throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 19
`Entered: June 12, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before NEIL T. POWELL, JAMES A. TARTAL, and
`ROBERT L. KINDER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TARTAL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`DECISION
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Nicholas Groombridge
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`As authorized by the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to the Petition
`
`(Paper 3), Edwards Lifesciences Corporation, Edwards Lifesciences LLC,
`and Edwards Lifesciences AG (“Petitioner”) filed a “Motion for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Nicholas Groombridge.” Paper 17.1 Petitioner represents
`that Patent Owner Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc., does not oppose the
`Motion. Paper 17, 4.
`Petitioner’s Motion is granted. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see also
`Unified Patents, Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Order
`Authorizing Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission, Paper 7 (October 15,
`2003) (setting forth requirements for pro hac vice admission).2
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for pro hac vice admission is
`granted, and Mr. Groombridge is authorized to represent Petitioner as back-
`up counsel in IPR2017-00060;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in this inter partes review proceeding;
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Groombridge is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations,
`and that Mr. Groombridge is subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction
`
`
`1 Petitioner also filed a declaration from Mr. Groombridge in support of the
`Motion. Paper 18. Such a declaration preferably should be filed as an
`exhibit, not as a separate paper in the case docket.
`2 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/patents-application-process/appealing-
`patent-decisions/decisions-and-opinions/representative-orders.
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct
`set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00060
`Patent 8,992,608 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory S. Cordrey
`JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL, LLP
`gcordrey@jmbm.com
`
`Brian Egan
`MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP
`began@mnat.com
`
`Catherine Nyarady
`PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON LLP
`cnyarady@paulweiss.com
`
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jennifer A. Sklenar
`Wallace Wu
`ARNOLD & PORTER LLP
`jennifer.sklenar@aporter.com
`wallace.wu@aporter.com
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket