throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
` Paper No. 21
`Entered: February 22, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)1
`____________
`
`Before CHRISTOPHER L. CRUMBLEY, JON B. TORNQUIST, and
`CHRISTOPHER M. KAISER, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`KAISER, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice Admission
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this style heading in subsequent
`papers.
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`
`
`On February 15, 2017, Petitioner filed Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`
`Admission of Mr. Jared Bobrow. Paper 6.2 The Motions are supported by
`
`Declarations of Mr. Bobrow. Ex. 1064.3 Patent Owner did not file an
`
`opposition.
`
`The Board has reviewed the submissions and determined that the
`
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`
`admit Mr. Bobrow pro hac vice in these proceedings.
`
`
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motions for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Mr. Jared Bobrow are granted in these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow is authorized to represent
`
`Petitioner as back-up counsel only, and that Petitioner is to continue to have
`
`a registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow shall comply with the Office
`
`Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`
`set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations; and
`
`
`
`2 We cite the paper and exhibit filed in IPR2017-00662. Petitioner filed
`similar motions and declarations in IPR2017-00663 (Paper 6; Exhibit 1062)
`and IPR2017-00664 (Paper 6; Exhibit 1060).
`3 There are two versions of Exhibit 1064 in the record of IPR2017-00662.
`Here, we refer to the Declaration of Jared Bobrow filed on
`February 15, 2017.
`
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case IPR2017-00662 (Patent 6,969,539 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00663 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`Case IPR2017-00664 (Patent 8,334,016 B2)
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Bobrow shall be subject to the
`
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the Office’s
`
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101–11.901.
`
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Jeremy Lang
`Jason.lang@weil.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Reza Mollaaghababa
`mollaaghababa@pepperlaw.com
`
`Thomas Engellenner
`engellennert@pepperlaw.com
`
`Andrew Schultz
`schultz@pepperlaw.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket