throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper 46
` Date: August 9, 2021
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`FREDMAN BROS. FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BEDGEAR, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`_____________
`
`IPR2017-00350 (Patent 8,887,332 B2)
`IPR2017-00351 (Patent 9,015,883 B2)
`IPR2017-00352 (Patent 8,646,134 B1)
`___________
`
`
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TERMINATION
`Due to Settlement After Institution of Trial
` 35 U.S.C. § 317; 37 C.F.R. § 42.74
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00350 (Patent 8,887,332 B2)
`IPR2017-00351 (Patent 9,015,883 B2)
`IPR2107-00352 (Patent 8,646,134 B1)
`
`INTRODUCTION
`I.
`With the Board’s authorization, Petitioner Fredman Bros. Furniture
`Company, Inc. and Patent Owner Bedgear, LLC (collectively, “Parties”)
`filed Joint Motions to Terminate these proceedings due to settlement.
`IPR2017-00350, Paper 45 (“Joint Motion”); IPR2017-00351, Paper 45;
`IPR2017-00352, Paper 46. In support of these motions, the Parties filed a
`copy of a confidential settlement agreement (IPR2017-00350, Ex. 2022;
`IPR2017-00351, Ex. 2022; IPR2017-00352, Ex. 2022 (“Settlement
`Agreement”)), as well as joint requests to file the settlement agreement as
`business confidential pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`(IPR2017-00350, Paper 44; IPR2017-00351, Paper 44; IPR2017-00352,
`Paper 45 (“Joint Request”)). For simplicity, we refer below only to the
`filings in IPR2017-00350, which are representative of the filings in each of
`the proceedings.
`
`II. DISCUSSION
`Under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), “[a]n inter partes review instituted under
`this chapter shall be terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint
`request of the petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided
`the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.”
`Section 317(a) also provides that if no petitioner remains in the inter partes
`review, the Office may terminate the review. Section 317(b) requires that
`any agreement between the parties, including collateral agreements, made in
`connection with the termination of an inter partes review “shall be in writing
`and a true copy of such agreement or understanding shall be filed in the
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00350 (Patent 8,887,332 B2)
`IPR2017-00351 (Patent 9,015,883 B2)
`IPR2107-00352 (Patent 8,646,134 B1)
`
`Office before the termination of the inter partes review as between the
`parties.”
`The Parties represent that they have made and signed an agreement
`that resolves all underlying disputes between the parties, including these
`proceedings. E.g., -00350 Joint Motion 1. Further, the Parties jointly certify
`that, aside from the Settlement Agreement, “there are no other agreements or
`understandings, oral or written, between the parties, including any collateral
`agreements or understandings, made in connection with, or in contemplation
`of, the termination of [these] proceedings,” and that the filed copy of the
`Settlement Agreement is a true and correct copy. E.g., id.
`We instituted trials in the above-identified proceedings. Although we
`decided the merits of the proceedings and entered final written decisions, the
`Federal Circuit vacated those final written decisions based on the Federal
`Circuit’s Arthrex decision. Bedgear, LLC v. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co.,
`783 F. App’x 1029 (2019) (order vacating and remanding) (citing Arthrex,
`Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc., 941 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 2019)). Petitioner
`filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which was dismissed upon a joint
`stipulation of dismissal on June 23, 2021. Fredman Bros. Furniture Co. v.
`Bedgear, LLC, No. 20-408, 2021 WL 2908899 (U.S. June 23, 2021).
`Notwithstanding that the proceedings have moved beyond the
`preliminary stages, the Parties have shown adequately that the termination of
`the proceedings is appropriate. Under these circumstances, we determine
`that good cause exists to terminate the proceedings. We further determine
`that the Settlement Agreement complies with the requirements for written
`agreements regarding termination set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 317(b).
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00350 (Patent 8,887,332 B2)
`IPR2017-00351 (Patent 9,015,883 B2)
`IPR2107-00352 (Patent 8,646,134 B1)
`
`The Parties also filed Joint Requests that the Settlement Agreement be
`treated as business confidential information and be kept separate from the
`file of the respective patents involved in these inter partes proceedings.
`E.g., -00350 Joint Request. After reviewing the Settlement Agreement
`between Petitioner and Patent Owner, we find that the Settlement Agreement
`contains confidential business information regarding the terms of settlement.
`We determine that good cause exists to treat the Settlement Agreement
`between Petitioner and Patent Owner as business confidential information
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`This Order does not constitute a final written decision pursuant to
`35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
` ORDER
`III.
`Accordingly, for the reasons discussed above, it is
`ORDERED that, for each proceeding, the Joint Motion to Terminate
`is granted, and IPR2017-00350, IPR2017-00351, and IPR2017-00352 are
`terminated pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.72; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that, for each proceeding, the Joint Request to
`File Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential is granted, and the
`Settlement Agreement shall be kept separate from the files of U.S. Patent
`No. 8,983,134 B2, U.S. Patent No. 9,015,883 B2, and U.S. Patent No.
`8,646,134 B1, and made available only to Federal Government agencies on
`written request, or to any person on a showing of good cause, pursuant to 35
`U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00350 (Patent 8,887,332 B2)
`IPR2017-00351 (Patent 9,015,883 B2)
`IPR2107-00352 (Patent 8,646,134 B1)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Jason R. Mudd
`Eric A. Buresh
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`Joseph J. Richetti
`Frank M. Fabiani
`Alexander Walden
`BRYAN CAVE LLP
`joerichetti@bryancave.com
`frank.fabiani@bryancave.com
`alexander.walden@bryancave.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket