`Tel: 571.272.7822
`
`Paper No. 61
`Entered: March 30, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`v.
`R2 SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00705; Case IPR2017-00706
`Case IPR2017-00707; Case IPR2017-00708
`Case IPR2017-01123; Case IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`____________
`____________
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JEAN R. HOMERE, and JENNIFER S. BISK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`Both parties request oral hearing for each of these proceedings
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70. The requests are granted.
`Oral hearing will commence at 1:00 PM ET, on May 1, 2018. The
`Board will provide a court reporter for the hearing and the reporter’s
`transcript will constitute the official record of the hearing. As proposed by
`the parties, each party will have ninety minutes of total time to present
`arguments in all of the six cases. The parties may split this time between the
`six cases as desired. The parties are on notice that arguments presented at
`the consolidated hearing may not have uniform application to all listed
`cases. Instead, application of arguments depends on the extent to which the
`underlying record of each case supports the arguments. Counsel is
`encouraged to be clear in identifying the underlying case or cases with
`respect to which an argument is made.
`Petitioner will open the hearing by presenting its case regarding the
`challenged claims for which we instituted trial and any claims proposed in
`Patent Owner’s Motions to Amend. Patent Owner will follow. Petitioner
`may reserve rebuttal time.
`Under 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(b), demonstrative exhibits must be served 7
`business days prior to the hearing. They shall be filed at the Board prior to
`the hearing, and the parties must initiate a conference call with the Board by
`two business days prior to the hearing to resolve any dispute over the
`propriety of each party’s demonstrative exhibits. Any dispute over the
`propriety of demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented two business
`days prior to the hearing will be considered waived. The parties are directed
`to CBS Interactive Inc. v. Helferich Patent Licensing, LLC, IPR2013-00033,
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`Paper 118 (October 23, 2013), regarding the appropriate content of
`demonstrative exhibits. We will consider the objections and schedule a
`conference call if necessary. Otherwise, we will reserve ruling on the
`objections until the hearing. Any objection to demonstrative exhibits that is
`not presented timely will be considered waived.
`The parties are reminded that the presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during each hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript.
`The Board expects lead counsel for each party to be present at oral
`hearing, although any backup counsel may make the actual presentation, in
`whole or in part. If lead counsel for either party is unable to attend the oral
`argument, the Board should be notified via a joint telephone conference call
`no later than two business days prior to the oral hearing to discuss the
`matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705; IPR2017-00706
`IPR2017-00707; IPR2017-00708
`IPR2017-01123; IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`Richard Goldenberg
`Donald Steinberg
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`James Glass
`John McKee
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
