Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 28
`Entered: September 12, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FUJIFILM CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, and
`MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KOKOSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`571-272-7822
`
`Paper 28
`Entered: September 12, 2018
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SONY CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`FUJIFILM CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before JO-ANNE M. KOKOSKI, JEFFREY W. ABRAHAM, and
`MICHELLE N. ANKENBRAND, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KOKOSKI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Trial Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner request an oral hearing pursuant to
`
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70. Papers 26, 27. The requests are granted.
`
`Each party will have 60 minutes of total argument time to present its
`
`arguments. Petitioner bears the ultimate burden of proof that the patent
`
`claims at issue in this review are unpatentable. Therefore, Petitioner will
`
`open the hearing by presenting arguments regarding the pending grounds of
`
`unpatentability. Patent Owner will then have the opportunity to respond to
`
`Petitioner’s arguments. Petitioner may reserve rebuttal time not to exceed
`
`half the total time allotted. Petitioner is cautioned that rebuttal time may
`
`only be used to respond to arguments made during Patent Owner’s
`
`argument.
`
`The hearing will commence at 1:00 pm EDT on September 25, 2018,
`
`and will be open to the public for in-person attendance on the ninth floor of
`
`Madison Building East, 600 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA. In-person
`
`attendance will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis. The
`
`Board will provide a court reporter, and the transcript shall constitute the
`
`official record of the hearing.
`
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits, if any, must be
`
`served seven business days before the hearing. Notwithstanding § 42.70,
`
`however, the parties shall file the demonstrative exhibits no later than three
`
`business days before the hearing to allow the panel sufficient time to review
`
`the materials.
`
`The Board reminds the parties that demonstrative exhibits are
`
`intended to assist the parties in presenting their oral arguments and are not
`
`evidence, and should be clearly marked as such. For example, each slide of
`
`a demonstrative exhibit may be marked with the words
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`
`“DEMONSTRATIVE EXHIBIT—NOT EVIDENCE” in the footer. The
`
`Board also reminds the parties that demonstrative exhibits are not a
`
`mechanism for making arguments or introducing evidence not previously
`
`presented in the record. The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical,
`
`Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The Board of Regents of the University of
`
`Michigan, Case IPR2013-00041 (PTAB Jan. 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for
`
`guidance regarding the appropriate content of demonstrative exhibits.
`
`The Board expects that the parties will meet and confer in good faith
`
`to resolve any objections to demonstrative exhibits. If such objections
`
`cannot be resolved, the parties may file any remaining objections with the
`
`Board at least three business days before the oral hearing. Objections to
`
`demonstratives should be carefully considered and framed as the Board has
`
`not found that such objections are helpful in many cases. The objections
`
`should identify with particularity the portions of the demonstrative exhibits
`
`that are subject to objection and include a one-sentence statement of the
`
`basis for each objection. No argument or further explanation is permitted.
`
`The Board will consider any objections and schedule a conference call if
`
`deemed necessary. Otherwise, the Board will reserve ruling on the
`
`objections. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is not timely
`
`presented will be considered waived.
`
`A hard copy of the demonstratives should be provided to the court
`
`reporter at the hearing. The parties are reminded that the presenter must
`
`identify clearly and specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or
`
`screen number) referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and
`
`accuracy of the reporter’s transcript. The parties also should note that at
`
`least one member of the panel will be attending the hearing electronically
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`
`from a remote location, and that if a demonstrative is not filed or otherwise
`
`made fully available or visible to the judge(s) attending the hearing
`
`remotely, that demonstrative will not be considered. Documents presented
`
`on the Elmo projector are not visible to remote judges, so please plan
`
`accordingly.
`
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present in person
`
`at the oral hearing. However, any counsel of record may present the party’s
`
`argument. If either party anticipates that its lead counsel will not be
`
`attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint telephone
`
`conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to the oral
`
`hearing to discuss the matter.
`
`Questions regarding specific audio-visual equipment should be
`
`directed to the Board at 571-272-9797. Requests for audio-visual equipment
`
`are to be made no later than 5 days in advance of the hearing date. The
`
`request is to be sent directly to Trials@uspto.gov. If the request is not
`
`received timely, the equipment may not be available on the day of the
`
`hearing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00618
`Patent 7,355,805 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Richard F. Giunta
`Randy J. Pritzker
`Marc S. Johannes
`WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS, P.C.
`RGiunta-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`RPritzker-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`MJohannes-PTAB@wolfgreenfield.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Neil P. Sirota
`Robert C. Scheinfeld
`Eliot D. Williams
`Eric J. Faragi
`BAKER BOTTS L.L.P.
`neil.sirota@bakerbotts.com
`robert.scheinfeld@bakerbotts.com
`eliot.williams@bakerbotts.com
`eric.faragi@bakerbotts.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
