`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 17
`Entered: January 9, 018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS US LLC; and
`NOKIA SOLUTIONS AND NETWORKS OY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00591
`Patent 8,325,675 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`Before TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, JENNIFER MEYER CHAGNON, and
`MICHELLE N. WORMMEESTER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`JEFFERSON, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`DECISION
`Granting Joint Motion to Dismiss
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(a)
`Granting Request to Treat Settlement Document
`as Confidential Business Information
`35 U.S.C. § 317(b); 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00591
`Patent 8,325,675 B2
`
`
`On December 22, 2017, the parties filed a joint motion to terminate
`the instant proceeding pursuant to a settlement agreement. Paper 15. The
`parties also filed a copy of their settlement agreement (which they refer to as
`“Exhibit 1100”), made in connection with the termination of the instant
`proceeding. Ex. 1100.1 In a concurrently filed paper, the parties jointly
`request that the settlement agreement be treated as confidential and kept
`separate from the file of the involved patent under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and
`37 C.F.R. § 42.74. Paper 16. We authorized the filing of these papers in an
`e-mail sent on December 22, 2017.
`We entered a Decision denying institution of inter partes review in
`this case on July 26, 2017. Paper 11. Petitioner has filed a Request for
`Rehearing (Paper 13),2 but we have not yet decided the merits of Petitioner’s
`Request for Rehearing. Based on these facts, it is appropriate to dismiss the
`Petition and Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing. Thus, the Joint Motion to
`Terminate the proceeding is granted.
`
`
`
`
`1 Pursuant to our instructions provided in an e-mail on December 28, 2017,
`the parties submitted a replacement version of Exhibit 1100 (which they
`designated as “Replacement Exhibit 1100”). The version of Exhibit 1100
`previously filed on December 22, 2017, will be expunged from the record.
`2 Petitioner filed a Motion to Expunge Paper 12, noting “[a]n incorrect
`version of the file for Petitioners’ Request For Rehearing Pursuant to
`37 C.F.R. § 42.71(d) was uploaded to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
`(PTAB) E2E.” Paper 14. Petitioner’s Motion is granted and Paper 12 will
`be expunged from the record.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00591
`Patent 8,325,675 B2
`
`
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that the joint motion to terminate the instant proceeding is
`granted, and the Petition and Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing are hereby
`dismissed;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties’ joint request that their
`settlement agreement (Ex. 1100) be treated as business confidential
`information and kept separate from the file of the involved patent, under the
`provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R § 42.74(c), is granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Expunge
`(Paper 14) is granted and Paper 12 is expunged; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that the version of Exhibit 1100 filed on
`December 22, 2017, is expunged.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00591
`Patent 8,325,675 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Benjamin Pleune
`ben.pleune@alston.com
`
`Scott Stevens
`scott.stevens@alston.com
`
`John Haynes
`john.haynes@alston.com
`
`Robert Caison
`robert.caison@alston.com
`
`
`J. Ravindra Fernando
`ravi.fernando@alston.com
`
`
`Christopher Douglas
`christopher.douglas@alston.com
`
`
`Derek Neilson
`derek.neilson@alston.com
`
`Ross Barton
`ross.barton@alston.com
`
`Samuel Merritt
`sam.merritt@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00591
`Patent 8,325,675 B2
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael Hawkins
`hawkins@fr.com
`
`
`W. Karl Renner
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`
`Roberto Devoto
`devoto@fr.com
`
`
`Jeremy Monaldo
`jjm@fr.com
`
`Nicholas Stephens
`nstephens@fr.com
`
`
`Thomas H. Reger II
`reger@fr.com
`
`
`Neil Wareen
`warren@fr.com
`
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
