`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HTC CORPORATION AND HTC AMERICA, INC.,
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.,
`
`Patent Owner.
`__________________
`
`PTAB Case No. IPR2017-00857
`Patent No. RE44,006
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Petitioners HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc. (collectively
`
`PTAB Case IPR2017-00857, Patent RE44,006
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`
`
`“Petitioner”) hereby request an oral hearing pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70 and the
`
`Board’s Institution Decision dated September 6, 2017 (Paper 7) and the Scheduling
`
`Order entered on September 6, 2017 (Paper 8) setting forth the oral hearing for
`
`June 1, 2018. Petitioner requests the oral argument to discuss the issues raised in
`
`the parties’ filings under the on-going review, including but not limited to, the
`
`following items:
`
`1. Whether Claim 1 is unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`over O’Neill.
`
`2. Whether Claim 1 is unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`over O’Neill and Robertson.
`
`3. Whether Claim 1 is unpatentable as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a)
`
`over O’Neill and Freeman.
`
`4.
`
`Rebuttal to Patent Owner’s presentation on all issues or arguments
`
`raised by the Patent Owner in the Patent Owner’s Response (Paper 14), or that may
`
`be raised by Patent Owner before the Board.
`
`5.
`
`Any other issues related to invalidity that the Board deems necessary
`
`for issuing a final written decision.
`
`Additionally, Petitioner requests permission to use audio/visual equipment to
`
`display demonstratives and exhibits.
`
`1
`
`
`
`PTAB Case IPR2017-00857, Patent RE44,006
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`Petitioner asks the Board to decide the length of time needed for requested
`
`oral argument for each party.
`
`This request is timely filed by Due Date 4 pursuant to the Scheduling Order
`
`issued on September 6, 2017 (Paper 8).
`
`
`
`Dated: April 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Ryan Hawkins/
`Back-up Counsel
`Ryan Hawkins, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Lead Counsel
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Kevin Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`John Schnurer, Reg. No. 52,196
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`2
`
`
`
`PTAB Case IPR2017-00857, Patent RE44,006
`Petitioner’s Request for Oral Argument
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true copy of the foregoing
`
`PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT has been served in its
`
`entirety this 27th day of April, 2018 by electronic mail on the Patent Owner via its
`
`attorneys of record:
`
`FITZPATRICK, CELLA, HARPER & SCINTO
`Justin J. Oliver (Reg. No. 44,986)
`Daniel S. Glueck (Reg. No. 37,838)
`PhilipsIPR@fchs.com
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
` /Ryan Hawkins/
`Back-up Counsel
`Ryan Hawkins, Pro Hac Vice
`
`Lead Counsel
`Bing Ai, Reg. No. 43,312
`
`Back-up Counsel
`Kevin Patariu, Reg. No. 63,210
`John Schnurer, Reg. No. 52,196
`
`Attorneys for Petitioners
`
`Dated: April 27, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PERKINS COIE LLP
`11988 El Camino Real, Suite 350
`San Diego, CA 92130
`(858) 720-5700
`
`
`
`1
`
`