throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
`
`
`APPLIED MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Case No. 1:16-CV-02190-PAG
`
`CORPAK MEDSYSTEMS, INC.
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`JUDGE PATRICIA A. GAUGHAN
`
`INITIAL INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS
`
`
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.1, Plaintiff APPLIED MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.
`
`
`
`
`
`(“AMT”) hereby provides the following information to Defendant CORPAK MEDSYSTEMS,
`
`INC. (“Corpak”).
`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (a): Infringed Claims
`
`Corpak infringes claim 18 of U.S. Patent No. 6,631,715 (the ’715 patent), which is
`
`entitled “Magnetic Nasal Tube Bridle System and Related Method,” under 35 U.S.C. § 271 (b).
`
`AMT reserves the right to allege that Corpak infringes claim 18 of the ‘715 patent under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 271 (a) and/or 35 U.S.C. § 271 (c) as information is provided by Corpak.
`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (b): Accused Instrumentalities
`
`The above-identified claim of the ‘715 patent is infringed by Corpak’s device for
`
`nasogastric/nasointestinal tube retention named the CORGRIP NG/NI Tube Retention System
`
`(the “Corgrip System”) when used in accordance with Corpak’s instructions. Product numbers
`
`include 25-008, 25-010, and 25-012, for use with NG/NI feeding tubes of sizes 8 French, 10
`
`French, and 12 French, respectively.
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 1
`
`

`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (c): Claim Chart
`
`AMT provides herewith as Exhibit A a detailed Claim Chart identifying specifically
`
`where each limitation of the asserted claim is found within each Accused Instrumentality. At
`
`present, AMT does not contend that any limitation in the asserted claim is governed by 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 112(6) (pre-AIA).
`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (d): Direct Infringers
`
`AMT alleges that claim 18 of the ‘715 patent is indirectly infringed under 35 U.S.C. §
`
`271(b), and that the direct infringers are each medical care provider that uses Corpak’s Corgrip
`
`System following the instructions provided by Corpak with the Corgrip System. See paragraphs
`
`14-16 of the Complaint.
`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (e): Literal Infringement
`
`As set out in the Claim Chart attached as Exhibit A, it is believed that each limitation of
`
`the asserted claim is literally present during use of Corpak’s Corgrip System by medical care
`
`providers following the instructions provided by Corpak with the Corgrip System. AMT
`
`reserves the right to amend these Contentions to describe how such limitations are alternatively
`
`met under the doctrine of equivalents, including for example if Corpak contends that one or more
`
`limitations of the asserted claim are not present during use of Corpak’s Corgrip System by
`
`medical care providers.
`
`L.P.R. 3.1(f): Priority Dates
`
`The ‘715 patent has a filing date of August 24, 2001, and claims priority of U.S.
`
`Provisional Application No. 60/230,525, filed September 1, 2000. AMT contends that the
`
`asserted claim has a priority date of August 24, 2001.
`
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 2
`
`

`
`L.P.R. 3.1 (g): Willful Infringement
`
`AMT alleges that Corpak willfully infringed the asserted claim for at least the following
`
`reasons. Beginning in or about March 2014 Corpak began offering for sale and selling in the United
`
`States the Corgrip System. Corpak had actual knowledge of the ‘715 patent when it offered for sale
`
`and sold its Corgrip System and provided specific instructions for the use of that system. Corpak
`
`learned of the ‘715 patent at least as early as 2011 when it reviewed AMT’s “Bridle” nasal tube
`
`retention system in connection with an attempt to acquire the rights to this innovative product from
`
`AMT. AMT’s “Bridle” nasal tube retention system practiced the ‘715 patent and was marked with
`
`the ‘715 patent number.
`
`Further, at about the time when Corpak announced the introduction of its Corgrip System,
`
`Corpak filed an Information Disclosure Statement in a patent application at the United States Patent
`
`and Trademark Office which disclosed the ‘715 patent, thereby showing that Corpak had knowledge
`
`of the ‘715 patent at that time.
`
`In addition, Corpak had and has specific intent to encourage and induce medical care
`
`providers using the Corgrip System to infringe the asserted claim. This intent is shown in the detailed
`
`instructions Corpak has provided and continues to provide for the use of its Corgrip System. These
`
`instructions specifically direct medical care providers using the Corgrip System to carry out each and
`
`every step of the method claimed in claim 18 of the ‘715 patent as shown in the Claim Chart.
`
`Furthermore, medical care providers using the Corgrip System have infringed and continue to
`
`infringe the asserted claim by using Corpak’s Corgrip System as instructed by Corpak.
`
`The reasonable implication of these facts is that Corpak knows that use of its Corgrip System,
`
`in accordance with its instructions for use thereof, infringes the asserted claim, and yet has
`
`consciously chosen to have made and sold the Corgrip System in derogation of the ‘715 patent.
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 3
`
`

