throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`PHOTODETECTOR‘SIZE CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF A
`
`
`
`
`
`NONINVASIVE REFLECTANCE PULSE OXIMETER FOR TELEMEDICINE
`
`APPLICATIONS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C. Pujary, M. Savage, Y. Mendelson
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Department of Biomedical Engineering, and Bioengineering Institute
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`compromising
`Abstraci—Low power management without
`provided an easy way to simulate various PD areas by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`signal quality is a key requirement in the optimal design of a
`connecting in parallel multiple PBS to the common
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wearable pulse oximeter.
`This paper
`investigates
`the
`summing
`input
`current-to-voltage
`of
`converter.
`a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`advantage gained by using a photodetector with a larger active
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Additional circuitry, consisting of amplifiers and band pass
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`area. Preliminary in viva experiments have demonstrated that
`
`
`
`
`filters, were used to produce two different signals (a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by increasing the area of the photodetector it is possible to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`pulsatile AC component and a non-pulsatile DC component)
`reduce the overall power requirement of a wireless sensor.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`from each PPG. Analog data streams were digitized at
`intended for telemedicine applications.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`501—12 for 30s periods by a National Instrument DAQ card
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Keywords—pulse oxinieter, telemedicine, wearable sensor
`installed in a PC matting LABYIEW 6.0 software.
`
`
`
`
`1. INTRODUCTION
`In- Vitro Experiments
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dark Tests: To test the background noise level generated
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by each PD, we performed a series of dark measurements by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`switching off the LEDs in the sensor and blocking ambient
`
`
`
`
`
`
`light from reaching the six PDs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Multiple Photodetectors Tests: Each PD was randomly
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`connected through the hub: ‘to determine
`the spatial
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`uniformity of the illuminating field incident on the PDs. To
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`produce a constant level background illumination, a signal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`composed of a DC bias voltage modulated by a small lI-Iz
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`AC sine wave was generated by a programmable function
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`generator. The signal from the function generator was
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`applied to a separate LED that was used to simulate a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`typical PPG signal. The external LED was attached to a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`translucent flat medium serving as an optical difi'user. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`surface of the diffuser was positioned at a distance of 30cm
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`away from the planar surface of the sensor.
`
`
`
`In- Viva Experiments
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`A series of in vivo experiments were performed to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`determine the signal improvement gained by using different
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PD areas. The prototype sensor was attached to the base of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`a volunteer’5 finger and the peak currents supplied to the red
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and infrared LEDs were adjusted to 3m and 1.9mA,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`respectively As the driving currents were adjusted, ,the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`output of each amplifier was monitored to assure that (i) a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`distinguiShable and stable PPG was observed when a single
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PD was employed, and (ii) maximal PPG signals were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`produced without causing amplifier saturation when all 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PDs we're connected in parallel through the hub.
`It
`is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`important
`to note that
`the final currents selected were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`significantly lower compared to the typical driving currents
`
`
`
`
`
`employed in commercial pulse oximeters.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Commercially available sensors used in reflectance
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`mode pulse oximeters employ a single photodetector (PD)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`element typically with an active area of about 12-15mm2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The light
`intensity detected by the photodetector in a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reflectance pulse oximeter depends on the incident light
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`intensity, absorption by skin, reflection by bones, tissue
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`backseattering and the amount of blood in the vascular bed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Compared to transmittance mode pulse oximetry,
`-[1].
`
`
`
`
`reflected photoplethysmograms
`(PPGs) have generally
`
`
`lower amplitudes.
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Low power management without compromising signal
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`quality is a key requirement in optimizing the design of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wearable telesensor. One approach to lowering the power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consumption of a wireless pulse oximcter, which is
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`dominated by the current required to drive the LEDs, is to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduce the LED duty cycle [2]. Alternatively, lowering the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`current supplied to the red and infiared LEDs can also
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduce power consumption. However, with reduced current
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`drive, there is a direct impact on the quality of the detected
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'PPGss Mendelson et a1. [3] showed that a concentric array
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of PDs could be used to increase the
`amount of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`backseattered light detected-by a reflectance type pulse
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`oximeter sensor. In this paper We investigate the advantages
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`of increasing the PD area and minimizing LED driving
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`currents to optimize the overall power requirement of a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reflectance mode pulse oximeter
`intended for 'future
`
`
`
`applications in telemedicine.
`
`
`II. METHODOLOGY
`
`
`Experimental setup
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`To study the effect of different PD areas, we constructed
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and tested a prototype reflectance sensor employing 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`identical (3mm x 4mm) PDs. The" equally spaced PDs were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`' concentrically arranged in a 18mm diameter planar
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`configuration around a pair of red and infrared LEDs. Each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PD was individually connected to‘a central hub. The hub
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`III. RESULTS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The Rent Mean Square (RMS) values corresponding to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the amplitude of the AC components measured frOm each
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PD are plotted1n Fig.1. During darkness the average noise
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0-7803-7767-21031'31 7.00 ©2003 IEEE
`
`
`
`148
`
`
`
`Page 1
`
`VALENCELL EXHIBIT 2012
`
`IPR2017—00318
`
`Page 1
`
`VALENCELL EXHIBIT 2012
`IPR2017-00318
`
`

`

`
`
`9
`DCortpletedarhtess
`} IConatant light ilbani'tltion i
`
`i
`:
`
`5“:
`
`UCahullIed :5
`IMeesured j;
`
`f
`
`
`
`
`
`PHOTODETECTOROUTPUT(V)
`
`6-PDs
`
`
`i i E !
`
`I l
`
`
`
`PHOTODETECTOROUTPUT(V)
`
`FDl
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5-PDs
`4-PDs
`2-PD!
`PIX
`PDQ
`3-PDs
`1-PD
`P03
`PBS
`F135
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`INDIVIDUAL PHOTODETECTORS
`MULTIPLE PHOTODETECTORS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 1. Individual photodetectar perfonnance under complete darkness and
`
`
`
`
`a constant light illumination.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`In
`individual PBS was 0.114V.
`generated by the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`comparison, the average PPG amplitude measured in vitro
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`by the 6 PBS under a spatially uniform illumination field
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`produced by the external LED source was 0.647V.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 2 shows the signals detected in vitro with multiple
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`combinations of PBS using the
`simulated uniform
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`illumination produced by the external LED. The right-side
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`bars represent the measured RMS values corresponding to
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`different PD areas. For comparison, the left-side bars were
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`computed
`using
`relationship
`0.647n, where
`the
`n
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`corresponds to the number of PBS connected in parallel. The
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`trend observed provide sufiicient evidence of a linear
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`improvement in signal intensity as a filnction of an increase
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`in the active area of the PDs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3 shows the magnitude of the pulsatile red and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`infrared PPGs measured
`in-vz'vo
`for
`different PD
`
`combinations.
`
`
`IV. DISCUSSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Minimizing the current required to drive the LEDs is a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`critical design consideration in optimizing the power
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`consumption of a wearable pulse oximeter. However,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`reduced LED driving currents has a direct impact on the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`incident light intensity produced by the sensor and could
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`lead to deterioration in the quality of
`the PPGs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Consequently,
`it could result
`in unreliable and therefore
`
`
`
`
`
`inaccurate calculation of oxygen saturation.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`From the data presented in Fig. 3, it can be observed that
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the overall increase in the reflected PPG signals achieved in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`viva when all 6 PBS were connected in parallel is smaller
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and does not follow the same linear relationship observed in
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`vitra as shown in Fig. 2. This deviation was most likely
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`caused by the non-uniform backseattered light distribution
`
`
`
`
`emanating from the finger.
`
`
`V. CONCLUSION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The data presented in this study demonstrate that the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`driving currents of the LEDs in a reflectance pulse oximeter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`canbe lowered significantly without compromising the
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 2. Signal improvement observed in-virro with multiple photodetectars.
`
`'i
`iElRedLED
`
`i
`llnfinredlED'i
`
`4-5]
`41
`”J
`,ll
`2.51
`.l
`
`I
`lJ41.
`lI
`
`
`
`PHOTODETECTOROUTPUT(V)
`
`
`
`
`
`3-l’Ds
`é-FDa
`l—PD
`2-?De
`4-FDs
`S‘PDs
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MULTIPLE PHOTODETECTORS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Fig. 3. Signal improvement observed in vivo with multiple photodetectors.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`quality of the PPGs simply by increasing the overall size of
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the PD in the sensor. Hence, with reduced LED driving
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`currents, maximizing the backseattered light collected by
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`the sensor and optimized digital switching techniques, a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`very low power consuming sensor can be developed thereby
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`extending the overall battery life of a pulse oximeter
`
`
`
`
`intended for telemedicine applications.
`
`ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`This research was supported in part by Department of
`
`
`
`
`Defense Cooperative Agreement DAMDl7-03-2-0006.
`
`_
`
`
`
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[1] Y. Mendelson, B. Ochs, “Noninvasive Pulse Oximetry
`
`
`
`
`Utilizing Skin Reflectance Photoplethysmography,” IEEE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 35, no. 10,
`
`
`
`
`pp. 798-805, Oct. 1988.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[2] S. Rhee, B.H. Yang and H. Asada,” The Ring Sensor: A
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`new Ambulatory Wearable Sensor for twenty Four Hour
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patient Monitoring,” Proc. of the 20th Annual International
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Conference ofthe IEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology
`
`
`
`
`
`Society. Hong Kong. Oct. 1998.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[3] Y. Mendelson, 10. Kent, BL. Yocum and MJ. Birle,”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Design and Evaluation of new reflectance pulse oximeter
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`sensor,” Medical Instrumentation, Vol.22, NO. 4, pp. 167-
`
`
`
`173, Aug. 1988.
`
`149
`
`
`
`Page 2
`
`Page 2
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket