throbber

`

`The development of a nasopharyngeal sling for anchoring
`termed the bridle by Luther and Armstrong, 10 has al(cid:173)
`nasoenteric nutritional support to be used with less
`of tube displacement. The bridle has increased the
`of patients managed through the enteral route.
`TECHNIQUE
`The technique was first described in 1981.10 Since that time,
`i(we have used it with slight modifications. A minimal amount
`~ofequipment(an 18" length of small base silicone rubbertub(cid:173)
`::;ing, a' McGill or ~imilar forceps, and 00 silk suture) is neces:
`fsary to create the bridle (Figure 1 ).
`.
`After a thorough explanation of the procedure, the patient
`is allowed to sit up or the head of the bed is raised to 45°. The
`t nostrils are checked for patency to establish which to use for
`.,:inserting the feeding tube. Both nostrils are lubricated with
`topical anesthetic. The hypopharynx is sprayed with a top(cid:173)
`ical anesthetic to decrease gagging. One end of the silicone
`rubber tube is placed in one nostril gently pushing the tube
`tip down and back. The other end of the tube is placed in the
`'opposite nasal passage in the same manner (Figure 2). When
`each limb has been advanced approximately 8", the patient
`js asked to open his mouth. Both ends of the tubing should
`••.• be visible in the hypopharynx. The two free ends are grasped
`with the forceps, pulled out through the mouth (Figure 3),
`and sutured together (Figure 4). The loop of tubing across the
`columella is then pulled gently, bringing the tied ends of the
`
`tube back to the nasopharynx and eventually to the posterior
`aspect of the nasal septum (Figure 5). One side of the loop is
`then advanced through one nasal passage while the other side
`is pulled, bringing the sutured ends through the nasal passage
`(Figure 6). Next, the tied ends are cut and the tubing is tied
`to itself allowing enough room between the loop and the sep(cid:173)
`tum to prevent pressure necrosis (Figure 7). Silk ties are placed
`in front and back of the knot to prevent slippage (Figure 8).
`The excess tubing is cut and the bridle is completed (Figure
`9).
`The enteric tube is then inserted through the preselected
`nasal passage and, once .in place, anchored to the bridle by
`silk sutures and adhesive tape (Figures 10 and 11 ). Attempts
`at pulling the tube will result in gentle traction of the posteri(cid:173)
`or aspect of the nasopharynx. Serious dislodgement by cough(cid:173)
`ing, sneezing, or gagging is usually prevented by the fixed
`point of the tube.
`
`CARE
`The bridle and tube should be checked every eight hours.
`Tube position and bridle looseness should be noted. The ten(cid:173)
`dency towards crusting can be avoided by use of topical anti(cid:173)
`biotic ointments. The adhesive tape should be replaced if
`loose or wet.
`
`RESULTS
`To date, we have employed this technique in 10 patients
`over the past year with encouraging results. The bridle has
`
`Figure 4: Ends sutured.
`
`Figure 5: Sutured ends being pulled back to hypo, and nasopharynx.
`
`Figure 6: Sutured ends brought out through a nasal passage.
`
`Figure 7: Tube tied to itself after cutting suture connecting ends.
`
`9
`
`CORPAK Ex 1006, Page 2
`
`

`

`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket