throbber
{median change -230, -610 and -214 [5.25 mgikg} and -534, -404 and
`-122 [3.5 mgikili. respectively). Levels subsequently recovered slightly
`until redosing at Week 48, followed by a second (comparable) nadir.
`l.ower C‘.l)4iCD8 ratios were due to preferential reductions in CD4
`versus CD8 cells. Reductions were also observed in CD4 naive and
`memory (CD45liA and CD45ltO) T-helper cells, and to a lesser
`extent in CD8 naive and memory cytotoxic T cells. B-cell (CD19)
`marker also revealed rapid reductions to nadir values at Weeks 9
`and 16, followed by more marked recovery than observed with T—celis.
`Conclusions: Treatment with cladribine
`tablets differentially
`affected CD4, CD8 and CD19 subpopulatlons. These findings may
`suggest a direct effect on T-cell function, humorai ii cell activity and
`antigen-presenting cell activity, which may be involved in immune-
`mediated disease pathogenesis.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono S.A. — Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck KGaA, Darmstadi. Germany.
`
`P8]?
`
`Iiarly onset of effect of treatment with clndrltilne tablets for
`relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in this 96-week, phase
`III, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLARITY study
`P. Vermersclt, G. Comi, 5. Cook, G. Giovannoni, K. Rammohan,
`P. Rieckrnann, P.S. Sorensen, I’. Chang, A. Hamlett, ii. Musch,
`R. tierjee, S. Greertberg
`
`iiniversity ofi.iiie (Liiie, Flt,],- University Vitrr-Snirrie (Miitrn, ii’); University
`o,"Meriicine nnri Dentistry (Neivnrit, U5); Boris nnd Tire Lomiorr School of
`Medicine (Lanrion, UK); Ohio State University (Columbus, US); University of
`Bririsir Coirrmbirr Wrnrcoitver, CA); itigsitospiinici (Caperrirngerr, DK);
`Merck Serono 5.A. (Geneva, CH)
`
`Ilaclrground: Ciadribirre is activated specifically in lymphocyte sub-
`types resulting in targeted and sustained immunomodulation, which
`provides the rationale for use of ciadribine tablets as a short-course
`annual treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS). We investigated the time
`of onset of treatment effect with cladrlbine tablets relative to placebo,
`in the CLARITY (CLAdRlbine tablets Treating multiple sclerosis
`ora|lY) study In patients with relapslngremitting MS (RRMS).
`Metlrorls: Patients with i'tliM5 (McDonald criteria; Expanded
`Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 0-5.5} were randomised 1.-1:1 to
`cladribine tablets (cumulative dose of 5.25 or 3.5 mgikg), or matching
`placebo. Cladribine tablets were given in short courses (once daily for
`4-5 days) In 4 or 2 consecutive months (23-day periods) In the first 48
`weeks, then 2 short courses at Weeks 48 and 52 (for both groups).
`Qualifying relapses were evaluated serially throughout the study,
`and Mill parameters (T 1-Gd+, active T2, and combined unique [CU]
`lesions per patient per scan) were evaluated at 24, 48 and 96 weeks
`post-randomisation.
`Results: The l’i'i‘ population comprised 456, 433 and 43? patients
`randomised to 5.25 mgikg, 3.5 mgiltg or placebo groups, respectively.
`Differences in qualifying relapse rate between active treatment groups
`vs. placebo were apparent as early as 4 weeks post first treatment
`course (5.25 and 3.5 mgikg vs. placebo: 0.2? and 0.23 vs. 0.42, respec-
`tively}. Statistically significant differences for all three MRI parameters
`were also evident at the first assessment (mean number of lesions per
`patient per scan in the 5.25 and 3.5 mgikg vs. placebo groups at Week
`24: 0.0?‘ and 0.0? vs. 0.9? for Tl Gr1+ lesions, 0.33 and 0.45 vs. 1.59
`for active T2 lesions, and 0.38 and 0.49 VS. 1.9]
`for CU lesions,
`respectively).
`Conclusions: Treatment with cladrtbine tablets resulted in early
`onset of effect in clinical and MRI outcomes. Taken together with
`the favourable tolerabtlity and safety results observed in this study
`(reported elsewhere),
`these findings provide strong support
`for
`annual short-course treatment with cladribine tablets in patients
`with MS.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono 5.!-.. - Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck l(GaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
`
`Posters ii
`
`S249
`
`P818
`
`Cludribine tablets produce sustained improvements in
`relapsi.ng~I'emitllng multiple sclerosis in the 96-week. phase
`III, double-Islinrl, placebo-controlled CLARITY study
`K. ltammohan, P. Vermersch, G. Coml, S. Cook, G. Giovannoni,
`P. Rieclunann, P.S. Sotensen, I’. Chang, A. iiamlett, it. Musch,
`it. \r'er|ee, S. Greenbcrg
`Ohio State University (Cnirnnims, US); University o,Fi.iiie (Liiie, FR),-
`Univcrsity tiirn—5nirrre (Milan, ii); University ofiiiedicirae and Dentistry
`(Neivrrrir, US); Burrs and Tire Lonrian Scirooi ofiiieritci.-re (London, UK),-
`Universiiy afiiritisii Coinnibirr (lirnrronver, CA); ltigsirospitnier
`(Coperrirngeri, DK); Merck Scrtnro S.A. (Geneva, CH}
`
`Background: Cladrtl)tne is activated specifically in lymphocyte sub-
`types resulting in targeted and sustained immunomodulation, which
`provides the rationale for use of cladrlbine tablets as a shortcourse
`annual treatment in multiple sclerosis. Here we investigated multiple
`clinical and MRI efficacy parameters over time to assess the persis-
`tence of treatment effect with cladribine tablets relative to placebo,
`from the CLARITY (Cl.Adiiibine tablets Treating multiple sclerosis
`orallli) study in patients with RRMS.
`Methods: Patients with RRMS (McDonald criteria; Expanded
`Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score 0-5.5) were randomised l:i:l to
`cladriblne tablets (cumulative dose of 5.25 or 3.5 mgikg), or matching
`placebo. Cladrlbine tablets were given in short courses (once daily for
`4-5 days) in 4 or 2 consecutive months (23-day periods) in the first 43
`weeks, then 2 short courses at Weeks 48 and 52 (both groups). Efficacy
`endpoints included the annuallsed qualifying relapse rate (primary),
`the proportion of relapse—free patients, and Mill activity measures vs.
`placebo (1'1_~Gd+, active T2, and combined unique [CU]
`lesions.’
`parientiscan).
`Results: The i‘iT population comprised 456, 433 and 43'.-’ patients ran-
`domised to 5.25 mgikg. 3.5 mgikg or placebo groups. respectively. in
`the cladriblne 5.25 mgikg, 3.5 mgikg and placebo groups 95.6%, 93.8%
`and 66.6% patients, respectively, were T1-Gd+ lesion-free at Week 24;
`94.1%, 94.2% and 73.1% patients were T1-Gd+ lesion-free at Week 96;
`TB. 1%, ?6.2% and 49.?9t: patients were T2 lesion-free at Week 24; and
`32.2%, 82.2% and 61.6% patients were T2 lesion-free at Week 96. The
`proportions of patients that were relapse-free in the ciadribine 5.25 rrigi
`kg, 3.5 mgikg and placebo groups were, 91.2%, 92.1% and 82.8%,
`respectively, at Week 24; 86.0%, 85.9% and ?4.l'lii at Week 48; and
`28.9%, '.?9.?% and 60.9% at Week 96. Reductions in relapse rate and
`MRI lesion count were also observed at these time points.
`Conclusions:
`'l'reai:rnent with cladriblne tablets resulted in sus-
`talned, consistent benefits on clinical and Mitt outcomes. The early
`beneficial effects across several MRI parameters of disease activity were
`sustained at Week 96, 44 weeks after the last treatment dose. Taken
`together with the rapid improvement and favourable tolerabiiity and
`safety results observed in this study (reported elsewhere), these find-
`ings provide strong support for annual short-course treatment with
`cladribine tablets in patients with MS.
`
`Funded by Merck Serono S.A. ~ Geneva, Switzerland, an affiliation of
`Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
`
`P319
`
`Glatiromer acetate 20mg subcutaneous twice-weekly versus
`daily injections: results of a pilot, prospective, randomised,
`and rater-blinded clinical and MRI 2-year study in relapsing-
`remittiug multiple sclerosis
`0. Khan, J. Perumal, C. Caon, A. Tselis, Z. Lstif, W. Ching, l-'. Bao,
`i. Zak
`
`Wayne State Urriversiiy School oflvieriiciire (Detroit, US)
`Objective: The optimal dose of giatiramer acetate (GA) In RRM5
`remains unknown. We have previously shown that GA administered
`on alternate days appears to be as effective as daily GA. There is con-
`siderable interest in studying a more patient friendly dosing regimen
`of GA that may be as efficacious and better tolerated than daily GA.
`Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, rater-blinded
`study to compare the clinical and MRI outcomes of GA 20 mg SC
`administered twice a week to GA administered daily. RRMS patients
`
`ms].sagepub.com
`
`Multiple Sclerosis 2009; 15: $151-$269
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 1
`
`

`
`5250
`
`Posters ii
`
`receiving Gail 2.0 mg SC daily for at least one year were randomized to
`either continue in the same fashion or switch to GA 20 mg SC twice
`weekly. Clinical assessments including EDS}; were performed every 6
`months and brain MRI scans were obtained at baseline and month 24.
`Results: 413 RRMS were randomized into two equal groups of either
`GA 20 mg SC daily or GA 20 mg SC bi-weekly. Both groups were well-
`matched for clinical demographics and MRI features at baseline. All
`patients remained in the study for the entire duration. After two years,
`the annualized relapse rate, mean EDS5, proportion of relapse-free
`patients, and the proportion of patients without disease progression
`were similar in the two groups. Brain MRI also did not demonstrate
`any significant differences in 't“2W or TIW lesion, or in the percentage
`brain volume change between the two groups. However, the inci-
`dence of lipoatrophy, local Injection site reactions, and Immediate-
`post ln}ection systemic reactions were significantly lower In the ‘alt
`twice-weekly group. Detailed analysts of the results will be presented.
`Conclusion: This study provides further evidence that Gil adminis-
`tered less frequently than daily may be as efficacious and better tol-
`erated than GA administered daily. This may have a significant
`impact on improving compliance and tolerability while maintaining
`the desired immunomodulating effect of GA. Furthermore, this may
`also have a favorable economic impact. l.arger, multi-center studies
`are warranted to confirm our findings and address a critical need of
`the MS patient community.
`
`P320
`
`Conversion of new inllantmotory lesions to persistent black
`holes In patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis
`participating in a phase 2 trial of DNA vaccine
`encoding myelin basic protein (IJIIT-3009)
`A. Papadopoulou, S. Traud, A. llaliman, J. Quan, R. King, 1-]. Garrett,
`L. Steinman, G. Cutter, L. Kappos, E.W. Radue
`University Hospital (Basel, CH); MIAC (Basel, CH); Brayiiiii Ttremperrtics
`(Stilt Mateo, US); Uiriversity ofzlloiurrrtn (Biriiririgltniri, US)
`Background: There is evidence that persistent T1-hypointense
`lesions, (persistent black holes, Pill-I] correlate better than T2 lesions
`with irreversible tissue damage, axonal loss and disability progression,
`in a Phase 2 Trial of a DNA Vaccine encoding Myelin Basic Protein
`(llHT-3009)
`in relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RIIMS)
`the
`median percentage change in T1-hypointense lesion volume was
`-3.76% in the low dose treatment group compared with 0% for pla-
`ceho (p=0.i}8) (Garren et al, Ann. Neurol. 2008).
`Objective: To determine the evolution of new inflammatory lesions
`to Pill-i and examine changes in lesion characteristics, such as size and
`degree of hypointensity, in Ill-lT-3009 treated patients compared with
`placebo.
`Methods: A post-hoc, rater-blinded evaluation of MRI scans collected
`during year it of the phase 2 trial was performed in RRMS patients,
`randomly assigned to receive placebo 0.5mg BHT-3009 or l.Smg iii-l‘i‘-
`3009. New and enlarging lesions (candidate lesions: Cl.) were selected
`at the first and second on—study MR1 (month 2 and 4) and were
`tracked on month 12 for T1-signal evolution. Lesions hypointense
`on 'l‘1-weighted pre contrast images of months 2 and 4 were consid-
`ereci acute black holes (Mil-i) and lesions not enhancing and hypoth-
`tense on month 12 were considered Pill-l. Size and degree of
`hypolntensity of ABH and PBH were also determined.
`Results: 650 (El. were found in 155 of 26? patients in the per protocol
`population, 180 CL in SDISF patients on placebo, 239 CL in SW96
`patients on 0.5 mg iii-i”i'-3009 and 231 (Ii. in diiiiié patients on 1.5 mg.
`4621650 Ci. were Gd enhancing. Average proportions of Cl. evolving
`into Plil-I were SDIISD (0.28) for placebo, 55f239 (0.23) for low dose
`and 49.’23l (0.21) for high dose treated patients. The mean proportion
`of CL per patient developing into Pill-1 was 0.25 in the two treatment
`groups (0.28 in the low dose and 0.21 in the high dose treatment
`group) and 0.29 in the placebo arm.
`Conclusions: in this exploratory analysis a trend to lower propor-
`tions of CL and CL per patient evolving into Pill-I In treated patients
`compared with placebo was detected.
`
`Supported by: Bayhill Therapeutics.
`
`lmmunosuppression
`
`P821
`
`Cancer risk in a MS populations treated with
`irnmunosuppressants
`Y. Handouk, S. De illso, l:'.. Perticaroli, M. Danni, V. Angeleri,
`L. Provlncialt
`
`Neurologlcrrl Clinic (Ailmtlfl, IT)
`Background: Use of the immunosuppressant drugs tmitoxantrone,
`methotrexate, azatloprine, etc..) are linked to cancer risk.
`Obit.-ctivc: we evaluated the presence of cancer in our multiple
`sclerosis (MS) cohort.
`Methods: in a population of 616 MS patients, we followed up F3
`patients, previously treated (43) or actually in treatment (30) with
`immunosuppressants: 10 with mitoxantrone (MTX) until the maxi-
`mum cumulative dose, 49 with azatloprlne (AREA), 2 with methotrex-
`ate (M'i'l-t), 2 with ciclofosfamide (CT)(}. 10 patients received more
`than 1 lmmunosupressant. The mean follow up period since first
`drug administration was 104.9.-l:62 months (min: 32 months, max:
`348 months). Mean treatment period was 65:51 months (min: 12
`months, max: 312 months).
`Results: One patient treated with CT): developed an uterine cancer
`two years after CTX withdrawal. The age at cancer diagnosis was 26
`years. No cancer was developed in patients treated with MTX, i'\'£..i\
`and M't‘i-i.
`Conclusion: '|‘he prevalence rate of uterine cancer in our MS cohort
`(1.3%) was higher than in the general population (0.01%).
`
`P822
`
`ASPIRE (Azatlnioprlne Secondary Progressive Interferon
`treated patients Randomised Evaluation} study: 2-year
`double-blind and 1-year open, randomised, multlcentre,
`pilot study. Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC)
`and magnetic resonance data
`E. Montanart, L. Manneschi, i. Pesci, L lviottl, E. lvierelll, M.lt. Tola,
`D. Caputo, L. Provinciall, E. Scarpini, M.G. Marrosu, A. Ghezrj,
`P. Cavalla, L. Durelli
`
`Osp. Clvile (Firleuzrr, ii); Osp. Civlle (Reggie Emilie, IT); University of
`Mariam: (Modem-', ll); Ci. Neirraloxlcrr (Ferraro, ll); Ci. Neuroiogiro
`(lvtilmr, H); Ci. Neuroiogice mucoira, ii"); Ci. Neuroioglcrr (Crrgiim-i, ff);
`Cl. Neuralogicrr (Grrllrirrrtc, i'l),- Ci. Nenroiogim (Turin. IT); Ci. Neuroiogtcrr
`(Drfmssnrro, IT)
`
`Combination therapy has been routinely used in autoimmune disease
`and, in the last years, even for multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the
`study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerahility of azathjoprine
`(AKA) when added to ll-‘N fl-lb In patients with secondary progressive
`MS who had an incomplete response to il~‘N ii-lb. The study provides
`an overall evaluation of illness stabilization, with the primary end-
`point being the variation in MS functional composite (MSFC) over the
`2-year double-blind and 1-year open treatment period. Secondary
`endpoints were léxpanded Disability Status Scale (ILDSS) variability,
`quality of life ((101,) effects according to the MSQUL-54 instrument,
`magnetic resonance (MRI) data, neutralizing antibodies and cyto-
`chine evaluations.
`35 patients completed randomization, 42 with azathloprine and IFN
`[l-lb and 43 with placebo and IFN ii-lb treatment. At the end of
`36 months 45 patients completed the study (2.3 and 21 respectively),
`resulting in an high number of drop-outs. MSQOL—.S4 and safety data
`analyzed showed a slight worsening in MA group.
`MSFC data were compared to basal data and showed a slight worsen-
`ing at 36 months in aaathioprine group in comparison to placebo.
`‘MRI data showed a reduction in enhancing lesions only at 12 months
`of treatment in Am group, while there was not consistent variation in
`the two groups at 24 and 36 months.
`
`Multiple Sclerosis 2009; 15: $151-$269
`
`msj.sagepub.com
`
`MYLAN PHARMS. INC. EXHIBIT 1055 PAGE 2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket