throbber
United States Patent [19]
`Woodcock
`
`[11] Patent Number:
`[45] 7 Date of Patent:
`
`5,050,256
`Sep. 24, 1991
`
`[54] ALLERGEN PROOF BEDDING SYSTEM
`RCO"ER PERMEABLE T0 WATER
`
`[75] Inventor: Asmey Woodcock’ Hale, England
`
`-
`
`[73] Assigneez Slumberland P'LC’ Green?eld’
`England
`
`[21]
`
`_:
`A _
`ppl NO 530’2 10
`
`[22] Filed:
`
`May 30, 1990
`
`[63]
`
`Related US. Application Data
`Continuation of Ser. No. 289,541, Dec. 23, 1988, aban-
`domed‘
`’
`
`[56]
`
`References Cited
`Us PATENT DOCUMENTS
`1,261,314 4/1918 Stoddard ............................... .. 5/501
`
`3,822,425 7/1974 Scales . . . . . . . .
`. . . . . .. 5/453
`4,508,775 4/1985 Adiletta
`.... .. 5/483
`4,700,418 10/1987 Ritter .................................... .. 5/449
`FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS
`
`92869 9/1958 Norway ................................ .. 5/501
`2012159A 7/1979 United Kingdom .................. .. 5/482
`
`OTHER PUBLICATIONS
`“Allergen Proof Encasings” a brochure from AEP, Inc.
`1450 E. 363rd ,St., Eastlake, Ohio 44094-1983.
`“Allergy control Products ”—Brochur,e from ACP CO‘
`89 Danbury Rd., PO. Box 793, Ridge?eld, Conn.
`
`Foreig" Application P'im'ity Data
`L30]
`Dec. 29, 1987 [GB] United Kingdom ............... .. 8730252
`
`Primary Examiner-Alexander Grosz
`Attorney, Agent, or Firm—Charles E. Baxley
`
`‘
`
`06877-1984.
`
`7
`
`[51] Int. 01.5 ...................... .. A47C 27/00; A47G 9/00
`[52] US. Cl. ......................................... .. 5/448; 5/470;
`5/482; 5/490; 5/501; 428/264; 428/265;
`428/3044; 428/4231; 428/425.1; 428/913;
`428/290
`[58] Field of Search ................. .. 5/482, 490, 495, 470,
`5/448, 501, 502; 428/4231, 425.1, 264, 265,
`304.4, 913, 290
`
`ABSTRACT
`[57]
`A bedding system for use where mite-allergy is a prob
`lem causing e.g. asthma comprises a permeable mite
`barrier such as microporous or vapor permeable coated
`fabric which can be used as a mattress cover or ticking,
`pillow and duvet covers.
`5
`
`3 Claims, 1 Drawing Sheet
`
`IPR2017-00524
`Fredman EX1025 Page 1
`
`

`
`U.S. Patent
`US. Patent
`
`sep.24, 1991
`Sep. 24, 1991
`
`5,050,255
`5,050,256
`
`FIG. 3
`
`K
`3/
`
`IPRZO17-00524
`
`Fredman EX1025 Page 2
`
`IPR2017-00524
`Fredman EX1025 Page 2
`
`

`
`1
`
`ALLERGEN PROOF BEDDING SYSTEM WITH
`COVER PERMEABLE TO WATER VAPOR
`
`This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 289,541,
`?led Dec. 23, 1988, now abandoned.
`
`BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
`This invention relates to bedding systems.
`A substantial proportion of the population suffers
`from asthmatic allergic reaction to mites. Mites reside in
`large numbers in the “upholstery” of mattresses, pil
`lows, duvets and the like, emerging into the warmth
`when the bed is occupied.
`It has been established that, by controlling mites,
`asthmatics, skin-test positive to the House Dust Mite
`Dermatophagoz'des pteronyssinus, showed signi?cant im
`provement. Mite control was effected by an initial kill
`by liquid nitrogen.
`Unfortunately, liquid nitrogen treatment is not a prac
`tical proposition for mite control except in the labora
`tory.
`Clearly, other methods of killing the mites could be
`used, or establishing conditions in the upholstery in
`which the mites could not survive. The use of chemical
`controls, however, has problems in that the controls
`themselves could have harmful effects, and they might
`not have the necessary permanence for bedding, which
`is used on a long term basis and which may need at least
`occasional laundering.
`The present invention provides method for mite con
`trol in bedding not subject of these disadvantages.
`
`25
`
`BRIEF DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
`The invention comprises a bedding system in which
`the or a substantialpart of the upholstery is enclosed in
`a permeable mite barrier.
`‘
`This will effectively prevent mites entering the up
`holstery and also prevent any mites in the upholstery
`emerging to effect an occupant.
`It is important that the mite barrier is permeable,
`however, in order to avoid discomfort and, in long-term
`occupation as with invalids and in hospitals, bedsores.
`Ideally, if the mite barrier has pores, it should have a
`pore size generally less than 10 microns. It is apparent
`that anything smaller causes no allergic reaction.
`A microporous mite barrier will, of course, be air
`permeable. There are, however, coated fabrics which
`are not porous and not therefore air permeable, but
`which are vapour permeable, while being impenetrable
`to free water. One such fabric is commercially available
`as a polyurethane system known as Baxenden Witcoflex
`971/973. Others are described in the literature such, for '
`example, as British Patent Specification No. 1,341,325.
`Such fabrics have already been used in bedding sys
`tems—see, for example, British Patent Speci?cation No.
`1,596,157, which describes a mattress cover of a
`"chemically/physico-chemically porous" material such
`as that disclosed in Speci?cation No. 1,341,325. Evi
`dently, the fabrics have been intended for increased
`comfort in use by permitting body-generated water
`vapour to be dispersed through the fabric whilst also
`acting to prevent free water from entering the mattress
`interior, and this is clearly of value in hospitals and in
`cases wherein incontinence is a problem, and for the
`control of bedsores.
`In GB-2,lO5,548A, a polyurethane-coated warp knit
`ted nylon mattress cover is made ?re resistant.
`
`5,050,256
`2
`Such fabrics can also be used in bedding systems
`according to the present invention and will clearly have
`the required comfort properties of the prior art bedd
`ding sytsems and, where appropriate, the ?rst resistant
`property.
`It has recently been proposed to enclose mattresses,
`pillows and box springs in dust-proof encasings made
`from a polyester-cotton fabric laminated with a dust
`proof coating, the latter being arranged to be on the
`inside of the encasing. Such dust-proof coating, how
`ever, has not been breathable or permeable and so has
`.solvedthe allergic reaction problem only at the expense
`of comfort, which has militated against its long term use
`and its use in hospitals.
`The prior art proposals to use permeable fabrics have
`not, on the other hand, been effective for the control of
`mites because it has not been recognised that a substan
`tially total barrier is required, whereas the prior art
`permeable fabric “comfort” proposals have deemed it
`necessary somehow to eliminate the moisture that has
`been transferred through the permeable fabric and so
`that bottom of the mattress has been left open. More
`over, these prior art “comfort” proposals have been
`essentially con?ned to the mattress, whereas mites tend
`to infest pillows and increasingly popular duvets.
`If sleeping on an impermeable mattress or mattress
`cover is uncomfortable, a plastic pillow is even more so.
`An impermeable duvet is a risk because of the possibili
`ity of suffocation.
`The permeable mite barrier of the invention can be
`used for the mattress ticking or as a mattress cover or as
`an enclosure within a mattress and may also be used as
`a pillow case or as an eiderdown or duvet cover.
`In all cases, the mite barrier may comprise a material
`which is itself decorative so that it can form the top
`cover of the item concerned, or it may be covered with
`a conventional material for added comfort and/or deco
`ration.
`It is clealy better if the complete bedding system
`incorporates the mite barrier, but a substantial improve
`ment would result even if merely the mattress were
`protected in this way.
`BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
`Embodiments of bedding systems according to the
`invention will now be described with reference to the
`accompanying drawings, in which:
`FIG. 1—is a perspective view of a mattress cover
`according to the invention;
`FIG. 2—-is a diagrammatic cross-section through a
`duvet or pillow; and
`FIG. 3-is a diagrammatic cross-section through
`another duvet.
`'
`
`30
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`60
`
`65
`
`DETAILED DISCLOSURE OF THE
`PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
`The mattress 11 illustrated in FIG. 1 is conventional.
`It is covered completely, however, by a cover 12 with
`a minimal closure 13 in the form of a closely meshing
`sliding fastener. Seams 14 of the cover 12 are desirably
`made carefully leaving little or no perforation through
`which mites can pass and desirably sealed as by an addi
`tional polyurethane coating.
`The material of the cover 12 is a Baxenden Witcoflex
`971/973 type polyurethane coated closely woven nylon
`or polyester fabric. Such fabric has a permeability in the
`range 2,500-7,000 gms of water vapor/mz/day and is
`
`IPR2017-00524
`Fredman EX1025 Page 3
`
`

`
`‘
`
`II!
`
`it
`
`it
`
`1i
`
`it
`
`5,050,256
`4
`3
`An advantage of the vapour permeable fabrics is that
`available commercially from Coverplus (Coated Fab
`they can be laundered without washing water penetrat
`rics) Limited of Newton, Hyde, Cheshire, England.
`ing to the inside, so that flock, feathers and the like
`The material may instead be used as the mattress
`remain dry.
`ticking, of course, like consideration being given to the
`The fabrics can be decorative-printed or colored in
`seams thereof and to any other penetration as of quilting
`the usual ways.
`or buttons. It is probably easier, however, in general, to
`Coatings for uses where incontinence is not a prob
`make conventional mattresses and provide them with
`lem can be lighter and the coated fabrics approximate
`mite-proof covers where necessary.
`more to uncoated fabrics in their handle, drape etc.
`The material will be coated on one face only and the
`Flameproo?ng can, of course, be incorporated.
`coated face may be on the inside of the cover 12 or
`I claim:
`ticking.
`1. A bedding system comprising an item of bedding
`FIG. 2 illustrates a duvet/pillow system in which the
`for the control of mite-induced allergy, said system
`foam or flock ?lling 21 is cased in a cover 22 of mite
`having interior upholstery and cover means for said
`barrier material.
`upholstery including permeable mite barrier material of
`Again, the coated face may be on the inside. Seams 23
`coated fabric totally enclosing all of said upholstery and
`may be overlocked and coated with polyurethane. The
`being permeable to water vapor in excess of 2,500
`duvet or pillow is, for use, enclosed in a regular duvet
`g/mzday, said upholstery and cover means including
`or pillow cover 24.
`top and bottom panels and side panels devoid of any
`FIG. 3 illustrates a devet 31 which is capable ofbeing
`apertures therein for the passage of ?uid between inside
`20
`used with or without a regular duvet cover 34 and is of
`and outside of the mattress, said material not having
`quilted or buttoned construction. The quilting scams or
`pores greater in size than 10 microns.
`button locations 32 are perforated through from face to
`2. A system according to claim 1 wherein said cover
`face of the duvet without, however, opening to the
`means are removable.
`3. A system according to claim 1 wherein said fabric
`inside thereof. Such an arrangement will avoid any risk
`is coated with one of Baxenden Witco?ex 971 and 973.
`that the coated fabric will cause suffocation in the man
`ner of a plastic bag.
`
`25
`
`35
`
`45
`
`55
`
`65
`
`IPR2017-00524
`Fredman EX1025 Page 4

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket