throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filed: March 19, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Filed on behalf of:
`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited
`By: Brenton R. Babcock
`Benjamin J. Everton
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`2040 Main Street, 14th Floor
`Irvine, CA 92614
`Tel.: (949) 760-0404
`Fax: (949) 760-9502
`Email: BoxFPH538@knobbe.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`__________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`__________________________________
`
`FISHER & PAYKEL HEALTHCARE LIMITED,
`Petitioner
`
`v.
`
`RESMED LIMITED,
`Patent Owner
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No. IPR2017-00632
`U.S. Patent No. 8,944,061 B2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`

`

`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd. v. Resmed Ltd.
`IPR2017-00632
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a) and the Scheduling Order (Paper 9),
`
`Petitioner Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited requests that the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeal Board hear oral argument on the instituted grounds of unpatentability for
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,944,061 and associated issues, including:
`
`1. Whether Claims 81, 84, 85, 87, 88, and 91 are obvious over Berthon-
`
`Jones and Barnett under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`2. Whether Claims 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 28–30, 32, 33, 35, 36, 38, 43–46
`
`are obvious over Berthon-Jones, Barnett and Lithgow under 35 U.S.C. § 103.
`
`3.
`
`Responses to any issues raised by Patent Owner in its Request for
`
`Oral Argument, or any issues raised at the oral argument.
`
`4.
`
`Any other issues the Board deems necessary for issuing a final written
`
`decision.
`
`The Board has previously scheduled the oral argument for April 23, 2018,
`
`see Paper 9.
`
`Petitioner believes 30 minutes of argument time for each party, including
`
`rebuttal by Petitioner, should be sufficient to address the issues in this IPR.
`
`Petitioner anticipates that approximately 4–6 people will attend the oral argument
`
`on its behalf.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Ltd. v. Resmed Ltd.
`IPR2017-00632
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 19, 2018
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP
`
`
`
`By: /Benjamin J. Everton/
`Brenton R. Babcock (Reg. No. 39,592)
`Benjamin J. Everton (Reg. No. 60,659)
`Customer No. 20,995
`Attorneys for Petitioner,
`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited
`(949) 760-0404
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00632
`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare v. Resmed
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`I hereby certify that, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e)(1) and agreement of the
`
`parties, a true and correct copy of PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL
`
`ARGUMENT is being served via email on March 19, 2018, to counsel for
`
`ResMed Limited at the email addresses below:
`
`
`Michael T. Hawkins
`Michael J. Kane
`Christopher C. Hoff
`Geoffrey Biegler
`Jason Zucchi
`3200 RBC Plaza
`60 South Sixth Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Tel: 612-337-2508
`IPR36784-0060IP1@fr.com
`PTABInbound@fr.com
`
`
`
`Dated: March 19, 2018
`
`27821462
`
`
`By: /Benjamin J. Everton/
`Brenton R. Babcock (Reg. No. 39,592)
`Benjamin J. Everton (Reg. No. 60,659)
`Attorney for Petitioner,
`Fisher & Paykel Healthcare Limited
`
`
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket