throbber
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, Mar. 1989, p. 1165-1172
`0270-7306/89/03 1165-08$02.00/0
`Copyright © 1989, American Society for Microbiology
`
`Vol. 9, No. 3
`
`p185¥£*? Monoclonal Antibody Has Antiproliferative Effects In
`Vitro and Sensitizes Human Breast TumorCells to
`Tumor Necrosis Factor
`
`ROBERTM. HUDZIAK,? GAIL D. LEWIS,2 MARCY WINGET,? BRIAN M. FENDLY,? H. MICHAEL SHEPARD,”
`AND AXEL ULLRICH?+*
`
`Departments of Developmental Biology,’ Pharmacological Sciences,” and Medicinal and Analytical Chemistry,°
`Genentech, Inc., 460 Point San Bruno Boulevard, South San Francisco, California 94080
`
`Received 3 October 1988/Accepted 8 December 1988
`
`The HER2/c-erbB-2 gene encodes the epidermal growth factor receptorlike human homolog of the rat neu
`oncogene. Amplification of this gene in primary breast carcinomas has been shown to correlate with poor
`clinical prognosis for certain cancer patients. We show here that a monoclonal antibody directed against the
`extracellular domain of p185‘7“*? specifically inhibits the growth of breast tumor-derived cell lines overex-
`pressing the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene product and prevents HER2/c-erbB-2-transformed NIH 3T3 cells from
`forming colonies in soft agar. Furthermore, resistance to the cytotoxic effect of tumor necrosis factor alpha,
`which has been shown to be a consequence of HER2/c-erbB-2 overexpression, is significantly reduced in the
`presence of this antibody.
`
`the human homolog of the rat proto-
`HER2!/c-erbB-2,
`oncogene neu (4, 34), encodes a 1,255-amino-acid glycopro-
`tein with extensive homology to the human epidermal
`growth factor (EGF) receptor (4, 21, 33, 34, 42). The
`HER2/c-erbB-2 gene product, p185‘7"*?, hasall of the struc-
`tural features and many of the functional properties of
`subclass I growth factor receptors (reviewed in references 43
`and 44),
`including cell surface location and an intrinsic
`tyrosine kinase activity. However, the ligand for this puta-
`tive growth factor receptor has not yet been identified.
`Amplification of the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene has been found
`in humansalivary gland and gastric tumor-derived cell lines
`(13, 34), as well as in mammary gland carcinomas(21, 22, 40,
`42). Slamonet al. (35) surveyed 189 primary breast adeno-
`carcinomas and determined that the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene
`was amplified in about 30% of the cases. Most importantly,
`HER2/c-erbB-2 amplification was correlated with a negative
`prognosis and high probability of relapse. Similar although
`less frequent amplification of the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene has
`been reported for gastric and colon adenocarcinomas(45,
`46). Experiments with NIH 3T3 cells also suggest a direct
`role for the overexpressed, structurally unaltered HER2/
`c-erbB-2 gene product p185"*? in neoplastic transforma-
`tion. High levels of HER2/c-erbB-2 gene expression attained
`by coamplification of the introduced gene with dihydrofolate
`reductase by methotrexate selection (18) or by using a strong
`promoter(6) was shownto transform NIH 3T3fibroblasts.
`Only cells with high levels of p1857"*? are transformed, i.e.,
`have an altered morphology, are anchorage independent,
`and will form tumors in athymic mice.
`Overexpression of p185”"”? may, furthermore, contribute
`to malignant tumor development by allowing tumorcells to
`evade one componentof the antitumor defenses of the body,
`the activated macrophage (17). Macrophages play an impor-
`tant role in immunesurveillance against neoplastic growth in
`vivo (1, 2, 38), and Urban et al. (39) have shown that tumor
`
`* Corresponding author.
`t Present address: Max-Planck-Institut fiir Biochemie, 8033 Mar-
`tinsried, Federal Republic of Germany.
`
`cells made resistant to macrophages display enhanced tu-
`morigenicity. Tumornecrosis factor alpha (TNF-a) has been
`shown to play a role in activated macrophage-mediated
`tumorcell killing in vitro (3, 11, 23, 29, 39). NIH 3T3 cells
`transformed by a transfected and amplified HER2/c-erbB-2
`cDNAshowincreasedresistance to the cytotoxic effects of
`activated macrophages or TNF-a in direct correlation with
`increased levels of p1857“"? expression. Furthermore,
`breast tumorcell lines with high levels of p185’7£*? exhibit
`resistance to TNF-a. Resistance to host antitumor defenses
`could facilitate the escape of cells from a primary tumor to
`establish metastases at distantsites.
`To further investigate the consequences ofalteration in
`HER2/c-erbB-2 gene expression in mammary gland neopla-
`sia and to facilitate investigation of the normalbiological role
`of the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene product, we have prepared
`monoclonal antibodies against the extracellular domain of
`p185£8?, One monoclonal antibody (4D5) was character-
`ized in more detail and was shown to inhibit
`in vitro
`proliferation of human breast tumor cells overexpressing
`p185£*? and, furthermore,
`to increase the sensitivity of
`these cells to the cytotoxic effects of TNF-a.
`
`MATERIALS AND METHODS
`Cells and cell culture. Human tumorcell lines were ob-
`tained from the American Type Culture Collection. The
`mouse fibroblast
`line NIH 3T3/HER2-349), expressing an
`amplified HER2/c-erbB-2 cDNA undersimian virus 40 early
`promotercontrol, and the vector-transfected controlcell line
`NIH 3T3/CVN have been described previously (18).
`Cells were cultured in a 1:1 mixture of Dulbecco modified
`Eagle medium and Ham nutrient mixture F-12 supplemented
`with 2 mM glutamine, 100 u of penicillin per ml, 100 pg of
`streptomycin per ml, and 10% serum. Human tumorcell
`lines were cultured with fetal bovine serum (GIBCO Labo-
`ratories, Grand Island, N.Y.); NIH 3T3 derivatives were
`cultured with calf serum (Hyclone Laboratories, Inc., Lo-
`gan, Utah.).
`Immunization. Female BALB/c mice were immunized
`with NIH 31T3/HER2-3,49) cells expressing high levels of
`
`1165
`
`(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)
`Hospira v. Genentech
`(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:3)
`IPR2017-00805
`(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:24)
`Genentech Exhibit 2055
`
`

`

`1166
`
`HUDZIAK ET AL.
`
`Mo. CELL. BIOL.
`
`p185#*®?_ The cells were washed once with phosphate-
`buffered saline (PBS) and detached from the plate with PBS
`containing 25 mM EDTA. After low-speed centrifugation,
`the cells were suspended in cold PBS (2 x 10’ cells per ml).
`Each mouse wasinjected intraperitoneally with 0.5 mlof this
`cell suspension on weeks0, 2, 5, and 7.
`On weeks 9 and 13, 100 pl of a Triton X-100 membrane
`preparation of p1857#*?, partially purified by wheat germ
`agglutinin chromatography (700 pg of protein per ml) (25),
`was administered intraperitoneally. Three days before fu-
`sion, 100 yl of the enriched p185“"*? protein was adminis-
`tered intravenously.
`Fusion and screening. Mice with high antibodytiters as
`determined by immunoprecipitation of p185‘7"*? were sac-
`rificed, and their splenocytes were fused as described previ-
`ously (26). Spleen cells were mixed at a 4:1 ratio with the
`fusion partner, mouse myelomacell line X63-Ag8.653 (20),
`in the presence of 50% polyethylene glycol 4000. Fusedcells
`were plated at a density of 2 x 10° cells per well in 96-well
`microdilution plates. The hypoxanthine-azaserine (12) selec-
`tion for hybridomas was begun 24 h later. Beginning at day
`10 postfusion,
`supernatants from hybridoma-containing
`wells were tested for the presence of antibodies specific for
`p185#£®? by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with
`the wheat germ agglutinin chromatography-purified p185"*?
`preparation (28). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay-pos-
`itive supernatants were confirmed by immunoprecipitation
`and cloned twice by limiting dilution.
`Large quantities of specific monoclonal antibodies were
`produced by preparation of ascites fluid; antibodies were
`then purified on protein A-Sepharose columns (Fermentech,
`Inc., Edinburgh, Scotland) and stored sterile in PBS at 4°C.
`Immunoprecipitations and antibodies. Cells were har-
`vested by trypsinization, counted in a Coulter counter
`(Coulter Electronics, Inc., Hialeah, Fla.), and plated 24 h
`before being harvested for analysis of p185"*? expression.
`Cells were lysed at 4°C with 0.8 ml of HNEGlysis buffer (18)
`per 100-mmplate. After 10 min, 1.6 ml of lysis dilution buffer
`(HNEG buffer with 1% bovine serum albumin and 0.1%
`Triton X-100) was addedto each plate, and the extracts were
`clarified by centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 5 min.
`Antibodies were added to the cell extracts and allowed to
`bind at 4°C for 2 to 4h. Immune complexes werecollected
`by adsorption to protein A-Sepharose beads for 20 min and
`washedthree times with 1 ml of HNEG buffer-0.1% Triton
`X-100. Autophosphorylation reactions were carried out for
`20 min at 4°C in 50 wl of HNEG washbuffer containing 5 mM
`MnCl, and 3 Ci of [y-72P]ATP (5,000 Ci/mmol, Amersham
`Corp., Arlington Heights,
`Ill.). The autophosphorylation
`reaction conditions have been described previously (18).
`Proteins were separated on sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)}-
`7.5% polyacrylamide gels and analyzed by autoradiography.
`The polyclonal antibody, G-H2CT17, recognizing the car-
`boxy-terminal 17 amino acids of p1857"®?, has been de-
`scribed previously (18). The anti-EGF receptor monoclonal
`antibody 108 (16) was provided by Joseph Schlessinger,
`Rorer Biotechnology, Inc.
`Fluorescence-activated cell sorting. SK-BR-3 human breast
`tumorcells overexpressing the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene(17, 22)
`or A431 human squamous carcinomacells overexpressing
`the EGFreceptor gene (14) were grown in T175 flasks. They
`were detached from the flasks by treatment with 25 mM
`EDTA-0.15 M NaCl, collected by low-speed centrifugation,
`and suspendedat 1 x 10° cells per ml in PBS—1% fetal bovine
`serum. One milliliter of each cell line was incubated with 10
`wg of either anti-HER2/c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody (4D5)
`
`or a control antibody (40.1.H1) recognizing the hepatitis B
`surface antigen. The cells were washed twice and suspended
`on ice for 30 min in 1 ml of PBS-1% fetal bovine serum
`containing 10 pg of goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G
`F(ab’), fragments conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate
`dye (Boehringer Mannheim Biochemicals,
`Indianapolis,
`Ind.). Unbound fluorescein dye was removed by two further
`washes. The cells were suspended at 2 x 10° per ml
`in
`PBS-1% fetal bovine serum and analyzed with an EPICS 753
`(Coulter) fluorescence-activated cell sorter. Fluorescein was
`excited by 300 mW of 488-nm argon laser light, and the
`emitted light was collected with a 525-nm band-passfilter
`with a 10-nm band width.
`Down-regulation assay. SK-BR-3 cells were plated at 1.5 x
`10° cells per 35-mm culture dish in normal medium. After a
`6-h period to allow attachment, the medium wasreplaced by
`1.5 ml of methionine-free labeling medium containing 150
`«Ci of [>°S]methionine per ml] and 2% dialyzed fetal bovine
`serum. The cells were metabolically labeled for 14 h and then
`chased with medium containing 2% dialyzed serum and
`unlabeled methionine. Either a control monoclonal antibody
`(40.1.H1) or anti-p185£*? (4D5) was added to a final con-
`centration of 2.5 pg/ml. At 0, 5, and 11 h, extracts were
`prepared with 0.3 ml of lysis solution and 0.6 ml of dilution
`buffer. The p185“£*? was immunoprecipitated with 2.5 pl of
`polyclonal antibody G-H2CT17. The washed immune com-
`plexes were dissolved in sample buffer, electrophoresed on a
`SDS-7.5% polyacrylamide gel, and analyzed by autoradiog-
`raphy. Each time point determination was performed in
`duplicate. Autoradiograph bandintensities were quantitated
`by using a scanner (Ambis Systems).
`Cell proliferation assays. The anti-p185"*? monoclonal
`antibodies were characterized by using the breast tumorcell
`line SK-BR-3. Cells were detached by using 0.25% (vol/vol)
`trypsin and suspended in complete medium at a density of 4
`
`CVN
`
`HER1
`
`HER2
`
`Go aS G6 Ofo 16. Bo
`vt
`wv
`—
`a
`wv
`—
`a
`+
`=
`1
`2 a4 5
`6
`[too
`9
`
` @ —
`#
`—-170
`
`FIG. 1. Specificity of monoclonal antibody 4DS5. Threecell lines,
`NIH 3T3/CVN, NIH 3T3/HERI-EGF receptor, and NIH 3T3/
`HER2-3499, were plated out at 2.0 x 10° in 100-mm culture dishes.
`At 24h, Triton X-100 lysates were prepared and divided into three
`portions. Either an irrelevant monoclonal antibody (6 pg of anti-
`hepatitis B virus surface antigen, 40.1.H1;
`lanes 1, 4, and 7),
`anti-p185““" monoclonal antibody 4D5 (6 yg; lanes 2, 5, and 8), or
`anti-EGF receptor monoclonal antibody 108 (6 jg; lanes 3, 6, and 9)
`was added and allowed to bind at 4°C for 4 h. The immune
`complexes were collected with 30 pl of protein A-Sepharose. Rabbit
`anti-mouse immunoglobulin (7 yg) was added to each 4D5 immuno-
`precipitation to improve the binding of this monoclonal antibody to
`the protein A-coated beads. Proteins were labeled by autophosphor-
`ylation and separated on an SDS-—7.5% polyacrylamide gel. The gel
`wasexposedto film at —70°C for 4 h with an intensifying screen. The
`arrows show the positions of proteins of M, 185,000 and 170,000.
`
`

`

`VoL. 9, 1989
`
`—G-H2CT17
`
`wG-H2CT17
`
`rm4D5
`
`185+
`170—
`
`FIG. 2. Binding of monoclonal antibody 4DS to unglycosylated
`receptor. NIH 3T3/HER2-349) cells were plated into two 100-mm
`plates at 2 x 10° cells per plate. After 14 h, the antibiotic tunicamy-
`cin was added to one plate at 3 pg/ml. After a further 5.5 h of
`incubation, Triton X-100 lysates were then prepared from each
`plate. Immunoprecipitations, the autophosphorylation reaction, and
`SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were performed as de-
`scribed in the legend to Fig. 1. Lanes: 1, tunicamycin-treated cell
`lysate (one-third of a plate) immunoprecipitated with 2.5 pl of a
`polyclonal antibody directed against the C terminus of p185**?; 2,
`tunicamycin-treated cell lysate (one-third of a plate) immunoprecip-
`itated with 6 pg of 4DS; 3, untreated control lysate (one-third of a
`plate) immunoprecipitated with the polyclonal antibody. The arrows
`showthe locations of proteins of M, 185,000 and 170,000.
`
`x 10° cells per ml. Aliquots of 100 pl (4 x 10* cells) were
`plated into 96-well microdilution plates, the cells were al-
`lowed to adhere, and 100 pl of media alone or media
`containing monoclonal antibody (final concentration, 5 pg/
`ml) was then added. After 72 h, plates were washed twice
`with PBS (pH 7.5), stained with crystal violet (0.5% in
`methanol), and analyzed for relative cell proliferation as
`described previously (36).
`For assays in which monoclonal antibodies were com-
`bined with recombinant human TNF-a (5.0 x 107 U/mg;
`Genentech, Inc.), cells were plated and allowed to adhere as
`described above. Following cell adherence, contro] medium
`alone or medium containing monoclonal antibodies was
`added to a final concentration of 5 pg/ml. Cultures were
`incubated for another 4 h, and then increasing concentra-
`tions of TNF-a were added to a final volume of 200 ul.
`Following 72 h of incubation, the relative cell number was
`determined by crystal violet staining. Some samples were
`analyzed by crystal violet staining following cell adherence
`for determination ofthe initial cell number.
`
`RESULTS
`
`Specificity of monoclonal antibody 4D5. Monoclonal anti-
`bodies directed against the extracellular domain of p1857#*?
`were prepared by immunizing mice with NIH 3T3 cells
`transfected with a HER2/c-erbB-2 cDNA (HER2-3499) (17,
`18) and overexpressing the corresponding gene product,
`p185£®?, One antibody exhibited severalinteresting biolog-
`ical properties and was chosen for further characterization.
`Antibody 4D5 specifically immunoprecipitated a single *?P-
`
`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND p185#&*?
`
`1167
`
`Relative
`
`NumberofCells
`
`0.1
`
`1
`
`10
`
`102
`
`103
`
`104
`
`Relative FluorescenceIntensity
`FIG. 3. Fluorescence-activated cell sorter histograms of human
`tumor cells binding anti-p185 monoclonal antibody 4D5. ——,
`Binding by the control antibody, 40.1.H1, directed against
`the
`hepatitis B surface antigen; ------ , binding by the anti-HER2/c-
`erbB-2 antibody, 4D5. The antibodies were first allowed to react
`with the cell surface. After a wash step, bound antibody was labeled
`by addition of fluorescein-conjugated F(ab’), fragment of goat
`anti-mouse immunoglobulin G. (A) Binding of the antibodies to the
`humanbreast tumor line SK-BR-3, which contains an amplification
`of the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene and expresseshigh levels of the HER2/
`c-erbB-2 gene product p185"*?. (B) Binding of the same antibodies
`to the human squamous epithelial cell
`line A431. This cell
`line
`expresses low levels of mRNA for HER2/c-erbB-2 andhigh levels (2
`x 10° receptors per cell) of the EGF receptor.
`
`labeled protein of M, 185,000 from NIH 3T3cells expressing
`p185/7£*? (Fig. 1, lane 8). This antibody did not cross-react
`with the human EGF receptor (HERI; Fig. 1, lane 5), even
`when overexpressed in a mouse NIH 3T3 background (Fig.
`1, lane 6). Furthermore, it did not immunoprecipitate any
`proteins from NIH 3T3 cells transfected with a control
`plasmid (pCVN) which expresses the neomycin resistance
`and dihydrofolate reductase genes only (Fig. 1, lane 2).
`To determine the nature of the epitope recognized by 4D5,
`NIH 3T3/HER2-3499 cells were treated with tunicamycin,
`which prevents addition of N-linked oligosaccharides to
`proteins (15, 41). Cells treated with this antibiotic for 5.5 h
`contained two proteins which were immunoprecipitated by a
`polyclonal antibody against the carboxy-terminal peptide of
`p185‘7*? (Fig. 2, lane 1). The polypeptide of 170,000 M,
`represents unglycosylated p1857"®”, The upper band ofca.
`185,000 M, comigrated with glycosylated p185£*? from
`untreated cells (Fig. 2, lane 3). Monoclonal antibody 4D5
`efficiently immunoprecipitated only the glycosylated form of
`p1857“*? (Fig. 2, lane 2). This experiment suggests either
`that the epitope recognized by 4D5 consists partly of carbo-
`hydrate, or, alternatively,
`that the antibody recognizes a
`conformation of the protein achieved only when it is glyco-
`sylated.
`
`

`

`1168
`
`HUDZIAK ET AL.
`
`MoL. CELL. BIOL.
`
`TABLE1. Inhibition of SK-BR-3 proliferation by anti-p185""*?
`monoclonal antibodies*
`
`&a ®Q
`
`a
`
`no
`
`O
`Oo
`
`Relative cell
`Monoclonal
`proliferation?
`antibody
`TOD ic cc cece cc eens e cence ene en ene ecececececegeeeseseseeneneaeaees 79.3 42.2
`24 ccc cece cee c ence ec eeececeeeeseneseneaeaeeeaeeeenenenenenes 79.5 + 4.4
`TDB oc cc cece cece cence eens ee eenene eens ne en ease eeeeneneneneere enone 83.8 + 5.9
`ADS ooo cece cece n ence ee cece ces et ete ence ea eeeeneeeeessee ee eee 44.2+ 4.4
`BEB oo ccc ccc cece sec ececnaeaeneneeeeecesessssceueceeseeseees 66.2 + 2.4
`GED ooo cece cece cea ececececneeeeeeeeeeegeeeeeeseseeeeeee 98.9 + 3.6
`
`TES occ cece ccc cece eae ceee eee eenenececedeaeseseseseeneenenegs 62.1 + 1.4
`3H4.....
`66.5 + 3.9
`
`2H] oo. cece ee ee ee rete tenees
`92.9 + 4.8
`“0.0
`1.0
`2.0
`3.0
`
`
`40.1.H1... debececeeseeeeeeeeeeeeneeeeensnetatenaee teeeees 105.8 + 3.8
`
`Antibody (ug/ml)
`AES cece ccc ec eee e cece cesses ee eneeneneneeeeseseee ene 94.7 + 2.8
`FIG. 5. Growth of SK-BR-3 cells in different concentrations of
`monoclonal antibody 4D5. The human breast tumor line SK-BR-3
`wasplated into 35-mm culture dishes at 20,000 cells per dish. Either
`0.1, 0.5, 1.0, or 3.0 wg of a control monoclonal antibody (40.1.H1,
`anti-hepatitis B surface antigen) or monoclonal 4D5 antibody per ml
`was added at the time of plating. After 8 days of growth, the plates
`were trypsinized and the cells were counted in a Coulter counter.
`Each concentration of antibody was plated and counted in duplicate,
`and the cell numbers were averaged.
`
` 2g
`
`w S
`
`o
`
`* SK-BR-3 breast tumor cells were plated as described in Materials and
`Methods. Following adherence, medium containing 5 pg of either anti-
`p185£*? or control monoclonal antibodies (40.1.H1 and 4F4) per ml were
`added.
`® Relative cell proliferation was determined by crystal violet staining of the
`monolayers after 72 h. Values are expressed as a percentage of results with
`untreated control cultures (100%).
`
`The binding of monoclonal antibody 4DS5 to human tumor
`cell
`lines was investigated by fluorescence-activated cell
`sorting (Fig. 3). This antibody was bound to the surface of
`cells expressing p185/7"**, Figure 3A shows the 160-fold
`increase in cellular fluorescence observed when 4D5 was
`added to SK-BR-3 breast adenocarcinomacells relative to a
`control monoclonal antibody. This cell
`line contains an
`amplified HER2/c-erbB-2 gene and expresses high levels of
`p1857£*? (17, 22). In contrast, the squamous carcinomacell
`line A431, which expresses about 2 x 10° EGFreceptors per
`cell (14) but only low levels of p1857“*? (4), exhibited only
`a twofold increase in fluorescence with 4DS5 (Fig. 3B) when
`compared with a control monoclonal antibody.
