`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 21
`Entered: February 22, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`
`
`On February 15, 2017, Petitioner filed Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Mr. Jared Bobrow. Paper 6.2 The Motions are supported by
`
`Declarations of Mr. Bobrow. Ex. 1064.3 Patent Owner did not file an
`
`opposition.
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Bobrow pro hac vice in these proceedings.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mr. Jared Bobrow are granted in these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow is authorized to represent
`
`Petitioner as back-up counsel only, and that Petitioner is to continue to have
`
`a registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow shall comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`
`2 We cite the paper and exhibit filed in IPR2017-00662. Petitioner filed
`similar motions and declarations in IPR2017-00663 (Paper 6; Exhibit 1062)
`and IPR2017-00664 (Paper 6; Exhibit 1060).
`3 There are two versions of Exhibit 1064 in the record of IPR2017-00662.
`Here, we refer to the Declaration of Jared Bobrow filed on
`February 15, 2017.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow shall be subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Lang
`Jason.lang@weil.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Reza Mollaaghababa
`mollaaghababa@pepperlaw.com
`
`Thomas Engellenner
`engellennert@pepperlaw.com
`
`Andrew Schultz
`schultz@pepperlaw.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`