throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 60
`Entered: August 22, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EMC CORPORATION, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., and
`NETAPP, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motion for Admission
`Pro Hac Vice of Dana O. Burwell
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745
`
`
`Petitioner filed a Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Dana O.
`Burwell in this proceeding. Paper 57 (“Motion” or “Mot.”). The Motion is
`unopposed. The Motion is granted.
`In its Motion, Petitioner states that there is good cause for the Board
`to recognize Mr. Burwell during this proceeding because Mr. Burwell “is an
`experienced litigator and has an established familiarity with the subject
`matter at issue in this proceeding.” Mot. 1. A Declaration made by Mr.
`Burwell attests to and sufficiently explains these facts. Ex. 1029. In
`addition, Mr. Burwell acknowledges his understanding that he will be
`subject to the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et seq. and to disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a).
`Id. at 2.
`Upon consideration, Petitioner has demonstrated sufficiently that Mr.
`Burwell has sufficient legal and technical qualifications to represent
`Petitioner in this proceeding.
`
`It is
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s unopposed motion for pro hac vice
`admission of Dana O. Burwell is granted; Mr. Burwell is authorized to
`represent Petitioner only as back-up counsel in the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Burwell is to comply with the Office
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Burwell is to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the
`USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et
`seq.
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Peter Dichiara
`peter.dichiara@wilmerhale.com
`
`Theodoros Konstantakopoulos
`theodoros.konstantakopoulos@wilmerhale.com
`
`Christopher Centurelli
`christopher.centurelli@klgates.com
`
`BENJAMIN WEED
`benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com
`
`Thomas Brown
`tom.brown@emc.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brenton Babcock
`2brb@knobbe.com
`
`Ted M. Cannon
`2tmc@knobbe.com
`
`Tim Seeley
`tims@intven.com
`
`James Hietala
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`John R. King
`2jrk@knobbe.com
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket