`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: June 19, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`_______________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`_______________
`
`CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`UNILOC USA, INC. and UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A.,
`Patent Owner.
`_______________
`
`Case IPR2017-00597
`Patent 8,571,194 B2
`_______________
`
`
`Before KARL D. EASTHOM, KEN B. BARRETT, and
`JEFFREY S. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ERRATA
`
`
`
`
`The panel modifies our Final Written Decision issued June 13, 2018
`
`(Paper 20) as follows:
`
`On page 31, the phrase “Claims 1–5 of the ’945 patent are
`
`unpatentable” is deleted and replaced with the phrase “Claims 1–5 of the
`
`’194 patent are unpatentable.” In all other respects, the Final Written
`
`Decision is unchanged.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00597
`Patent 8,571,194 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`David McCombs
`david.mccombs.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Theodore Foster
`ipr.theo.foster@haynesboone.com
`
`Dina Blikshteyn
`dina.blikshteyn.ipr@haynesboone.com
`
`Jamie McDole
`jamie.mcdole@haynesboone.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Brett Mangrum
`brett@etheridgelaw.com
`
`Sean Burdick
`sean.burdick@unilocusa.com
`
`Ryan Loveless
`ryan@etheridgelaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`