`571-272-7822
`
`
` Paper 65
`
` Entered: August 29, 2018
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EMC CORPORATION, LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.,
`and NETAPP, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES I LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before JEFFREY S. SMITH, GEORGIANNA W. BRADEN, and
`DANIEL J. GALLIGAN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`Per Curiam.
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`
`The parties request oral argument pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 61,
`64. The requests are GRANTED.
`Oral argument will be held on Friday, September 7, 2018 on the ninth floor
`of Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia, commencing
`at 1:00 p.m. Eastern Time. Each party will have 60 minutes of total argument
`time. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the claims at issue in this
`review are unpatentable. 35 U.S.C. § 316(e). Petitioner will proceed first to
`present its case with regard to the claims on which trial was instituted. Thereafter,
`Patent Owner may respond to Petitioner’s case, and then Petitioner may use any of
`its remaining time for rebuttal regarding the challenged claims.
`The Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing, and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. No live testimony from
`any witness will be taken at the oral argument. The hearing will be open to the
`public for in-person attendance. Attendees will be accommodated on a first-come,
`first-served basis. If the parties have any concern about disclosing confidential
`information, they are to contact the Board at least 10 days in advance of the
`hearing to discuss the matter. Any counsel of record may present the party’s
`argument.
`Any demonstrative exhibits must be served seven business days before the
`hearing. 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b). Demonstrative exhibits are not evidence and
`may not introduce new evidence or arguments. Instead, demonstrative exhibits
`should cite to evidence in the record. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of Michigan,
`Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), regarding the appropriate
`content of demonstrative exhibits. The parties must file any objections to the
`demonstratives with the Board at least two business days before the hearing. Any
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not presented timely will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which demonstratives
`are subject to objection and include a short (one sentence or less) statement of the
`reason for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted. The
`Board will consider the objections and schedule a conference if deemed necessary.
`Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral
`argument. Demonstratives should be filed at the Board no later than two days
`before the hearing. A hard copy of the demonstratives should be provided to the
`court reporter at the hearing.
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be directed to
`the Board at (571) 272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment are to be
`made at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing date. The
`request is to be sent to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not received timely,
`the equipment may not be available on the day of the hearing. The parties are
`reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and specifically each
`demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number) referenced during the
`hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the reporter’s transcript. The parties
`also should note that two members of the panel will be attending the hearing
`electronically from a remote location and that, if a demonstrative is not filed or
`otherwise made fully available or visible to the judges presiding over the hearing
`remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered. If the parties have questions
`as to whether demonstrative exhibits would be sufficiently visible and available to
`all of the judges, the parties are invited to contact the Board at 571-272-9797.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00429
`Patent 6,775,745 B1
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Peter Dichiara
`Theodoros Konstantakopoulos
`WILMER HALE
`peter.dichiara@wilmerhale.com
`theodoros.konstantakopoulos@wilmerhale.com
`
`Christopher Centurelli
`Benjamin Weed
`K&L GATES
`christopher.centurelli@klgates.com
`benjamin.weed.ptab@klgates.com
`
`Thomas Brown
`EMC Corporation
`tom.brown@emc.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brenton Babcock
`Ted M. Cannon
`John R. King
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2brb@knobbe.com
`2tmc@knobbe.com
`2jrk@knobbe.com
`
`Tim Seeley
`James Hietala
`INTELLECTUAL VENTURES
`tims@intven.com
`jhietala@intven.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
