`
`
`Filed on behalf of
`
`Patent Owner Intellectual Ventures II, LLC
`By:
`John R. King
`
`Ted M. Cannon
`
`Bridget A. Smith
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`2040 Main Street, Fourteenth Floor
`
`Irvine, CA 92614
`
`Tel.: (949) 760-0404
`
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`
`Email:
`BoxPGL46@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00416
`U.S. Patent 6,516,442
`
`
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S EXHIBIT LIST
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________
`
`NETAPP, INC. and LENOVO (UNITED STATES), INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES II, LLC
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00416
`NetApp v. Intellectual Ventures
`
`This paper provides a current list of the exhibits for Patent Owner Intellectual
`
`Ventures II, LLC.
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`Description
`
`2001
`
`2002
`
`2003
`
`2004
`
`2005
`
`2006
`
`2007
`
`2008
`
`2009
`
`2010
`
`David A. Patterson & John L. Hennessy, Computer Organization &
`Design: The Hardware/Software Interface 1–45 (Chapter 1), 532–
`593 (Chapter 8), 594–648 (Chapter 9) (1994)
`
`Definition of “multiprocessor,” Webster’s New World Dictionary
`of Computer Terms 386 (5th ed. 1994)
`
`Comtre Corp., Multiprocessors & Parallel Processing (Philip H.
`Enslow, Jr. ed., 1974)
`
`What is a Loosely Coupled Multiprocessor System? – Definition
`from Techopedia, https://www.techopedia.com/definition/
`30839/loosely-coupled-multiprocessor-system (last accessed Mar.
`20, 2017)
`
`M. Morris Mano, Computer System Architecture (3rd ed. 1993)
`
`Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Modern Operating Systems 362–394
`(Chapter 9) (1st ed. 1992)
`
`Andrew S. Tanenbaum, Modern Operating Systems 503–582
`(Chapter 8) (2d ed. 2001)
`
`Henri E. Bal & Andrew S. Tanenbaum, “Distributed Programming
`with Shared Data,” 16.2 Computer Languages 129–146 (1991)
`
`What is Symmetric Multiprocessing (SMP)? Webopedia Definition,
`http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/S/SMP.html (last accessed Mar.
`20, 2017)
`
`Richard W. Sevcik, Viewpoint: For Commercial Multiprocessing,
`The Choice Is SMP, IEEE Spectrum, Jan. 1995, 50
`
`-1-
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00416
`NetApp v. Intellectual Ventures
`
`Exhibit No.
`
`2011
`
`2012
`
`2013
`
`2014
`
`2015
`
`2016
`
`2017
`
`2018
`
`Description
`
`Thomas J. LeBlanc & Evangelos P. Markatos, Shared Memory vs.
`Message Passing in Shared-Memory Multiprocessors, Proceedings
`of the Fourth IEEE Symposium on Parallel and Distributed
`Processing, Dec. 1992, 254–263
`
`Entry on “memory” in Van Nostrand’s Scientific Encyclopedia
`2017–2021 (8th ed. 1995)
`
`Definitions of “main memory,” “mass storage,” “memory,”
`“random-access memory (RAM),” “secondary storage,” and
`“secondary storage medium” in Que’s Computer User’s Dictionary
`302–303, 306, 411–412, 444–445 (1994)
`
`IEEE Standard Glossary of Computer Hardware Terminology
`(1995)
`
`Definitions of “bidirectional” and “duplex transmission” in
`Microsoft Press Computer Dictionary 41, 136 (1994)
`
`Plaintiffs Intellectual Ventures I LLC and Intellectual Ventures II
`LLC’s Reply Claim Construction Brief, Intellectual Ventures I LLC
`et al. v. HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:15-
`CV-660-JRG (E.D. Tex. May 25, 2016)
`
`Transcript of Markman Hearing, Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al.
`v. HCC Insurance Holdins, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 6:15-CV-
`660-JRG (E.D. Tex. June 15, 2016)
`
`Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge,
`Intellectual Ventures I LLC et al. v. HCC Insurance Holdings, Inc.
`et al., Civil Action No. 6:15-CV-660-JRG (E.D. Tex. Aug. 26,
`2016)
`
`-2-
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00416
`NetApp v. Intellectual Ventures
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`
`
`By: /Bridget A. Smith/
`John R. King (Reg. No. 34,362)
`Ted M. Cannon (Reg. No. 55,036)
`Bridget A. Smith (Reg. No. 63,574)
`Customer No. 20,995
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Intellectual Ventures II LLC
`(949) 760-0404
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 4, 2017
`
`
`
`-3-
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00416
`NetApp v. Intellectual Ventures
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this PATENT OWNER’S
`
`
`
`EXHIBIT LIST and EXHIBITS 2001–2018 are being served on April 4, 2017,
`
`via email pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), to counsel for Petitioners as addressed
`
`below:
`
`Jackson Ho (Lead Counsel)
`Brian J. Ankenbrandt
`K&L GATES LLP
`630 Hansen Way
`Palo Alto, CA 94304
`jackson.ho@klgates.com
`brian.ankenbrandt@klgates.com
`Phone: 650-798-6719
`Fax: 650-798-6701
`
`Benjamin E. Weed
`K&L GATES LLP
`70 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100
`Chicago, IL 60602
`benjamin.weed.PTAB@klgates.com
`Phone: 312-781-7166
`Fax: 312-827-8152
`
`Dated: April 4, 2017
`
`
`
`25480538
`
`By: /Bridget A. Smith/
`John R. King, Reg. No. 34,362
`Ted M. Cannon, Reg. No. 55,036
`Bridget A. Smith, Reg. No. 63,574
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Intellectual Ventures II, LLC
`
`
`
`-4-
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
