`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`———————
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`———————
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG S.A.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`———————
`
`IPR2017-00058
`U.S. Patent No. 7,804,948
`
`———————
`
`JOINT PROPOSED PROCEDURE ON REMAND
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`I.
`
`Introduction
`
`Joint Proposed Procedure on Remand
`
` IPR2017-00058 / U.S. Patent 7,804,948
`
`Per the Board’s email order on January 18, 2022, the parties have met and
`
`conferred regarding the proper procedure for remand in this case.
`
`II.
`
`Proposed Procedure on Remand
`
`The parties agree that, since the Federal Circuit’s order on January 23, 2020
`
`vacated the final written decision, the procedure on remand should include the
`
`issuance of a final written decision.
`
`The parties disagree, however, on whether additional steps are needed
`
`beforehand. The partes submit their respective proposals below for the Board’s
`
`consideration.
`
`Patent Owner’s Proposed Procedure: A hearing before a new panel,
`
`followed by a final written decision issued by the new panel.
`
`Petitioner’s Proposed Procedure: The previous panel may reissue the
`
`previous final written decision, after which Patent Owner may seek Director Review
`
`if it chooses.
`
`III. Conclusion
`
`If the Board requests, the parties are prepared to file separate one-page
`
`statements explaining the legal authorities for their respective proposals, to provide
`
`a list of proposed dates and times for a teleconference with the Board, or both.
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`Joint Proposed Procedure on Remand
`IPR2017-00058 / U.S. Patent 7,804,948
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`Dated: February 1, 2022
`HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP
`2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700
`Dallas, Texas 75219
`Telephone: 214-651-5533
`Facsimile: 214-200-0853
`
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`Telephone: 469-401-2659
`
`/Brett Mangrum/
`Brett Mangrum
`Lead Counsel for Patent Owner
`Registration No. 64,783
`
`2
`
`
`
`Joint Proposed Procedure on Remand
`IPR2017-00058 / U.S. Patent 7,804,948
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6, this is to certify that a true and correct copy of
`
`the foregoing “Joint Proposed Procedure on Remand” service was made on the
`
`Patent Owner as detailed below:
`
`February 1, 2022
`Date of Service:
`Manner of Service: Electronic Mail to: brett@etheridgelaw.com
` ryan@etheridgelaw.com
` jim@etheridgelaw.com
` jeff@etheridgelaw.com
` sean.burdick@unilocusa.com
`
`Document Served:
`Persons Served:
`
`Joint Proposed Procedure on Remand
`Brett Mangrum
`Ryan Loveless
`James Etheridge
`Jeffrey Huang
`Etheridge Law Group
`2600 E. Southlake Blvd., Ste. 120-324
`Southlake, TX 76092
`
`Sean D. Burdick
`Uniloc USA, Inc.
`7160 Dallas Parkway, Ste. 380
`Plano, TX 75024
`
`/David L. McCombs/
`David L. McCombs
`Lead Counsel for Petitioner
`Registration No. 32,271
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
