`
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822 Entered: February 7, 2018
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`INTEL CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`R2 SEMICONDUCTOR, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00705, Case IPR2017-00706,
`Case IPR2017-00707, Case IPR2017-00708,
`Case IPR2017-01123, Case IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B21
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JEAN R. HOMERE, and
`JENNIFER S. BISK, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`BISK, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Patent Owner’s Unopposed Motion for
`Pro Hac Vice Admission of Iman Lordgooei
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`
`1 This Order addresses issues that are the same in all identified cases. We
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties, however, are not authorized to use this combined heading in
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705, IPR2017-00706,
`IPR2017-00707, IPR2017-00708,
`IPR2017-01123, IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`
`R2 Semiconductor, Inc. (“Patent Owner”) filed a Motion for pro hac
`
`vice admission of Iman Lordgooei. Paper 44 (“Mot.”).2 Patent Owner
`
`provided a Declaration of Mr. Lordgooei in support of the Motion. Ex.
`
`2055. Patent Owner states that Intel Corporation (“Petitioner”) does not
`
`oppose Patent Owner’s Motion. Mot. 1.
`
`Having reviewed the Motion and the Declaration of Mr. Lordgooei,
`
`we conclude that Mr. Lordgooei has sufficient qualifications to represent
`
`Patent Owner in these proceedings and that Patent Owner has shown good
`
`cause for Mr. Lordgooei’s pro hac vice admission. See Unified Patents, Inc.
`
`v. Parallel Iron, LLC, IPR2013-00639, Order Authorizing Motion for Pro
`
`Hac Vice Admission, Paper 7 (PTAB October 15, 2003) (setting forth
`
`requirements for pro hac vice admission). Mr. Lordgooei is permitted to
`
`appear pro hac vice in these proceedings as back-up counsel only. See 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`
`
`
`It is:
`
`ORDER
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion for pro hac vice admission of
`
`Iman Lordgooei is granted, and Mr. Lordgooei is authorized to represent
`
`Patent Owner only as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`
`
`
`
`
`2 For expediency, we refer to the papers filed in IPR2017-00705. Patent
`Owner filed similar papers in IPR2017-00706, -00707, -00708, -01123, and
`-01124.
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705, IPR2017-00706,
`IPR2017-00707, IPR2017-00708,
`IPR2017-01123, IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file a power of
`
`attorney within 3 business days, identifying Mr. Lordgooei, and all other
`
`individuals admitted pro hac vice in this proceeding, in accordance with 37
`
`C.F.R. § 42.10(b);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner must file an updated
`
`mandatory notice within 3 business days, identifying Mr. Lordgooei, and all
`
`other individuals admitted pro hac vice in this proceeding, as back-up
`
`counsel in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`
`registered practitioner as lead counsel in these proceedings;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lordgooei is to comply with the
`
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for
`
`Trials, as set forth in Title 37, Part 42 of the Code of Federal Regulations;
`
`and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Lordgooei is subject to the USPTO’s
`
`disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO’s Rules
`
`of Professional Conduct set forth at 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`
`3
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00705, IPR2017-00706,
`IPR2017-00707, IPR2017-00708,
`IPR2017-01123, IPR2017-01124
`Patent 8,233,250 B2
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`Richard Goldenberg
`Donald Steinberg
`WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE & DORR LLP
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`don.steinberg@wilmerhale.com
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`James Glass
`John McKee
`QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
`jimglass@quinnemanuel.com
`johnmckee@quinnemanuel.com
`
`
`4
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
