`571.272.7822
`
` Paper No. 28
`Filed: March 9, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION, GLOBALFOUNDRIES U.S., INC., MICRON
`TECHNOLOGY, INC., and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS COMPANY, LTD.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DANIEL L. FLAMM,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Cases: IPR2017-00279, IPR2017-00280, IPR2017-00281,
`IPR2017-00282
`Patent RE40,264 E1,2
`____________
`
`Before KIMBERLY McGRAW, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Granting Patent Owner’s Motion to Enter
`the Curriculum Vitae of Daniel L. Flamm, Sc.D.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`1 Samsung Electronics Company, Ltd. was joined as a party to these
`proceedings via Motions for Joinder in IPR2017-01749, IPR2017-01750,
`IPR2017-01751, and IPR2017-01752.
`2 This decision addresses issues common to the above identified cases.
`Therefore, we exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each
`case. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00279 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00280 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00281 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00282 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`
`
`On March 6, 2018, Patent Owner, Daniel L. Flamm, filed an authorized
`
`motion to enter the curriculum vitae of Daniel L. Flamm, Sc.D. (“C.V.”) into
`
`the record in each of the above proceedings. Paper 25 (“Motion”).3 A copy
`
`of the C.V. was filed as Exhibit 2003.
`
`In its Motion, Patent Owner states that a Declaration of Daniel L.
`
`Flamm, Sc.D. (“Declaration”) was filed in support of Patent Owner’s
`
`Response on September 20, 2017 as Exhibit 2001. Motion 1. Patent Owner
`
`states that Declaration refers to Dr. Flamm’s C.V. as being “attached as
`
`Appendix A,” but that the C.V. was inadvertently not attached to the
`
`Declaration at the time the Declaration was filed. Id. Patent Owner further
`
`states that the C.V. “simply provides further details of Dr. Flamm’s
`
`background and qualifications that were described in the declaration already
`
`of record,” does not introduce any new evidence, and does not affect the
`
`substantive arguments already set forth in the brief. Id. at 2.
`
`Petitioner does not oppose the Motion.
`
`Because Petitioner does not oppose Patent Owner’s Motion, and we
`
`find no prejudice resulting from entering Dr. Flamm’s C.V. into the record,
`
`we grant Patent Owner’s Motion.
`
`Accordingly, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s motion to have the Curriculum Vitae
`
`of Daniel L. Flamm, Sc.D. entered into the record is granted.
`
`
`
`3 Paper and exhibit numbers refer to documents filed in IRP2017-00279.
`Corresponding papers may be found in each of the other proceedings.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00279 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00280 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00281 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`IPR2017-00282 (Patent RE40,264 E)
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Jason Lang
`Robert Magee
`WEIL, GOTSCHAL & MANGES LLP
`jason.lang@weil.com
`robert.magee@weil.com
`
`Jonathan McFarland
`Philip Morin
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`jmcfarland@perkinscoie.com
`pmorin@perkinscoie.com
`
`David M. Tenant
`Nathan Zhang
`WHITE & CASE LLP
`dtennant@whitecase.com
`nathan.zhang@whitecase.com
`
`Naveen Modi
`Joseph E. Palys
`Chetan R. Bansal
`PAUL HASTINGS LLP
`naveenmodi@paulhastings.com
`josephpalys@paulhastings.com
`chetanbansal@paulhastings.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Justin J. Lesko
`Law Offices of Steve G. Lisa, Ltd.
`justinlesko@patentit.com
`
`Rolf O. Stadheim
`Stadheim & Grear
`stadheim@stadheimgrear.com
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