`The binding of 4DS correlated with the levels of p185/7"*?
`expressed by these twocell lines. SK-BR-3 cells, expressing
`high levels of p1857"*?, showed an 80-fold increase in
`relative fluorescence intensity compared with A431 cells.
`This experiment demonstrates that 4D5 specifically recog-
`nizes the extracellular domain of p1857"*?.
`
`100
`
`10
`
`Plate
`104Cellsper
`
`16
`
`0
`
`4
`
`8
`12
`Days of Culture
`FIG. 4. Growth curve of SK-BR-3 cells treated with anti-HER2/
`c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody 4D5. Cells were plated into 35-mm
`culture dishes at 20,000 cells per plate in medium containing 2.5 pg
`
`of either control antibody (40.1.H1, anti-hepatitis B surface antigen)
`
`
`
`(Q) or anti-p1854"? antibody 4D5 (@) per ml. On the indicated
`days, cells were trypsinized and counted in a Coulter counter. The
`determination for each time point and each antibody was done in
`duplicate, and the counts were averaged. The arrow indicates the
`day the cells were refed with medium without antibodies.
`
`Effects on cell proliferation. We used the human mammary
`gland adenocarcinoma cell
`line, SK-BR-3,
`to determine
`whether monoclonal antibodies directed against the extra-
`cellular domain of p185’7“*? had any effect on the prolifera-
`tion of cell lines overexpressing this receptorlike protein.
`SK-BR-3 cells were coincubated with several HER2/c-erbB-
`2-specific monoclonal antibodies or with either of two dif-
`ferent control monoclonal antibodies (40.1.H1, directed
`against the hepatitis B surface antigen; 4F4, directed against
`recombinant human gammainterferon). Most anti-HER2/
`c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibodies which recognize the extra-
`cellular domain inhibited the growth of SK-BR-3 cells (Table
`
` Relative
`NumberofCells
`
`157.
`
`361
`
`175
`
`3713
`HER2
`
`231 MCF-7 SK-
`BR-3
`Cell Line
`FIG. 6. Screening of breast tumorcell lines for growth inhibition
`by monoclonal antibody 4D5. Each cell line was plated in 35-mm
`culture dishes at 20,000 cells per dish. Either a control monoclonal
`antibody (9F6, anti-human immunodeficiency virus gp120) or the
`anti-p185“*? monoclonal antibody 4D5 was added on day 0 to 2.5
`pg/ml. Becausethe different cell lines grow at different rates, the cell
`lines NIH 3T3/HER2-3499 and SK-BR-3 were counted after 6 days,
`cell lines MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 were counted
`after 9 days, and cell lines MDA-MB-175VII and MDA-MB-361
`were counted after 14 days. The difference in growth between cells
`treated with 4D5 and 40.1.H1 is expressed as the ratio of cell
`numbers with 4D5 versus a control monoclonalantibody, 9F6. Each
`cell line was assayed in duplicate for each antibody, and the counts
`were averaged.
`
`

`

`VOL. 9, 1989
`
`Ohr
`12-223"
`
`Shr
`4
`
`11hr
`6-77
`8
`
`5
`
`1169
`
`29
`
` MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND p185s¥28?
`
`FIG. 8. Effect of antibody binding on p185£*? turnover. SK-
`BR-3 cells were labeled for 14 h with [°°S]methionine. The label was
`then chased with cold methionine and either an irrelevant monoclo-
`nal antibody (40.1.H1, anti-hepatitis B surface antigen) or 4DS was
`added to 2.5 g/ml. The cells on the plates were lysed at 0, 5, and 11
`h, and *S-labeled p1857“*? was quantitated by immunoprecipita-
`tion with the C-terminal specific polyclonal antibody. The 5- and
`11-h time point determinations were performed in duplicate for each
`of the two antibodies. Proteins were separated by SDS-polyacryl-
`amide gel electrophoresis. The fluor-treated gel was exposedto film
`for 4 h at room temperature. The arrow indicates the position of a
`protein of M, 185,000. Band intensities were quantitated by using an
`Ambis Systems scanner. Lanes; 1, 0 h; lanes 2 and 3, 40.1.H1 (5 h);
`lanes 4 and 5, 4D5 (5 h); lanes 6 and 7, 40.1.H1 (11 h); lanes 8 and
`9, 4D5 (11 h).
`
`effects were achieved by using a concentration of between
`0.5 and 1 pg/ml.
`The effect of 4DS on the proliferation of six additional
`breast tumorcell lines, as well as mouse NIH 3T3fibroblasts
`transformed by p185/7“"? overexpression (NIH 3T3/HER2-
`3499), Was tested in monolayer growth assays. Cells were
`plated at low density in medium containing 2.5 pg of either a
`control antibody or 4DS per ml. When the cultures ap-
`proached confluency, cells were removed with trypsin and
`counted. 4DS did not have any significant effect on the
`growth of the MCF-7, MDA-MB-157, MDA-MB-231, or
`NIH 3T3/HER2-3,49) cell
`lines (Fig. 6). It did, however,
`significantly affect the growth of the cell lines MDA-MB-361
`(58% of control) and MDA-MB-175-VII (52% of control),
`which express high levels of p185/7#*? (17).
`Interestingly, monoclonal antibody 4DS5 had no effect on
`the monolayer growth of the NIH 3T3/HER2-345 cell line.
`However,
`it completely prevented colony formation by
`these cells in soft agar (Fig. 7), a property which had been
`induced by HER2/c-erbB-2 amplification (18). In the pres-
`ence of 200 ng of a control monoclonal antibody (antitissue
`factor, TC-C8) per ml, 116 (average of two plates) soft-agar
`colonies were counted, while the samecells plated simulta-
`neously into soft agar containing 200 ng of 4DS per ml did not
`yield any colonies.
`Monoclonal antibody 4D5 down-regulates p185#*?, To
`determine whether the antiproliferative effect of 4D5 was
`due to enhanced degradation of p185"*?, we measuredits
`rate of turnover in the presence or absence of antibody.
`p1857“®? was metabolically labeled by culturing SK-BR-3
`cells for 14 h in the presence of [>°S]methionine. Cells were
`then chased for various times, and either a control antibody
`or 4D5 was addedat the beginning of the chase period. At 0,
`5, and 11 h, cells were lysed and p185”"*? levels were
`assayed by immunoprecipitation and SDS-polyacrylamide
`gel electrophoresis. p1857“*? is degraded morerapidly after
`exposure of SK-BR-3 cells to 4DS5 (Fig. 8). Densitometric
`evaluation of the data showed that the p185’7“*?half-life of
`
`FIG. 7. Inhibition of anchorage-independent growth of NIH 3T3/
`HER2-34o9 cells by 4D5. Cells (20,000 per 60-mm plate) were plated
`in 0.2% soft agar over a 0.4% agar base. After 3 weeks, the plates
`were photographed at x100 magnification by using a Nikon micro-
`scope with phase-contrast optics. (a) HER2-3499 cells plated in agar
`containing 200 ng of a control antibody (TF-C8) per ml. (b) The same
`cells plated in agar containing 200 ng of 4D5 per ml.
`
`1). Maximum inhibition was obtained with monoclonal anti-
`body 4DS, which inhibited cellular proliferation by 56%. The
`control antibodies had nosignificant effect on cell growth.
`Figure 4 compares the growth of SK-BR-3 cells in the
`presence of either a control antibody, 40.1.H1, or the
`anti-p1857"*? antibody. Proliferation of the cells was inhib-
`ited when antibody 4D5 was present. The generation time
`increased from 3.2 to 12.2 days. To determine whether 4D5
`treatment was cytostatic or cytotoxic, antibody was re-
`moved by medium change11 daysafter treatment. Thecells
`resumed growth at a nearly normalrate, suggesting that the
`antibody affected cell growth rather than cell viability. The
`dose-response curve (Fig. 5) showed that a concentration of
`200 ng/ml
`inhibited growth by 50%, whereas maximum
`
`

`

`1170
`
`HUDZIAK ET AL.
`
`MOL. CELL. BIOL.
`
`A. SK-BR-3
`
`B. SK-BR-3
`
`C. MDA-MB-175-VIl
`
`1.5
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`—O Oe
`
`1.0
`
`0.5
`
`
`
`RelativeCellProliferation
`
`
`
`
`0.0
`tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of TNF-a. Cells were plated in 96-well
`FIG. 9. Monoclonal antibody 4D5 sensitizes breast
`microdilution plates (4 x 10* cells per well for SK-BR-3, MDA-MB-175-VII, and MDA-MB-231; 10* cells per well for HBL-100 and T24) and
`allowed to adhere for 2 h. Anti-HER2/c-erbB-2 monoclonal antibody 4D5 (5 wg/ml) or anti-hepatitis B surface antigen monoclonal antibody
`40.1.H1 (5 pg/ml) was then added for a 4-h incubation prior to the addition of TNF-« to a final concentration of 10* units/ml. After 72 h, the
`monolayers were washed twice with PBS and stained with crystal violet dye for determination of relative cell proliferation. In addition, some
`cell monolayers were stained with crystal violet following adherence in order to determine the initial cell density for comparison with cell
`densities measured after 72 h. The symbols denoteinitial cell density (I), untreated (control) cells (@), cells treated with TNF-a (i), 4DS
`
`(ZB), TNF-a plus 4D5 (0), 40.1.1 (38:9; or TNF-a plus 40.1.1 (440%).
`
`7 h decreased to 5 h in the presence of antibody (data not
`shown).
`Monoclonal antibody 4D5 enhances TNF-a cytotoxicity.
`The addition of certain growth factors to tumorcells has
`been shown to increase their resistance to the cytotoxic
`effects of TNF-a (37). A prediction based on these findings
`would be that expression of oncogenes that mimic or replace
`growth factor receptor function mayalso increase the resis-
`tance ofcells to this cytokine. Recently, it was shownthat
`overexpression of the putative growth factor
`receptor
`p1857£*? in NIH 3T3 cells caused an increase in the resis-
`tance of these cells to TNF-a (17). Furthermore, breast
`tumorcell lines with high levels of p185’7“*? also exhibited
`TNF-e resistance.
`To further investigate the mechanism by which the 4D5
`antibodyinhibited cell growth, we investigated the response
`of three breast tumorcell lines to TNF-a in the presence or
`absence of this antibody. If the anti-p185’7“"? monoclonal
`antibody 4D5 inhibited proliferation of breast tumorcells by
`interfering with the signalling functions of p185‘7"*?, addi-
`tion of this antibody would be expected to enhance the
`sensitivity of tumor cells to TNF-a. Both SK-BR-3 (Fig. 9A)
`and MDA-MB-175-VII (Fig. 9C) were growth inhibited by
`both the monoclonal antibody 4D5 (5 pg/ml; 50% and 25%
`inhibition, respectively) and high concentrations of TNF-a
`
`(Q x 10* units/ml; 50% and 60% inhibition, respectively).
`However, the combination of TNF-a and monoclonal anti-
`body 4D5 reduced the SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-175-VII
`tumor cell number to a level below that
`initially plated,
`indicating the induction of a cytotoxic response. In a sepa-
`rate experiment, SK-BR-3 cell viability was determined
`directly by using trypan blue dye exclusion, yielding identi-
`cal results to those described above that were obtained by
`using crystal violet staining (data not shown). A control
`monoclonal antibody, 40.1.H1, did not
`inhibit SK-BR-3
`breast tumorcell proliferation, nor did it induce an enhanced
`sensitivity of this cell line to the cytotoxic effects of TNF-a
`(Fig. 9B). In addition, the growth of the breast tumorcell line
`MDA-MB-231, which does not express detectable levels of
`p185/7£”? (17), was unaffected by monoclonal antibody 4DS5,
`and the growthinhibition seen with the combination of 4D5
`and TNF-a wassimilar to that observed with TNF-a alone
`(Fig. 9D). Furthermore, neither HBL-100 (30), a nontrans-
`formed but immortalized human breast epithelial cell line
`(Fig. 9E), nor T24 (27), a human bladder carcinomacell line
`(Fig. 9F), expressed high levels of p1857"*? (data not
`shown), and neither demonstrated growth inhibition by 4D5
`or an enhanced growth-inhibitory or cytotoxic response to
`the combination of TNF-a and monoclonal antibody 4D5.
`These results demonstrate that only tumor cells which
`
`

`

`VOL. 9, 1989
`
`MONOCLONAL ANTIBODIES AND p85?
`
`1171
`
`overexpress p185“*? will become sensitized to the cyto-
`toxic effects of TNF-a by antibody 4DS.
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`the
`We have prepared monoclonal antibodies against
`extracellular domain of the HER2/c-erbB-2 gene product,
`p185#"*? | and have found that one of these, 4D5, strongly
`inhibits the growth of several breast tumorcell lines and
`furthermore sensitizes p185/7"*?-overexpressing breast car-
`cinoma cell lines SK-BR-3 and MDA-MB-175-VII to the
`cytotoxic effects of TNF-a. Monoclonal antibody 4DS5 is
`specific for p1857"*? and showsno cross-reactivity with the
`closely related human EGF receptor expressed in mouse
`fibroblasts. Of six mammary carcinoma cell lines tested,
`only the three lines which express high levels of p185/77*?
`(SK-BR3, MBA-MB-175, and MDA-MD-361 [17]) were
`growth inhibited, and 4D5 did not inhibit the proliferation of
`a nontransformed human breast epithelial cell line, HBL-
`100, or the bladder carcinomacell line T24.
`In the presenceofthe antibody, th

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket