WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION
`International Bureau
`
`PCT
`INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT)
`(51) International Patent Classification 7 :
`WO 00/35346
`A61B 5/11
`
`(11) International Publication Number:
`
`A2
`
`(43) International Publication Date:
`
`22 June 2000 (22.06.00)
`
`(21) International Application Number:
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`(22) International Filing Date:
`
`16 December 1999 (16.12.99)
`
`(30) Priority Data:
`60/112,989
`
`16 December 1998 (16.12.98)
`
`us
`
`(71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): STANFORD
`UNIVERSITY [US/US]; Suite 350, 900 Welch Road, Palo
`Alto, CA 94304-1850 (US).
`
`(72) Inventors; and
`(75) Inventors/Applicants (for US only): ALEXANDER, Eugene,
`J. [US/US]; 573 Lytton Apt. D, Palo Alto, CA 94301 (US).
`ANDRIACCHI, Thomas, P. [US/US]; 12167 Altamont
`Court, Los Altos Hills, CA 94022 (US). LANG, Philipp
`[DE/US]; 225 Lincoln Way, Apt. 206, San Francisco, CA
`94122 (US). NAPEL, Sandy, A. [US/US]; 445 Blake Street,
`Menlo Park, CA 94025 (US).
`
`(74) Agents: MORAN, Tom, M.; Cooley Godward LLP, 3000
`El Camino Real, Five Palo Alto Square, Palo Alto, CA
`94306-2155 (US) et al.
`
`(81) Designated States: AE, AL, AM, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG,
`BR, BY, CA, CH, CN, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, EE,
`ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP,
`KE, KG, KP, KR, KZ, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LV, MA,
`MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, NO, NZ, PL, PT, RO, RU,
`SD, SE, SG, SI, SK, SL, TJ, TM, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG,
`US, UZ, VN, YU, ZA, ZW, ARIPO patent (GH, GM, KE,
`LS, MW, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZW), Eurasian patent (AM,
`AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European patent (AT,
`BE, CH, CY, DE, DK, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, IE, IT, LU,
`MC, NL, PT, SE), OAPI patent (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM,
`GA, GN, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG).
`
`Published
`Without international search report and to be republished
`upon receipt of that report.
`
`(54) Title: ASSESSING THE CONDITION OF A JOINT AND PREVENTING DAMAGE
`
`THE CARTILAGE DEGENERATION PATIERN
`OBTAIN THE
`CARTILAGE IMAGE
`
`tO
`
`THE MOVEMENT PATIE..,R_N ____ -.
`OBTAIN INTERNAL
`OBTAIN EXTERNAL
`IMAGE OF JOINT WITH BONES
`IMAGE OF JOINT
`
`20
`
`28
`
`CREATE 30 IMAGE
`OF THE CARTILAGE
`
`DISPLAY THE IMAGE
`DEGENERATION PATIERN
`
`COMPARE PATIERNS
`OBTAINED OVER TIME
`
`22
`
`USE
`EXTERNAL
`MARKERS
`
`30
`
`USE
`ElCTERNAL
`MARKERS
`
`MANIPULATE JOINT I BONES
`IMAGE (OPTIONAL)
`
`CREATE 30 IMAGE
`OF JOINT I BONES
`
`CORRELATE MARKER
`SETS
`
`32
`
`34
`
`RECORD STATIC
`JOINT I BONES
`AND JOINT I BONES
`IN MOVEMENT
`
`PROCESS IMAGE
`OF JOINT I BONES
`
`REFERENCE
`DATABASE
`
`COMBINED MOVEMENT --.....;;;=~--'
`L__~P~ATI~ER=N~--1'-,;;<m;:;;;;:;~;;w;~;:;-;;;;::;;;;;;:~~
`
`DISPlAY CORRELATED
`IMAGES
`
`DETERMINE RELATION BETWEEN
`MOVEMENT AND WEAR PATIERNS
`
`PROVIDE THERAPY (OPTIONAL}
`
`so
`
`(57) Abstract
`
`Methods are disclosed for assessing the condition of a cartilage in a joint, particularly a human knee. The methods include converting
`an image such as an MRI to a three dimensional map of the cartilage. The cartilage map is then correlated to a movement pattern of the
`joint to assess the affect of movement on cartilage wear. Reference markers useful in obtaining internal images of the cartilage and bone
`and external images of the limbs in a motion are described. The markers aid in correlating the various images. Changes in the thickness
`of cartilage over time can be determined so that therapies can be provided.
`
`-i-
`
`Smith & Nephew Ex. 1004
`IPR Petition - USP 9,295,482
`
`

`
`FOR THE PURPOSES OF INFORMATION ONLY
`
`Codes used to identify States party to the PCT on the front pages of pamphlets publishing international applications under the PCT.
`
`AL
`AM
`AT
`AU
`AZ
`BA
`BB
`BE
`BF
`BG
`BJ
`BR
`BY
`CA
`CF
`CG
`CH
`CI
`CM
`CN
`cu
`CZ
`DE
`DK
`EE
`
`Albania
`Armenia
`Austria
`Australia
`Azerbaijan
`Bosnia and Herzegovina
`Barbados
`Belgium
`Burkina Faso
`Bulgaria
`Benin
`Brazil
`Belarus
`Canada
`Central African Republic
`Congo
`Switzerland
`Cote d'Ivoire
`Cameroon
`China
`Cuba
`Czech Republic
`Germany
`Denmark
`Estonia
`
`ES
`FI
`FR
`GA
`GB
`GE
`GH
`GN
`GR
`HU
`IE
`IL
`IS
`IT
`JP
`KE
`KG
`KP
`
`KR
`KZ
`LC
`LI
`LK
`LR
`
`Spain
`Finland
`France
`Gabon
`United Kingdom
`Georgia
`Ghana
`Guinea
`Greece
`Hungary
`Ireland
`Israel
`Iceland
`Italy
`Japan
`Kenya
`Kyrgyzstan
`Democratic People's
`Republic of Korea
`Republic of Korea
`Kazakstan
`Saint Lucia
`Liechtenstein
`Sri Lanka
`Liberia
`
`LS
`LT
`LU
`LV
`MC
`MD
`MG
`MK
`
`ML
`MN
`MR
`MW
`MX
`NE
`NL
`NO
`NZ
`PL
`PT
`RO
`RU
`SD
`SE
`SG
`
`Lesotho
`Lithuania
`Luxembourg
`Latvia
`Monaco
`Republic of Moldova
`Madagascar
`The former Yugoslav
`Republic of Macedonia
`Mali
`Mongolia
`Mauritania
`Malawi
`Mexico
`Niger
`Netherlands
`Norway
`New Zealand
`Poland
`Portugal
`Romania
`Russian Federation
`Sudan
`Sweden
`Singapore
`
`SI
`SK
`SN
`sz
`TD
`TG
`TJ
`TM
`TR
`TT
`UA
`UG
`us
`uz
`VN
`YU
`zw
`
`Slovenia
`Slovakia
`Senegal
`Swaziland
`Chad
`Togo
`Tajikistan
`Turkmenistan
`Turkey
`Trinidad and Tobago
`Ukraine
`Uganda
`United States of America
`Uzbekistan
`Viet Nam
`Yugoslavia
`Zimbabwe
`
`-ii-
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`ASSESSING THE CONDITION OF A JOINT AND
`
`PREVENTING DAMAGE
`
`5 This invention was supported in part by a National Institute of Health Grant No.PAR-
`
`97-014, and the government may have rights in this invention.
`
`This application claims
`
`the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application Serial
`
`No. 60/112,989, filed December 16, 1998 ..
`
`10
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`
`FIELD OF INVENTION
`
`15
`
`This invention relates to assessmg the condition of a joint and the use of the
`
`assessment in aiding in prevention of damage to the joint or treatment of diseased
`
`cartilage in the joint.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`20
`
`Osteoarthritis is the most common condition to affect human joints as well as a
`
`frequent cause of locomotor pain and disability. More particularly, osteoarthritis
`
`(OA) of the knee occurs in a substantial portion of the population over the age of fifty.
`
`25
`
`In spite of its societal impact and prevalence, however, there is a paucity of
`
`information on the factors that cause osteoarthritis to progress more rapidly in some
`
`individuals and not in others. Previously considered a "wear and tear" degenerative
`
`disease with little opportunity for therapeutic intervention, osteoarthritis is now
`
`increasingly viewed as a dynamic process with potential for new pharmacologic and
`
`30
`
`surgical treatment modalites such as cartilage transplantation, osteochondral allo- or
`
`autografting, osteotomies and tibial corticotomies with angular distraction.
`
`However, the appropriate deployment and selection of treatment interventions for OA
`
`is dependent on the development of better methods for the assessment of the condition
`
`of a patient's joint and the degeneration process.
`1
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`There is, therefore, a need for improved methods for examining the factors that
`
`influence as well as quantification of the progression of the disease.
`
`5 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an accurate non-invasive imaging technique for
`
`visualization of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis, particularly in knees. However,
`
`current MRI techniques cannot provide information on the relationship between the
`
`location of the cartilage loss and variations in the load bearing areas during the
`
`walking cycle. This information is important since it has been shown that dynamic
`
`10
`
`loads during walking are related to the progression of knee OA. Thus, the ability to
`
`locate cartilage defects or areas of cartilage thinning relative to the load bearing areas
`
`of the knee could be valuable in evaluating factors influencing the progression of
`
`osteoarthritis.
`
`15
`
`SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
`
`This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint of a mammal, particularly a
`
`human subject, using the assessment to treat and monitor the subject as needed for
`
`cartilage degeneration problems. While the numerous aspects of the invention are
`
`20
`
`useful for joints generally, they are particularly suited for dealing with the human
`
`knee. Some aspects related the static images and degeneration patterns of a cartilage,
`
`while others relate to the interaction of such images and patterns to provide a better
`
`means of assessing the condition of a cartilage.
`
`One aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a cartilage.
`
`25
`
`The method comprises obtaining an image of a cartilage, (preferably a magnetic
`
`resonance image), converting the image to a three-dimensional degeneration pattern,
`
`and evaluating the degree of degeneration in a volume of interest of the cartilage. By
`
`performing this method at an initial time T, and a later time T1, one can determine the
`
`change in the volume of interest and evaluate what steps to take for treatment.
`
`2
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`Another aspect of this invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a
`
`joint. The method comprises obtaining a three-dimensional map of the cartilage at an
`
`initial time and calculating the thickness or regional volume of a region thought to
`
`contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at the initial time, obtaining a three-
`
`5
`
`dimensional map of the cartilage at a later time, and calculating the thickness or
`
`regional volume of the region thought to contain degenerated cartilage so mapped at
`
`the later time, and determining the loss in thickness or regional volume of the
`
`cartilage between the later and initial times. The 3D map may be a thickness map, a
`
`biochemical map or a combination.
`
`10
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in
`
`a joint of a human, which method comprises electronically transferring an
`
`electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to
`
`a receiving device located distant from the transferring device; receiving the
`
`15
`
`transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a
`
`degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a
`
`site for analysis.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a method for determining the volume of cartilage
`
`loss in a region of a cartilage defect of a cartilage in joint of a mammal. The method
`
`20
`
`comprises (a) determining the thickness, DN, of the normal cartilage near the cartilage
`
`defect; (b) obtaining the thickness of the cartilage defect, Do, of the region;
`
`( c) subtracting Do from DN to give the thickness of the cartilage loss, DL; and
`
`( d) multiplying the DL value times the area of the cartilage defect, Ao, to give the
`
`volume of cartilage loss.
`
`25
`
`Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the change of a region
`
`of cartilage in a joint of a mammal over time. The method comprises (a) estimating
`
`the width or area or volume of a region of cartilage at an initial time T 1, (b)
`
`estimating the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage at a later time T 2, and
`
`· 30
`
`( c) determining the change in the width or area or volume of the region of cartilage
`
`between the initial and the later times.
`
`Still another aspect of the invention is a method of estimating the loss of cartilage in a
`
`3
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`joint. The method comprises (a) defining a 3D object coordinate system of the joint at
`
`an initial time, T 1; (b) identifying a region of a cartilage defect within the 3D object
`coordinate system; ( c) defining a volume of interest around the region of the cartilage
`
`defect whereby the volume of interest is larger than the region of cartilage defect, but
`
`5
`
`10
`
`does not encompass the entire articular cartilage; ( d) defining the 3D object
`coordinate system of the joint at a second timepoint, T 2; ( e) placing the identically(cid:173)
`sized volume of interest into the 3D object coordinate system at timepoint T 2 using
`the object coordinates of the volume of interest at timepoint T 1; (f) and measuring any
`differences in cartilage volume within the volume of interest between timepoints T 1
`and T2.
`
`Another aspect of this invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map
`
`of joint cartilage. The method comprises measuring a detectable biochemical
`
`component throughout the cartilage, determining the relative amounts of the
`
`15
`
`biochemical component throughout the cartilage; mapping the amounts of the
`
`biochemical component through the cartilage; and determining the areas of cartilage
`
`deficit by identifying the areas having an altered amount of the biochemical
`
`component present.
`
`Once a map is obtained, it can be used in assessing the condition of a cartilage at an
`
`20
`
`initial time and over a time period. Thus, the biochemical map may be used in the
`
`method aspects of the invention in a manner similar to the cartilage thickness map.
`
`4
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of cartilage in
`
`a joint from a distant location. The method comprises electronically transferring an
`
`electronically-generated image of a cartilage of the joint from a transferring device to
`
`a receiving device located distant from the transferring device;
`
`rece1vmg
`
`the
`
`5
`
`transferred image at the distant location; converting the transferred image to a
`
`degeneration pattern of the cartilage; and transmitting the degeneration pattern to a
`
`site for analysis.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a kit for aiding in assessing the condition of
`
`cartilage in a joint of a mammal, which kit comprises a software program, which
`
`10 when installed and executed on a computer reads a cartilage degeneration pattern
`
`presented in a standard graphics format and produces a computer readout showing a
`
`cartilage thickness map of the degenerated cartilage.
`
`Another aspect of this invention is a method for assessing the condition of a subject's
`
`cartilage in a joint, the method comprises obtaining a three dimensional biochemical
`
`15
`
`representation of the cartilage, obtaining a morphological representation of the
`
`cartilage, and merging the two representations, and simultaneously displaying the
`
`merged representations on a medium. The merged representations are then used to
`
`assess the condition of a cartilage, estimate the loss of cartilage in a joint, determining
`
`the volume of cartilage loss in a region of cartilage defect, or estimating the change of
`
`20
`
`a region of cartilage at a particular point in time or over a period of time.
`
`A method for correlating cartilage image data, bone image data, and opto-electrical
`
`image data for the assessment of the condition of a joint, which method comprises (a)
`
`obtaining the bone image data of the joint with a set of skin reference markers
`
`25
`
`positioned in externally near the joint, (b) obtaining the opto-electrical image data of
`
`the joint with a set of skin reference markers positioned in the same manner as (a),
`
`and (c) using the skin reference markers to correlate the images obtained in (a) and (b)
`
`with each other, wherein each skin reference marker is detectable in the bone data and
`
`the opto-electrical data. The method also can be used to further evaluate cartilage
`
`30
`
`image data that is obtained using a similarly positioned set of skin reference markers.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a skin reference marker that comprises (a) a
`
`material detectable by an imaging technique; (b) a container for holding the material,
`
`5
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`( c) a material that causes the container to adhere to the skin of a human, and ( d) a
`
`reflective material placed on the surface of the container.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a biochemical map of a cartilage that comprises a
`
`three-dimensional representation of the distribution of the amount of the biochemical
`
`5
`
`component throughout the cartilage.
`
`6
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a method for providing a biochemically-based map
`
`of joint cartilage of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and associated
`
`bones on either side of the joint, which method comprises (a) measuring a detectable
`
`biochemical component throughout the cartilage; (b) determining the relative amounts
`
`5
`
`of the biochemical component throughout the cartilage; ( c) mapping the amounts of
`
`the biochemical component in three dimensions through the cartilage; and ( d)
`
`determining the areas of abnormal joint cartilage by identifying the areas having
`
`altered amounts of the biochemical component present.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a method for deriving the motion of bones about a
`
`10
`
`joint from markers placed on the skin, which method comprises (a) placing at least
`
`three external markers on the patient's limb segments surrounding the joint, (b)
`
`registering the location of each marker on the patient's limb while the patient is
`
`standing completely still and while moving the limb, ( c) calculating the principal axis,
`
`principal moments and deformation of rigidity of the cluster of markers, and ( d)
`
`15
`
`calculating a correction to the artifact induced by the motion of the skin markers
`
`relative to the underlying bone.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a system for assessing the condition of cartilage in
`
`a joint of a human, which system comprises (a) a device for electronically transferring
`
`a cartilage degeneration pattern for the joint to a receiving device located distant from
`
`20
`
`the transferring device; (b) a device for receiving the cartilage degeneration pattern at
`
`the remote location; ( c) a database accessible at the remote location for generating a
`
`movement pattern for the joint of the human wherein the database includes a
`
`collection of movement patterns of human joints, which patterns are organized and
`
`can be accessed by reference to characteristics such as type of joint, gender, age,
`
`25
`
`height, weight, bone size, type of movement, and distance of movement; (d) a device
`
`for generating a movement pattern that most closely approximates a movement
`
`pattern for the human patient based on the characteristics of the human patient; ( e) a
`
`device for correlating the movement pattern with the cartilage degeneration pattern;
`
`and (f) a device for transmitting the correlated movement pattern with the cartilage
`
`30
`
`degeneration pattern back to the source of the cartilage degeneration pattern.
`
`7
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`A method for assessing the condition of the knee joint of a human patient, wherein the
`
`knee joint comprises cartilage and associated bones on either side of the joint, which
`
`method comprises (a) obtaining the patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data
`
`of the knee showing at least the bones on either side of the joint, (b) segmenting the
`
`5 MRI data from step (a), (c) generating a geometrical representation of the bone of the
`
`joint from the segmented MRI data, (d) assessing the patient's gait to determine the
`
`load pattern or the cartilage contact pattern of the articular cartilage in the joint during
`
`the gait assessment, and ( e) correlating the load pattern or cartilage contact pattern
`
`obtained in step ( d) with the geometrical representation obtained in step ( c ).
`
`10 Another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the rate of degeneration of
`
`cartilage in the joint of a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and the bones
`
`on either side of the cartilage, which method comprises (a) obtaining a cartilage
`
`degeneration pattern of the joint that shows an area of greater than normal
`
`degeneration, (b) obtaining a movement pattern of the joint that shows where the
`
`15
`
`opposing cartilage surfaces contact, ( c) comparing the cartilage degeneration pattern
`
`with the movement pattern of the joint, and (d) determining if the movement pattern
`
`shows contact of one cartilage surface with a portion of the opposing cartilage surface
`
`showing greater than normal degeneration in the cartilage degeneration pattern.
`
`Another aspect of the invention is a method for monitoring the treatment of a
`
`20
`
`degenerative joint condition in a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and
`
`accompanying bones on either side of
`
`the joint, which method comprises (a)
`
`comparing the movement pattern of the joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of
`
`the joint; (b) determining the relationship between the movement pattern and the
`
`cartilage degeneration pattern; ( c) treating the mammal
`
`to minimize further
`
`25
`
`degeneration of the joint condition; and (d) monitoring the treatment to the mammal.
`
`Still another aspect of the invention is a method of assessing the condition of a joint in
`
`a mammal, wherein the joint comprises cartilage and accompanying bones on either
`
`side of the joint, which method comprises (a) comparing the movement pattern of the
`
`joint with the cartilage degeneration pattern of the joint; and (b) determining the
`
`30
`
`relationship between the movement pattern and the cartilage degeneration pattern
`
`Other aspects of the invention may be apparent upon further reading the specification
`and claims of the patent application.
`
`8
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`
`In the accompanying drawings:
`
`5
`
`Figure 1 shows an overview schematic representation of some aspects of the invention
`
`of this application.
`
`Figure 2 shows a DEFT pulse sequence.
`
`Figure 3 shows the signal levels for cartilage and synovial fluid with RARE and
`
`DEFT pulse sequences, both TE= 14 miliseconds.
`
`10
`
`Figure 4 shows the mean contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of cartilage to joint fluid for
`
`various MRI pulse sequences.
`
`Figure 5 shows the mean contrast for cartilage and joint fluid for various MRI pulse
`
`sequences.
`
`Figure 6 shows a DEFT acquisition usmg non-selective refocusing pulses to
`
`15 maximize the SNR efficiency and a partial K- Echo-Plainer acquisition gradients in
`
`order to minimize the required scan time for 3D volume.
`
`Figure 7 shows four sample images acquired with a DEFT pulse sequence combined
`
`with a partial K- Echo-Plainer acquisition in order to provide efficient 3D coverage.
`
`Figures 8A and SB show a 3-point Dixon GRE image of the articular cartilage of
`
`20 medial fermorotibial compartment in a normal 35-year old volunteer. Figure 13A has
`
`the subject in supine position and Figure 13B has the subject in an upright position.
`
`Figures 9A-9C show patient position and application of imaging coil and tracker coil
`
`for kinetic MR imaging of the knee. Patient is in upright weight-bearing position for
`
`active flexion and extension study of the knee.
`
`25
`
`Figure 9B is a 2D cartilage thickness map demonstrating abrupt decrease in cartilage
`
`thickness in the area of the defect (arrows). The/::,. thickness between the neighboring
`
`pixels can be use to define the borders of the cartilage defect. Note defused cartilage
`
`thinning in the area enclosed by the asterisks(*).
`
`9
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`Figures 1 OA-1 OC show a 3D surface registration of femoral condyles based on Tl -
`
`weighted Spin-Echo MR images. Figure 6A is a baseline with a knee and neutral
`
`position. 6B is a follow-up with knee and external rotation with a 3D view that is the
`
`identical to the one used in 6A but the difference in knee rotation is apparent.
`
`In
`
`5
`
`Figure 6C, transformation and re-registration of Scan B into the object coordinate
`
`system of Scan A shows the anatomic match to A is excellent.
`
`Figure 1 lA shows a 2D cartilage thickness map where a proton density fast spin-echo
`
`MR image demonstrates a focal cartilage defect in the posterior lateral fermoral
`
`condyle (black arrows). White arrows indicate endpoints of the thickness map.
`
`10
`
`Figure 12 shows the anatomic coordinate system in the femur and in the tibia.
`
`Figure 13 shows calculation of the anatomic coordinate system from palpable bony
`
`landmarks.
`
`Figure 14 shows additional marker names and locations for MR to optical cross
`
`registration.
`
`15
`
`Figure 15 shows the marker names and locations for the standard point-cluster
`
`technique protocol.
`
`Figure 16 shows the error in the tibial location estimate for the rigid body model and
`
`the intrical deformation correction technique.
`
`Figure 17 shows the error in tibial orientation estimate for the rigid body model and
`
`20
`
`the interval deformation correction technique.
`
`Figure 18A - 181 show functional joint imaging.
`
`Figure 19 shows the super imposition of the tibiofemoral contact line onto the 3D
`
`cartilage thickness map.
`
`Figure 20 shows the determination of the natural line of curvature as the cutting plain
`
`25
`
`is rotated about the transepicondyear reference, the cartilage-plain intersection results
`
`ma curve.
`
`Figure 21 shows the determination of the tibiofemoral contact line through the
`
`10
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT /U S99/30265
`
`proximity detection and approach algorithm.
`
`Figures 22A and 22B show a 2D MRI (3D SPGR) and 3D cartilage thickness map.
`
`Figures 23A - E show the matching of 3D thickness maps generated from MR images
`
`obtained with a knee neutral position and external rotation.
`
`5
`
`SPECIFIC DESCRIPTION
`
`Overview
`
`Figure 1 is a schematic overview of some of the various aspects of the invention.
`
`10 While a complete description of the many aspects of the invention is found in the
`
`specification and claims, the schematic overview gives some of the broad aspects of
`
`the invention.
`
`This invention relates to assessing the condition of a joint in a mammal. One aspect is
`
`15
`
`a method for such an assessment. The assessment can be done using internal images,
`
`or maps, of the cartilage alone or in combination with a movement pattern of the joint.
`
`If used alone, a map obtained at an initial time is compared with a map obtained at a
`
`later time to provide a view of the change in cartilage over time. Another aspect is a
`
`method is comparing the movement pattern for a joint of a subject being studied with
`
`20
`
`the cartilage degeneration pattern of the subject, then determining the relationship
`
`between the movement pattern and the degeneration pattern.
`
`If, in determining the
`
`relationship between the two patterns, one finds that the movement pattern has caused
`
`the degeneration pattern or will continue to adversely affect the degeneration pattern,
`
`therapy can be prescribed to minimize the adverse effects, such as further
`
`25
`
`degeneration or inflammation.
`
`In overview, some of the systems and methods of this invention are illustrated by the
`
`flow chart in the attached Figure 1. Figure 1 is based· on the full range of processes,
`
`preferably applied to a knee and surrounding cartilage.
`
`30
`
`In Figure 1, the first step 10 represents obtaining an image of the cartilage itself. This
`
`is typically achieved using MRI techniques to take an image of the entire knee and
`
`11
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`then, optionally, manipulating (e.g., "subtracting out" or "extracting") the non(cid:173)
`
`cartilage images as shown in step 12. Non-cartilage images typically come from bone
`
`and fluid. Preferably, the MRI is taken using external markers to provide reference
`
`points to the MRI image (step 11).
`
`5
`
`If the cartilage is imaged with a 2D MRI acquisition technique, the resulting stack of
`
`2D images so obtained can be combined into a 3D image, as indicated in step 14. A
`
`preferred alternative is to use 3D MRI acquisition techniques to acquire a 3D image
`
`directly. In either case, the same "non-cartilage image extraction techniques referred
`
`10
`
`to in step 12 can be used.
`
`With a full 3D image captured, various "maps" or displays of the cartilage can be
`
`constructed to give a cartilage degeneration pattern. This is represented by step 16.
`
`One such display can, for example, be a color-coding of a displayed image to reflect
`
`15
`
`the thickness for the cartilage. This will allow easy visual identification of actual or
`
`potential defects in the cartilage.
`
`Together with or independently of the cartilage imaging, and as represented by
`
`parallel step 20, a 3D image of the knee joint is taken, again preferably using MRI.
`
`20 Many of the same techniques as applied in steps 10 to 14 are used to do this.
`
`However, as illustrated by sub-step 22, it is useful to define and register a skin(cid:173)
`
`external frame of reference around the joint. This is achieved by placing fiduciary
`
`markers on the skin around the outside of the knee (step 22) prior to taking the image.
`
`25
`
`In addition to an image extraction technique (as described above in step 12), an image
`
`is manipulated to enhance the image of the position of the markers (step 24). The
`
`resulting manipulated image is used to give a 3D image of the joint and associated
`
`bones (step 26).
`
`30 With the markers in place, and as shown by step 30, an additional set of markers is
`
`placed on the skin along the outside of the leg, and an external image of the limb is
`
`obtained. Using at least two cameras, images are then taken of the subject in a static
`
`state. In addition, images are also taken of the subject while moving. This is shown
`
`collectively by step 32. The images obtained are then processed to relate the
`12
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (Rl:fLE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`movement of the skin relative to the bone.
`
`In addition, certain calculations are
`
`performed, for example, the center of mass is calculated. These manipulations are
`
`shown in Step 34. Further, as the fiduciary markers are still in place during the video
`
`image capture, a correlation between the fiduciary and the additional set of markers
`
`5
`
`can be made. This is shown in step 36.
`
`Once this marker-to-marker correlation is made, the static 3D image of the joint (with
`
`associated fiduciary markers) and the movement images of the leg bones (also with
`
`fiduciary markers in place) can be combined. The fiduciary markers, therefore, serve
`
`10
`
`as baseline references. The combination (step 40) of 3D cartilage image (from
`
`step 14), 3D knee joint image (step 26), and the moving leg co-ordinates (step 34)
`
`will, after appropriate corrections, result in a displayable, 3D motion image of the
`
`joint moving as per step 46.
`
`The moving images, showing the contact areas of the knee joint can be used in
`
`15
`
`conjunction with the various "maps" or displays generated at step 16 to provide a
`
`visual indication of potential or actual cartilage defects and help in determining their
`
`relation between movement and degeneration patterns. This is shown in step 48.
`
`Furthermore, as
`
`the vanous
`
`images are supported by actual mathematical
`
`20
`
`quantification, real measurements (such as cartilage thickness) can be taken and
`
`compared with later or earlier measurements and/or imaging. This allows the tracking
`
`of the progression of a defect, or conversely, continued tracking of healthy cartilage.
`
`This aids a health worker in providing therapy for the patients. The method allows
`
`monitoring and evaluation of remedial actions as well as possible treatment
`
`25
`
`prescriptions.
`
`Thus, this invention discloses, for example, a method to examine the relationship
`
`between articular cartilage morphology and the functional load bearing areas of a
`
`knee joint measured during movement. The method includes enhanced imaging
`
`30
`
`techniques to reconstruct the volumetric and biochemical parameters of the articular
`
`cartilage in three dimensions; and a method for in vivo kinematic measurements of the
`
`knee. The kinematic measurement permits direct in vivo measurements of complete
`
`six-degrees of freedom motion of the femur or the tibia or associated bones during
`
`13
`
`SUBSTITUTE SHEET (RULE 26)
`
`

`
`WO 00/35346
`
`PCT/US99/30265
`
`normal activities. This permits the study of load bearing of articular cartilage during
`
`movement. In particular, this method can aid in locating cartilage defects relative to
`
`the changing load bearing areas of the knee joint during daily activities. While the
`
`various aspects of the invention are useful in mammals generally, they are particularly
`
`5
`
`useful for human patients.
`
`Obtaining the Cartilage Degeneration Pattern
`
`Imaging Articular Cartilage
`
`In general, the joint of a patient