throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`Tel: 571-272-7822
`
`
`Paper 21
`Entered: January 19, 2018
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`PLASTIC DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`MAXCHIEF INVESTMENTS LIMITED,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2017-00846
`Patent 6,622,644 B2
`____________
`
`
`Before SCOTT A. DANIELS, TIMOTHY J. GOODSON, and
`ELIZABETH M. ROESEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`DANIELS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`TERMINATION
`Dismissing the Petition After Institution Due to Settlement
`37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a)
`
`On January 8, 2017, the parties filed a “Joint Motion to Terminate
`
`Proceeding” (Paper 19), and “Joint Motion to File Settlement Agreement as
`
`Business Confidential Settlement Information” under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b)
`
`and C.F.R. § 42.74(c) (Paper 20). The parties also filed a copy of their
`
`written settlement agreement (Exhibit 1008).
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00846
`Patent 6,622,644 B2
`
`
`We instituted trial in this proceeding on September 5, 2017 and set an
`
`oral hearing date of May 24, 2018. This proceeding is, therefore, still in its
`
`early stages. The parties indicate the following with respect to their dispute
`
`involving U.S. Patent 6,622,644 B2 (“the ’644 patent”):
`
`Petitioner and Patent Owner have entered into a written
`settlement agreement that resolves all underlying disputes
`between the parties, including this proceeding . . . As required by
`the Board, the parties are submitting a true copy of the agreement
`(Ex. 1008) along with this joint motion to terminate and a
`separate joint request to file the settlement agreement as business
`confidential information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.74(c).
`
`Paper 19, 1. Under these circumstances, we determine that it is appropriate
`
`to dismiss the petition. See 37 C.F.R. §§ 42.5(a), 42.71(a). This paper does
`
`not constitute a final written decision pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 318(a).
`
`
`
`It is
`
`ORDERED that the parties’ “Joint Motion to Terminate Proceeding”
`
`is granted to the extent that proceeding IPR2017-00846 is terminated;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Inter Partes Review of
`
`the above-referenced patent is dismissed; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that, as was requested timely by the parties
`
`the settlement agreement (Paper 20) will be treated as business confidential
`
`information under 35 U.S.C. § 317(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 42.74(c).
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00846
`Patent 6,622,644 B2
`
`For PETITIONER:
`
`John S. LeRoy
`Mark A. Jotanovic
`Michael N. Maccallum
`BROOKS KUSHMAN, P.C.
`mmaccallum@brookskushman.com
`mjotanovic@brookskushman.com
`jleroy@brookskushman.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`Mark P. Crockett
`Michael J. Bradford
`LUEDEKA NEELY GROUP, P.C.
`mcrockett@Luedeka.com
`mbradford@Luedeka.com
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket