`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: April 11, 2019
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GOOGLE LLC, MICROSOFT CORPORATION, and
`MICROSOFT MOBILE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2017-004471
`Patent 7,529,806 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, ROBERT J. WEINSCHENK, and
`KAMRAN JIVANI, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`WEINSCHENK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Motion to Withdraw Counsel
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e)
`
`
`
`
`
`1 Microsoft Corporation and Microsoft Mobile Inc. (collectively,
`“Microsoft”) filed a petition in IPR2017-01754, and Microsoft has been
`joined to this case.
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00447
`Patent 7,529,806 B1
`
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Koninklijke Philips N.V. (“Philips”) filed a Motion to Withdraw
`
`Counsel in the above-listed proceeding. Paper 38 (“Motion” or “Mot.”).
`
`We authorized the Motion in an email dated March 20, 2019. Google LLC
`
`and Microsoft do not oppose the Motion. Mot. 2. For the following reasons,
`
`the Motion is granted.
`
`II.
`
`ANALYSIS
`
`Counsel may withdraw from an inter partes review only with
`
`authorization from the Board. 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(e). Philips requests
`
`authorization to withdraw Jason M. Dorsky as back-up counsel.2 Mot. 2.
`
`Philips represents that lead counsel, Justin J. Oliver, “will continue to
`
`represent Philips in this proceeding, along with Daniel S. Glueck and
`
`Margaret J. Evans.” Id. Philips also filed updated mandatory notices
`
`identifying its new back-up counsel. Paper 37, 1. Having reviewed the
`
`Motion, we determine that good cause exists for granting the Motion.
`
`III. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`ORDERED that the Motion is granted; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Jason M. Dorsky is withdrawn as counsel
`
`for Philips in the above-listed proceeding.
`
`
`2 The Motion states that Philips requests authorization to withdraw Stephen
`Kai-tung Yam as back-up counsel. Mot. 2. Stephen Kai-tung Yam,
`however, was not identified as back-up counsel in this proceeding. Paper 4,
`3; Paper 30, 1. We, therefore, understand Philips as requesting authorization
`to withdraw Jason M. Dorsky as back-up counsel, just as Philips requests in
`a related proceeding, IPR2017-00437.
`
` 2
`
`
`
`
`
` 3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00447
`Patent 7,529,806 B1
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David Krinsky
`Aaron Maurer
`Christopher Suarez
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`dkrinsky@wc.com
`amaurer@wc.com
`csuarez@wc.com
`
`Christina J. McCullough
`Chad S. Campbell
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`cmccullough@perkinscoie.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Justin J. Oliver
`Daniel S. Glueck
`Margaret J. Evans
`VENABLE LLP
`joliver@venable.com
`dsglueck@venable.com
`mjevans@venable.com
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