`
`L.P.R. 3.2: Document Production
`
`Pursuant to Local Patent Rule 3.2, AMT is producing herewith documents that are
`
`required to be disclosed under that Rule. Nothing in these required disclosures shall be
`
`considered an admission that such disclosures are prior art or evidence of prior art under 35
`
`U.S.C. § 102 (pre-AIA) or § 103 (pre-AIA).
`
`
`
`Dated: November 8, 2016
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`/s/ Michael P. Padden
`Michael P. Padden
`Steven J. Solomon
`Gregory M. York
`Pearne & Gordon LLP
`1801 East 9th Street, Suite 1200
`Cleveland, OH 44114
`(216) 579-1700
`mpadden@pearne.com
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Applied
`Medical Technology, Inc.
`
`
`
`4
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 4
`
`

`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I, Kristy M. Wiles, a non-attorney, hereby certify that I served this INITIAL
`
`
`
`INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS by serving a copy of each to the parties listed below by
`
`regular U.S. mail and email this 8th day of November, 2016:
`
`Attn: Mark R. Jacobs
`Matasar Jacobs LLC
`1111 Superior Ave., Suite 1355
`Cleveland, Ohio 44114
`Phone: (216) 453-8180
`Fax: (216) 282-8600
`Email: mjacobs@matasarjacobs.com
`
`Attn: Richard M. McDermott
`Alston & Bird LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280
`Phone: (704) 444-1045
`Fax: (704) 444-1745
`Email: rick.mcdermott@alston.com
`
`Attn: Tasneem Dharamsi Delphry
`Alston & Bird LLP
`Bank of America Plaza
`101 S. Tryon Street, Suite 4000
`Charlotte, NC 28280
`Phone: (704) 444-1199
`Fax: (704) 444-1111
`Email: tasneem.delphry@alston.com
`
`Attn: Jitendra Malik
`Alston & Bird LLP
`4721 Emperor Boulevard, Suite 400
`Durham, NC 27703-8580
`Phone: (919) 862-2210
`Fax: (919) 862-2260
`E-mail: jitty.malik@alston.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`_/s/ Kristy M. Wiles____
`
`5
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 5
`
`

`
`Exhibit A
`Exhibit A
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK EX 1009, Page 6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 6
`
`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Claim Chart for U.S. Patent No. 6,631,715
`
`
`
`Claim
`
`Corpak’s CORGRIP device
`
`
`
`
`Corpak’s CORGRIP device is designed and
`intended for use by a medical care provider in
`a method of placing and securing a nasal tube,
`such as a nasogastric tube or nasointestinal
`tube, through a nose into a patient.
`
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 2, in the
`section titled “Directions for Insertion,”
`instructs in step 2 to “[p]osition the patient in
`accordance with facility protocol for feeding
`tube placement.” Corpak’s instruction manual
`also illustrates, for example in subsequent step
`5, the presence of the nasal tube so inserted
`into a nare of a nose of a patient. Although
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 2, also
`instructs that “[t]he CORGRIP may be placed
`before or after the NG/NI tube,” and although
`the claim recites the step of inserting the tube
`into a nare before reciting the remaining steps,
`the claim does not require that this step be
`carried out in order with respect to the
`remaining steps, but rather just that the step be
`carried out. Thus, Corpak’s instruction manual
`instructs a medical care provider to insert the
`nasal tube into a first or second nare of the
`nose of the patient.
`
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 3,
`instructs in step 6 to “[i]nsert the WHITE
`catheter into the OPPOSITE nostril 5-7 cm or
`to the same distance as the YELLOW catheter
`so magnet tips are at the same point behind the
`vomer bone.” Corpak’s instruction manual
`also illustrates in step 6 the insertion of the
`white catheter into a first nare of the nose, in
`this case corresponding to the nare on the left
`side of the illustration, and thus the patient’s
`right nare. For reference, Corpak’s CORGRIP
`device includes a white catheter. The white
`
`
`
`What is claimed is:
`
`18. A method of placing and securing at least
`one tube through a nose into a patient
`comprising:
`
`
`
`inserting the at least one tube into a first or
`second nare of the nose;
`
`
`
`inserting an end portion of a flexible member
`having a magnet attached thereto into a first
`nare of the nose;
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 7
`
`

`
`catheter includes a flexible member,
`corresponding to umbilical tape. The flexible
`member has an end portion, corresponding to
`an end of the umbilical tape. The end portion
`of the flexible member has a magnet attached
`thereto, corresponding to a magnet attached to
`the umbilical tape by what appears to be heat-
`shrink sleeve. Although Corpak’s instruction
`manual instructs insertion of the white catheter
`after insertion of the yellow catheter, and
`although the claim recites the step of inserting
`an end portion of a flexible member into a first
`nare of the nose, before reciting the step of
`inserting a magnetic probe into a second nare
`of the nose, the claim does not require that
`these steps be carried out in this order, but
`rather just that they be carried out. Thus,
`Corpak’s instruction manual instructs a
`medical care provider to insert an end portion
`of a flexible member having a magnet attached
`thereto into a first nare of the nose.
`
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 2,
`instructs in step 5 to “[i]nsert the YELLOW
`retrieval catheter approximately 5-7 cm into
`nare opposite the nasal tube.” Corpak’s
`instruction manual also illustrates in step 5 the
`insertion of the yellow catheter into a second
`nare of the nose, in this case corresponding to
`the nare on right side of the illustration, and
`thus the patient’s left nare. Corpak’s
`instruction manual, on page 3, also instructs in
`step 7 that “[s]ome gentle manipulation of the
`catheters will encourage magnet engagement
`along with deployment of TRUE TORQUE
`TECHNOLOGY in the WHITE catheter,” and
`that “[w]hen the magnets connect behind the
`vomer bone, you will hear the click and/or feel
`the connection.” Corpak’s instruction manual,
`on page 22, in the section “Summary of
`Magnet Locking Progression Behind Vomer
`Bone,” illustrates such connection. For
`reference, Corpak’s CORGRIP device includes
`a yellow catheter. The yellow catheter
`includes a magnet for attracting the magnet
`attached to the end portion of the white
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`inserting a magnetic probe into a second nare
`of the nose for attracting said magnet and said
`end portion of said flexible member;
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 8
`
`

`
`catheter, as illustrated. Thus, the yellow
`catheter corresponds to a magnetic probe for
`attracting the magnet and the end portion of the
`flexible member. Thus, Corpak’s instruction
`manual instructs a medical care provider to
`insert a magnetic probe into a second nare of
`the nose for attracting said magnet and said end
`portion of said flexible member.
`
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 3,
`instructs in steps 8-10 that “[w]hen magnet
`engagement has occurred, press the WHITE
`button on the catheter to release the umbilical
`tape,” “[s]lowly/deliberately withdraw the
`WHITE catheter approximately 10 cm out of
`the nare,” and “[t]hen slowly/deliberately
`withdraw the YELLOW catheter 2-3 cm
`outside of nare allowing the advancement of
`the umbilical tape behind the vomer bone and
`out the opposite nostril.” For reference,
`Corpak’s CORGRIP device is designed to hold
`the umbilical tape in place within the white
`catheter while the white button is not pressed,
`and to release the umbilical tape so it can move
`relative to the white catheter when the white
`button is pressed. Once the magnet and the
`end portion of the umbilical tape have been
`attracted by the magnetic probe, and while the
`white button is being pressed, withdrawal of
`the white catheter from the first nare results in
`the magnet and the end portion of the umbilical
`tape remaining connected to the magnetic
`probe while the white catheter is being
`withdrawn from the first nare of the patient.
`Subsequent withdrawal of the yellow catheter
`from the second nare results in retrieval of the
`magnet and the end portion of the umbilical
`tape, also from the second nare. A portion of
`the umbilical tape is thereby pulled into the
`first nare, around the vomer bone, and out the
`second nare. Thus, Corpak’s instruction
`manual instructs a medical care provider to
`remove said probe from the second nare of the
`nose thereby retrieving said end portion of said
`flexible member through the second nare of the
`nose.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`removing said probe from the second nare of
`the nose thereby retrieving said end portion of
`said flexible member through the second nare
`of the nose; and
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 9
`
`

`
`
`Corpak’s instruction manual, on page 4, in the
`section titled “Securing the CORGRIP to the
`NG/NI tube with the SSL (Slot-Slide-Lock)
`Clamp,” instructs in steps 1 and 2 to “SLOT
`the NG/NI tube into the groove of the SSL
`Clamp,” “[t]hen place one or both sides [of]
`the umbilical tape onto the flat area of the
`clamp, in front of the feeding tube,” and
`“SLIDE the clamp up to approximately 1 cm
`from nare.” Corpak’s instruction manual
`illustrates, at the same steps, that the nasal tube
`is positioned into a groove formed in the
`clamp. For reference, Corpak’s CORGRIP
`device includes a clamp. The clamp is a
`receiver, i.e. for the nasal tube. The receiver
`has a channel formed therein, corresponding to
`the groove formed in the clamp. Securing the
`clamp to the nasal tube by pressing the nasal
`tube into the groove results in snapping of the
`nasal tube into the groove. This is snapping,
`based on the nasal tube having an outer
`diameter, and the groove having an opening
`corresponding to a narrow gap, such that the
`outer diameter of the nasal tube is slightly
`greater than the narrow gap of the opening of
`the groove. Thus, pressing is required to force
`the nasal tube to pass through the narrow gap,
`and once the nasal tube is in the groove,
`pulling would be required to free the nasal tube
`from the groove. This is so even if the groove
`has an inner diameter that is greater than the
`outer diameter of the nasal tube. This is
`apparent based on the instructions, noted
`above, to “slot” the tube into the groove of the
`clamp, then to “slide” the clamp up to
`approximately 1 cm from nare. This also is
`apparent based on actually handling and using
`the CORGRIP device in practice.
`
`
`
`
`
`snapping the at least one tube into a channel
`formed in a receiver.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CORPAK Ex 1009, Page 10

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket