throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 33
`Date: April 23, 2018
`
`
`
`
`
` UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`
`
`____________
`
`NATIONAL OILWELL VARCO, L.P.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`TECHNICAL INDUSTRIES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`___________
`
`Case IPR2017-00860
`Case IPR2017-009101
`
`_____________
`
`
`
`Before THOMAS L. GIANNETTI, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Request for Oral Hearing
`37 C.F.R. § 42.70
`
`
`
`1 The parties are not authorized to use this caption.
`
`
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00860
`IPR2017-00910
`
`
`The Scheduling Orders for these cases set the date for oral hearing as
`May 17, 2018, if a hearing is requested by the parties and granted by the
`Board. The parties have jointly requested oral hearing in each case pursuant
`to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70.
`In view of the foregoing, it is hereby
`ORDERED that the joint request for oral hearing in each case is
`granted;
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will have a total of 60 minutes
`to present argument in both cases; the parties may allocate their time
`between the cases as they see fit;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner will open the hearing by
`presenting its case regarding the challenged claims in both cases for which
`the Board instituted trial. After Petitioner’s presentation, Patent Owner will
`have 60 minutes to respond to Petitioner’s argument. Petitioner may reserve
`reasonable rebuttal time to respond to arguments presented by Patent Owner.
`FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing will commence at 10 A.M.
`ET on May 17, 2018, on the Ninth floor of Madison Building East, 600
`Dulany Street, Alexandria, Virginia. The Board will provide a court reporter
`for the hearing and the reporter’s transcript will constitute the official record
`of the hearing. The hearing will be open to the public for in-person
`attendance that will be accommodated on a first-come, first-served basis.
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Board expects lead counsel for each
`party to be present in person at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record,
`however, may present the party’s argument. Demonstrative exhibits must be
`served by Tuesday, May 8, 2017. The parties also shall also provide a
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00860
`IPR2017-00910
`
`courtesy copy of any demonstrative exhibits to the Board by emailing them
`to Trials@uspto.gov. by Tuesday, May 8, 2018.
`FURTHER ORDERED that despite the requirement in 37 C.F.R.
`§ 42.70(b) to file demonstratives, the parties shall not file any demonstrative
`exhibits in this proceeding without prior authorization from the Board. The
`parties are reminded that each presenter must identify clearly and
`specifically each demonstrative exhibit (e.g., by slide or screen number)
`referenced during the hearing to ensure the clarity and accuracy of the
`reporter’s transcript.
`FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file any objections to the
`demonstratives with the Board by May 10, 2018. Any objection to
`demonstrative exhibits that is not timely presented will be considered
`waived. The objections should identify with particularity which
`demonstratives are subject to objection, and include a short (one sentence or
`less) statement of the reason for each objection. No argument or further
`explanation is permitted. The Board will consider the objections and
`schedule a conference call to address them, if deemed necessary. Otherwise,
`the Board will reserve ruling on the objections until after the oral argument.
`The parties are directed to St. Jude Medical, Cardiology Division, Inc. v. The
`Board of Regents of the University of Michigan, IPR2013-00041 (PTAB
`January 27, 2014) (Paper 65), for guidance regarding the appropriate content
`of demonstrative exhibits.
`FURTHER ORDERED that the Board expects lead counsel for each
`party to be present in person at the oral hearing. Any counsel of record,
`however, may present the party’s argument. The parties may divide
`argument among counsel as they wish.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00860
`IPR2017-00910
`
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that if any party expects that its lead counsel
`will not be attending the oral argument, the parties should initiate a joint
`telephone conference with the Board no later than two business days prior to
`the oral hearing to discuss the matter.
`FURTHER ORDERED that any special requests for audio visual
`equipment should be directed to Trials@uspto.gov. Requests for special
`equipment will not be honored unless presented in a separate communication
`not less than five days before the hearing directed to the above email
`address.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`IPR2017-00860
`IPR2017-00910
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Robert M. Bowick, Jr.
`Bradford T. Laney
`RALEY & BOWICK, L.L.P.
`rbowick@raleybowick.com
`blaney@raleybowick.com
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`
`Ted M. Anthony
`BABINEAUX, POCHÉ, ANTHONY & SLAVICH, L.L.C.
`tanthony@bpasfirm.com
`
`Joseph L. Lemoine, Jr.
`LEMOINE & ASSOCIATES, LLC
`joe@lemoine.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket