`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 114
`Entered: January 8, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`ACRUX DDS PTY LTD., ACRUX LIMITED, and
`ARGENTUM PHARMACEUTICALS LLC,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`KAKEN PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD. and VALEANT
`PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`IPR2017-00190
`Patent 7,214,506 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before ERICA A. FRANKLIN, SUSAN L. C. MITCHELL, and
`ROBERT A. POLLOCK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MITCHELL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement on Remand
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00190
`Patent 7,214,506 B2
`
`
`On May 11, 2020, the Board authorized the parties to file a motion to
`terminate, settlement agreement, and motion to keep the settlement
`agreement business confidential. Thereafter, pursuant to 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 42.72, 42.74 and 35 U.S.C. § 317(b), Petitioners (Acrux DDS PTY Ltd.,
`Acrux Limited, and Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC) and Patent Owner
`(Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Bausch Health Companies Inc.
`formerly known as Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc.) (collectively
`referred to as “the parties”) filed Joint Motions to Terminate the above-
`referenced proceeding, including requests to treat the respective settlement
`agreements as Business Confidential Information and Be Kept Separate,
`(Papers 105 and 112 (collectively “Joint Motions”)) along with copies of
`two written Confidential Settlement Agreements (Ex. 2204 and Ex. 2205
`(collectively “Settlement Agreements”)).
`Particularly, on May 13, 2020, Patent Owner and Petitioners Acrux
`DDS PTY Ltd. and Acrux Limited (collectively “Acrux”) filed a Joint
`Motion to Terminate the above-referenced proceeding and Joint Request to
`keep a settlement agreement as business confidential information and to
`keep the settlement agreement separate from the file of the involved patent
`(Paper 105), along with a copy of the written Confidential Settlement
`Agreement (Ex. 2204—filed as BOARD’S EYES ONLY). On November
`12, 2020, Patent Owner and Petitioner Argentum Pharmaceuticals LLC
`(“Argentum”) filed a Joint Motion to Terminate the above-referenced
`proceeding and Joint Request to keep a second settlement agreement as
`business confidential information and to keep that settlement agreement
`separate from the file of the involved patent (Paper 112), along with a copy
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00190
`Patent 7,214,506 B2
`
`of the written Confidential Settlement Agreement (Ex. 2205—filed as
`BOARD’S EYES ONLY). 1
`In the Joint Motions, the parties represent that they have reached
`agreements to jointly seek termination of this inter partes review
`proceeding, and that the filed copies of the Settlement Agreements are true
`and complete copies. Paper 105, 1, 4; Paper 112, 1, 4. The parties further
`represent that their Settlement Agreements resolve all currently pending
`disputes and proceedings between the parties (including Patent Office and
`District Court proceedings) involving the 7,214,506 patent. Paper 105, 3–4;
`Paper 112, 3–4.
`Generally, the Board expects that a proceeding will terminate after the
`filing of a settlement agreement. Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide 86.2 This proceeding is on remand from
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and a final
`written decision has not been rendered in the remanded proceeding. Based
`on the facts in this case, we determine that it is appropriate to terminate the
`above-referenced proceeding without rendering a final written decision.
`Additionally, upon review of the Joint Motions requesting that the
`Settlement Agreements be treated as business confidential information and
`be kept separate from the file of the patent involved in this inter partes
`proceeding, we determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement
`
`
`1 Argentum originally opposed the motion to terminate filed by Acrux DDS
`PTY Ltd., Acrux Limited, and Patent Owner. See Paper 107. Argentum,
`however, now jointly supports termination of this proceeding as no dispute
`remains between the parties and the Board. See Paper 112, 3–4.
`2 Available at https://www.uspto.gov/TrialPracticeGuideConsolidated.
`
` 3
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00190
`Patent 7,214,506 B2
`
`Agreements as business confidential information pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`Therefore, both requests in the Joint Motions are granted.
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`Accordingly, it is:
`ORDERED that the requests in the Joint Motions (Papers 105 and
`112) to terminate the above-referenced proceeding are GRANTED, and
`IPR2017-00190 is TERMINATED with respect to all Petitioners and Patent
`Owner;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the requests in the Joint Motion that the
`Settlement Agreements (Ex. 2204 and Ex. 2205) be treated as business
`confidential information and be kept separate from the file of the above-
`referenced proceeding and from the file of Patent 7,214,506 B2, under the
`provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), are GRANTED;
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement Agreements (Ex. 2204 and
`Ex. 2205) shall remain available as BOARD’S EYES ONLY in the record in
`IPR2017-00190.
`
`
` 4
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00190
`Patent 7,214,506 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Tara Raghavan
`Steven Birkos
`RAKOCZY MOLINO MAZZOCHI SIWIK LLP
`traghavan@rmmslegal.com
`sbirkos@rmmslegal.com
`
`Teresa Rea
`Shannon Lentz
`CROWELL & MORING LLP
`trea@crowell.com
`slentz@crowell.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`John Livingstone
`Naoki Yoshida
`Anthony Hartman
`Trenton Ward
`Barbara Rudolph
`FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT & DUNNER LLP
`john.livingstone@finnegan.com
`naoki.yoshida@finnegan.com
`Hartmana@finnegan.com
`Trenton.ward@finnegan.com
`Barbara.rudolph@finnegan.com
`
`Toan Vo
`BAUSCH
`Toan.vu@bausch.com
`
`
` 5
`
`
`
`
`
`