throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Paper 19
`
` Entered: January 8, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. d/b/a ST IMAGING,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`E-IMAGEDATA CORP.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases1
`IPR2017-00177 (Patent 8,537,279 B2)
`IPR2017-00178 (Patent 9,179,019 B2)
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`MELISSA A. HAAPALA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAAPALA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Argument
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`1 This Decision applies to each of the listed cases. The parties are not
`authorized to use a multiple case caption.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00177; Patent 8,537,279 B2
`IPR2017-00178; Patent 9,179,019 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The date set for oral hearing for these proceedings is February 7,
`
`2018, if hearing is requested by either party and granted by the Board. Paper
`7.2 Petitioner requests oral hearing and does not express a preference for the
`hearing location. Paper 16. The request for oral hearing for these
`proceedings is granted.
`
`A combined hearing will be held for the above-captioned cases. The
`hearing will commence at 2 PM Eastern Time on February 7, 2018, on the
`ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria,
`Virginia.
`
`Each side will have 45 minutes, total, to present its arguments for
`both cases. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that Patent Owner’s
`claims at issue in this review are unpatentable. Accordingly, Petitioner will
`open the hearing by presenting its case regarding the challenged claims for
`which the Board instituted trial. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent
`Owner will respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve time to
`respond to Patent Owner’s arguments. Patent Owner may not reserve time.
`
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the
`reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. At
`least one member of the panel may attend the oral argument remotely by use
`of two-way audio-visual communication equipment. The hearing will be
`open to the public for in-person attendance that will be accommodated on a
`first-come, first-served basis. If the parties have any concern about
`disclosing confidential information, they are requested to contact the Board
`at least 10 days in advance of the hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`
`2 Our decision refer to the papers entered in IPR2017-00177. Similar papers
`were entered in IPR2017-00178.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties are reminded that, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.53(f)(7), a
`proponent of deposition testimony must file such testimony as an exhibit.
`The Board will not consider any deposition testimony that has not been so
`filed.
`The parties are further reminded that, under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b),
`demonstrative exhibits must be served at least seven (7) business days before
`the hearing date. The parties also shall provide a courtesy copy of any
`demonstrative exhibits to the Board at least five business days prior to the
`hearing by emailing them to Trials@uspto.gov. Notwithstanding 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70(b), the parties shall not file any demonstrative exhibits in this
`proceeding without prior authorization from the Board. See 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.5(b).
`The parties must meet and confer to discuss and resolve any
`objections to demonstrative exhibits. Any party with unresolved objections
`must file such objections with the Board at least two (2) business days
`before the hearing. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstrative exhibits are subject to objection, and include a short (one
`sentence or less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or
`further explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference if deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will
`reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument. Any objection
`to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc.
`v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041
`(PTAB January 27, 2015) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate
`content of demonstrative exhibits. Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence
`
`IPR2017-00177; Patent 8,537,279 B2
`IPR2017-00178; Patent 9,179,019 B2
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00177; Patent 8,537,279 B2
`IPR2017-00178; Patent 9,179,019 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and may not introduce new evidence or arguments. Instead, demonstrative
`exhibits should cite to evidence in the record. The parties are reminded that
`the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative
`exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the hearing to
`ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument. If either party expects that its lead counsel will not be attending
`the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone conference
`with the Board no later than two (2) business days prior to the oral hearing to
`discuss the matter.
`Any special requests for audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special equipment will not be honored
`unless presented in a separate communication not less than five (5) days
`before the hearing directed to the above email address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00177; Patent 8,537,279 B2
`IPR2017-00178; Patent 9,179,019 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jason A. Engel
`Robert J. Barz K&L
`GATES LLP
`jason.engel@klgates.com
`robert.barz@klgates.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Johanna M. Wilbert
`Joel Austin
`Michael Piery
`QUARLES & BRADY LLP
`johanna.wilbert@quarles.com
`joel.austin@quarles.com
`michael.piery@quarles.com
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket