throbber
Three-Dimensional Spin-Echo-Train Proton-Density-Weighted Imaging
`Using Shaped Signal Evolutions
`
`JP Mugler III1, S Bao2, RV Mulkern2,3, CRG Guttmann2, FA Jolesz2, JR Brookeman1
`Departments of Radiology,1University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA,
`2Brigham and Women’s Hospital and3Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
`
`Figure 2 presents sagittal, coronal, and axial proton-
`density-weighted images reconstructed at 1.4 mm thickness
`from a 10-minute 3D acquisition of the whole head. The flip-
`angle series of Fig. 1 was used for the refocusing RF pulses.
`The direction corresponding to the shaped-signal evolution
`is left-right in the axial image. The image contrast is compa-
`rable to that for conventional-SE proton-density-weighted
`images, and despite the long echo train length no substantial
`blurring is evident. Pulse sequence parameters included:
`TR/TE, 2400/20 ms; echo train length, 48; echo spacing,
`4 ms; matrix, 148 x 144 x 256, FOV, 20 x 16.5 x 22 cm.
`
`150
`
`120
`
`90
`
`60
`
`30
`
`0
`
`FLIP ANGLE (degrees)
`
`0
`
`40
`30
`20
`10
`REFOCUSING PULSE NUMBER
`FIG 1: Refocusing-RF-pulse flip angle as a function of echo
`position for the shaped signal evolution discussed in the text.
`
`50
`
`FIG 2: Proton-density-weighted sagittal, coronal, and axial
`images, 1.4 mm thick, from a 10-minute 3D acquisition of the
`whole head.
`
`CONCLUSIONS
`Shaped signal evolutions have been successfully
`incorporated into a single-slab 3D proton-density-weighted
`pulse sequence and image sets of the whole brain, with a
`volume resolution of 1.3 mm3, have been obtained in an
`acquisition time of 10 minutes. These results suggest the
`possibility of incorporating preparatory RF and/or gradient
`pulses into the 3D sequence to yield high-resolution 3D
`spin-echo data sets with additional contrast behaviors such
`as strong T1-weighting (inversion preparation) or diffusion.
`REFERENCES
`1. Hennig J, Nauerth A, Friedburg H. Magn Reson Med 1986; 3:823-833.
`2. Melki PS, Jolesz FA, Mulkern RV. Magn Reson Med 1992; 26:328-341.
`3. Mugler III JP, Epstein FH, Brookeman JR. Magn Reson Med 1992;
`28:165-185.
`4. Le Roux P, Hinks RS. Magn Reson Med 1993; 30:183-190.
`5. Mugler III JP, Brookeman JR, Mulkern RV, et al. 6th ISMRM; 1998, 1959.
`
`This work was supported by NIH grant NS-35142.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Turbo / fast spin-echo (SE) pulse sequences [1,2] are
`widely used for T2-weighted imaging. The long effective
`echo time (TEeff) required for T2 weighting permits concom-
`itantly long echo trains in conjunction with a k-space weight-
`ing that yields minimal
`image artifacts. For short TEeff
`values, however, as required for T1- or proton-density-
`weighted imaging, similarly long echo trains result in sub-
`stantial image blurring because the center of k space must
`be sampled early in the echo train. To avoid this blurring
`short echo trains can, of course, be used, but this then
`lengthens the acquisition time, approaching that for a con-
`ventional SE pulse sequence.
`An alternative that may permit long echo trains to be
`used with short TEeff values is to prospectively shape the
`signal evolution [3,4] using refocusing-RF-pulse flip angles
`that vary as a function of the position in the echo train. Uni-
`form signal evolutions can, at least in theory, be achieved,
`thus eliminating the blurring problem. We have incorporated
`this variable-flip-angle strategy into a single-slab three-
`dimensional (3D) pulse-sequence structure [5] and devel-
`oped a technique for 3D proton-density-weighted imaging.
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`The flip-angle series required to yield the desired sig-
`nal evolutions during the spin-echo train were derived using
`a computer-based theoretical model
`implemented on an
`Ultra-60 workstation (Sun Microsystems Inc., Mountain
`View, CA). The signal-shaping algorithm was based a previ-
`ously published method [3]. The theoretical model was used
`to explore the maximum attainable signal levels as a func-
`tion of the signal evolution shape, pulse-sequence charac-
`teristics, and tissue relaxation times.
`The 3D proton-density-weighted pulse sequence incor-
`porating the variable-flip-angle refocusing-RF pulses was
`implemented on a 1.5 T commercial whole-body imager
`(Vision, Siemens Medical Systems, Iselin NJ). Images were
`acquired of doped-water phantoms and of the heads of vol-
`unteers, after obtaining informed consent.
`RESULTS
`The maximum signal level attainable from a given tis-
`sue decreased as the echo-train length or echo spacing
`increased. In contrast, the maximum signal level increased
`roughly in proportion to the degree to which the signal evo-
`lution was allowed to decrease during the echo train. For a
`given flip-angle series, the signal evolution varied somewhat
`among tissues, but all signal evolutions corresponding to the
`range of biological relaxation times were similar.
`These results led us to select a signal evolution that
`decreased rapidly for the few echoes, was approximately
`uniform for 70% of the total duration, and then decreased
`slowly over the remaining echoes. The rapid signal
`level
`decrease at the beginning of the signal evolution occurred
`during the first few (2-4) echoes which were discarded to
`allow the signal from flowing blood to decay to a negligible
`level. The flip-angle series corresponding to this signal evo-
`lution is shown in Fig. 1.

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket