throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 20
`Entered: July 25, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SHENZHEN LIOWN ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-01785
`Patent 8,721,118 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before J. JOHN LEE, WILLIAM M. FINK, and JESSICA C. KAISER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`FINK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Parties’ Joint Motion to Terminate Trial
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01785
`Patent 8,721,118 B2
`
`
`
`
`I. DISCUSSION
`
`On July 21, 2017, the parties filed a Joint Motion to Terminate this
`
`proceeding (Paper 18), a true copy of the parties’ settlement agreement (Ex.
`
`1033), and a request to treat the settlement agreement as business
`
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`(Paper 17).
`
`The trial is still in its preliminary stages. On April 3, 2017, we
`
`entered a decision instituting an inter partes review of claims 1, 3, 8, and 10
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,721,118 B2 (Ex. 1001, “the ’118 patent”). Paper 14.
`
`Although we have instituted a trial, Patent Owner has not filed a response to
`
`the Petition, nor has Petitioner filed a reply.
`
`In the Joint Motion to Terminate this proceeding, the parties indicate
`
`that they have settled their dispute regarding the ’118 patent. Paper 18, 1.
`
`According to the parties, terminating this proceeding at this early juncture
`
`would “preserve the Board’s resources and obviate the need for any more
`
`Board involvement in the present proceeding.” Id. at 3. We agree with the
`
`parties in this regard. Consequently, we determine that it is appropriate to
`
`terminate the trial without rendering any further decisions. See 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.72.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2016-01785
`Patent 8,721,118 B2
`
`
`
`
`II. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ request to treat the settlement agreement
`
`(Ex. 1033) as business confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is GRANTED; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Joint Motion to Terminate this
`
`proceeding is GRANTED, and this proceeding is hereby terminated.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`
`IPR2016-01785
`Patent 8,721,118 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Thomas N. Millikan
`Bing Ai
`Joseph P. Reid
`Patrick J. McKeever
`Babak Tehranchi
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`tmillikan@perkinscoie.com
`ai-ptab@perkinscoie.com
`jreid@perkinscoie.com
`pmckeever@perkinscoie.com
`btehranchi@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jon E. Wright
`David K.S. Cornwell
`Richard D. Coller III
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX PLLC
`jwright-PTAB@skgf.com
`davide-PTAB@skgf.com
`rcoller-PTAB@skgf.com
`
`Ryan S. Dean
`John van Loben Sels
`FISH & TSANG, LLP
`rdean@fishiplaw.com
`jvanlobensels@fishiplaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket