throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`____________________________________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________________________________________
`
`T-MOBILE US, INC. and T-MOBILE USA, INC.
`Petitioners
`
`
`v.
`
`Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd.,
`Patent Owner
`____________________________________________
`
`
`Trial No. IPR2017-00671
`U.S. Patent No. 8,638,750
`
`PETITIONERS’ NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS TO EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ActiveUS 165636788v.1
`
`

`

`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.64(b)(1), Petitioners T-Mobile US, Inc., and T-
`
`Trial No. IPR2017-00671
`U.S. Patent No. 8,638,750
`
`
`
`Mobile USA, Inc. (“Petitioners”) hereby submit their notice of objections to certain
`
`evidence that Patent Owner Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd. (“Patent Owner”)
`
`submitted with the Patent Owner’s Response dated November 13, 2017 in
`
`connection with Trial No. IPR2017-00671.
`
`Petitioner objects to the following items:
`
`
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibit 2004 (titled “Declaration of Mr. Scott Andrew
`
`Denning”) under Fed. R. Evid. 401-403 (relevance; more prejudicial than
`
`probative), Fed. R. Evid. 602 (lack of personal knowledge), and Fed. R. Evid. 802
`
`(hearsay). For example, at least paragraphs 38 and 46 contain information that is
`
`not relevant and is more prejudicial than probative. In addition, there is a failure to
`
`show personal knowledge of some of the facts alleged in paragraphs 38 and 46.
`
`Additionally, paragraphs 38 and 46 contain hearsay.
`
`Petitioner objects to Exhibits 2006, 2007, 2008, and 2009 under Fed. R.
`
`Evid. 401-403 (relevance; more prejudicial than probative), Fed. R. Evid. 802
`
`(hearsay), and Fed. R. Evid. 901 (failure to authenticate). These exhibits are not
`
`relevant and are more prejudicial than probative. In addition, these exhibits
`
`
`ActiveUS 165636788v.1
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`contain hearsay. Additionally, Patent Owner has failed to produce evidence
`
`Trial No. IPR2017-00671
`U.S. Patent No. 8,638,750
`
`sufficient to support a finding that each item is what Patent Owner claims it is.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
` Date: November 20, 2017 /Joseph F. Haag/
`
`
`
`
`
` Joseph F. Haag
` Registration No. 42,612
`
`
`ActiveUS 165636788v.1
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Trial No. IPR2017-00671
`U.S. Patent No. 8,638,750
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`I hereby certify that on November 20, 2017, I caused a true and correct copy
`
`of Petitioners’ Notice of Objections to Evidence to be served by email on Patent
`
`Owner by serving this material to the following email addresses of records:
`
`Michael T. Hawkins (IPR35548-0058IP1@fr.com)
`W. Karl Renner (AXF-PTAB@fr.com, PTABInbound@fr.com)
`Jeremy Monaldo (monaldo@fr.com)
`Roberto Devoto (devoto@fr.com)
`Stuart A. Nelson (PTABInbound@fr.com)
`Kevin K. Su (PTABInbound@fr.com)
`Conrad A. Gosen (PTABInbound@fr.com)
`IPR35548-0058IP1@fr.com (ref.: Docket No. 35548-0058IP1)
`
`
`
` /Joseph F. Haag/
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Joseph F. Haag
` Registration No. 42,612
`
`
`ActiveUS 165636788v.1
`
`3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket