throbber
1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`Page 1
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
` BEFORE THE PATENT AND APPEAL BOARD
`________________________________________________________
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA,)
`INC., )
` )
` ) CASE IPR 2017-00857
` Petitioner, )
` ) Patent No. RE44,006 E
` )
` )
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V., )
` )
` Patent Owner. )
` )
`________________________________________________________
` DEPOSITION UPON ORAL EXAMINATION BEFORE TRIAL
` OF
` JACOB WOBBROCK, Ph.D.
`_________________________________________________________
` 9:00 A.M.
` April 17, 2018
` 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900
` Seattle, Washington
`
`Reported By: Deanna M. Ellis, CCR No. 2511
`Job No:
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`Philips 2008
`HTC v. Philips
`IPR2017-00857
`
`

`

`Page 2
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
`
` April 17, 2018
` 9:00 a.m.
` Deposition of JACOB WOBBROCK, Ph.D.,
`held at the offices of Perkins Coie, LLP,
`1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4900, Seattle,
`Washington, before Deanna M. Ellis, CCR 2511
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`1
`
`2 3
`
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 3
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` APPEARANCES
`
`Fitzpatrick Cella Harper & Scinto
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`975 F Street Northwest
`Washington, DC 20004
`
`BY: JUSTIN OLIVER, ESQ.
`
`Perkins Coie
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`11988 El Camino Real
`San Diego, CA 92130
`
`BY: RYAN HAWKINS, ESQ.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`
`6 7
`
`8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 4
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` INDEX
`
`EXAMINATIONS
` PAGE
`THE WITNESS: JACOB WOBBROCK, Ph.D.
`By Mr. Oliver ................................ 5
`By Mr. Hawkins ............................... 138
`
` EXHIBITS
`(No exhibits were marked.)
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`1
`2
`
`3 4
`
`5
`6
`
`7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
`

`

`Page 5
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` JACOB WOBBROCK, Ph.D., Witness herein, having been
` duly sworn by the Certified Court Reporter, testified under
`oath as follows:
` EXAMINATION
` BY MR. OLIVER:
` Q. How are you today, Dr. Wobbrock?
` A. I'm good, thank you.
` How are you?
` Q. I'm fine, thanks.
` I'm just going to start with a little housekeeping.
` Do you understand that you're testifying under
` oath today?
` A. I do.
` Q. You understand what it means to testify under
` oath?
` A. I do.
` Q. Is there any reason you cannot give truthful
` or accurate answers today?
` A. No reason.
` Q. Okay. You're not taking any medication that
` may affect your ability to answer questions?
` A. No.
` Q. Over the course of the day, I'll ask you
` questions. I'll try to be clear. There might be
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 6
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` occasions where my questions aren't clear. If there's
` an instance where my question's not clear, please let me
` know and I'll try and clarify.
` A. Um-hum.
` Q. If you don't indicate that the question was
` unclear, I'll assume that you understood the question;
` is that fair?
` A. That's fair.
` Q. Okay. Your counsel may make objections.
` Typically, it's an objection followed by one word. You
` understand that absent an objection based on privilege
` you'll be required to answer the question?
` A. I understand.
` Q. Okay. I'll try and take breaks about every
` hour or so. If you need to take a break before I've
` suggested one, please let me know. The only thing I ask
` is that if there's a question pending, that you answer
` it before we take the break; is that fair?
` A. Sure.
` Q. Okay. How did you prepare for your deposition
` today?
` A. I read -- re-read my declarations. I re-read
` the patents that are at issue. And I spent about four
` hours with counsel discussing the issues.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 7
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` Q. Okay. Now, was that just one meeting with
` counsel on this?
` A. It was.
` Q. Okay. With whom did you meet?
` A. Ryan Hawkins.
` Q. Anyone else?
` A. No.
` Q. All right. A little more housekeeping just to
` make the day go a little bit smoother.
` I'm going to give you a few documents here that
` have already been marked. The first document I'm going
` to give to you has already been marked as Exhibit 1001,
` and it's U.S. Reissued Patent 44,006.
` Do you recognize that document?
` A. I do.
` Q. Okay. The next document I'll hand to you has
` been already marked as Exhibit 1007. It's U.S. Patent
` 5,621,906, which I'll refer to as O'Neill.
` Do you recognize that document?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. The next document I'll hand you has been
` marked as Exhibit 1010. It is U.S Patent No. 6,006,227.
` I'll refer to this document as Freeman.
` Do you recognize that document?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 8
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. All right. The next document, Exhibit 1016,
` is your Declaration in Support of Petitioner's Reply to
` Patent Owner's Response.
` Do you recognize this document?
` A. Yes, I do.
` Q. Is that your declaration?
` A. Yes, it is.
` Q. That's your signature on the second page?
` A. Indeed, it is.
` Q. Okay. The last for now is Exhibit 1005, which
` is your initial declaration in this case.
` Do you recognize that document?
` A. I do, yes.
` Q. Okay.
` A. I have the first four items that you've shown
` me in this binder, which they're unmarked, just sort of
` with some tabs that make them a little easier to flip
` to, and three-hole punches that make them a little
` easier to turn. So if you don't mind, I may use this
` just for the sake of ease of use.
` Q. Certainly. May I just see it for a second?
` A. Of course.
` Q. Thanks.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 9
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` Okay. Can you turn to Paragraph 3 of your reply
` declaration.
` A. Yep. Okay.
` Q. In there you discuss the term "list;" is that
` correct?
` A. I do.
` Q. In the second sentence you say:
` Although list-type menus were common at
` the time of the invention, also common
` were menus of other shapes and types?
` Is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. When you say "other shapes," what do you mean
` by other shapes than a list?
` A. Well, I give an example of a shape that's
` other than a list at the end of that paragraph, for
` example, the pie menu or circular menu, sometimes also
` called a radial menu, on the top of Page 2.
` Q. How are you defining the shape of a list?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; vague.
` A. Could you more specific?
` Q. Well, you say there could be other shapes, and
` I assume that means other shapes than the shape of a
` list; is that correct?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 10
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` A. I say:
` Also common were menus of other shapes
` and types, for example, pie or radial
` menus.
` Q. Okay. Does that refer to shapes other than
` the shape of a list?
` A. It does.
` Q. Okay. So what do you assume to be or what do
` you believe to be the shape of a list?
` A. Well, the list-type menus I refer to are
` the... Let's see. I don't have an example.
` I do here. We see some examples of list-type menus
` on Page 8 or Page 9 --
` Q. What's common about the shape of those -- or
` what's the assumption that you're making with respect to
` what the shape of such a list would be?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; foundation,
` assumes facts not in evidence.
` A. So these are -- in this case, these examples,
` Page 8 and 9, they're vertically arranged. They have a
` top and a bottom, and elements are stacked in these
` examples.
` Q. Are all lists vertically arranged?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 11
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` speculation.
` A. No, not necessarily. I was referring to the
` examples specifically on Pages 8 and 9.
` Q. Okay. So what would be a person of ordinary
` skill in the art's understanding of the shape of a list?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; beyond the
` scope.
` A. Yeah. So my analysis of a list in the case of
` what a person of ordinary skill in the art would regard
` was to say that there are menu designs that are clearly
` not lists, like the radial menu, circular in shape,
` where I give examples, as well, on Page 4 of animated,
` three-dimensional type menus that are not lists.
` Q. But you're saying that those have other
` shapes. So if we're going to say they have other
` shapes, I'm just trying to figure out what the shape of
` a list would be so that we can see what the differences
` are between the two.
` A. I have an --
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection;
` mischaracterizes his testimony. The paragraph
` specifically says menus of other shapes and types, and
` he's reiterated that several times, too.
` MR. OLIVER: The rules require an
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 12
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` objection followed by one word. I'd like you to limit
` your objections to those stated in the rules.
` MR. HAWKINS: I -- what rule limits my
` objections to one word?
` MR. OLIVER: I'll pull the rule up at
` the next break.
` MR. HAWKINS: Okay.
` Q. You state in Paragraph 3 other shapes. So if
` there are shapes other than -- are you referring to
` shapes other than the shape of a list?
` A. In that paragraph I am.
` Q. Okay. So then my question is: What is the
` understood shape of a list?
` A. I haven't offered a definition of a list. I'm
` not prepared to give a comprehensive definition that
` would cover all types of lists. But I am prepared and
` have given examples of things that clearly are not
` lists, and they appear, as I said, on Page 2 and on Page
` 4 as examples.
` Q. All right. So taking the example on Page 2,
` what is it about the shape of that list -- or what is it
` about the shape of what's shown in the figure that is
` different than the shape of a list?
` A. In this case, we have a radial menu, which is
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 13
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` circular, and there's no stacking of the items in it,
` there's no list-like arrangement, and there's no top or
` bottom. But I'm not offering those characteristics as a
` comprehensive definition of a list, just characteristics
` of this particular menu.
` Q. If those are not characteristics that
` distinguish from a list, what are the characteristics
` that you relied on to distinguish this type of list --
` or this type of display from the shape of what would be
` understood as a list?
` A. So I said those are not -- I'm not offering
` those as comprehensive characteristics of a list.
` Q. You're not offering what as comprehensive
` characteristics of a list?
` A. So when I referred to the radial menu saying
` that the items aren't stacked, there's not a top or
` bottom, and so forth, those are characteristics of this
` pie menu that I used to opine that it's not -- would not
` be regarded as a list. But I am not offering a complete
` and full definition of what a list would be in that
` case.
` Q. Okay. You keep going back to stacked. Would
` your understanding of a list be that a list has to be
` stacked items?
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 14
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` A. I'm not saying a list has to be a set of
` stacked items. A list could be a set of stacked items.
` Q. Would the stacked items have to be linear?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
` speculation, beyond the scope.
` A. I haven't done that analysis.
` Q. Could a list be items that are arranged in a
` curved manner?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; beyond the
` scope, calls for speculation.
` A. Possibly.
` Q. Can a list be two columns?
` MR. HAWKINS: Same objections.
` A. I'd have to consider a more specific case to
` really offer an opinion. That's not an analysis I've
` done.
` Q. Do you have in mind a definition that a person
` of ordinary skill in the art would assign to the term
` list?
` A. No. That's not an analysis I've done. I
` think they could recognize when things are not lists.
` For example, the pie menu I've given on Page 2, that's
` different than saying that they would have a complete
` definition of a list in their mind.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 15
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` Q. Some of the things you gave to distinguish the
` figure on Page 2 from a list is -- that it's radial and
` that it's not stacked; is that correct?
` A. I mentioned those as possible characteristics
` that one would recognize.
` Q. Okay. Is the term in the figure on Page 2
` "close" stacked over "save?"
` A. It's vertically above save. Whether one of
` ordinary skill in the art would consider that stacked, I
` can't really say.
` Q. If you can't say, how would you know whether
` or not a person of ordinary skill in the art would
` consider this a list?
` A. There are other characteristics to this menu
` that would suggest that it's not list-like.
` Q. What would those be?
` A. Well, I've mentioned them.
` Q. You said there's no beginning and end. Was
` that one of them?
` A. I believe that was right.
` Q. Why do you say there's no beginning or end on
` the Figure 2 menu?
` A. Because it's a circle --
` Q. Or Page 2, sorry.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 16
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` A. Sorry, it's circle.
` Q. Okay. So if items are arranged in a circle,
` you would not consider them a list?
` A. I'm not prepared to make that generalization.
` Q. On what evidence did you rely to support your
` opinion in Paragraph 3 of your reply declaration?
` A. Can you repeat the question just to make sure
` I get it?
` Q. Sure.
` You conclude that list-type menus were common at
` the time of the invention. Also common were menus of
` other shapes and types, for example, pie and radial
` menus.
` A. Um-hum.
` Q. My question would be: What evidence did you
` rely upon to determine that a person of ordinary skill
` in the art would consider pie or radial menus to be
` different than list-shaped menus?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; misstates the
` testimony and the declaration.
` A. Well, the evidence that I relied on was my
` expertise in the history of the field and systems
` available at the time and before the time of the
` invention, the specific references that I include in my
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 17
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` declaration here, and the example menus, both in my
` original declaration and in this response declaration.
` Q. Any specific documents?
` A. I cite to a few of them on Page 2 that you can
` see.
` Q. Those appear to be examples of other types of
` menus. I didn't see that those define the term "list"
` in any way.
` A. Okay. Is there a question?
` Q. Is there a document that you relied on to
` define the term "list?"
` A. Not specifically, no.
` I ascribed it. It's common understanding for one
` of ordinary skill at the time.
` Q. A grocery list could be a list; is that
` correct?
` A. In everyday language, sure.
` Q. Okay. If a grocery list was written in a
` circle, would it still be a grocery list?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for,
` speculation, outside of the scope.
` A. I don't know. I haven't analyzed grocery
` lists as part of this work.
` Q. If you could look at the figure you provided
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 18
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` on Page 2 of your reply declaration, you refer to that
` as radial. When you say that what's shown is radial,
` are you referring to the actual text items or the
` graphics that surround them?
` A. The term "radial" for a menu like this is
` referring to the inside out, center out action by which
` these items are selected, typically.
` Q. If the graphics around them were rectangular
` instead of, you know, each pie shaped, would that then
` constitute a list?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
` speculation, beyond the scope.
` A. I don't know. I don't have an example of such
` a menu. I haven't done an analysis of one. I can't
` say.
` Q. Can you turn to Paragraph 4 of your reply
` declaration.
` A. Um-hum, yes.
` Q. There you point out that a preferred
` embodiment of the 006 Patent has a circular menu
` arrangement; is that correct?
` A. Yes. I say the circular --
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; form, calls for
` a legal conclusion.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 19
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` A. Yes. I say in Paragraph 4:
` The circular menu arrangement of Figure 2
` in the 006 Patent.
` Q. So when a person -- so would the existence of
` that example cause a person of ordinary skill in the art
` to understand that the menu as claimed in the 006 Patent
` need not be arranged in a linear manner?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection. Same
` objections; calls for a legal conclusion, outside the
` scope.
` A. I'm not able to quite make sense of your
` question as stated. If you could repeat it or rephrase
` it, I'd appreciate it.
` Q. Well, you're suggesting -- well, let me
` rephrase that.
` You're stating that the presence of a circular
` menu in the 006 Patent would be one that a person of
` ordinary skill in the art would not regard as a list; is
` that correct?
` A. Yes. I say:
` Which has no defined beginning and end
` and which a POSITA would not regard as a
` list.
` Q. You state that a person of ordinary skill in
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 20
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` the art would not consider that example a list because
` it doesn't have a defined beginning or end; is that
` correct?
` A. I do state that in my declaration.
` Q. Okay. What about the circularity of the
` arrangement? Is that another reason?
` A. I don't state that explicitly.
` Q. So based on your statement in claim 4 --
` A. Paragraph 4?
` Q. Excuse me, Paragraph 4, a person of ordinary
` skill in the art would not construe the claims that the
` 006 Patent as requiring a list of items having a defined
` beginning and end; is that correct? (Sic.)
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; beyond the
` scope, vague.
` A. What I'm dealing with in Paragraph 4 in terms
` of the word "list" is from Philips construction, and the
` word appears in the construction offered by Philips. So
` a person of ordinary skill in the art would not confront
` that in the claim directly. I don't believe the word
` "list" is in the claim directly.
` Q. So what understanding of list -- let me
` rephrase that.
