throbber
Three-Dimensional T2-Weighted Imaging of the Brain Using Very Long Spin-Echo Trains
`
`JP Mugler III1, B Kiefer2, JR Brookeman1
`1Department of Radiology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
`2Siemens Medical Engineering Group, Erlangen, Germany
`
`lesions seen in the 2D image appear, to varying degrees, in
`three adjacent 1-mm sections. Furthermore,
`the overall
`image quality for the very long SE-train and conventional-SE
`images is similar, despite the much thinner sections of the
`former. Figures 2e and f, depicting the largest lesion in sag-
`ittal and coronal orientations, respectively, demonstrate the
`capability for high-quality images in arbitrary orientations.
`
`160
`120
`80
`40
`0
`REFOCUSING RF−PULSE NUMBER
`
`c
`
`f
`
`100
`
`80
`
`60
`
`40
`
`20
`
`0
`
`FLIP ANGLE (degrees)
`
`b
`
`e
`
`FIG 1: Variable flip-
`angle series for the
`160-echo 3D images
`shown in Fig. 2.
`
`a
`
`d
`
`FIG 2: T2-weighted (a) 2D and (b-f) 3D SE images from a volun-
`teer with non-specific white-matter lesions (arrows). The three 1-
`mm thick 3D images in (b)-(d) correspond to the single 3-mm thick
`2D image in (a). In the 3D images, the phase-encoding direction
`corresponding to the 160-echo train is left-to-right in (b)-(d) and (f);
`no image artifacts secondary to this very long SE-train are appar-
`ent. For the 10 min. 3D acquisition, parameters were TR/effective
`TE, 2750/328 ms; matrix, 256 x 160 x 216; FOV, 25.6 x 16.0 x 21.6
`cm; echo spacing, 4.1 ms; ETL, 160. For the 14.8 min. 2D acqui-
`sition, parameters were TR/TE1/TE2, 2750/20/80 ms; matrix, 256
`x 160; FOV, 25.6 x 16.0 cm; thickness, 3.0 mm; sections, 54.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Very long SE trains with prescribed signal evolutions
`permit brain imaging with both adequate S/N and useful con-
`trast properties, and thus provide a vehicle for substantially
`reducing the imaging time. For example, a half-Fourier acqui-
`sition (as described in [3]) combined with the very long SE-
`train T2-weighted method (Fig. 2) could provide 1-mm isotro-
`pic resolution of the whole brain in about 5 minutes, and a 3D
`single-slab FLAIR version [4] could provide 3-mm contigu-
`ous sections of the whole-brain in less than 5 minutes.
`REFERENCES
`1. Hennig J. J Magn Reson 1988; 78:397.
`2. Alsop DC. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37:176.
`3. Mugler III JP, Brookeman JR, et al. 6th ISMRM; 1998, 1959.
`4. Mugler III JP, Brookeman JR, et al. 7th ISMRM; 1999, 8.
`This work was supported by NIH grant NS-35142.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Spin-echo trains used in clinical fast-SE-based imaging
`generally employ high flip angles (>100˚) for the refocusing
`RF pulses. The echo-train durations are typically less than
`the T2s of interest for short effective-TEs or less than two to
`three times these T2s for long effective-TEs. For brain imag-
`ing at 1.5T, these limits yield echo-train durations of <100ms
`and <300ms, respectively. Longer durations can degrade
`image contrast and cause artifacts such as blurring.
`The use of low-flip-angle refocusing pulses has been
`proposed as a strategy for accelerating SE-train-based acqui-
`sitions by lengthening the usable duration of the echo train [1].
`Alsop extended this concept by deriving variable flip-angle
`series based on the pseudosteady-statecondition of a con-
`stant signal level when T1 and T2 relaxation are neglected [2].
`Two-dimensional, T2-weighted brain images were acquired
`using an 80-echo train with a duration of 400 ms [2].
`We have investigated the potential of very long SE trains
`based on prescribed signal evolutions which explicitly con-
`sider the T1s and T2s of interest. Using the resulting variable-
`flip-angle RF-pulse series, we achieved T2-weighted single-
`slab 3D imaging of the brain with effective-TEs and echo-train
`durations of greater than 300 and 600ms, respectively.
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Using a computer-based theoretical model, variable-
`flip-angle refocusing RF-pulse series were calculated for
`several prescribed signal evolutions, including the following
`evolution for gray matter at 1.5T: exponential decay for the
`first 20 echoes (decay constant 114 ms), constant for 66 ech-
`oes, and exponential decay for the remaining echoes (decay
`constant 189 ms); 160 echoes with 4.1ms echo spacing.
`This variable-flip-angle series was implemented in a 3D
`single-slab T2-weighted fast-SE-based pulse sequence,
`adapted from previously-described techniques [3]. Imaging
`was performed on a 1.5 T whole-body imager (Symphony,
`Siemens Medical Systems).
`Images of
`the head were
`acquired in volunteers after obtaining informed consent. The
`performance of the 3D T2-weighted technique was also com-
`pared to that for a 2D T2-weighted conventional-SE sequence.
`RESULTS
`Figure 1 shows the calculated variable-flip-angle series
`for the gray matter signal evolution described above. All of the
`flip angles are less than 100˚, introducing a strong T1 depen-
`dence which can thereby lengthen the usable duration of the
`echo train substantially beyond the T2 value (~100ms).
`Figure 2 compares T2-weighted 2D and 3D images
`from a 59 year-old subject with age-related non-specific
`white-matter lesions. The very long SE-train images (Figs.
`2b-f) display high contrast between the lesions and sur-
`rounding white matter, suggesting that this echo train may
`provide clinically useful contrast characteristics that appear
`very similar to those for conventional T2-weighed SE images
`(Fig. 2a). However, as evidenced by the exceptionally long
`effective TE of 328ms, the associated contrast behavior dif-
`fers from that of established echo-train techniques and
`requires further investigation. The thin 1-mm sections pro-
`vide an improved definition of lesion location and extent; the

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket