`571-272-7822 Entered: December 7, 2017
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`APPLE INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2017-00210 and IPR2017-00219 (Patent 7,116,710 B1);
` Case IPR2017-002971 (Patent 7,916,781 B2); Cases IPR2017-00700,
`IPR2017-00701, and IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2) 2
`
`____________
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, TREVOR M. JEFFERSON, and
`JOHN A. HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Granting Petitioner’s Motions for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of James M. Dowd and Mark D. Selwyn
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 Case IPR2017-00423 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`2 This Decision will be entered in each case. The parties are not authorized
`to use this caption style.
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00210, IPR2017-00219 (Patent 7,116,710 B1)
`IPR2017-00297 (Patent 7,916,781 B2)
`IPR2017-00700, IPR2017-00701, IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`
`Petitioner filed in each of the captioned cases an unopposed motion
`
`for Pro Hac Vice Admission of James M. Dowd. Paper 303. The motion is
`supported by a declaration of Mr. Dowd. Ex. 1027.
`
`Petitioner also filed in each of the captioned cases an unopposed
`motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Mark D. Selwyn. Paper 31. The
`motion is supported by a declaration of Mr. Selwyn. Ex. 1028.
`
`Upon review of the record before us, we determine that the
`requirements of 37 C.F.R. § 42.10 have been met and there is good cause to
`admit Mr. Dowd and Mr. Selwyn pro hac vice.
`
`It is, therefore,
`
`ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of
`James M. Dowd is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Pro Hac Vice
`Admission of Mark D. Selwyn is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Dowd and Mr. Selwyn are
`authorized to act as back-up counsel in the instant proceedings only;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner must file updated mandatory
`notices identifying Mr. Dowd and Mr. Selwyn as back-up counsel in
`accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3);
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for the instant
`proceedings;
`
`
`3 We refer to the papers filed in IPR2017-00210. Petitioner filed similar
`papers in the other cases listed in the caption.
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00210, IPR2017-00219 (Patent 7,116,710 B1)
`IPR2017-00297 (Patent 7,916,781 B2)
`IPR2017-00700, IPR2017-00701, IPR2017-00728 (Patent 7,421,032 B2)
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Dowd and Mr. Selwyn are to comply
`
`with the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice
`for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37, Code of Federal Regulations;
`and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Dowd and Mr. Selwyn are to be
`
`subject to the Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a),
`and the USPTO Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R.
`§§ 11.101 et seq.
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`Richard Goldenberg
`Brian M. Seeve
`Michael H. Smith
`Dominic Massa
`WILMER, CUTLER, PICKERING, HALE AND DORR, LLP
`richard.goldenberg@wilmerhale.com
`brian.seeve@wilmerhale.com
`michaelh.smith@wilmerhale.com
`dominic.massa@wilmerhale.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Michael T. Rosato
`Matthew A. Argenti
`Richard Torczon
`WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI
`mrosato@wsgr.com
`margenti@wsgr.com
`rtorczon@wsgr.com
`
`
`
`3
`
`