throbber

`
`Human Breast Cancer: Correlation of
`Relapse and Survival with Amplification
`of the HER-Z/neu Oncogene
`
`DENNIS I. SLAMON,* GARY M. CLARK, STEVEN G. WONG, WENDY I. LEVIN,
`AXEL ULLRICH, WILLIAM L. MCGUIRE
`
`The HER-Zlnm oncogene is a member of the erbB—like
`oncogene family, and is related to, but distinct from, the
`idermal growth factor receptor. This gene has been
`s own to be amplified in human breast cancer cell lines.
`In the current study, alterations of the gene in 189
`primary human breast eaneers were investigated. HER-Z/
`m was found to be amplified from 2- to
`ter than 20-
`fold in 30% ofthe tumors. Correlation 03:1: am lifiea-
`tion with several disease
`eters was evalua
`Am-
`
`plification of the HER-2km; gene was a signifieant pre-
`dictor of both overall survival and time to rela se in
`
`' cance
`patients with breast cancer. It retained its 3'
`even when adjustments were made for other known
`prognostic factors. Moreover, HER-2km; amplifieation
`ad greater prognostic value than most currently used
`prognostic factors, including hormonal-receptor status,
`in
`ph node-
`'tive disease. These data indicate that
`this gene may
`y a role in the biologic behavior and/or
`pathogenesis 0 human breast cancer.
`
`HE EVIDENCE LINKING PROTO-ONOOGENES TO THE INDUC-
`
`tion or maintenance of human malignancies is largely cir-
`cumstantial, but has become increasingly compelling. This
`circumstantial evidence is derived from studies of animal models,
`tumor cell lines, and actual human tumors. Data from animal models
`and cell lines include: (i) sequence homology between human proto-
`oncogenes and the viral oncogenes of transfomiing retroviruses that
`are known to be tumorigenic in some species (1, 2); (ii) transfection
`studies showing the transforming potential of prom-oncogenes in
`NIH 3T3 cells and primary embryo fibroblasts (3—5); and (iii) the
`central role of certain prom-oncogenes in tumorigenesis by chronic
`transforming retroviruses such as avian leukosis virus (6). Data fi'om
`human tumors include: (i) increased expression of specific proto-
`oncogenes in some human malignancies (7, 8); (ii) localization of
`prom-oncogenes at or near the site of specific, tumor-associated
`chromosomal translocations (9); and (iii) amplification of proto-
`oncogenes in some human tumors (10, 11).
`Additional data linking prom-oncogenes to cell growth is their
`expression in response to certain proliferation signals (12, 13) and
`their expression during embryonic development (14, 15). More
`direct evidence comes from the fact that, of the 20 known proto—
`oncogenes, three are related to a growth factor or a growth factor
`receptor. These genes include c-nk, which is homologous to the
`9 JANUARY 1987
`
`transforming gene of the simian sarcoma virus and is the B chain of
`platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) (16, 17); c-fim‘, which is
`homologous to the transforming gene of the feline sarcoma virus
`and is closely related to the macrophage colony-stimulating factor
`receptor (CSF-lR)
`(18); and c-crbB, which encodes the EGF
`receptor (EGFR) and is highly homologous to the transforming
`gene of the avian erythroblastosis virus (19). The two receptor-
`related prom-oncogenes, c-fim‘ and c-crbB, are members of the
`tyrosine-specific protein kinase family to which many proto-onco-
`genes belong.
`Recently, a novel transforming gene was identified as a result of
`transfection studies with DNA firom chemically induced rat neu-
`roglioblastomas (20). This gene, called mu, was shown to be related
`to, but distinct from, the c-rrbB prom-oncogene (21). By means of
`v-crbB and human EGFR as probes to screen human genomic and
`complementary DNA (cDNA) libraries, two other groups indepen-
`dently isolated human crbB—related genes that they called HER-2
`(22) and c-erbB-Z (23). Subsequent sequence analysis and chromo-
`somal mapping studies revealed all three genes (neu, c-crbB-Z, and
`HER-2) to be the same (22, 24, 25). A fourth group, also using v-
`erbB as a probe, identified the same gene in a mammary carcinoma
`cell line, MAC 1 17, where it was found to be amplified five- to ten-
`fold (26).
`This gene, which we will call HER-Z/mu, encodes a new member
`of the tyrosine kinase family; and is closely related to, but distinct
`from, the EGFR gene (22). HER-Zlneu diifers from EGFR in that it
`is found on band q21 of chromosome 17 (22, 24, 25), as compared
`to band pll—p13 of chromosome 7, where the EGFR gene is
`located (27). Also, the HER-Zlm gene generates a messenger
`RNA (mRNA) of 4.8 kb (22), which dilfers from the 5.8- and 10-
`kb transcripts for the EGFR gene (28). Finally, the protein encoded
`by the HER-Z/neu gene is 185,000 daltons (21), as compared to the
`170,000-dalton protein encoded by the EGFR gene. Conversely, on
`the basis of sequence data, HER-Zlnm is more closely related to the
`EGFR gene than to other members of the tyrosine kinase family
`(22). Like the EGFR protein, HER-Zlneu has an extracellular
`domain, a transmembrane domain that includes two cysteine-rich
`repeat clusters, and an intracellular kinase domain (21), indicating
`
`and W. I. Levin are in the Division of Hematology-
`D. I. Slamon, S. G. Won
`Medicine and Ionmn Com
`ive Cancer Center,
`Onco
`, Department
`UCLA
`1 of Medicine, Los Angdes, CA 90024. G.
`. Clark and W. L. McGuire
`Science Career at San Antonio,
`an Antonio, TX 78284. A.
`lln'ch is in the
`are in the Division ofOncology, Department ofMedicine, Univets‘ ofTexas Health
`Department of Molecular Biology, Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA 94080.
`
`“To whom correspondence should be addressed.
`
`ARTICLES I77
`
`(cid:43)(cid:82)(cid:86)(cid:83)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:68)(cid:3)(cid:89)(cid:17)(cid:3)(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)
`Hospira v. Genentech
`(cid:44)(cid:51)(cid:53)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:20)(cid:26)(cid:16)(cid:19)(cid:19)(cid:27)(cid:19)(cid:24)(cid:3)
`IPR2017-00805
`(cid:42)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:87)(cid:72)(cid:70)(cid:75)(cid:3)(cid:40)(cid:91)(cid:75)(cid:76)(cid:69)(cid:76)(cid:87)(cid:3)(cid:21)(cid:19)(cid:23)(cid:22)
`Genentech Exhibit 2043
`
`

`

`Title 1. Association betwwn HER-2km: amplification and disease parame-
`ten in 103 breast tumors.
`
`Number of tumors
`
`
`Fm"
`Single
`2 to 5
`5 to 20
`>2_o
`Tm,
`PT
`
`copy
`copies
`copies
`copies
`Hormonal m
`m?”
`
`1511+
`ER-
`
`53
`31
`
`1
`
`l
`4
`
`65
`38
`
`0.99
`
`ng+
`PgR-
`
`52
`2—5
`>5
`Unknown
`
`$50
`>50
`Unknown
`
`42
`42
`
`13
`34
`l7
`20
`
`21
`52
`11
`
`6
`2
`5
`1
`Twin (Wm)
`l
`1
`l
`5
`1
`2
`0
`3
`45: atW (was)
`1
`2
`2
`7
`0
`2
`Number {positive lynql: m
`34
`1
`0
`3
`30
`0
`22
`l
`0
`l
`20
`1—3
`25
`2
`2
`4
`17
`>3
`Unknown
`17
`1
`3
`1
`22
`
`
`2
`3
`
`0
`1
`2
`2
`
`l
`4
`0
`
`52
`51
`
`15
`41
`22
`25
`
`25
`65
`13
`
`0.85
`
`0.82
`
`0.83
`
`0.11
`
`thatittooislikelyto be acellularreceptorforanasyetunidentified
`ligand.
`As a result of the published data showing amplification of HER-
`2/neuinahumanmammarycarcinomacellline,andaspaitofan
`ongoing survey in our laboratory of pinto-oncogene abnortnalities
`in human tumors, we evaluamd alterations of the PIER-2km: gene
`inalargesetiesofhumanprimarybreastcancers.0urmultsshow
`that amplification of this gene occurs relatively frequently in breast
`cancer,anddiatitisassociatedwithdiseaserelapseandoverall
`patient survival.
`Factors that are known to be important in the prognosis of breast
`malignancies in individual patients include: size of the primary
`tumor, stage of disease at diagnosis, hormonal receptor status, and
`number of axillary lymph nodes involved with disease (positive
`nodes) (29). The current study, whidi was conductedm two parts,
`involved the evaluation of tissue from 189 separate breast malignan-
`ciesthatwerepartofa breastcancerstudyongoingattthniversity
`of Texas, San Antonio. This cohort of tumors was of interest
`because considerable information was available on the majority of
`the specimens including size ofdie primary tumor, estrogen recep-
`tor status, progesterone receptor status, age of patient, disease stage,
`andstatusoftheaxillarylymphnodes.
`Indieinitialsurvey,dssuefrom 103primarybreastcancerswas
`evaluated for alterations in the HER-2km: gene. DNA from
`individual tumors was prepared as described (30), digested with
`EcoRI, andsubjectedtoSouthern blotanalysiswithanP-labeled
`HER-Zlml probe, whichis known to detect a 13-kb hybridizing
`band in human DNA (22). Examples of tumors from the initial
`survey areshown in Fig. 1. Ofthe 103 samplesexamined, 19(1896)
`showed evidence of HER-2km; gene amplification. The degree of
`amplificationin individual cases was determined by dilution analysis
`(Fig. 2A), as well as soft laser densitometry scanning. To determine
`thatthe amountofDNAloadedineachlanewasequivalerit,all
`filters were washed and rehybridized with a 32P—labeled arginase
`gene probe (31). This probe identifies a 15-ltb hybridizing band on
`Eco Ill—digested human DNA, and was selected as a control
`because it more appropriately assesses the relative amount and
`
`
`
`Receptor mus was analysed as described 39). ER, estrogenreceptorreeepton+ ad -
`
`fixeorrelationofl-IER-Z/manylifi'-
`TStatistiml
`nulligram" ofproeein.’
`bydiex’tesLPvtluawereeomputed
`gmwididiseasepanmetenwere
`aficcombiningthecasetwidiSto
`and>20copies.
`
`with low molecular weight species, which transfer more readily on
`Southern blotting. All
`lanes were shown to contain equivalent
`amounts of high molecular weight DNA (Fig. 28). Individual
`tumorswere assigriedeogroupscontainingasinglecopy,2eo5
`copies, 5 to 20 copies, and greater than 20 copies of the HER-2km;
`gene (Fig. 1). Assignment oftumors to the various groups was done
`
`Fig.1.Analysisofalteiationsofthe1-1Ek-2/m
`inhurnanbreastcancer. Sbownare790fthe
`89breasttiunorsusediuthis.'1‘uriiots
`with a single
`of HER-Zines: 3, 4, 10 to 15,
`20, 23 to 25, 27 to 29, 31, 38, 42 to 46, 48, 49,
`52, 55, 61, 65, 66, 71, 72, and 74. Tumors with
`two to five copies of HER-2km: l, 2, 5, 7, 9, 16,
`17, 19, 21, 22, 32, 35, 36, 47, 50, 54, 56 to 58,
`60, 62, 70, and 75 to 77. Tumors with 5 to 20
`copies of HER-Wm: 6, 8, 26, 34, 37, 39 to 41,
`51, 53, 63, 64, 67, 69, 73, and 79. Tumors with
`more than 20 copies of HER-Zlm: 18, 30, 33,
`59,68,and78.
`oftumors77to79have
`rearrangements in the HER-2km: gene. DNA
`was attracted from tissues and ‘
`with Eco
`Rlasdescribed(30).Atotalof1ugofEcoRI—
`digestedDNAwasbadedontoO.agaroee8%
`WWW
`andtransferred
`onto
`filter
`iodyne 30). Allfilters
`werenywninavmbvenfor3hoursat80°q
`prehybridizedin 5X SSC (standard saline citrate)
`containin 50% formamide, 1096 dent-an sulfate,
`0.1% SD ,denaturedsalmonspetm DNA(1 mg!
`ml), and 4X Denhardts solution for 12 hours,
`then hybridizedin the same solution containing
`321’-labeled nick-translated HER-2 probe (21)
`specificactivityoflxlO’cp
`microgramof
`DNA; 2 x 10‘ m/ml. Hybcpnrfiznon occurred
`at42°Cfor48 cumbflowedbywashingof
`filters under the following conditionsin succes-
`
`178
`
`‘. 2 3‘ 5 '
`”a...
`g,
`1...
`
`6780'
`
`011121314
`
`..,.
`.v
`
`, y.
`it» fi”~'
`
`
`
`151011131920 2122232425$278291
`
`--.flu I
`
`
`
`4142644454647484950
`
`”qfiswum
`
`51 52535456569390“ QBMGGGG
`
`
`
`-
`sion: 2xSSCfo‘r20minu‘eesatiroom
`ture;twowashesof30minuteseachin2x SC,
`0.1% SDS at 65°C; one wash of30 minutes in
`
`075x 880, 0.1% SDS at 65°C. Filters were then
`exposed to XAR-S x-ray film (Kodak) for aurora-
`Why-
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 235
`
`

`

` Bs
`
`oatsaasasassssvssssao
`
`amplification. It is well known that the number of positive nodes is
`diebestprognosticlactorfordiseaserecurrenceandsunrivalin
`patients with breast cancer (29). Given the correlation between
`number of nodes positive and HER-Zlm amplification, one might
`predict
`that amplification of this gene might also have some
`prognostic vahte. No long-term follow-up data, however, were
`available on the 103 patients analyzed in the initial study. For this
`reason, a second study was conducted on 100 breast eancer samples
`from patients with positive axillary lymph nodes. All of the informa-
`tion available for the first group of 103 patients was available for
`these patients. In addition, relapse and survival information was
`available, since these cases had a median follow-up of 46 months
`(range 24 to 86 months). Ofthese 100 samples, 86 yielded suficient
`DNA for study. Amplification of the HER-2km: gene was mea-
`sured as in the initial survey, and examples oftumors from this study
`are shown (Fig. 1). Amplifiean'on was found in 34/86 (40%) of
`these patients. For this larger sample of node-positive patients,
`several statistically signifieant or nearly significant relationships were
`observed. In agreement with the preliminary survey, there was an
`association between number of involved lymph nodes and HER-2i
`m amplification (Table 2). In addition,
`the presence of gene
`amplifieation was correlated with estrogen receptor status and size
`of primary tumor (Table 2). Together, these two surveys yielded
`data on 189 patients and the association of HER-2km: amplifica-
`tion with various disease parameters in the combined group is
`shown in Table 3.
`
`While these correlations were of interest, the strong relationship
`
`ofHER-Z/m
`Fig.2.(A)Exampleofdilutionalanalysisto assess
`l2ugofEcoRI-
`geneamplifieation.1.anesa,s,k,andpwereloaded
`digestedbreastmniorDNAlaneaisDNAfromnmflms. l),which
`tsatumorwithasinslecopyofthel-IER/Z-mgene. Lanesis
`D Afromtumor33, whidtrepresentsatumorwith>20¢opieeofrhe
`HER-Zlmgene. Lanesbtofareserialdilutions(l:100, 1:20, 1:10, 1:5,
`andl.2, respectively)oftthNAsampleinlanes. LanekisDNAfroni
`tumor35(Fig. l),whichreptesentsatumorcontainingtwotofivecopiesof
`theHER-Z/mgzie. Laneshtoj areserialdilutions(l:10, 1:5,and122,
`DNAsantpleinlaneLIanepisDNAfromnimoru
`(Fig.l),whichtepresentsatumorwid15to20copiesofthel-IER-2lm
`.I.aneslmoareserialdilutions(1:20, 1:10, 1:5, and122,
`with
`)oftheDNA
`inlanep Thefilnetwas
`and
`be
`32P-Iabeledl-lER—Zprobeasinli
`1. (B)Exampleofarsinase
`hybridizationtodemonsu-ate that «.13th amounts oftumor DNAP'w‘Le
`loadcdintoeachlane.Reh
`offiltercontaininslanes30to40
`(Fig. l). 'I‘hefilserwasfirststrippedoflabelby
`inabufi‘ermadeup
`ofSO'isfm-namide, 3x SSC,and0.l%SDSat6°Clbr20minutet,
`followingbydtmenicmssivewashaofSntinuteseedflnOJx SSCatroom
`
`temperature. FilterswereexposedovemighovernishronXAR-Sfilm(Kodak)eo
`erumeranavalofaflradioamvepmbethen
`asinFis. lwitlia
`nPlabeled human arsinase gene probe (31).
`
`inablindedfashion,indiattheyweremadewithoutknowledgeof
`diseascparameters. Analysisofthedataforassociationbetweengene
`amplificationandanumberofdiseaseparameterswasthenper-
`formed.
`Of103 tumors evaluated inthe initial survey, therewasessentially
`nocorrelanonbetweengeneamplifieationandesn'ogenreceptor
`starus,prosesteronerecepcorstatus,sizeoftumots,orageat
`diagnosis (Table 1). However, when analysis was performed for
`association between HER-2km: amplification and number of posi-
`tive lymphnodes, atreridwasnoted.'I‘hisanalysisshowedthat4/34
`(11%) ofpatients with no involved nodes, 2/20 (10%) with l to 3
`involved nodes, and 8/25 (32%) with >3 involved nodes had gene
`amplification (P= 0.11). Ifthese data wereeramined bycornparing
`0 to 3 positive nodes versus >3 positive nodes, the correlation with
`gene amplification bceame more significant (P < 0.05). Thus, there
`was a significant increase in incidence of HER-2km: gene amplifies-
`tion in patients with >3 axillary lymph nodes involved with disease.
`A multivariate regression analysis to correlate HER-2km: amplifies-
`tion with various disease parameters identified the number of
`positive nodes as the only significant factor, either alone or iii
`combination, to correlate with amplification.
`This initial study indicated thatit might be possible to discrimi-
`nate among node-positive patients on the basis of HER-2/m gene
`
`1.0
`
`Disease-tree
`
`OVOVIII
`
`Fig. 3.Actuarialcurveforrelapsein(A)node-
`positive patients with no
`tion versus
`tients with any amplification (>2
`copies))oi'HE-Eflm and (C) node--positive pa-
`tients with no amp
`vermsof
`positive
`tients with greater than 5 copies HER-2mm.
`Ramada] curve for overall survivalin (B) node-
`positive patients with no
`versus
`positive
`dents with anyamamlifieation (>2
`copies))of HIE-g:2/m and (D)
`positive pa-
`tientswithnoamplificetionversusnodc-positrve
`patients with greater than 5 copies ofHERZlm.
`Actuarialcurvesforbothrelapseandoverallsur—
`vivalwerecomputcdbythemethodofKaplan
`andMeier(44)andcomparedbythelosranktest
`(42—44).
`
`9 JANUARY 1987
`
`
`
`survivalprobability 0 0
`
`9.
`
`.°to
`
`as O
`
`Pa
`
`
`
`survivalmuseum 9oOQ
`
`9n
`
`O
`
`
`
`Not ampmloa (n :52)
`
`
`
`Ampum (mat)
`
`
`
`
`
`Not emplliled (n .52)
`
` Not amplilled (n :52)
`
`
`Amplified (n=11)
`>5 copies
`
`
`
`Not amplllied (n =52)
`
`
`
`
`’5 copies
`
`
`Amplified 0! =34)
`
`Amplified (n :11)
`
`
`
`o
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`48
`
`60
`
`72
`
`o
`84
`Time (months)
`
`12
`
`24
`
`36
`
`48
`
`60
`
`72
`
`84
`
`ARTICLES
`
`179
`
`

`

`between HER-Zlm amplification and nodal status (P = 0.002)
`indicated that
`information on amplification of this gene may
`correlate with disease behavior; that is, recurrences and survival. To
`test this, univariate survival analyses were performed in which
`amplification was compared to relapse and survival in this patient
`group. A total of 35 patients had a recurrence of the disease, and 29
`had died at the time of the analyses. Median times to relapse and
`death were 62 months and 69 months, respectively. The median
`follow-up time for patients still alive was 47 months, ranging from
`24 to 86 months. A total of 71 of the 86 patients (8396) received
`some form of therapy after mastectomy: adjuvant systemic therapy
`alone, 47%; adjuvant systemic therapy plus local radiation, 19%;
`and local radiation alone, 17%. A strong and highly statistically
`significant correlation was fbund between the degree of gene
`amplification and both time to disease relapse (P = <0.0001) and
`survival (P = 0.0011) (Table 4). Moreover, when compared in
`univariate analyses to other parameters, amplification of HER-2km:
`was foundtobesuperiortoallotherprognosticfacuors,withdie
`exception of the number of positive nodes (which it equaled) in
`predicting time to relapse and overall survival in human breast
`cancer (Table 4). The association between HER-Wm amplification
`and relapse and survival can be illustrated graphically in actuarial
`survival curves (Fig. 3, A to D). While there was a somewhat
`shortened time to relapse and shorter overall survival in patients
`having any amplification of the HER-2km: gene in their tumors
`(Fig. 3, A and B),
`the greatest differences were found when
`comparing patients with >5 copies of the gene to those without
`amplification (single copy) (Fig. 3, C and D). Patients with greater
`than five copies of HER-2km: had even shorter disease-free survival
`times (P= 0.015) and overall survival
`times (P= 0.06) when
`compared to patients with no amplification. The phenomenon of
`greater gene copy number correlating with a worse prognosis has
`also been seen in evaluations of N-nqyc gene amplification in human
`neuroblastomas (32).
`To determine if amplification of HER-Zlm was independent of
`other known prognostic factors in predicting disease behavior,
`multivariate survival analyses were perfomied on the 86 node-
`positive cases. Amplification of the gene continued 00 be a strong
`prognostic factor, providing additional and independent predictive
`information on both time to relapse and overall survival in these
`
`Tablaz. Association between HER-21m amplificationanddiseaseparame-
`tersin86breasttumrsfromnode—positivepatients.
`2t05
`5to20
`>20
`copies
`copies
`00135“
`
`Factofl
`
`Sinsk
`copy
`
`Total
`
`PT
`
`ER+
`ER-
`
`PgR+
`PgR-
`
`52
`2—5
`>5
`
`550
`>50
`
`38
`14
`
`31
`21
`
`18
`28
`6
`
`16
`36
`
`Hormonal may”m
`21
`5
`2
`4
`
`4
`18
`5
`5
`Tumor size (M)
`8
`3
`12
`2
`3
`4
`
`A5: atW (years)
`12
`6
`11
`3
`
`l
`l
`
`1
`l
`
`0
`1
`1
`
`1
`l
`
`65
`21
`
`54
`32
`
`29
`43
`14
`
`35
`51
`
`0.05
`
`0.14
`
`0.09
`
`0.06
`
`43
`0
`5
`7
`31
`1-3
`>3
`21
`16
`4
`2
`43
`
`
`0.06
`
`'ERandPgRareasdeaaibediiiTablel.
`liER-flmamplificationwidivariousdisease
`thvalueswere
`aftereombining
`weresofewsamplesinthe >20group.
`180
`
`TStanstiealanalysesforeorrelationof
`wereperformed
`thex’
`5m20and>20cases,sineediere
`
`515253545558575859606162 83648566
`
`
`
`leofreh
`
`Fig.4.Exam
`werestri
`..(
`
`'
`ybridization offilter with human EGFR probe. Filters
`asinFig.ZB, andhybridized with nP-labeled human EGFR
`,asiiiFingShownarethekswermolecularweightbands
`widi’zP-labeledEGFRprobeinfilter
`lanesSlto66
`(Fig. l). Thebandsfi'om
`tobottomare28 22 andl8
`respectiv
`Lane52isanexample
`animorshowingmarkedamplificaiion (>50
`copies) oftheEGFRgene
`
`patients, even when other prognostic factors were taken into
`account (Table 4).
`Rearrangement ofthe HER-2km: gene was rare. Ofthe total 189
`tumors evaluated, three showed evidence of rearrangement, and in
`two ofthe three cases, the rearrangement was identical (Fig. 1, cases
`77 to 79). Also, two of the rearranged HER-2/m loci were
`amplified (Fig. 1, cases 78 and 79). The incidence of HER-2km:
`reamngementasdeterminedbyEcoRIdigestionwasmosmallto
`attempt statistical correlations.
`To determine whether the phenomenon of amplification ofHER-
`2/0» in breast cancer extended to related growth factor receptors,
`all filters were analyzed with the EGFR probe (Fig. 4). Amplifica-
`tion ofthe EGFR gene was found in 4/189 (2%) ofthe cases, and
`rearrangementoftheEGFRgenewasfoundinoneoftl'iosefour
`cases. The incidence of EGFR amplification and rearrangement was
`too small to attempt statistical correlation. Comparison of HER-ZI
`an amplification (53/189 or 28%) with that of the EGFR gene
`reveals the incidence of the former to be 14 times greater than that
`of the latter, indicating that the phenomenon of gene amplification
`is not a general one for a related tyrosine kinase—specific receptor in
`human breast cancer. Moreover, studies examining alterations of
`two other tyrosine kinase—specific prom-oncogenes, ab! and fogin
`breast cancer did not show amplification of these genes (33).
`Alterations ofnon—tyrosine kinase—related prom-oncogenes in these
`
`Tabb 3. Association between HER21m amplification and disease parame
`ters in combined surveys (189 patients).
`
`2t05
`5co20
`>20
`.
`copies
`copies
`copies
`
`Total
`
`H
`
`Factor'
`
`Single
`copy
`
`ER+
`ER-
`
`PgR+
`PgR—
`
`52
`2—5
`>5
`Unknown
`
`550
`>50
`Unknown
`
`91
`45
`
`73
`63
`
`31
`62
`23
`20
`
`37
`88
`1 1
`
`Home!W static
`23
`14
`3
`6
`
`10
`20
`10
`6
`Tumor size (W)
`9
`4
`13
`7
`4
`6
`0
`3
`
`43: a: liquid: (years)
`l
`13
`0
`
`10
`2
`
`2
`5
`
`3
`4
`
`0
`2
`3
`2
`
`2
`5
`0
`
`0.05
`
`0.06
`
`0.19
`
`0.11
`
`130
`59
`
`106
`83
`
`44
`84
`36
`25
`
`60
`1 16
`13
`
`Number d'pan'ts've W trader
`34
`0
`3
`1
`30
`0
`65
`7
`6
`l
`51
`1—3
`68
`18
`8
`4
`38
`>3
`Unknown
`17
`1
`3
`1
`22
`
`
`0.002
`
`TStatisticalamlysesforcot-relaiionof
`‘ERandPgRareasdescr-ibedinTablel.
`- HER-Zimampfificationwidivanmndiseuepanmewswueperfonnedbydiex’
`mat. PvalueswaemmputedafsacombiningdreaseswhhStoZOmd>20copiet
`
`SCIENCE, VOL. 235
`
`

`

`Table 4. Univariate and muln'variate analyses comparing disease-free survival (relapse) and overall survival to prognostic factors in node—positive patients.
`
`Multivariate“
`Univariate (P)
`
`Factor
`
`Number of positive nodes
`HER-2/neu
`
`Survival
`
`0.0001
`0.0011
`
`Relapse
`
`0.0002
`<0.0001
`
`Survival
`
`Relapse
`
`0.0003
`0.02
`
`(0.0938 t 0.0256)
`(0.0872 1 0.0388)
`
`0.001 (0.0849 t 0.0266)
`0.001 (0.1378 1 0.0425)
`
`0.05
`0.05
`Log (PgR)
`0.06
`0.06
`Tumor size
`0.10
`0.15
`Log (ER)
`0.61
`0.22
`Age
`
`parametric regression model was used to evaluate the predictive power ofvarious combinations andinteractions ofprognostic factorsin a multivariate manner
`(42-44)!)arucaslluymnonare shown as P (regression coeflicient : SE).
`
`(—0.5158 x 0.2414)
`
`0.03
`
`tumors have been examined. In a survey of 121 primary breast
`malignancies, amplification of the c-myc gene was found in 38
`(32%) (34). Attempts to correlate c—myc gene amplification with
`stage ofdisease, hormonal receptorvstatus, histopathologic grade, or
`axillary node metastases showed no association. There was a statisti-
`cally significant association between c-myc amplification and age at
`diagnosis >50 years in a group of95 ofthese patients (34). Data on
`relapse and survival were not presented in this study; however, there
`was no correlation between c-mye amplification and nodal status to
`indicate an association with disease behavior.
`
`The exact role of various prom-oncogenes in the pathogenesis of
`human malignancies remains unclear. One line of evidence implicat-
`ing abnormalities of these genes in human disease is association of
`their amplification with tumor progression in specific cancers. The
`N-myc gene is fiequently amplified in human neuroblastomas and
`neuroblastoma cell lines (35, 36). Studies on the N-mye proto-
`oncogene were the first to show a direct association between
`abnormalities in a prom-oncogene and clinical behavior of a human
`tumor. N-myc amplification and expression correlate both with stage
`of disease and overall survival in patients with neuroblastoma (10,
`32, 37). Moreover the greater the N-myc gene copy number, the
`worse the patient prognosis for all stages of the disease (32). Taken
`together, these data indicate a role for the Nmy: gene in the
`pathogenesis of neuroblastoma (32).
`Neuroblastoma is a relatively rare disease with an incidence ofone
`per 125,000 children. Carcinoma of the breast, however,
`is a
`common malignancy affecting one ofevery 13 women in the United
`States. There are 119,000 new cases per year, and approximately
`40,000 women will die of the disease in 1986 (38). Current
`treatment decisions for individual patients are frequently based on
`specific prognostic parameters. The major prognostic factors for
`breast cancer include presence or absence of tumor in the axillary
`nodes, size of the primary tumor, and presence or absence of
`hormonal receptors (29). The current study indicates that amplifica-
`tion of the HER-Z/neu gene is a significant predictor of both overall
`survival and time to relapse in node-positive patients with breast
`cancer. Amplification of the gene retains its prognostic significance
`in multivariate analysis, even when adjustments are made for other
`known prognostic factors. Moreover, amplification of HER-Zlneu
`has greater prognostic value than most currently used prognostic
`fa'ctors,
`including progesterone and estrogen receptors, and is
`equivalent to and independent of the best known prognosticator—
`number of positive lymph nodes. Finally, the degree of HER-2/neu
`amplification appears to have an effect on survival, with greater copy
`number being associated with a worse prognosis (Fig. 3, C and D).
`A similar phenomenon has been observed for N-myc gene amplifica-
`tion in human neuroblastoma (32).
`The potential role of HER-Zines; in the pathogenesis of breast
`cancer is unknown. Like N-myo, the correlation of HER-Zlneu
`amplification with disease progression indicates it may be an
`important gene in the disease process. The role of other cell
`
`9 JANUARY 1987
`
`receptors in the biology of breast cancer is well established (29, 39,
`40). It is easy to speculate that a gene encoding a putative growth
`factor receptor, when expressed in inappropriate amounts, may give
`a growth advantage to the cells expressing it. Alternatively, alter-
`ation in the gene product itself may lead to a critical change in the
`receptor protein. A single point mutation in the transmembrane
`domain of the protein encoded by the rat neu oncogene appears to
`be all that is necessary for the gene to gain transforming ability (41).
`Whether this or a similar alteration is found in the amplified HER-
`2/neu gene in human breast cancer will require sequence analysis of
`the homologous region in the amplified human gene. In addition,
`studies evaluating the expression of this gene at the RNA and/or
`protein level will prove important in determining if HER-Zlneu
`amplification results in an expected increased gene expression. The
`question of amplification of HER-2/neu in metastatic as compared
`to primary lesionsin a given patient is important. The current study
`utilized only primary breast tumors for analyses. It would be of
`interest to determine if HER-Zlneu copy number18 altered as the
`tumor metastasizes. A recent study evaluating N-myc copy number
`in human small cell carcinoma of the lung showed no difference
`between primary and metastatic lesions (11).
`The initial survey from the current study showed that 15% of
`breast cancer patients with stage I disease (node-negative) have
`HER-Zlneu amplification. Unfortunately, no long-term follow-up
`data were available for these patients. This stage I setting may be an
`additional group in which HER-Zlneu measurements will have an
`impact in predicting biologic behavior of the tumor, and as a result,
`in design of treatment strategy. Finally, if the HER-2/neu gene
`product functions as a growth factor receptor that plays a role in the
`pathogenesis of breast cancer,
`identification of its ligand and
`development of specific antagonists could have important therapeu-
`tic implications.
`
`REFERENCES AND NOTES
`
`Spwxewwwwr
`
`NH
`
`C
`
`,Avmu. Rev. Brother". 52, 301 (1983).
`us,.Amm Rev. Genet. 18, 553 (1984).
`mgmgm:tng?“<Eggfirfi§new
`Papwzr>oospsseem~
`.i’garadaéoR. A. Weinberg, Nature (London) 304, 596 (1983).
`a
`3
`2
`H. E.
`armus,). M. Bish
`,iln'd 316,160(1985)
`G. NeeLS. M. Asmmibid. 290, 475 (1981).
`., Science 224, 256 (1984).
`g;:g;*wE‘EEEE’EEEE
`.,Mol Cell. Bfol. 5, 1969 (1985).
`G. Klein, Sui/1m. 252, 54 (March 1985)
`al.,Sa'enae224, 1121 (1984).
`.,fbid 233, 461 (1986).
`33, 357 1983).
`.dE. B.
`,Nanm (London) 311, 433 (1984).
`.,299 640 (1982).
`:Wp“2rn
`I ClineProc Natl. AM. So. U...SA 81, 7141 (1984).
`E2 Ea.
`etal.,Namre (London) 304, 35 (1983).
`c, M. W. Hunkapiller, L. E. Hood, Science 221, 275 (1983).
`EEE
`al., Cell4l, 665 (1985).
`etal., Nature (London) 307, 521 (1984).
`EE
`gxrpown
`.yl’adh, M. Murra, R. A. Weinberg, fbi'd. 290, 261 (1981).
`echteretal, {bid 3 2, 513 (1984).
`.Coussens “al., Saenee 230,1132 (1985).
`18am? lfléslgamata, K. Toyoshima,T. Yamamoto, Pm. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
`(
`)
`ARTICLES 181
`
`.SE
`
`

`

`24. A. L. Schechternal.,Sa'ene¢229,976 (1985).
`25. 5.1.5
`' m1,
`at. cw. Biol. 5, 955 (1985).
`25. c. 3.33%“ . H. Kraus, s. A. Aaronson, m 229, 974 (1985).
`27. D.M
`andM. Smith,C met. Cell. Genet. 37, 71 (1984).
`28. A. numb a al.,Nm (um) 09, 418 (1984).
`23‘ 9mg “15" ”‘fid’f’i’sfiwfififiss” 4mm
`.
`.
`‘
`'
`.
`.Fri
`.
`‘
`.-
`,
`(Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory,00lds
`' Harbor, MI, 1982), pp. 282—285.
`31. G. I. Daikes,W. w. Grady, R. M. Kern, s.
`.CedarbamBWJWRa.
`32. R C. Seegereptnl., N. E 1.1.1114. 313, 1111 (1985).
`33. I. Yokota and, 5m 1, 251 (1986).
`34. C. Escot a 41., Pm. Ned. And. 8“: 0.3.4. 83, 4834 (1986).
`35. M. Schwab a at, Mm (Landon) 305, 245 (1983).
`
`38.
`39.
`
`41.
`42.
`
`44:
`45.
`
`Z
`.
`. Kohl a at, ca: 35, 359 (1984).
`more
`. Sager and D. Slamon, unpublislmd data.
`MrN w
`ilverberg and I. Lubera, CA Cm]. Clin. 36, 9 (1986).
`.
`.
`orwitz, W. L. McGuire, O. H. Pearson, A. Segaloff, Science 189, 726
`)0
`rd
`
`ialmanacmp. W
`
`.
`
`v
`McGuire, Sem‘n. om. 5, 428 (1978).
`sf:
`, R A. Weinberg, Cd: 45, 549 (1986).
`.
`.
`)
`, 87 (1972 .
`reslaw, Int. Stat. Rn.
`, 45 (1975).
`Kaplan and P. Meier, I. AM. 8:11;. Anne. 53, 457 (1958).
`ppmed
`U.$. Pub‘ Health ServieegxantsCA36827andCA30195 and:
`t from riton Bioscienees, Inc. We thank D. Keith, L. Gordon, and W. Aft for
`‘
`assisuneeandDr. S. Cedarbaumforpmvidingthehumanarginase
`
`probe
`
` R meurrh \I'lit‘l(‘.~
`
`The Atomic Structure of Mengo Virus
`at 3.0 A Resolution
`
`MING LUO, GERRIT VRIEND*, GREG KAMER, IWONA MINOR, EDWARD ARNOLD,
`MICHAEL G. ROSSMANN, ULRIKE BOEGE, DOUGLAS G. SCRABA, GREG M. DUKE,
`ANN C. PALMENBERG
`
`'IhestrucmreofMengovirus,arepresentativememberof
`d1eeardiopieornavimses,issubstantiallydifi‘erentfi~omthe
`structures of rhino- and polioviruses. The structure of
`Mengoviruswassolvedwiththeuseofhumanrhinovirus
`l4asan8Aresolutionsu'ucmralapproximation.Phase
`infommdonwasumexmdfismsllwmambyuscof
`
`without the use of the isomorphous replacement tech-
`nique. Although the organization of the major eapsid
`proteins VPl, VP2, and VP3 ofMengo virus is essentially
`the same as in rhino- and polioviruses, large insertions
`
`and deletions, mostly in WI, radically alter the surface
`features. In particular, the putative receptor binding
`“canyon” ofhuman rhinovirus 14 becomes a deep “pit” in
`Mengo virus beeause of polypeptide insertions in WI
`that fill part of the eanyon. The minor eapsid peptide,
`VP4,
`is completely internal in Mengo virus, but its
`association with the other eapsid proteins is substantially
`difi'erent from that in rhino- or poliovirus. However, its
`carboxyl terminus is loeated at a position similar to that in
`human rhinovirus 14 and
`liovxrus, suggesting the same
`autoeatalytic cleavage of
`0 to VP4 and VP2 takes place
`during assembly in all these pieornaviruses.
`
`ICORNAVIRUSEs (1 ) COMPRISB A LARGE FAMILY OF SINGLE-
`
`P stranded RNA-containing animal viruses. They have been
`
`classified into four genera on the basis of physical properties
`of the vin'ons: (i) cardioviruses, such as encephalomyocarditis virus
`(EMCV), Theiler’s murine encephalitis virus, and Mengo virus; (ii)
`enteroviruses, such as poliovirus, hepatitis A virus, and Coxsackie
`virus; (iii) aphthoviruses, such as foot—and-mouth disease viruses
`(FMDV); and (iv) rhinoviruses, of which there are about 100
`serotypes. The physiological consequences of picomavir

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket