throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 16
`Entered: June 8, 2017
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`ACTA MEDICAL L.L.C.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`CURLIN MEDICAL INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00324
`Patent 6,164,921
`____________
`
`
`
`Before BEVERLY M. BUNTING and AMANDA F. WIEKER,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BUNTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`JUDGMENT
`Termination of the Proceeding
`35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00324
`Patent 6,164,921
`
`
`ACTA Medical LLC, (“Petitioner”) filed a Petition requesting an inter
`partes review of claims 15–34 (“the challenged claims”) of U.S. Patent No.
`6,164,921 (Ex. 1001, “the ’921 patent”). Paper 1 (“Pet.”). Curlin Medical
`Inc., (“Patent Owner”), the assignee of the ’921 patent, filed a Preliminary
`Response to the Petition. Paper 9 (“Prelim. Resp.”). In an email to the
`Board dated June 5, 2017, Petitioner requested leave to file a motion for
`adverse judgement under 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(b)(4). During a June 6, 2017
`telephone conference between the parties and Judges Bunting and Wieker,
`the parties indicated that they had settled their dispute. Because the parties
`have settled their dispute, we granted authorization to file the present joint
`motion to terminate this proceeding pursuant to a settlement agreement
`under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74.
`On June 7, 2017, the parties filed this joint motion to terminate the
`present proceeding pursuant to a settlement agreement. Paper 13. The
`parties also filed a true copy of their written settlement agreement, made in
`connection with the termination of this proceeding, in accordance with 35
`U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. Ex. 2002. Additionally, the parties
`submitted a joint request to have their settlement agreement treated as
`confidential business information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c). Paper 14.
`The parties submit that termination is appropriate because the parties
`have settled their dispute and have reached agreement to terminate this
`proceeding. Paper 13, 1. The parties represent that this settlement
`agreement ends all disputes as to this patent, including the pending district
`court lawsuit. Id.
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00324
`Patent 6,164,921
`
`
`The Parties are reminded that the Board is not a party to the
`settlement, and may identify independently any question of patentability. 37
`C.F.R. § 42.74(a). Generally, however, the Board expects that a proceeding
`will terminate after the filing of a settlement agreement. See, e.g., Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48768 (Aug. 14, 2012).
`We note that this proceeding is still in the preliminary stage, and the Board
`has not yet issued a decision whether to institute an inter partes review. 1
`Under the circumstances, based on the record before us, we determine
`that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding with respect to both
`Petitioner and Patent Owner. At this juncture, termination is suitable
`because it promotes efficiency and minimizes unnecessary costs. Based on
`the facts, it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding without rendering a
`final written decision. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(a); 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`ORDER
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that the settlement
`
`agreement (Exhibit 2002) be treated as business confidential information
`under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c), to be kept separate from
`the patent file in this proceeding, is GRANTED;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate IPR2017-
`00324 is GRANTED; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that this proceeding is TERMINATED.
`
`
`1 We remind the parties that the statutory deadline for institution of trial is
`June 13, 2017.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00324
`Patent 6,164,921
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Donald McPhail
`Kyle Vos Strache
`COZEN O’CONNOR
`dmcphail@cozen.com
`kvosstrache@cozen.com
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jason E. Stach
`Brandon Bludau
`FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
`GARRETT & DUNNER, L.L.P.
`Jason.stach@finnegan.com
`Brandon.bludau@finnegan.com
`
`George Snyder
`Charles Rauch
`HODGSON RUSS LLP
`IPDocketing@hodgsonruss.com
`gsnyder@hodgsonruss.com
`crauch@hodgsonruss.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket