throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571.272.7822
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper No. 8
`
` Entered: May 12, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`CRESTRON ELECTRONICS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`VESPER TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00497
`Patent 6,611,247 B1
`____________
`
`
`
`Before KEVIN F. TURNER, JASON J. CHUNG, and
`MELISSA A. HAAPALA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`HAAPALA, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Joint Motion to Terminate
`35 U.S.C. § 317 and 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.72, 42.74
`
`Pursuant to our authorization, on April 27, 2017, the parties filed a
`joint Motion to Terminate Proceedings and Request to File
`Settlement Agreement as Business Confidential Information. Paper 7. The
`parties represent that termination is appropriate because they have reached
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00497
`Patent 6,611,247 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`an agreement resolving the dispute involving the patent at issue and the prior
`litigation between the parties in connection with the patent at issue has been
`dismissed with prejudice. Id. at 3. Along with the motion, the parties filed a
`copy of a document they represent is a true copy of the settlement agreement
`between the parties as Exhibit 1014, which the parties request be treated as
`business confidential information pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c). Id. at 4–5. The parties represent that “there are no
`other written or oral agreements or understandings, including any collateral
`agreements, between them made in connection with the termination of this”
`proceeding. Id. at 4.
`
`“An inter partes review instituted under this chapter shall be
`terminated with respect to any petitioner upon the joint request of the
`petitioner and the patent owner, unless the Office has decided the merits of
`the proceeding before the request for termination is filed.” 35 U.S.C.
`§ 317(a). The proceeding is at an early stage, with the Office not yet having
`determined whether to institute the proceeding. Under the circumstances,
`we determine that it is appropriate to terminate this proceeding with respect
`to all parties without rendering a final written decision. We further
`determine the request to treat the settlement agreement (Ex. 1014) as
`business confidential information was timely filed with the settlement
`agreement, and, therefore, grant the request. See 35 U.S.C. § 317(b);
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the joint Motion to Terminate the captioned
`proceeding is granted; and
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the joint request that the settlement
`
`agreement (Ex. 1014) be treated as business confidential information
`pursuant to § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) is granted.
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00497
`Patent 6,611,247 B1
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`Samir Termanini
`Philip Kirkpatrick
`CRESTRON ELECTRONICS, INC.
`termanini@gmail.com
`pkirkpatrick@crestron.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Kenneth Weatherwax
`LOWENSTEIN & WEATHERWAX LLP
`weatherwax@lowensteinweatherwax.com
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket