`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 40
`Entered: June 26, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00444
`Patent 6,915,560 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before NEIL T. POWELL, JAMES A. TARTAL, and
`STACY B. MARGOLIES, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`TARTAL, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`
`Granting Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.14 and 42.54
`
`
`
`
`
`As authorized by the Case Management and Scheduling Order
`
`(Paper 10, 2), Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (“Petitioner”) and Boston
`
`Scientific Scimed, Inc., (“Patent Owner”), (collectively, “the Parties”),
`
`jointly move for entry of a proposed Stipulated Protective Order. Paper 14
`
`(“Motion” or “Mot.”); see also Paper 14, attached Ex. 1 ([Proposed]
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00444
`Patent 6,915,560 B2
`
`Stipulated Protective Order).1
`
`Upon review of the Motion we determine that the Parties have
`
`identified sufficiently how the proposed Stipulated Protective Order departs
`
`from the Board’s default protective order set forth in the Office Patent Trial
`
`Practice Guide, 77 Fed. Reg. 48756, 48769–71 (Aug. 14, 2012). Paper 14,
`
`2–5, attached Ex. 2 (comparing the proposed Stipulated Protective Order to
`
`the Board’s default protective order). Upon further review of the proposed
`
`Stipulated Protective Order, we find that the parties have shown sufficiently
`
`good cause for the proposed modifications from the Board’s default
`
`protective order and that the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is
`
`warranted.
`
`Accordingly, it is
`
`ORDERED that the Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective
`
`Order (Paper 14) is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order (Paper
`
`14, attached Ex. 1) submitted jointly by the parties is hereby entered; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Stipulated Protective Order (Paper
`
`14, attached Ex. 1) shall govern the conduct of the proceeding unless
`
`otherwise modified by the Board.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 The Parties are advised that any exhibit to any paper must be filed as a
`separate document as an exhibit with an independent exhibit number, not as
`an attachment to the paper being filed.
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00444
`Patent 6,915,560 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Craig Summers
`Brenton Babcock
`Christy Lea
`Cheryl Burgess
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2css@knobbe.com
`2brb@knobbe.com
`2cgl@knobbe.com
`2ctb@knobbe.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Wallace Wu
`Jennifer Sklenar
`Nicholas Nyemah
`ARNOLD & PORTER KAYE SCHOLER LLP
`wallace.wu@apks.com
`jennifer.sklenar@apks.com
`nicholas.nyemah@aporter.com
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
