throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper No. 36
`
` Entered: May 22, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`SK HYNIX INC., SK HYNIX AMERICA INC., and
`SK HYNIX MEMORY SOLUTIONS INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`NETLIST, INC.
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`IPR2017-00667
`Patent 7,532,537 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before STEPHEN C. SIU, MATTHEW R. CLEMENTS, and
`SHEILA F. McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`McSHANE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00667
`Patent 7,532,537 B2
`
`SK hynix Inc., SK hynix America Inc., and SK hynix memory
`
`solutions Inc. (“Petitioner”) filed a Corrected Petition requesting inter partes
`review of claims 1–17, 24–38, and 45–55 of U.S. Patent No. 7,532,537 B2
`(the ’537 patent), that included three grounds asserting anticipation of some
`claims by Amidi (“Ground A”), obviousness of some claims over Amidi
`(“Ground B”), and obviousness of some claims over Amidi and Klein
`(“Ground C”). Paper 6, 2. On July 21, 2017, we issued a Decision
`instituting inter partes review on all claims and on all grounds. Paper 10,
`25.
`In Petitioner’s Reply, Petitioner stated that Ground A and Ground B
`
`relied upon claim construction that had been rejected by the Federal Circuit
`during the time the inter partes review had been pending, and “[t]o narrow
`the issues for the Board in this proceeding, Petitioners will not pursue
`Grounds A and B.” Paper 19, 1, n.1. At the April 24, 2018 oral hearing, the
`parties agreed to vacating Ground A and Ground B. See Transcript of April
`24, 2018 (Tr.), Paper 35, 35:1–12, 37:19–25.
`
`In order to memorialize the agreement of the parties, the parties shall
`file a Joint Motion to Limit the Petition to remove Ground A and Ground B
`from the proceeding. See, e.g., Apotex Inc., v. OSI Pharms., Inc., Case
`IPR2016-01284 (PTAB Apr. 3, 2017) (Paper 19) (granting, after institution,
`a joint motion to limit the petition by removing a patent claim that was
`included for trial in the institution decision). The Joint Motion shall be filed
`within two (2) weeks of the entry of this Order.
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is hereby:
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00667
`Patent 7,532,537 B2
`
`ORDERED that the parties shall file, within two (2) weeks of the date
`
`of this Order, a Joint Motion to Limit the Petition to remove Ground A and
`Ground B from the proceeding.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00667
`Patent 7,532,537 B2
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Joseph A. Micallef
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mehran Arjomand
`Erol Basol
`Jonathan Statman
`MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
`marjomand@mofo.com
`ebasol@mofo.com
`jstatman@mofo.com
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket