`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. d/b/a ST IMAGING
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`E-IMAGEDATA CORP.
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`CASE: IPR2017-00346
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,197,766
`_____________________
`
`
`
`DECLARATION OF ANTHONY J. SENN, P.E.
`
`
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 1 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`1.
`
`2.
`
`I, Anthony J. Senn, P.E., do hereby declare and say:
`
`I am over the age of twenty-one (21) and competent to make this
`
`declaration. I am also qualified to give testimony under oath. The facts and
`
`opinions listed below are within my personal knowledge.
`
`3.
`
`I am being compensated for my time in this matter at my typical
`
`hourly consulting rate. My compensation in no way depends on the outcome of
`
`this proceeding or the content of my opinions.
`
`4.
`
`I have been asked to review certain documents, including U.S. Patent
`
`No. 9,197,766 (which I refer to as the ‘766 Patent) (Ex. 1001), and to provide my
`
`opinions on what those documents disclose. The documents I was asked to review
`
`include those addressed in more detail in the rest of this declaration. I provide my
`
`conclusions regarding the disclosures of these documents below.
`
`5.
`
`I was also asked to provide my opinion on the technical feasibility of
`
`combining certain aspects of certain documents. I have offered my opinion on the
`
`feasibility of these combinations in this declaration.
`
`6.
`
`I am not offering any conclusions as to the ultimate determinations I
`
`understand the Board will make in this proceeding. I am simply providing my
`
`opinion on the technical aspects of the documents (including, where asked, the
`
`application of what I understand Petitioner and/or the Board asserts is the
`
`appropriate construction for this proceeding) and on the motivations and
`
`2
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 2 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`combinability of the concepts disclosed in those documents from a technical
`
`perspective.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`7.
`
`I am a mechanical engineer with over 25 years of experience in
`
`research and development, product design, project management and field
`
`engineering.
`
`8. My experience in these areas spans design of mechanical assemblies
`
`and machinery, materials and manufacturing methods, and 3-D CAD design from
`
`initial concept through final implementation.
`
`9.
`
`As part of my experience, I have managed products from idea to
`
`design to implementation to customer installation, maintenance, and satisfaction. I
`
`have also observed and assisted with the electrical design and controls associated
`
`with automated machinery. I have extensive experience working with and the
`
`design of automated machinery and/or its components consisting of rotary
`
`bearings, linear guides or bearings, lead screws, belt drives, sensors, etc. For the
`
`last 10 years, I have been a consulting engineer working part time on automated
`
`microform scanning equipment.
`
`10.
`
`I received my Bachelor’s of Science degree
`
`in Mechanical
`
`Engineering from California State University, Chico in Chico, California in 1991.
`
`3
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 3 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`11. Upon graduating from California State University, Chico, I was hired
`
`by NEC Electronics as an Assembly Process Engineer. In this role, I was
`
`responsible to maintain and improve high volume, semiconductor manufacturing
`
`assembly processes.
`
`12.
`
`In 1992, I was hired by Healthtek, Inc. as a Senior Engineer. In this
`
`role, I was responsible to manage all technical aspects of high volume / low yield,
`
`disposable, medical product manufacturing.
`
`13.
`
`In 1993, I was hired by SCP Global Technologies as a Senior Staff
`
`Engineer. In this role, I was a technical team leader of complex automation and
`
`mechanical design projects in parallel with solo design work relative to large scale
`
`semiconductor equipment manufacturing.
`
`
`
`I successfully managed and
`
`implemented a number of projects, including innovative concept generation,
`
`planning, scheduling, vendor evaluation, sub-contractor management, formal
`
`presentations, employee supervision and on time deadline completion. In this role
`
`over 11 years, I developed a number of technical strengths, including traditional
`
`engineering, finite element analysis, reliability engineering, fluids handling,
`
`chemical compatibility, airflow management, plastic part design, manufacturing
`
`engineering, design for
`
`injection molding, specification writing, creative
`
`packaging, and basic electrical and software skills.
`
`4
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 4 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`14.
`
`In 1999, I successfully passed
`
`the Idaho State Professional
`
`Engineering examination to become a licensed Professional Engineer (PE).
`
`15.
`
`In 1998, I formed Inventure Engineering, LLC.
`
` Inventure
`
`Engineering, LLC provides consulting engineering, design, and build services to
`
`clients worldwide.
`
` We specialize in assisting our client’s new product
`
`development programs from initial concept through manufacturing. I continue to
`
`consult for clients in my role for Inventure Engineering, LLC. Petitioner is a
`
`current client of Inventure Engineering, LLC.
`
`16. For the past 10 years I have been an engineering consultant with
`
`nextScan, Inc., a manufacturer and innovator of digital film scanning equipment.
`
`During this time, I have performed solo mechanical design work and have worked
`
`alongside teams of engineers, software programmers, and procurement and
`
`manufacturing personnel. This work has involved both roll film scanning as well
`
`as microfilm slides and film strips in jackets or aperture cards.
`
`17.
`
`I have worked on several different designs of microform and roll film
`
`scanning equipment in consultation with nextScan. I have become intimately
`
`familiar with all aspects of microform and roll film scanning equipment, including
`
`the electrical and mechanical considerations that go into designing these devices.
`
`18.
`
`In my career, I have been awarded 12 U.S. Patents for 5 different
`
`companies.
`
`5
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 5 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`19. For these reasons and because of my technical experience and training
`
`as outlined in my curriculum vitae (Ex. 1003), I believe I am qualified to offer
`
`technical opinions regarding the ‘766 Patent and the other documents I reviewed as
`
`part of my work in this matter. I believe I am capable of opining about the state of
`
`the art in these areas at various points in time from the early 1990s to the present,
`
`as I have been familiar with the academic and commercial work being done by
`
`nextScan and others in the industry.
`
`U.S. PATENT NO. 9,197,766
`
`20. The ‘766 Patent is titled “Digital Microform Imaging Apparatus.”
`
`(Ex. 1001). It was filed on September 26, 2014, as a continuation of an application
`
`that issued as U.S. Patent No. 9,179,019, which was a continuation of an
`
`application that issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,537,279, which was a continuation of
`
`an application that issued as U.S. Patent No. 8,269,890. I have been asked to
`
`assume (and I have assumed) for purposes of my analysis that the ‘766 Patent has
`
`an effective filing date of May 15, 2007. I have therefore tried to offer opinions in
`
`this declaration through the eyes of one of skill in the art (as defined below in
`
`Paragraph 38) as of May 15, 2007.
`
`21. The
`
`‘766 Patent discloses microform
`
`imaging apparatuses.
`
`Microform readers were well known long before the ‘766 Patent. The ‘766 Patent
`
`acknowledges that the principle features of microform readers–a chassis/support
`
`6
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 6 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`structure, a mirror, a lens, an image sensor, a film carrier, and an adjuster–were
`
`well known many years before May 15, 2007. (Ex. 1001 at 1: 39-42, 2:25-38, and
`
`2:51-52). The ‘766 Patent further recognizes that the digital aspects incorporated
`
`into the claimed invention were not novel. (Ex. 1001 at 2:30-33 and 2:51-52).
`
`Rather, digitization of microfilm was a natural result of the prevalence of
`
`computers and the digital age. (Ex. 1001 at 1:63-2:3).
`
`22. The ‘766 Patent indicates that “[w]hat is needed in the art is a
`
`compact and versatile digital microform imaging apparatus which can easily adapt
`
`to a broad range of reduction ratios and media types while providing good
`
`resolution of the images and ease of use.” (Ex. 1001 at 2:59-62). The asserted
`
`claims of the ‘766 Patent do not require that the digital microform imaging
`
`apparatus be compact in any way.
`
`SUMMARY OF OPINIONS
`
`23. As discussed in more detail below, my review of prior art documents
`
`in this proceeding demonstrates that the individual components of the ‘766 Patent
`
`were well known as of the earliest possible priority date of May 15, 2007.
`
`Specifically, microform readers have existed for decades and certainly predate the
`
`‘766 Patent. The ‘766 Patent discloses microform reader patents dating back to
`
`1973, but these reading devices were well known long before the 1970s. (Ex. 1001
`
`at 1:48-50, 2:2-3, 2:25-27, 2:50-51). Microform reading devices have been used
`
`7
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 7 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`for nearly a century to read and view documents stored as microform including
`
`Microfilm, Microfiche, Aperture cards, etc. Microform is stored on reel film or as
`
`cassettes, which can hold thousands of pages of miniaturized documents for
`
`efficient archiving and storage. A user operates a microform reader to access the
`
`archived documents through magnification and display. Microform’s ability to
`
`store many documents in a small space became increasingly popular in the 1950s
`
`when libraries used it for the archival of deteriorating newspaper collections and
`
`record preservation.
`
`24. Due to the increased popularity of microform, microform readers were
`
`increasingly developed to enable users to retrieve and view the image information
`
`stored on the microform. The basic operation of a microform reader has not
`
`changed for decades, i.e., microform readers retrieve image information by
`
`projecting a magnified view of microform images to readable proportions. The
`
`image can then be viewed, printed, or saved by the user.
`
`25. To improve image quality, many prior art microform readers included
`
`focus and magnification adjustment functionality, which is typically achieved by
`
`moving the lens and/or image sensor. Devices with moving components are not a
`
`new concept. Rotating and translating parts have been a part of mechanical
`
`reading and imaging devices for the last century. Achieving motion within a
`
`microform reading or imaging device has been accomplished much in the same
`
`8
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 8 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`way for decades. The well known and long used configurations to convert motor
`
`drive shaft rotational energy into linear motion include lead members, guide rails,
`
`and rack and pinion arrangements. A lead member arrangement, such as a
`
`threaded lead screw (e.g., worm) and threaded (driven) nut enables linear motion
`
`as the threaded nut moves along the rotating lead member (e.g., worm). The motor
`
`shaft can be directly connected to the lead member or can be coupled to the lead
`
`member through the use of pulleys and belts, gears or other means of rotary motion
`
`transmission. Another well known technique includes a guide rail, pulleys, and a
`
`drive belt. The drive belt may be coupled to a carriage that slides along the guide
`
`rail as the drive shaft rotates a drive pulley. Additionally, a rack and pinion gear
`
`arrangement can be used, such that rotation of the motor shaft guides the pinion
`
`gear along the rack. The various configurations discussed above can be used to
`
`move the lens and image sensor through ranges of motion.
`
`26. With the advent of the computer and advances in electronic storage,
`
`digital conversions of microform became popular. (Ex. 1001 at 1:63-2:3).
`
`Microform readers were adapted with image sensors such as line sensors and area
`
`sensors to capture the image information from the projected film that could be
`
`saved and stored electronically. Many microform readers were integrated with
`
`computers to save digital copies of the scanned images.
`
`9
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 9 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`27. Fujinawa and Wally disclose microform imaging apparatuses that
`
`include a chassis/support structure, a fold mirror, an image sensor, a lens, and film
`
`carriers. Additionally, Fujinawa and Wally disclose an area sensor that is movable
`
`within a first range of movement. Additionally, Fujinawa and Wally disclose a
`
`lens that is movable within a second range of movement. The first range of
`
`movement and the second range of movement in Wally and Fujinawa overlap.
`
`Fujinawa also discloses a film carrier (e.g., microform media support structure)
`
`and supply and take-up film roll attachments. Additionally, Minolta discloses a
`
`film carrier with supply and take-up film roll attachments specifically designed to
`
`be used with microform imaging apparatuses. Minolta’s film carrier is capable of
`
`moving in longitudinal (e.g., front to back) and transverse (e.g., side to side)
`
`directions.
`
`28. At a high level, the features disclosed in the ‘766 Patent were not new
`
`as of May 15, 2007, as further discussed below. My review of the documents
`
`referenced in the preceding paragraph comports with my experience that those of
`
`skill in the art before 2007 knew of and regularly worked with devices having the
`
`features mentioned in the above paragraph. The figure below is a schematic
`
`representation of the Fujinawa microform imaging apparatus (e.g., Ex. 1004 at Fig.
`
`4) and is representative of the well known features of microform imaging
`
`apparatuses.
`
`10
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 10 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`
`29. Support structures and frames including a chassis and or a housing,
`
`have been used in microform readers since their inception to support and/or
`
`enclose the different components of the microform reader. For example, the
`
`support structure is used to support lenses, mirrors, image sensors, etc. As
`
`illustrated above, the support structure may include a frame and/or an enclosure to
`
`support the light source, film carrier, fold mirror, lens, sensor, etc. For example,
`
`the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a support structure that supports the other
`
`components of the microform reader. (Ex. 1007 at Fig. 2.1b). Several other
`
`example microform readers also include a support structure. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0033,
`11
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 11 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`Figs. 3-6); (Ex. 1005 at 8:52-54, Figs. 1, 2, 4, and 6-8); (Ex. 1006 at 5:9-13, Fig.
`
`1); (Ex. 1011 at 5:34-37, 5:20-45, Figs. 1 and 4).
`
`30. Light sources have been used with image reading devices and in
`
`microform readers to transmit light through the film and passed through optics,
`
`such as a lens, and captured by an image sensor. For example, the 5100 Fiche
`
`Scanstation includes a light source. (Ex. 1007 at pp. 8, 16, 18, Fig. 2.2a, Fig.
`
`2.2b). It was well known in the prior art for the light source to direct light through
`
`film along an optical axis of the device. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶0039, 0055, 0058, 0059,
`
`Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005 at 8:59-66, Figs. 17 and 18; Ex. 1006 at 5:20-24, 6:54-57, Figs.
`
`1-4; Ex. 1007 at 8, 16, 18, Fig. 2.2a, Fig. 2.2b; Ex. 1011 at 4:19-23, 5:45-46, 7:20-
`
`30, Figs. 5, 9, 12).
`
`31. Mirrors have been used in microform readers to change the direction
`
`of the light path within the device. Even the earliest of projector systems and
`
`microform readers used mirrors to project images illuminated by a light source
`
`onto a projector screen. In the same sense, fold mirrors are used in digital systems
`
`to direct light towards the image sensor, which enables the optical components to
`
`be positioned on different axes than the light source. As illustrated above, the fold
`
`mirror (shown in green) is supported by the chassis/support structure and directs
`
`light from the light source, through the lens (shown in yellow) to the sensor (shown
`
`in purple). For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a fold mirror that
`
`12
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 12 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`directs light projected through the lens to the image sensor or CCD. (Ex. 1007 at
`
`Figs. 2.2a and 2.2b, p.16). Several other example microform readers also include
`
`fold mirrors. (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0039, Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005 at 8:61-64, 12:1-33, Figs.
`
`17, 18, and 56; Ex. 1006 at 5:24-27, Figs. 1-4 and 6).
`
`32. As discussed above, with the advent of the computer and the
`
`continuing advances in electronic storage, digital conversions of microform
`
`became popular. (Ex. 1001 at 1:63 to 2:3). Microform readers were adapted with
`
`image sensors such as line sensors and area sensors to capture the image
`
`information from the projected film. As illustrated above, the sensor (shown in
`
`purple), such as an area sensor, is supported by the carriage (shown in red) and is
`
`used to capture image data of the microform. The carriage (shown in red) supports
`
`the area sensor (shown in purple) for movement to adjust the distance between the
`
`optical components (e.g., lens and fold mirror) to control the focus and the zoom of
`
`the microform imaging apparatus. For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation
`
`includes a CCD to digitize the film image. (Ex. 1007 at pp. 7, 14-17, Fig. 2.2b).
`
`Several other example microform readers also include image sensors such as area
`
`sensors. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0009, 0039, 0049, 0055, 0059, 0112, Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005
`
`at 8:61-64, 11:63 to 12:6, 2:37-39, Figs. 17, 18, 56; Ex. 1006 at 6:62-65, 7:66-68,
`
`10:4-13, Fig. 2; Ex. 1011 at 7:31-40; 8:12-14; 8:34-40, Figs. 5, 6, 9).
`
`13
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 13 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`33. Lenses are used to magnify and/or focus the image on the film such
`
`that the film is readable. As illustrated above, the lens (shown in yellow) is
`
`supported by a carriage (shown in red), which is ultimately supported by the
`
`support structure, such as a chassis, and is positioned between the sensor (shown in
`
`purple) and the fold mirror (shown in green). In other examples, the lens (shown
`
`in yellow) may be directly coupled to and supported by the support structure or
`
`chassis. For example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a lens that collects and
`
`focuses the light projected through the film onto the image sensor. (Ex. 1007 at
`
`Figs. 2.2a and 2.2b, pp. 15-17). Several other example microform readers also
`
`include lenses. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0055, 0059, Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005 at 8:61-64,
`
`2:37-39, 12:1-6, Figs. 17, 18, and 56; Ex. 1006 at 5:22-27, Figs. 1-4 and 6; Ex.
`
`1011 at 8:41-51, Figs. 5, 6, 12).
`
`34. Film carriers or microform media support structures are used to
`
`position and support the film within the device. As illustrated above, the film
`
`carrier (shown in gray) is supported by the chassis, and is positioned above the
`
`light source, which enables light to pass through the film to the other optical
`
`components of the device. In other examples, the film carrier may be movable
`
`such that the film can be moved in a transverse or longitudinal direction. For
`
`example, the 5100 Fiche ScanStation includes a film loading area and film
`
`cartridges that support film (e.g., fiche film). (Ex. 1007 at Fig. 2.2b, pp. 8, 16).
`
`14
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 14 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`Several other example microform readers also include film carriers. (Ex. 1004 at
`
`¶¶ 0039, 0045-0048, 0082, 0083, Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005 at 14:8-16, 2:57-64, Figs. 19,
`
`51-56; Ex. 1006 at 7:13-22, Figs. 2, 3; Ex. 1008 at pp. 3-5, 7; Ex. 1009; Ex. 1011
`
`at 5:45-53, 5:60-63, 6:3-7, Fig. 11).
`
`35. Accessory film carriers and universal film carriers (e.g., microform
`
`media support structures) were well known for their versatile design, enabling
`
`them to work with a wide variety of microform media and multiple models of
`
`microform readers, regardless of the mechanics of the readers. Such accessory
`
`film carriers (e.g., microform media support structures) could be independently
`
`designed and sold separately from microform readers, yet still be entirely
`
`compatible with the microform readers. As discussed above, some microform
`
`readers included their own microform media support structures. (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶
`
`0039, 0045-0048, 0082, 0083, Figs. 3-6; Ex. 1005 at 14:8-16, 2:57-64, Figs. 19,
`
`51-56; Ex. 1006 at 7:13-22, Figs. 2, 3; Ex. 1007 at Fig. 2.2b, pp. 8, 16; Ex. 1011 at
`
`5:45-53, 5:60-63, 6:3-7, Fig. 11). In other instances, accessory film carriers were
`
`separately sold, which were capable of fitting on or into various microform readers
`
`to work in conjunction with the reader’s mechanical and optical components. (Ex.
`
`1008 at pp. 3, 4, 10; Ex. 1009). For example, the accessory film carrier (e.g.,
`
`microform media support structure) could fit above the microform reader’s light
`
`source thereby allowing the projected film image to be passed through the optical
`
`15
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 15 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`components (e.g., fold mirror, lens, etc.) to the image sensor. (Ex. 1008 at pp. 3-7;
`
`Ex. 1009).
`
`36. The combinations I was asked to consider in the instant proceeding
`
`(i.e., (1) Fujinawa combined with Minolta and (2) Fujinawa combined with
`
`Minolta and Wally) could and would have been made by a person of ordinary skill
`
`in the art as of May 15, 2007. I was asked to perform that task without using
`
`“hindsight” reasoning. Instead, I was asked to consider the feasibility and
`
`combinability of references through the eyes of a person of skill in the art as of
`
`May 15, 2007.
`
`37. As I describe below, the individual references are all in the digital
`
`microform imaging space and contain mechanical elements that could be combined
`
`in a predictable manner.
`
`LEVEL OF SKILL IN THE ART
`
`38.
`
`I was asked to provide my opinion about the experience and
`
`background a person of ordinary skill in the art of the ‘766 Patent would have had
`
`as of May 15, 2007. In my opinion, such a person of skill in the art would have
`
`had at least a bachelor’s of science degree in either electrical engineering or
`
`mechanical engineering with at least 3 years’ experience designing electro-
`
`mechanical products including experience designing imaging equipment such as
`
`copiers, scanners, and/or microform scanners and readers. Such a person would
`
`16
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 16 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`understand the optical considerations and the mechanical constraints within these
`
`devices.
`
`39. Under my definition, I believe that I was a person of ordinary skill in
`
`the art as of May 15, 2007. Furthermore, I believe that I can opine today about
`
`what those of skill in the art would have known and understood as of May 15,
`
`2007.
`
`THE FUJINAWA PUBLICATION
`
`40. As part of my work in this proceeding, I was asked to review U.S.
`
`Patent Publication No. 2004/0012827 (“Fujinawa”) (Ex. 1004).
`
`41. Fujinawa is entitled “Image Reading Apparatus” and is generally
`
`directed an image reading apparatus for reading film images, in particular, an
`
`image reading apparatus that can handle films having different sizes. (Ex. 1004 at
`
`¶ 0003). Figures 1 and 3 to 6 of Fujinawa illustrate an “image reading apparatus.”
`
`42. Fujinawa discloses a digital microform imaging apparatus. Fujinawa
`
`describes that the “image signal processing circuit 15 amplifies, signal processes
`
`and digitizes the signals from line sensor 28. The image signal processing circuit
`
`also supplies the digitized signals to CPU 11.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0064). Figure 4 of
`
`Fujinawa is annotated and reproduced below as an example of a digital microform
`
`imaging apparatus.
`
`17
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 17 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`
`43. The image reading apparatus of Fujinawa includes a support structure.
`
`Figure 1 of Fujinawa illustrates “an image reading apparatus 1 including a cover 2
`
`on an upper surface thereof.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0033). In my opinion, it is apparent
`
`that the cover and structural components of Fujinawa create a support structure that
`
`gives sufficient structural integrity to the device. Additionally, in my opinion, one
`
`of skill in the art would understand a support structure and an assembly support
`
`structure to be equivalent structures.
`
`18
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 18 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`44. Fujinawa further discloses that the support structure forms first and
`
`second cavities, the first and second cavities spaced apart to form a substantially
`
`horizontal gap there between. Fujinawa explains “[a]s shown in FIGS. 3-6, the
`
`image reading apparatus comprises, an insertion opening 6,” which “is located on
`
`the side surface of the image reading apparatus [and] is used for inserting the strip
`
`film 4 and slide-mounted film 5.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0039, 0033). Fujinawa also
`
`discloses that the “film detection sensor 35 and opposing rollers 36 are provided in
`
`insertion opening 6,” and that the “opposing rollers 37 convey 35 mm film,
`
`delivered from insertion opening 6 by the opposing rollers 36, to the opposing
`
`rollers 38.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0044, 0047). Thus, the region within the opening 6
`
`between the rollers forms a substantially horizontal gap. Additionally, as
`
`illustrated below in Figure 4, the region above the gap is the second cavity and the
`
`region below the gap is the first cavity. Furthermore, Figure 4 of Fujinawa
`
`illustrates that the second cavity is formed above the gap. Thus, Fujinawa also
`
`discloses that the second cavity is located above the microform media support
`
`structure as further illustrated below. For example, Figure 4 of Fujinawa depicts
`
`that the second cavity is located above the microform media support structure. As
`
`discussed in more detail below, the combination of Fujinawa and Minolta also
`
`discloses a support structure that forms first and second cavities spaced apart by a
`
`gap.
`
`19
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 19 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ex. 1004 at Fig. 4).
`
`45. Fujinawa further discloses a microform media support structure.
`
`Specifically, Fujinawa discloses that “[w]hen the leading end of the film original
`
`arrives at the reading position between the opposing rollers 38 and 39, the
`
`projected light of the light source 31 is blocked by the film original. It can also be
`
`transmitted through the film original.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0083). Additionally,
`
`Fujinawa discloses that “[l]ight source 31 illuminates one surface of the film. The
`
`light source 31 is controlled by the light source drive circuit 18. The light
`
`transmitted through the film is introduced to the line sensor 28 via the lens 29.”
`
`20
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 20 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`(Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0055). Fujinawa further discloses that “CPU 11 controls the
`
`opposing roller drive circuit 20, which receives the detection signal from film
`
`detection sensor 35. The opposing roller drive circuit 20 controls rotation of the
`
`opposing rollers 36. The opposing roller drive circuit 20 receives instructions from
`
`CPU 11. As a result, the strip film 4 and slide-mounted film 5 are provided to the
`
`conveyor path (see FIGS. 5-6). Along the conveyor path are opposing rollers 37, a
`
`magnetic head 33, an optical sensor 34, opposing rollers 38, opposing rollers 39, a
`
`magnetic head 32, opposing rollers 40, and a take-up chamber 41. The light source
`
`31 is provided between opposing rollers 38 and 39.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶¶ 0045-0046).
`
`Additionally, Fujinawa states that the “opposing rollers 37, 38, 39 and 40 are
`
`driven separately by the opposing roller drive circuit 20. The opposing rollers 37
`
`convey roll film 7, delivered from loading chamber 22, to the opposing rollers 38.
`
`The opposing rollers 37 convey 35 mm film, delivered from the insertion opening
`
`6 by the opposing rollers 36, to the opposing rollers 38.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0047).
`
`Fujinawa also discloses that after the film enters the reading apparatus, “opposing
`
`rollers 38 and 39 feed the film original at a constant speed during image reading.
`
`The opposing rollers 40 convey the film (roll film 7 and strip film 4), to take-up
`
`chamber 41.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0048). Thus, the opposing rollers support the
`
`microform media within the digital microform imaging apparatus. As illustrated
`
`above in Figure 4 of Fujinawa, the media support structure is located within the
`
`21
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 21 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`gap. In my opinion, one of skill in the art would understand that the media support
`
`structure is mounted within the gap.
`
`46. While Fujinawa does not explicitly disclose that the microform media
`
`support structure is mounted for movement along a substantially horizontal
`
`longitudinal direction and a substantially horizontal transverse direction that is
`
`substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal direction. In my opinion, it would
`
`have been within the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art to mount the
`
`media support structure within the gap for movement in a longitudinal direction
`
`and transverse direction. Additionally, as discussed in more detail below, in my
`
`opinion, the combination of Fujinawa with Minolta fully discloses a microform
`
`media support structure mounted within the horizontal gap for movement along a
`
`substantially horizontal longitudinal direction and a substantially horizontal
`
`transverse direction that is substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal direction.
`
`For example, replacing the front-to-back arrangement of film attachments in
`
`Fujinawa with the movable side-by-side arrangement of Minolta would result in
`
`microform media support structure mounted within the horizontal gap for
`
`movement along a substantially horizontal
`
`longitudinal direction and a
`
`substantially horizontal transverse direction that is substantially perpendicular to
`
`the longitudinal direction.
`
`22
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 22 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`47. Fujinawa also discloses a housing that forms the second cavity. As
`
`illustrated above with respect to Figure 4, Fujinawa includes an enclosure (e.g.,
`
`cover subassembly) that forms a space that encloses all the internal components of
`
`the reading apparatus (e.g., motors, area sensors, lens, fold mirror, etc.).
`
`Specifically, Fujinawa discloses a “reading apparatus 1 including a cover 2 on an
`
`upper surface thereof. The cover 2 is for opening and closing a cartridge chamber
`
`for loading a cartridge 3.” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0033). Additionally, Fujinawa discloses
`
`that the apparatus further includes a supply side or source roll film attachment and
`
`a take up roll film attachment that are supported by the chassis on opposite lateral
`
`sides of the housing. For example, Fujinawa discloses that the supply side roll film
`
`arrives from “the cartridge 3 to a conveyor path. When the cartridge motor 23 is
`
`driven backward, the roll film 7 is taken up inside cartridge 3 from the conveyor
`
`path (See FIG. 4).” (Ex. 1004 at ¶ 0051). Additionally, Fujinawa discloses that
`
`after the film enters the reading apparatus, “opposing rollers 38 and 39 feed the
`
`film original at a constant speed during image reading. The opposing rollers 40
`
`convey the film (roll film 7 and strip film 4), to take-up chamber 41.” (Ex. 1004 at
`
`¶ 0048). As discussed above, the components (e.g., supply side roll and take up
`
`side roll film attachments) are supported within the image reading apparatus,
`
`which includes a support structure and chassis. Thus, the components, such as the
`
`film attachments, are supported by the support structure and/or chassis. Figure 4 of
`
`23
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. EXHIBIT 1002
`Page 23 of 61
`
`
`
`
`
`Fujinawa illustrates a supply side roll film attachment (shaded in blue below) and a
`
`take up side roll film attachment (shaded in purple below) supported by the support
`
`structure and/or chassis.
`
`
`
`(Ex. 1004 at Fig. 4).
`
`48. While Fujinawa does not explicitly disclose that the film attachments
`
`are supported on opposite lateral sides of the housing, this would have been within
`
`the knowledge of one of skill in the art in view of the disclosures of Minolta. One
`
`of skill in the art would recognize that Minolta’s side-by-side arrangement of film
`
`attachments and support structure could be substituted for Fujinawa’s front-to-back
`
`arrangement of film attachments and support structure to achieve the same,
`
`24
`
`DIGITAL CHECK CORP. E