` Is there any understanding of list beyond what
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 21
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` you've stated here, no defined beginning and end, that
` would prevent application of that term to what's shown
` in Figure 4 -- excuse me, Paragraph 4?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; misstates
` testimony.
` A. There well may be things that a person of
` ordinary skill would also consider besides a no defined
` beginning and end that would cause them to conclude that
` this is not a list arrangement.
` Q. What would those be?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; asked and
` answered.
` A. Yeah. I -- I've referred to a handful of
` things already. But I'd have to do that analysis
` further to provide you with an exhaustive answer of
` things they might consider.
` Q. Can you provide an example of one other thing?
` A. That's not an analysis I've done. It's enough
` that they would see there's no defined beginning and end
` to regard this design as not being a list. There may be
` other things they would consider. I'd have to think
` about that more.
` Q. What if a person of ordinary skill in the art
` encountered an inscription of an elliptical list? Would
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 22
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` a person of ordinary skill in the art be able to
` understand what that means?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
` speculation.
` A. I'm not sure what you mean by an elliptical
` list exactly, so I couldn't say what they would say.
` Q. Well, what would you understand to be an
` elliptical list if someone said that to you?
` A. That's what I'm telling you. You've said it
` to me, and I don't know what you mean. I don't have an
` example of such a thing in front of me, so I don't know.
` Q. You can't provide any thought on what an
` elliptical list might be?
` A. Not off the top of my head, honestly, no.
` Q. Could what's shown in the figure -- in
` Paragraph 4 of your reply declaration be an elliptical
` list?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; beyond the
` scope.
` A. An "elliptical list" is not a term in the art.
` It's not a term I've ever heard or seen. It's not a
` term a person of ordinary skill in the art would have
` ever encountered. So I don't know.
` Q. So what's your understanding or would be the
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 23
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` understanding of a person of ordinary skill in the art
` of an elliptical?
` A. Elliptical, as an adjective describing an
` ellipse, would be understood. And I refer to that in my
` original declaration and have a diagram and a few places
` of an ellipse. For example, on Page 96.
` Q. What would a person of ordinary skill in the
` art understand to be the definition of the term "list"?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; asked and
` answered.
` A. As I said before, I don't have a definition
` for you. That's not an analysis I performed. Offering
` a complete definition is a fairly large undertaking. So
` I'm not sure.
` Q. You indicated before that a list could include
` stacked items that have a beginning and end; is that
` correct?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; misstates
` testimony.
` A. A list could include items that are listed one
` above the other --
` Q. Okay.
` A. -- with a top and bottom. For example, that's
` an option, perhaps, for a list.
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 24
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` Q. So with that understanding of list and the
` understanding of elliptical that you've already set
` forth in previous testimony, what would you understand
` to be an elliptical list?
` A. As I said, that's not something I've ever
` considered, heard, analyzed, regarded. I'm just not
` prepared to answer that.
` Q. Okay. Can you turn to Paragraph 7 of your
` reply declaration.
` A. Yes. Okay.
` Q. In Paragraph 7 you talk about the term
` "machine functions;" is that correct?
` A. Yes.
` Q. You state that you believe "machine functions"
` is too narrow of a term; is that correct?
` A. I say in Paragraph 7 that "machine functions"
` is too narrow.
` Q. You also discuss widgets as allowing a user to
` choose between either a command or a value; is that
` correct?
` A. I quote from Dr. Brad Myers' video -- a video
` publication called All the Widgets where he refers to
` quote, "An important class of widgets allows the user to
` choose one or more from a set of options, either to
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 25
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` choose a command or a value," end quote.
` Q. Do widgets control computer functions?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
` speculation, outside the scope, vague.
` A. Not precisely. No, widgets do not control
` computer functions.
` Q. Can you turn to your original declaration,
` Exhibit 1005, Paragraph 54.
` A. Okay.
` Q. Starting on the second line there's a
` parenthetical that states:
` A user interface widget is a
` screen-based mechanism that can receive
` user input for the purpose of controlling
` a computer system.
` Is that correct?
` A. Yes, that's the parenthetical there in
` Paragraph 54.
` Q. So in what ways do widgets, as stated here,
` serve a purpose of controlling a computer system?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection to form.
` A. Users control computer functions and can do so
` through widgets, among other methods.
` Q. So in that sense do widgets -- is the purpose
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 26
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` of widgets controlling a computer system?
` A. Widgets play many functions allowing users to
` provide input to a system.
` Q. Okay. So why would you state that widgets are
` not used for controlling computer functions?
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; misstates the
` testimony.
` A. I did not actually state that.
` MR. OLIVER: Can you read back that
` testimony.
` (Requested testimony read back.)
` Q. So you said not precisely, widgets do not
` control computer functions. What did you mean by that?
` A. Widgets don't control computer functions,
` users do --
` Q. Okay.
` A. -- as is clear in the quote here.
` Q. So users use widgets to control computer
` functions?
` A. Users control computer functions through a
` number of methods. Widgets can be one of them.
` Q. Okay. In Paragraph 7 of your reply
` declaration you refer to, in the sentence bridging Pages
` 4 and 5, menus having two primary purposes; to initiate
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 27
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` a command or to set a value, correct?
` A. I want to make sure I'm looking in the same
` place to which you're referring.
` Are you quoting from the Brad Myers' quote or are
` you looking at something else?
` Q. No. I'm looking at the sentence that bridges
` Pages 4 and 5.
` A. Okay. I say:
` It was commonly understood that menus had
` two primary purposes; to initiate a
` command or to set value.
` Q. What does it mean "to set a value?"
` A. Menus, among other types of widgets, are
` commonly used to allow users to set a value, sometimes
` can be thought of setting a property of something. I
` give examples of color in a paint program or choosing a
` line thickness.
` Q. So let's take the example that you give of
` choosing a color in a paint program. You, for instance,
` give the example of selecting yellow, correct?
` A. I give that example, yes.
` Q. In discussing that example at Line 10 on Page
` 5 of your reply declaration you state that:
` Such a choice often places a checkmark
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 28
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` next to the menu item but does not
` initiate any visible command or machine
` function from the user's point of view.
` Correct?
` A. That is an accurate reading of my quote there,
` yes.
` Q. So what do you mean by a visible command?
` A. When a command is triggered, for example, with
` a menu item, often, but not always, there's some kind of
` feedback for the user to understand that that command
` was initiated. Often, though, when setting a value of
` the kind like setting yellow, that kind of feedback is
` not provided because the user just changed the property
` of something.
` Q. What about the checkmark, would that be
` visible to the user?
` A. It might be. It depends on the design of the
` particular widget with which they're interacting whether
` that checkmark is used or visible.
` Q. What about beyond the user's view in the
` background does the selection of yellow perform an
` unseen underlying machine function?
` A. Well --
` MR. HAWKINS: Objection; calls for
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 29
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` speculation.
` A. I refer to this idea in my next sentence. I
` say:
` Of course, ultimately, everything and
` anything a computer does is executed in
` computer code and, in a purely technical
` sense, is a function carried out by a
` machine. But this is not how a POSITA
` would regard choosing a value from a
` menu.
` Q. Okay.
` A. Anymore than, for example, the user thinking
` about the state of the electric charge that they've just
` changed on their disc or in their memory, which is also
` behind the scenes.
` Q. So, then, there would be an underlying machine
` function that's performed when a user selects, for
` instance, yellow in a paint program?
` A. Well, for a computer to do anything, it
` functions as a machine.
` Q. Why do you refer to the user's point of view
` with respect to a machine function?
` A. Well, my analysis is what one of ordinary
` skill would understand. And the art at issue is user
`
`TSG Reporting - Worldwide - 877-702-9580
`
`

`

`Page 30
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`
` Wobbrock, Ph.D.
` interface technology. And the understanding of such
` technology is inherently tied

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket