throbber

`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`DIGITAL STREAM IP, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`Case IPR2017-00834
`Patent 8,265,545
`____________
`
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION & CERTIFICATION
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b) REQUESTING EXPIRED
`PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Notice of Request for Relief
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b), Patent Owner moves for a district
`
`court-type claim construction with respect to the challenged claims of U.S.
`
`Patent 8,265,545.
`
`
`
`
`
`Material Facts
`
`1. U.S. Patent 8,265,545, the patent challenged in this proceeding, will
`
`expire July 2, 2017, within 18 months of the NOTICE OF FILING DATE
`
`ACCORDED TO PETITION AND TIME FOR FILING PATENT OWNER
`
`PRELIMINARY RESPONSE, Paper No. 4, mailed February 27, 2017, in
`
`this proceeding.
`
`
`
`2. Petitioner, MERCEDES BENZ USA, LLC, filed its petition on
`
`February 1, 2017, acknowledging that U.S. Patent 8,265,545 may expire
`
`prior to the Board rendering a final written decision in this proceeding. Pet.
`
`at 7.
`
`
`
`3. Petitioner alleges, “For this petition the outcome would be the same
`
`under either [a broadest reasonable interpretation (‘BRI’) or Phillips]
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`standard, as Mercedes’ [] claim constructions are proper under either the
`
`BRI or a Phillips-type claim interpretation.” Pet. at 7.
`
`
`
`
`Certification
`
`
`
`Patent Owner, by and through its undersigned attorney of record,
`
`certifies that U.S. Patent 8,265,545 will expire July 2, 2017.
`
`
`
`Requested Relief
`
`Patent Owner respectfully submits that the requirements of Rule
`
`42.100(b) are met, and requests that in this proceeding the Board construe
`
`the claims of U.S. Patent 8,265,545 in accordance with the meaning they
`
`would have to a person of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the alleged
`
`invention considering the intrinsic evidence, and, if appropriate, extrinsic
`
`evidence. Phillips v. AWH Corp., 415 F.3d 1303, 1314-18 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
`
`
`
`Discussion
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b), a Patent Owner “may request a
`
`district court-type claim construction approach to be applied if [the Patent
`
`Owner] certifies that the involved patent will expire within 18 months from
`
`the entry of the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition. The request,
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`accompanied by [the Patent Owner’s] certification, must be made in the
`
`form of a motion under § 42.20, within 30 days from the filing of the
`
`petition.” The instant motion is being filed within 30 from the filing of the
`
`petition (February 1, 2017), and Patent Owner has certified that the involved
`
`patent, US Pat. 8,265,545, will expire July 2, 2017, within 18 months from
`
`the entry of the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition on February 27,
`
`2017. Accordingly, this request meets the requirements set forth in Rule
`
`42.100(b).
`
`
`
`The Board should grant Patent Owner’s requested relief because the
`
`request is timely, Petitioner recognized that the involved patent may expire
`
`before a final written decision is rendered, Pet. at 7, and Petitioner alleges
`
`that the outcome of the proceeding will not be affected by the Board
`
`adopting a Phillips-type claim construction. Id.
`
`Accordingly, Patent Owner requests that the Board grant this motion
`
`and apply a district court-type claim construction in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`333 W San Carlos St., Suite 200
`San Jose, CA 95110
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: tarek.fahmi@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing
`PATENT OWNER’S MOTION & CERTIFICATION
`UNDER 37 C.F.R. § 42.100(b) REQUESTING EXPIRED
`PATENT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION
`was served on March 2, 2017, by filing this document though the PTAB E2E
`System as well as by delivering a copy via email directed to the attorneys of
`record for the Petitioner at the following address:
`
`
`Celine Jimenez Crowson
`Joseph J. Raffetto
`Ryan Stephenson
`HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
`555 13th Street N.W.
`Washington, D.C. 20004
`
`Mercedes-DSIPCase@hoganlovells.com
`
`
`The parties have agreed to electronic service in this proceeding.
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: March 2, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Ascenda Law Group, PC
`333 W San Carlos St., Suite 200
`San Jose, CA 95110
`Tel: 866-877-4883
`Email: patents@ascendalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/Tarek N. Fahmi/
`
`Tarek N. Fahmi
`Reg. No. 41,402
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket