’t so sure.
`Box, for one, said he is concerned that SawStop may be too expensive, particularly for lower-priced products.
`
`It could raise the price of a $17o sawused by many woodworking hobbyists to $3oo, Box said. Delta sells saws
`
`ranging in price from $149 to $4,ooo. "I see it being used on the upper-end saws, more than those that sell under
`
`$5oo," Box said.
`
`The problem, he said, is that if Delta doesn’t add the feature to all of its table saws, it could risk being the target of
`
`product-liability lawsuits by people injured using a lower-priced sawwithout the feature.
`
`SawStoplTC-O099108
`
`CX-268.0002
`
`SD3 Exhibit 2004 – Page 2
`
`

`
`"Price is an important consideration," said Victor E. Schwartz, a Washington lawyer who specializes in product
`
`liability. "I can see the trial if something goes wrong: ’Here is a company that provides safety for the rich but not for
`
`the poor.’"
`
`Manufacturers also said they are concerned that safety features could give woodworkers a false sense of security and
`
`tempt them to take more risks. Some customers agree. One wrote in the Internet chat room: "The reason I don’t
`
`want it is that... I don’t want anything present that will reduce my fear .... I do believe my sense of caution will be
`
`reduced and expose me incrementally to the danger I fear most in my shop."
`
`That argument angers Gass and consumer safety officials. "That’s like saying that when I get in my car, I’ll be cavalier
`
`about crossing the center line because I have an air bag," Gass said.
`
`"To say people become more reckless when there are additional safety features really offends me," said Ann Brown,
`
`chairman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission. "That’s what people said when the CPSC tried to create a
`
`child-resistant lighter -- a better lighter would make people more careless and leave them around the house. But it
`
`hasn’t. The o nly thing we’ve seen is the injury rate go way down."
`
`Another issue is replacement parts. As now made, once SawStop is activated, the sawwill not work again until a new
`
`braking cartridge is installed. Each cartridge would cost $5o or less, Gass said.
`
`Domeny said SB Power Tool’s testing suggests that the blade also might have to be replaced because the brake
`
`sometimes damages the cutting teeth. Domeny is concerned that a sawuser might not see the damage and reuse the
`
`blade "only to have the fractured tooth fly up and end up in your face."
`
`Gass said that’s "an inherent risk" with any saw that uses carbide teeth. "But as a relative risk, it’s about a thousand
`
`times less than the risk of cutting your finger off. Typically, the tooth is not big enough or traveling fast enough to
`
`seriously injure you, unless it hits you in the eye. But that’s why you wear safety goggles."
`
`Domeny said that "at first look, [SawStop] obviously has a good appeal, but there are some hidden risks and hazards
`
`that we have to balance." He said his company is "probably a month or two away from making a decision."
`
`Stephen F. Gass invented a safety brake for table saws, but manufacturers are reluctant to use it.
`
`SawStoplTC-O099109
`
`CX-268.0003
`
`SD3 Exhibit 2004 – Page 3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket