throbber
Paper 47
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822 Entered: April 27, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`
`AXON ENTERPRISE, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DIGITAL ALLY, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`_______________
`
`
`IPR2017-00375
`Patent 8,781,292 B1
`
`_______________
`
`
`
`
`
`Before PHILLIP J. KAUFFMAN, MINN CHUNG, and
`ROBERT L. KINDER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAUFFMAN, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00375
`Patent 8,781,292 B1
`
`
`The Supreme Court issued its decision on April 25, 2018, in SAS
`
`Institute Inc. v. Iancu, 584 U.S. ____ (2018), addressing the Board’s ability
`
`to issue a final written decision addressing a subset of the claims challenged
`
`in a petition. In our Decision on Institution, we determined that Petitioner
`
`demonstrated a reasonable likelihood that it would prevail in showing that at
`
`least 1 of the challenged claims of the ’292 patent is unpatentable and we
`
`instituted inter partes review of all challenged claims. Paper 9. We
`
`instituted on obviousness over (1) Pierce, and (2) Pierce and 20/20-W. Id. at
`
`27–28. We did not institute on Petitioner’s contention that if Pierce alone
`
`and Pierce combined with 20/20-W do not disclose a second communication
`
`signal, it would have been an obvious variant of Pierce. Id. at 27, fn.. 18. In
`
`light of the Supreme Court’s decision in SAS, we amend our institution
`
`decision to include review of all of the grounds presented in thePetition.
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner shall meet and confer to discuss the need for
`
`additional briefing and any adjustments to the schedule. We are willing to
`
`consider an extension of the one-year statutory deadline if warranted.
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 314(a), we amend our
`
`institution decision to include review of all grounds presented in the Petition;
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, Petitioner and Patent Owner shall meet
`
`and confer to discuss additional briefing and schedule changes, and shall
`
`provide the Board three mutually agreed upon dates and times for a
`
`conference call that can occur no later than five business days from entry of
`
`this order.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00375
`Patent 8,781,292 B1
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Michael Specht
`Richard Bemben
`Michelle Holoubek
`STERNE, KESSLER, GOLDSTEIN & FOX P.L.L.C.
`mspecht-ptab@skgf.com
`rbemben-ptab@skgf.com
`holoubek@skgf.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Jennifer Bailey
`Marshall Honeyman
`ERISE IP, P.A.
`jennifer.bailey@eriseip.com
`marshall.honeyman@eriseip.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket