`
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`____________
`
`BLACKBERRY CORP.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`
`
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00749
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,064,919
`
`____________
`
`JOINT MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING
`PURSUANT TO 35 U.S.C. § 317(a)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(a) and authorization of the Board granted on
`
`April 28, 2017, Petitioner BlackBerry Corp. (“BlackBerry”) and Patent Owner
`
`Optis Wireless Technology, LLC (“Optis”) jointly request termination of IPR2017-
`
`00749, which is directed to U.S. Patent No. 8,064,919 (“the ‘919 Patent”).
`
`This inter partes review was filed January 23, 2017. A Preliminary
`
`Response has not been filed by the Patent Owner and no decision regarding
`
`institution of the proceeding has issued. Further, no final written decision on the
`
`merits of this review proceeding has been entered. The parties have settled their
`
`dispute, and have reached agreement to terminate this inter partes review. As there
`
`are no other petitioners in this proceeding, and the proceeding is still at a very early
`
`stage, the parties respectfully submit that termination of this proceeding is
`
`appropriate.
`
`The parties’ Settlement Agreement has been made in writing, and a true
`
`copy of same is attached hereto as Exhibit 1012.1 The parties further jointly certify
`
`that there is no other agreement or understanding between them, including any
`
`other collateral agreements, made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`
`termination of the instant proceeding as set forth in 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). The parties
`
`desire that the Settlement Agreement be maintained as business confidential
`
`1 The Settlement Agreement is being filed electronically via the Patent Trial and
`
`Appeals Board’s E2E as “Parties and Board Only.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`information under 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c) and a separate joint request to that effect is
`
`IPR2017-00749
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`being filed concurrently.
`
`As stated in 35 U.S.C. § 317(a), because Petitioner and Patent Owner jointly
`
`request this termination as to Petitioner, no estoppel under 35 U.S.C. § 315(e) shall
`
`attach to Petitioner.
`
`I. Reasons Why Termination is Appropriate
`Termination with respect to Petitioner is proper under 35 U.S.C. § 317(a)
`
`because the parties are jointly requesting termination and the Office has not yet
`
`“decided on the merits of the proceeding before the request for termination is
`
`filed.” Here, no decision on the merits has been made. Accordingly, the parties
`
`are entitled to terminate this proceeding as to Petitioner under Section 317(a) upon
`
`their joint request.
`
`The parties respectfully submit that termination of this proceeding is
`
`appropriate because (a) this proceeding is at a very early stage and no motions are
`
`outstanding; (b) the parties have reached agreement to end their dispute concerning
`
`the ‘919 Patent; (c) the parties have agreed to dismiss the related district court
`
`litigation with respect to the ‘919 Patent; (d) the parties agree that this Inter Partes
`
`Review should be terminated; and (e) termination of this proceeding will preserve
`
`the Board’s resources and obviate the need for any more Board involvement in this
`
`matter.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00749
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`II. Related District Court Litigation and Status
`The ‘919 patent was asserted in PanOptis Patent Management, LLC v.
`
`
`BlackBerry Limited, No. 2:16-cv-00062-JRG-RSP (E. D. Tex.). This litigation
`
`proceeding has been dismissed as part of the parties’ Settlement Agreement.
`
`There are no other current litigation proceedings involving the subject patent.
`
`III. Related Proceedings Before the Office
`No other proceedings related to the ‘919 Patent are pending.
`
`Dated: May 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Robert C. Mattson/
`Robert C. Mattson (Reg. No. 42,850)
`OBLON, MCCLELLAND, MAIER
`& NEUSTADT, LLP
`1940 Duke Street
`Alexandria, Virginia 22314
`(703) 412-6466
`cpdocketmattson@oblon.com
`Counsel for Petitioner
` BlackBerry Corp.
`
`/Barry J. Bumgardner/
`Barry J. Bumgardner
`Registration No. 38,397
`NELSON BUMGARDNER, P.C.
`3131 W. 7th Street, Suite 300
`Fort Worth, Texas 76107
`(817) 377-3494
`barry@nelbum.com
`Counsel for Patent Owner
` Optis Wireless Technology, LLC
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2017-00749
`Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), the undersigned certifies service of JOINT
`
`MOTION TO TERMINATE PROCEEDING with EXHIBIT 1012 on the counsel
`
`of record for the Patent Owner by filing this document through the PTABE2E
`
`System as well as delivering a copy via electronic mail to the following address:
`
`Barry J. Bumgardner
`Brent N. Bumgardner
`NELSON BUMGRDNER, P.C.
`barry@nelbum.com
`brent@nelbum.com
`optis-IPR@nelbum.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Robert C. Mattson/
`Robert C. Mattson (Reg. No. 42,850)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: May 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`